User talk:Ktdk

Your recent editing history at All Nippon Airways shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. David Biddulph (talk) 11:33, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The other users are accepting my edits for that page Ktdk (talk) 11:37, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All the other users have accepted my edits and Carl Grass field was the user who disagrees with me the editors who are experienced than me have accepted my edits of if all other user disagrees with me then I would have stopped Ktdk (talk) 15:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ktdk reported by User:David Biddulph (Result: ). Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 12:32, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at KLM fleet. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:07, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All the other users have accepted my edits and Carl Grass field was the user who disagrees with me the editors who are experienced than me have accepted my edits of see the page history of Air Canada fleet All Nippon airways fleet and KLM fleet Ktdk (talk) 16:05, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see no evidence that "editors who are experienced than me have accepted my edits." Do you have any evidence of that? In the KLM editor history, there are two instances where other editors restored your edits then reverted themselves; that doesn't look like "agreement" to me. I also see that you canvassed a bunch of editors (including me) to do something about another editor with whom you are in a content dispute with; this suggests a fundamental misunderstanding about how Wikipedia works. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @Ohnoitsjamie:, Ktdk is likely referring to me reviewing and accepting Air Canada fleet via New Page Patrol. The splitting of the fleet portion of the main airline article when it becomes unwieldy is commonplace in the other major airline articles I checked (e.g. American Airlines, United Airlines). -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:41, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When I moved the article to that KLM page one user didn't reverted my edit leaderofthewave user he didn't reverted back my edit and also see ANA fleet page history of this time that was not a valid reason for unblocking I will stop messaging after block expires I will go according to the procedure to move the page by talking in their respective talk pages Ktdk (talk) 16:45, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• May I remind you, you were blocked for the edits you made to Air Canada as well as others ~ now it seems that right after your block you return and do the same edits again ~ do not revert my edits on Air Canada ~ regards ~mitch~ (talk) 19:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Also just to help you out, you can not take the first sentence from another article such as Air Canada fleet and use that as the only sentence on the main article ~ I see your point as to link the fleet tables from the main article but you still have to give more information to the reader ~ regards ~mitch~ (talk) 20:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ktdk ~ Just an adder, if you want to see a properly linked from the main ~ look ~ here regards ~mitch~ (talk) 20:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Ethiopian Airlines, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. You removed another editor's message. We don't just remove messages; it will be archived and deleted automatically in due course. David Biddulph (talk) 08:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can see that you are trying to inflate demographics of Vijayawada and deflate those of Visakhapatnam. You are using sources that suit your purpose. Wikipedia doesn't work that way. Please discuss on the talk page before making changes related to demographics. Sharkslayer87 (talk) 06:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed that you without explaining why and without looking at the given ref., have constantly removed Visakhapatnam from the destinations table. Here are the diff's of your removals [1][2][3]. This may be considered disruptive because apart from not explaining your edit or looking at the ref. you have probably ignored my previous reverts edit summary as well. Kindly do not remove VTZ again. Thank you! Bingobro (Chat) 09:57, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Swami Vivekananda Airport has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Ktdk you reverted my edit calling it unsourced, [4] without looking at the provided source again! also you seem to have left something on my talk page regarding this which you removed. Bingobro (Chat) 09:37, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Tiderolls 13:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If I find that you revert another editor without first obtaining consensus on the article talk page I will block your account. Tiderolls 13:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tide rolls if you see this u will understand I have agreed with user LeoFrank for a while regarding his domestic statement "I said no change in domestic statement untill consensus is made in talk page from my point of view this isn't a fair warning Ktdk (talk) 14:11, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have reverted several times over the last few days and have not posted to the article's talk page. That is edit warring and will result in a warning. Your link doesn't work for me, but if you understand that you require consensus going forward then we should have no problems. Tiderolls 14:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[5] this is the link furtherly I haven't done any major edit warring my last edit was 6 October 2020 excluding today's edits if you see my edit history you will understand Tide rolls before it's too late I have agreed to make consensus [6] Ktdk (talk) 14:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The edit you're linking to is furtherance of an edit war. By the way, discussion does not take place in edit summaries. Please read WP:Edit warring and make sure you understand. You say that you will seek consensus, and that is good, but I do not want you to get blocked over a misunderstanding of the policy. Tiderolls 15:06, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ktdk

Thank you for creating List of the busiest airports in Europe (2010–2015).

