The First Moderns
From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
 First edition | |
| Author | William R. Everdell |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Language | English |
| Subject | Modernism, philosophy, mathematics, history of ideas, art history |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press |
Publication date | 1997 |
| Pages | 501 |
| ISBN | 0-226-22480-5 |
| OCLC | 45733213 |
The First Moderns: Profiles in the Origins of Twentieth-Century Thought is a book on Modernism by the historian William Everdell, published in 1997 by the University of Chicago Press. A New York Times Notable Book of 1997, and included by the New York Public Library on its list of "25 Books to Remember from 1997", The First Moderns suggests that "the heart of Modernism is the postulate of ontological discontinuity".[1]
Background and overview[edit]
 | This section needs additional citations for verification. (April 2021) |
Everdell, dean of humanities at Saint Ann's School in Brooklyn Heights,[2] posits that Modernism first emerged in the field of mathematics rather than the arts, specifically in the work of the German mathematician Richard Dedekind, who, in 1872, demonstrated that mathematicians operate without a continuum. This represents the formalization of Everdell's axiom of "ontological discontinuity", which he goes on to examine in a multiplicity of contexts. He examines this emerging framework of discreteness in science (Ludwig Boltzmann's mechanics, Cajal's neuroscience, Hugo de Vries' conception of the gene and Max Planck's quantum work, Albert Einstein's physics), mathematics, logic and philosophy (Georg Cantor, Gottlob Frege, Bertrand Russell and the linguistic turn, Husserl and the beginnings of phenomenology), in addition to the arts (James Joyce's novels, Picasso's Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, Schoenberg's 12-tone music).
Reviews[edit]
Critics largely reviewed The First Moderns favorably, appreciating Everdell's interdisciplinary approach, in publications including the New York Review of Books, the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post.[3] The Pulitzer Prize-winning book critic Michael Dirda considers it among his "favorites".[4]
References[edit]
- ^ "Notable Books of the Year 1997". The New York Times. December 7, 1997. Retrieved July 11, 2017.
- William R. Everdell (1997). The First Moderns: Profiles in the Origins of Twentieth-Century Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 351.
- "25 Books to Remember from 1997". The New York Public Library. Retrieved 2019-01-26. - ^ William R. Everdell (August 17, 2003). "It's About Time. It's About Space". The New York Times. Retrieved July 28, 2017.
- ^ Jim Holt (May 20, 1999). "Infinitesimally Yours". The New York Review.
Drawing together such disparate manifestations as Seurat's pointillism, Muybridge's stop-motion photography, the poetry of Whitman, Rimbaud, and Laforgue, the tone rows of Schoenberg, and the novels of Joyce, the author [Everdell] makes an engrossing and persuasive case for his claim that 'the heart of Modernism is the postulate of ontological discontinuity'
- Hugh Kenner (June 29, 1997). "A Change of Mind". The New York Times.The change started to happen in the 1870's, and not, as William R. Everdell arrestingly demonstrates in "The First Moderns," in painting or in literature but in number theory. He's aware that word-focused people will be startled: "Everyone who has heard of modernism has heard of Picasso. Most have heard of Joyce. But who has heard of Dedekind?" Yet it was an 1872 pamphlet of Richard Dedekind's that first, to use the terminology of 19th-century positivism, "rigorized" modernism's generic concept -- which, as Everdell reveals, is discontinuity.
- Frederic Morton (July 20, 1997). "Deconstructing Modernism". Los Angeles Times.Everdell's "The First Moderns" brilliantly maps the beginning of a path at whose end loom as many diasporas as there are men.
- ^ Dirda, Stephen (December 23, 2007). "MODERNISM". The Washington Post.