User talk:Das osmnezz

Hello Das osmnezz. Thank you for creating the wiki page for Stefan Bajčetić. I'm a little unsure how to proceed with updating his last name to the proper form from Bajcetic to Bajčetić. The correct form of Bajčetić is also used for his father's wiki page. Can you please help change his main profile title name? Thank you kindly. Spirit Fox99 (talk) 20:07, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Spirit_Fox99Spirit Fox99 (talk) 20:07, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• User talk:Das osmnezz/Archive 1
• User talk:Das osmnezz/Archive 2
• User talk:Das osmnezz/Archive 3
• User talk:Das osmnezz/Archive 4
• User talk:Das osmnezz/Archive 5
• User talk:Das osmnezz/Archive 6
• User talk:Das osmnezz/Archive 7
• User talk:Das osmnezz/Archive 8

Your article Văn Sỹ Thủy has conflicting birthdates, with different ones in the lead and short description. I can’t read Vietnamese, so you need to go through the sources and find the correct one. Roasted (talk) 01:48, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loic Chan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loic Chan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Anwegmann (talk) 03:10, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alopua Petoa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alopua Petoa (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:15, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There was a recent AfD on this subject at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dastan Satpayev. Please don't move this back to the mainspace again. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:12, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wang Zixiang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

2 professional appearances. Fails GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RossEvans19 (talk) 13:28, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fernando de Noronha football team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fernando de Noronha football team until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Svartner (talk) 11:01, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Orjuan Essam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:35, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One single citation is of course not good enough for a BLP like Isak Alemayehu is. It's not good enough to state that sources exist, either - when the alternative option is to continue the development in draft space. Geschichte (talk) 08:59, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Das, about Wang Zixiang - please can you add the sources to the article? I'm struggling to see the notability at present with only 2 career games played :) RossEvans19 (talk) 16:27, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reginaldo Estevao is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reginaldo Estevao until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Svartner (talk) 17:09, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fidel (Brazilian footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails in WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Svartner (talk) 17:11, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samson Kpenosen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samson Kpenosen (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Svartner (talk) 17:20, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farid Alfa-Ruprecht is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farid Alfa-Ruprecht until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 14:23, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Roberto Peraza has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just one international match, fails in WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Svartner (talk) 18:09, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Celestine Mbarassem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails in WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Svartner (talk) 10:13, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]