User:PKT, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello - please note that this list has some undefined reference names. See the references section, where the undefined names are shown in bold red font, and please fix the issues.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|PKT}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

PKT(alk) 17:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PKT: Well then I didn't check the missing references properly I will do it later. Furtherly it is not bold red it is bold black. 3 references are missing in that page Ktdk (talk) 18:05, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Why did you scrunch up the list of the names of the administrative divisions of Vietnam? I do notice that you made several tries before you got the results that you did. So I guess you worked on it pretty hard. Uporządnicki (talk) 11:04, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at this some more, and I have a guess about what's going on. Before you started working on it, the layout had been done by me. When I looked at the history and at various template documentations, I read somewhere that the particular way I had done the layout might not work correctly on some handheld devices. I look at Wikipedia only on desktop computers, so I didn't know this. I wonder if you were trying to get the thing to show up on a handheld device. One result was that any city on the list that happened to have more than one word in its name (many of them) would run onto several lines. And there was a long shoestring of a list. I've gone in and redone it in a way that--I gather--might work better on a small screen. Uporządnicki (talk) 15:10, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion. The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7. The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed. The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125. The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members New Members KingAviationKid (Joined on 17 December) PatrickChiao (Joined on 22 December) Wp9097 (Joined on 16 December) Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921. Closed Discussions Featured Article assessment Jim Lovell (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Good Article assessment HAL Tejas (discussion) – Closed as not promoted on 30 December 2021 William Hodgson (RAF officer) (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Supermarine Sea King (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 22 December 2021 Raymond Hesselyn (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 4 December 2021 Deletion Timeline of Berlin Brandenburg Airport's construction (discussion) – Closed as delete and redirect on 30 December 2021 Evergreen International Airlines Flight 17 (discussion) – Closed as keep on 25 December 2021 Requested moves Akbarpur (Ambedkar Nagar) Airstrip → Akbarpur Airstrip (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 1983 Avensa Douglas DC-9 crash → Avensa Flight 007 (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 035 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 035 (discussion) – Withdrawn on 28 December 2021	Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY. Aviation pages by quality Quality Total FA 142 FL 15 A 56 GA 505 B 4,573 C 11,878 Start 15,082 Stub 18,754 List 2,539 Category 11,638 Disambig 653 File 2,713 Portal 629 Project 89 Redirect 1,518 Template 2,489 NA 66 Assessed 73,339 Unassessed 1 Total 73,340 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 251,791 Ω = 4.92
New/Ongoing Discussions Featured Article review D. B. Cooper (discussion) – Since 14 December 2021 A-class Article assessment Granville Gee Bee Model A (discussion) – Since 21 April 2020 List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War (discussion) – Since 22 February 2010 Good Article assessment Romanian Air Corps (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Jean Batten (discussion) – Since 2 October 2021 Merger proposals List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 June 2021 Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation (discussion) – Since 30 May 2021 Airport Movement Area Safety System → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 29 May 2021 ASDE-X → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 28 May 2021 Splitting proposals Family Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 November 2021 2021 Kabul airport attack (discussion) – Since 24 September 2021 List of military aircraft of the United States (discussion) – Since 16 August 2021 Braniff International Airways (discussion) – Since 8 September 2019 Deletion List of maiden voyages (discussion) – Since 29 December 2021 Requested moves Hot-air balloon → Hot air balloon (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 108 → Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 109 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 150 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 150 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 206 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 206 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 708 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 892 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 892 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 TWA Flight 800 → TWA Flight 800 (1996) (discussion) – Since 27 December 2021 Dynamic Airways Flight 405 → Dynamic International Airways Flight 405 (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 CommutAir Flight 4281 → CommutAir Flight 4821 (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Thai Airways → Thai Airways International (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Thai Airways fleet → Thai Airways International fleet (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 List of Thai Airways destinations → List of Thai Airways International destinations (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Did you know Ravish Malhotra (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Alexander Tahy (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 Veronica Volkersz (discussion) – Since 6 December 2021 Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll (discussion) – Since 3 December 2021 On The Main Page Did you know... ... that the aerobatic demonstration aircraft used by SoloTürk is also used in military operations of the Turkish Air Force? (24 December)
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Defence Research and Development Organisation into Projects of DRDO. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 04:38, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jitendra Singh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abey LEFTIST madarchod kitna terrorists ki choosega be bhosdike. Jaa pakistan me jaake apni gaand marwaa madarchod librandu 183.87.33.4 (talk) 18:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings @ Ktdk,

In regard to your recent good faith edit @ the article Ex-Muslims, we already do have separate article giving country wise details so we are not looking for country wise subsections in the article Ex-Muslims that being working as a summary article, hence I am inclined to revert your good faith edit if you do not mind.

Instead I request your copy edit help @ Draft:Ex-Muslim activism in Kerala as and when you can spare the time.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 15:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dixon Technologies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TCL.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Zerodha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have copied this article from Italian Wikipedia Ktdk (talk) 18:50, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zerodha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 12:09, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ktdk! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 12:09, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sid95Q. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to RadhaKrishn have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sid95Q (talk) 10:38, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect List of busiest airports by passenger traffic(2010-2015) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 11 § List of busiest airports by passenger traffic(2010-2015) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 23:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ktdk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zerodha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]