User talk:Funcrunch

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people They should not be given alerts for those areas.

Please read: If you're coming here wondering why I pinged you about vandalism to your user page when there is no obvious recent vandalism in that page's history, it was probably attempted vandalism by an unconfirmed or anonymous user which was caught by this edit filter. I've been monitoring that filter log because I started the RfC that resulted in its creation.

Congrats ! Anthere (talk) 10:08, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, congratulations! 🖤🩶🤍💚🤍🩶🖤 — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 10:45, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

++, congratulations! TheTranarchist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 16:06, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

+1, congrats! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 13:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks everyone! It was truly an honor (and surprise!) to be chosen as Media Contributor of the Year. :-) (WMF post: Celebrating the 2023 Wikimedian of the Year Winners) Funcrunch (talk) 17:32, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! Watching the recording now! EponineBunnyKickQueen (talk) 17:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just watched my bit myself! I was switching between Eventyay and Zoom windows during the event. :-) The award ceremony starts at about 7 hours and 21 minutes into this video, and my bit starts at 8:01:47: Wikimania 2023 Day 1 - Plenary Funcrunch (talk) 18:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see your excellent work getting some recognition! -Pete Forsyth (talk) 19:21, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 September 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article JoAnne A. Epps, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 16:20, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 September 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tigist Assefa, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 09:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to your edit to Bryan Johnson (entrepreneur): There is currently an RFC regarding whether or not information about his life extension practices/attempts can be mentioned in the article or not. You may want to take a look at this RFC here. Given that I think it should be mentioned, I am not going to revert your edit, but a certain other editor will likely revert it if he notices it, as he has reverted when other people have added similar information to the article. Vontheri (talk) 10:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I neglected to review the (long) talk page discussion before adding the edit; I didn't think that just mentioning he was involved in these practices would be controversial. I certainly don't think my edit implied endorsement or anything, but if it's reverted I honestly don't care that much. Funcrunch (talk) 16:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I never thought just mentioning it would be controversial either, nor did I think merely mentioning it is the same as endorsing it. But apparently others (or an other) see it differently... Vontheri (talk) 16:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have a bit of interest in that person sj Miller and I wanted to say that it is still incorrect to use they/them/their to refer to sj Miller. I like editing that page and adding extra information about sj Miller. Beebeenewan (talk) 23:41, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will respond on the article talk page. Funcrunch (talk) 23:47, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Null-pronominal means not using third person pronouns of any kind. I have looked up that term already. Beebeenewan (talk) 23:48, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't put that term in, some other editor did. Please discuss this on the sj Miller talk page, as I already asked. I will remove any further messages from you on my talk page about this article. Funcrunch (talk) 23:52, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that revert, Funcrunch. For the record, deadnaming is not an adequate reason to revert someone else’s comment (WP:OTHERSCOMMENTS), but WP:NOTFORUM is probably a good enough reason there. — HTGS (talk) 05:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, meant to also tag LilianaUwU! — HTGS (talk) 05:38, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, it's mostly NOTFORUM I was going for, but I did take offense with the masculine pronouns personally, hence my revert summary. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 16:14, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 December 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Richard Hunt (sculptor), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the proper Ukrainian alphabet:
Аа Бб Вв Гг Ґґ Дд Ее Єє Жж Зз Ии Іі Її Йй Кк Лл Мм Нн Оо Пп Рр Сс Тт Уу Фф Хх Цц Чч Шш Щщ Ьь Юю Яя

Here is my modified Ukrainian alphabet
Аа Бб Вв Гг Дд Ее Жж Зз Ии Йй Кк Лл Мм Нн Оо Пп Рр Сс Тт Уу Фф Хх Цц Чч Шш Щщ Ьь Юю Яя Ґґ Єє Іі Її
In my modified Ukrainian alphabet, these four letters: Ґ, Є, І and Ї are distinct and sorted alphabetically after Я in that order. Beebeenewan (talk) 10:31, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is this regarding an article I've edited? If not, why are you telling me this? Funcrunch (talk) 19:35, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 December 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Amp Fiddler, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 02:26, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Les McCann, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 23:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yo @Funcrunch, apologies for that reversion. I was too hyper in deleting content. Bremps... 03:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I'd just taken the time to specify which sections were completely lacking sources vs those that had only a few, so was miffed. I'd be fine if the discography ultimately gets pared down significantly rather than editors trying to source every single entry. Funcrunch (talk) 03:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I get that. Discography sections tend to get real hairy, especially when a work is more obscure. Bremps... 04:00, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 February 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Aston "Family Man" Barrett, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 11:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 February 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Henry Fambrough, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 12:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm reverting your reversion of my edits. My edits were completely consistent with the MOS, making no use of previous pronouns. My edits, including explanation of aspects such as a stepbrother, make the article clearer to read. Please discuss on the Chelsea Manning talk page if you think otherwise. Samp4ngeles (talk) 18:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As noted by @DMacks (an admin) on your own talk page, you are skirting very close to a block. Funcrunch (talk) 18:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pings. Let me know if there are any further problems once the 31h block expires (I will also keep their talkpage watchlisted for a while). DMacks (talk) 06:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cleanup! Book stubs are new to me, and so many pieces thereto. Have a wonderful evening. Star Mississippi 02:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help! I noticed it because Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor is on my watchlist since I created that article. Funcrunch (talk) 02:03, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Her research and writing is fascinating, isn't it?

I'm about to go cleanup the bazillion misspellings of Taylor's name in Beverly_Smith. While I'd like to think people who care to write about Smith's work would take time to get the name of someone also writing about her work right... Star Mississippi 02:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People with non-binary gender identities has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --MikutoH ^talk! 01:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 April 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Cecil Williams (pastor), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 09:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 June 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article James Lawson (activist), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 05:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm going to assume good faith in your post on my talk page and the reverting of the edit. Let me clarify, the term Cis in this article, is only used in the apparently contentious sentence. Whereas the term transgender is used 47 times and in full compliance with the source. The readability of the article is disrupted when multiple names of the same term is used. So to not have to go through a possible Rfc for consistency in language please reconsider your edit. Best regards. Ip says: Work Better yes. (talk) 21:09, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please post on Talk:Lia Thomas if you want to dispute this edit further, thanks. Funcrunch (talk) 22:28, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]