User talk:Boneymau

Hello Boneymau, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Good on ya, I see you've already update some related articles. I've just started a draft for ARIA Music Awards of 2014 in my user space. You can jump in if you wish. I've just start updating the Fine Arts section from the 2013 values;shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 02:32, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article is up, with final nominations for first section. Artisan and Arts Awards are already decided.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:23, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sweet Charity may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• review-hayes-production-loses-no-sweetness-in-move-to-bigger-stage-20150117-12sa08.html</ref><ref>[http://jolitson.com/2015/01/18/sweet-charity-remount/ </ref><ref>http://m.dailytelegraph.com.au/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:05, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 11th Helpmann Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perth Concert Hall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

http://artsreview.com.au/on-the-couch-with-roger-hodgman/

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Australian Film Institute Award for Best Screenplay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Knight. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1994 Australian Film Institute Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In The Name Of The Father. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Julie Forsyth, Boneymau!

Wikipedia editor Airplaneman just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Ran across Julie Forsyth while doing new page patrol. Very interesting life story, thanks for sharing. Cheers, Airplaneman ✈ 07:51, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Airplaneman's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hello, Boneymau. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Robvanvee. Boneymau, thanks for creating Australian Film Institute Award for Best Documentary!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article could use additional sources. Otherwise, nice start!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Robvanvee 09:02, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating The Last Tasmanian, Boneymau!

Wikipedia editor KGirlTrucker81 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good work! :)

To reply, leave a comment on KGirlTrucker81's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 00:12, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Dorothy Dodd, Boneymau!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

{{{3}}}

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 07:50, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Great job on the article Future D. Fidel! We definitely have gaps in the coverage of African descent communities on Wikipedia! Keep up the great work and filling valuable content gaps! Sadads (talk) 00:37, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As you are in Australia but with no location identified - is there anything you would like to add in any way to the Australian conversation in relation to the Cycle 2 stage - either on wiki or off?

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017

I do think your contribution is important due to your strong edit history and presence in the Australian editing community - I am tidying up my report in the next day or so - so I am not asking for an essay - any words in relation to what the strategy or anything that you think is important relative to strategy, I would be interested to hear about - thanks JarrahTree 01:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Gabriela Tylesova, Boneymau!

Wikipedia editor Scope creep just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Need an image of the person for the article.

To reply, leave a comment on Scope creep's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

scope_creep (talk) 15:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. The situation was one of close paraphrasing: the content was extremely close to the original, a derivative work of it, and not merely an independent writeup containing the same information. That's the reason for the deletion. Feel free to follow up with me, of course, if you wish. Nyttend (talk) 00:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Close paraphrasing is a copyright infringement; if it's not a G12 case, it's an IAR case, since "improving or maintaining Wikipedia" definitely includes the removal of illegal content. Nyttend (talk) 01:08, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to reach Bounemaux who edited the CHARLOTTE SWEET reference under Drama Desk Award nominations ("Outstanding Lyrics"). As author of the show I helps install the Wiki entry but we couldn't figure out how to add a logo. Any help would be appreciated. Michael Colby (ludlow29@aol.com) Ludlow29 (talk) 23:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pulling up the information on him and removing the prod. I did not know that there were so many Australian sources on him. Rogermx (talk) 01:45, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Boneymau, Thank you for your reference for Jason Klarwein as an indigenous actor/director. I didn't find any reference in any of the articles I read. Much appreciated SeptimusDaisy (talk) 06:14, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating The Big Life (musical), Boneymau!

Wikipedia editor Hydronium Hydroxide just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

When creating a stub article like this, please consider expanding with details of what it is about, a little critical reaction from reviews, etc.

To reply, leave a comment on Hydronium Hydroxide's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 05:26, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Boneymau. I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 17:54, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Boneymau. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Boneymau. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amongst multiple things, you are doing awesome. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:27, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Boneymau,

Google [[1]] includes no less than 52 references to Elsa Marshall-Hall more than enough to make the person notable. I hope you agree.

Regards, Albert Isaacs (talk) 04:18, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree Albert Isaacs, there are established benchmarks for notability and 52 references in Google is not a principal measure. But it's not up to you or me individually, it's the consensus of the Wikipedia community. And there are quite normal processes to confirm or challenge notability. Don't take it personally. Boneymau (talk) 07:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear "Boneymeau",

Elsa Marshall-Hall has 29 of her compositions preserved, mainly in the Grainger Museum. I believe this shows how important some people regard her!

Regards, Albert Isaacs (talk) 07:29, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Boneymau,

Thanks for your edit. I agree with your assessment of the amateur theatrical roles being not noteable. I edited the article, left out the line about her amateur theatrical career later in life and replaced the "Theatre" heading with a new one, now only listing roles Olivia Harkin played in productions classed as "Pro-Am" by AusStage. Do you agree with this edit? (I do not want to start a warring here, =)).

Greetings, Sjokhazard (talk) 12:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the Artisan and Public Voted awards. Are you still working on the upper section? Don't want to edit conflict.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:28, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not today shaidar cuebiyar. I could work from the bottom up though, if I do get time. Boneymau (talk) 04:32, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I've been doing. I've avoided wLs, for now. Good on ya for your work. Query: I haven't caught up with Hall of Fame inductees.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:37, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've done my bit until the winners are announced.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 06:55, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Boneymau, I appreciate your comments on the recent page deletion request. Was it still up for discussion? I wondered if you would reconsider your delete suggestion given that new sources were added, and that you felt: "The one material issue is whether the radio work including the award is sufficient as WP:NCREATIVE. Boneymau (talk) 23:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)" MagentaSwann (talk) 01:49, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MagentaSwann, that debate is now complete and the closer (who is not me) determined a Delete result was reached. I am not going to reconsider my delete suggestion. You are free to pursue a Wikipedia:Deletion review if you can argue it is relevant. Or maybe just take a step back and appreciate why others have come to the conclusion that the subject does not have sufficient notability against Wikipedia benchmarks. Cheers. Boneymau (talk) 20:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing the category, assuming you're right. Do you have any info on its demise? Doug butler (talk) 10:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doug butler, from a quick google, this Theatre Heritage Australia article tells the full story: https://theatreheritage.org.au/on-stage-magazine/stage-by-stage/item/771-behind-the-plaque-the-arrow-theatre-middle-park Boneymau (talk) 23:34, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'm a duffer. I saw the THA article earlier, then went off at a tangent. And the repro of the Theatre Guild programme is another nail in the coffin of my obsession with "June Brunel" being the proper spelling of the actress's name. Doug butler (talk) 23:41, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]