User talk:Designate

This user may have left Wikipedia. Designate has not edited Wikipedia since May 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

You're invited to the Peabody Essex Museum Edit-a-thon Spring 2014

On May 3rd, the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem, Massachusetts will be hosting a Native American and Chinese Art edit-a-thon from 9:00-5:00 pm. You are more than welcome to attend, as there will be free food and drink, and an outing afterwards. If you are interested, please sign up here, as we would love to see you there!

If you have any questions, please leave a message at Ed Rodley's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk • contribs) 15:53, 25 April 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Adrianne Wadewitz edit-a-thons in Southern New England

As you may have already heard, the Wikipedia community lost an invaluable member of the community last month. Adrianne Wadewitz was a feminist scholar of 18th-Century British literature, and a prolific editor of the site. As part of a worldwide series of tributes, New England Wikimedians, in conjunction with local institutions of higher learning, have created three edit-a-thons that will be occurring in May and June. The events are as follows: May 21st at Northeastern University's Snell Library, in the Digital Scholarship Commons on the second floor May 22nd at Brown University's Rockefeller Library, in the Digital Scholarship Lab June 25th at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (exact location TBA), where we will also be hosting a "how to conduct an edit-a-thon" session beforehand We hope that you will be able to join us, whether you are an experienced editor or are using Wikipedia for the first time. If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

I am going to the library today and will look at the first volume of Wallner (I bought only the second) and should be able to respond to Brian's remaining questions, mostly regarding years Pierce did stuff. With that accomplished, we may as well move ahead to FAC. You might want to look over my edits and also there were one or two minor issues at PR I was unsure of and said you might to weigh in on, but we can do that on our talk pages or the article's.--Wehwalt (talk) 09:32, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm happy with it. Great job keeping up with the PR. I will hit up the library again before long, to iron out some things, but I'm comfortable taking it to FAC. —Designate (talk) 21:26, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:38, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm posting here to follow up on the recent Village Pump discussion, archived here, to move pronunciations and other info out of article lead sections. I'm inviting editors who participated in that discussion to comment on the Manual of Style:Lead section guideline. If you would like to participate, please add your comments to the discussion. Cheers! Ivanvector (talk) 19:57, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do beg pardon, I'm not quite sure what you're talking about. Can you explain the problem/needed fix? At a guess, it might be the image in the TFA being too small to give details in the uncropped image? Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 17:59, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If I might give a preliminary suggestion, perhaps using File:Franklin Pierce - 1852.jpg or File:George Peter Alexander Healy - Franklin Pierce - Google Art Project.jpg might be a better solution than trying to force the current photo/art/thing (the way daguerreotypes were converted into albumen photos is a bit weird) into a shape it may not be completely suitable for. I don't mind; it's a featured picture. It will have its day on the main page. =) Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:09, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I find that offering a cropped version can often lead to the crop being used inappropriately, so could we only host the cropped version locally, with a {{notforcommons}}? I'd rather avoid having the cropped image suddenly appear in a dozen articles, while the full view of Pierce all but disappears, and a little planning ahead will help avoid that. =) Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 19:29, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And, of course, what we really want to avoid is what File:Franklin Pierce - 1852.jpg was like until I clicked to the source: cropped, and, more than that, not even noted as such, and with the original unavailable on Wikipedia. You don't want to know just how much it pains me to stumble across something like that, and yet it happens all the time in ACW articles - but I go off-topic. =) Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 19:50, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest using File:Pierce crop.jpg. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 20:44, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Berkshire Community College logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is to inform you that Franklin Pierce, which you nominated at WP:FAC, will appear on the Wikipedia Main Page as Today's Featured Article on 23 November 2014. The proposed main page blurb is here; you may amend if necessary. Please check for dead links and other possible faults before the appearance date. Brianboulton (talk) 16:40, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

US politicians
Thank you for quality articles written in collaboration, such as Franklin Pierce and List of Governors of West Virginia, for reviews, assessments and distributing FA stars, for user pages of utmost simplicity, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —Designate (talk) 14:40, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

... and thank you for John Tyler! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:32, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Five years ago, you were recipient no. 1041 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:00, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Half Barnstar
		For your collaboration with Wehwalt (talk · contribs) on the Featured Articles Franklin Pierce and John Tyler you are hereby awarded the Left Half of the Half Barnstar. Congratulations! For the Military history Wikiproject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 07:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Designate. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 05:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nikkimaria (talk) 05:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikipedia Library Users,

You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Saw you made lots of edits, especially to articles on politicians, but haven't been active in recent months. This post is just to let you know that your name has been added to the page linked above. Remember to remove your name from the list if you resume editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:18, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Designate. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sunday July 16, 1-5pm: New England Wiknic

