User talk:Augmented Seventh

A lot of edits are based on how your users feel and not based on facts. I had edits removed because other users continue to revert them when wiki and reputable sources disagree. No point to putting the effort to improve pages if facts are not most important. I will not be editing anymore and this has been very eye opening to how unreliable the information on Wikipedia really is. Cltj (talk) 03:15, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For instance, users are using USA census data as a reason to revert a name to unisex, completely ignoring the rest of the world, thereby making an innaccurate representation as a whole. Cltj (talk) 03:24, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear that it is a unisex name in the United States.

Could you edit the body to include the difference between global regions? Augmented Seventh🎱 03:29, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It makes far more sense to have the page represent everyone, not specifically edit based on region. At least for the infobox. If Ryan is statistically 0.1% more female than John, it makes little sense to label it as unisex. Wikipedia should be for everyone equally, not USA then everyone.

I would agree in the text below to have a paragraph making regional distinctions though. Cltj (talk) 03:36, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://genderize.io/our-data

https://genderize.io/names/ryan

Tons of data pulled from every country. If you feel the need, I provided their data Cltj (talk) 03:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean.

There remains individual encyclopedia projects for different regions.

It appears this subject has been addressed, exhaustively, in the past, and the consensus is reflected in the division into various nations. Augmented Seventh🎱 03:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Well, I'll leave editing those pages to reflect objective reality, instead of keeping it unisex for whatever reason, to the rest of you. Not having a battle to just have facts posted on the most minor things. I noticed it is on plenty of other provably male names listed as Unisex. Jack, Kyle, Cody, Ryan just off the top of my head. Also interesting that names labeled as having biblical origins are less likely labeled as unisex. As are female names with the same or higher percentages of male than Kyle. Johanna has a higher spread than Kyle. Carina is the same and is labeled as female as well. There is obvious bias and it is very easy to avoid. Unisex should be set a 5% minimum as a standard as wiki's own Unisex page supports that. Cltj (talk) 04:39, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As are female names with the same or higher percentages of male than Kyle (has female)* Cltj (talk) 04:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I went to a notable actress, Michael Learned, and indeed Michael is listed as a traditionally masculine.

It would seem to be arbitrary, to a degree. I'll look into tomorrow. There's always a way to add reliably sourced fact to the encyclopedia. As with any collaborative project, it can sometimes be accomplished through measured incremental actions. Augmented Seventh🎱 05:29, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mind fixing Cody to properly state male? I provided sources but it keeps being changed back to this unisex bs. Cltj (talk) 12:24, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear that Cody is a unisex name that is used mostly for males. Augmented Seventh🎱 15:01, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia article on Code Motion had said that code motion is "also known as code hoisting, code sinking, loop-invariant code motion, or code factoring". However, those are specific types of code motion, and, thus, I made an edit to say that it "includes code hoisting, code sinking, loop-invariant code motion, and code factoring".

You reverted my edit without giving any sort of reason. What is the reason for your reversion? Are you even a real person, or are you just a bot? Lxvgu5petXUJZmqXsVUn2FV8aZyqwKnO (talk) 20:41, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping to keep the encyclopedia accurate.

I saw an edit changing the meaning of established content, looked at your recent contributions, noticed your change wasn't reliably sourced, and removed your edit as unverified.

Looking at it right now, it seems legit.

have a Wikipedia day, Augmented Seventh🎱 21:00, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For protecting the project of vandalism. Keep up the good work! PawPatroler (talk) 01:15, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Groovy Augmented Seventh🎱 02:33, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hope this is the relevent page to thank you about your recent restoring of the Karava page. Even the Amarapura Nikaya page was vandalised with unreferenced unencyclopedic content repeatedly with irrelevant (and frankly racist and tribalistic) argumentsover the past few months by mobile editor of 2402:4000:2130:292:a0c7:1b65:f3fd:7fad He seems to target the Durava, Karava and Salagama as well as Wahumpura and Bathgama and some other pages.

2402:4000:2080, 2402:4000:2130, 2402:4000:2380 is the same person using Sri Lanka Dialog number (the last four digits change according to the date of post) appears to have been reported for other unlawful or criminal activity as per the below Google search / website.

https://www.abuseipdb.com/check/2402:4000:2080:9544:1163:68af:2a38:305c Reporter IoA Timestamp in UTC Comment Categories ph 2024-10-14 09:20:56 (8 months ago) Bad web bot attempting to run wp-login.php on non-WP site

Please delete this comment if this happens to be the incorrect space/page, thanks! 45.121.91.120 (talk) 10:24, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Noted. Augmented Seventh🎱 07:55, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You do realise the event could be cancelled? 151.226.14.179 (talk) 20:45, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Usually, the encyclopedia doesn't include speculative trivia around notable current events.

Keep me posted. I'm now curious to know if it goes. Augmented Seventh🎱 07:55, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this guy keeps vandalizing Tennessee’s football page can you help or get an admin Chasenielsen545 (talk) 05:34, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]