You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" at John F. Kennedy Park, near Harvard Square, Cambridge, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck. Sunday July 16 New England Wiknic (also on Facebook) 1–5pm - come by any time! Look for us by the Wikipedia / Wikimedia banner! We hope to see you there! --Phoebe (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Template:Collab-us/month has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Anna Maria College logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Anna Maria College seal.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Designate. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Designate. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michael O. Moore has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:09, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Peter A. Vellucci requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 04:42, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Designate! I've long had the same concern (that you expressed at the Village Pump here and that I much later brought up here) that hatnotes are a bad way to clarify surnames. I've been trying to learn template editing, so I went ahead and created Template:Chinese name 2, which inserts a footnote rather than a hatnote, and boldly implemented it at Mao Zedong and Xi Jinping to see what reaction it gets. If it catches on, it could be expanded to other surname templates, or we could even do a mass-replacement via a bot. Sdkb (talk) 19:43, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Finnusertop and Valereee: pinging you two since you participated at the pump discussion I started. Sdkb (talk) 19:43, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The more I think about this, I'm of the opinion that it would be better to update WP:HAT to correspond to actual usage instead: not all hatnotes are strictly for disambiguation purposes. Here are my reasons:

1. I'd argue this information is primarily about the article title, not the actual name of the subject (the boldface quasi-reiteration of the article title). The reader may wonder why the article is located at Mao Zedong and not Zedong Mao, regardless of whether she was redirected or if there is another topic with the same name in reverse order. That's why this information should be displayed immediately after the title, not later in the lead. Hatnotes are our method of explicitly clarifying article titles.
2. As I pointed out at VP, we have (and need) hatnotes like {{Correct title}} that also don't disambiguate, and I don't want to introduce inconsistencies (for name order vs. other titular adjustments)
3. Moving hatnote spam to footnote spam is just moving the problem around. While MOS:LEADCLUTTER is bad, the footnote solution is not ideal either. I don't want to see hundreds of thousands of articles with an extra footnote that says something rather obvious. In some respects, a hatnote is more consistent and subtle, easy to ignore when you know you're looking at the right article and doesn't tempt you to click to see what information has been hidden away from you.
4. Some articles that already have too many footnotes about language and script and I don't want them to have one more.
5. There is still some confusion about what these hatnotes are supposed to clarify and for whom (readers or editors). I think they are at least implicitly there to prevent people from changing name order in articles (or moving them). But we don't use hatnotes to document consensus or offer editorial advice (I've said before that Wikipedia:Editnotice are for this purpose).
6. All that being said, we still need to retain the key idea of WP:RELATED and actually observe it (so no stupid decisions like Talk:Suicide methods#RFC: Hatnote at top). I'd like to see WP:HAT prudently amended in a way that allows non-disambiguating hatnotes but still discouraging links to related ones. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sdkb and Valereee: ping – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:14, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm following along, no strong opinion on this but listening! --valereee (talk) 18:58, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for those thoughts, Finnusertop! I find some of them more persuasive than others. Re (1), if there is a question of disambiguation between Mao Zedong and Zedong Mao, a traditional hatnote would be able to address that. Re (2), I think {{Correct title}} addresses a more pressing issue for readers than name ordering. (3) is more persuasive to me, since decluttering is a large part of the goal of the change. A question I have is whether casual readers know instinctively to often ignore hatnotes the same way regular editors do. Re (5), I'm fairly strongly of the view that it's very rarely necessary for notices for editors to have to interfere with the reading experience, since we can use hidden comments or edit notices to achieve that much less obtrusively.

By way of update, after implementing the switch on about a half dozen of the highest-profile Chinese biography articles I could think of yesterday, none of them have yet been reverted. I find this honestly a little surprising, since normally when trying to change something there's some status quo attachment sentiment, but the impression I'm getting is that the persistence of the hatnote practice is less a result of editors defending/preferring it than it is a holdover from the period when hatnotes were less well-defined, and just no one has bothered to create an alternative until now. Sdkb (talk) 10:22, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sdkb will you kindly let us know if some of them get reverted or discussed? I'd like to hear from more editors. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:31, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Finnusertop: Cold Season just brought up the edits at the Chinese MOS. I'm not sure exactly how to keep discussion most centralized, but there will likely be some there. Sdkb (talk) 19:27, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've also implemented at Zhang Dongju, an article I created, since no one's objected at Mao and Xi :) --valereee (talk) 14:59, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Charles E. Shannon, Jr portrait.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Assumption College logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Assumption College seal.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bay Path College seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Party cell/Democratic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 02:11, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Party cell/Republican has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 02:11, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Political party color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:21, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bristol Community College logo.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Designate. I'm just posting to let you know that List of governors of West Virginia – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for November 18. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 00:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:U.S. Congress committee assignments has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 02:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Greenfield Community College logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:John Tyler Community College logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]