User talk:Logical Premise

• Please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) and add comments on a new topic in a new section.
• Threads older than two months are typically archived.
• I welcome badgering on RfA and AfD votes. If you can convince me to reverse my AfD vote, you win a barnstar.
• Questions, requests, criticism, and any other comments are always welcome!

• Archive One (September - October 2008)
• Archive Two (October 2008 - August 2010)
• Archive Three (August 2010 - May 2011)
• Archive Four (May 2011 - April 2016) Hiatus Archive

• Angry complaints of personal attacks will be completely ignored unless you provide a diff and a rational reason why it's a personal attack.
• I do not refactor comments. If you insist I refactor a comment, please consult an Arabic translator for "اذهب يمارس الجنس مع نفسك" for instructions on how to proceed. If you don't like what I say that is your problem.
• If you state your case without resorting to logical fallacies such as ad hominems and other marks of a weak mind, I will be more than happy to apologize for any legitimate concerns and/or strike or delete (NOT refactor) comments I've made that are offensive.
• I am not trying to be pointy, I'm trying to avoid situations where I will snatch someone's head right off their shoulders for levels of stupidity no human being should have to endure.
• If you are an editor of Conservapedia or a Bright and you wish to discuss anything involving religion, do not edit my talk page. You will be reverted. I do not engage in conversation with POV pushers, of any stripe.
• If you are new to Wikipedia, please ignore all of the above and ask whatever you like. I am happy to help newcomers.

Archived. Finally.  Logical Premise ^Ergo? 19:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Logical Premise. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I PRODed an article you created long ago, Metaoxyacids, because I could find no mentioned of it in any source except the single mention in the 1891 book you linked. So I assume the term never really caught on? That said, chemistry is not my cup-of-tea, so maybe I just missed something? Anyway, if you object to the PROD, please remove the tag. If you can immprove the article, I'd be happy to see that instead. Let me know if I can help in any way. Happy editing! Ajpolino (talk) 06:00, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Famousdog. Logical Premise, thanks for creating Aqua Net!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Is there any reason to think that this particular brand of hair spray is so notable that the information here can't just be merged with hair spray?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Famousdog (woof)(grrr) 07:40, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply but the article looks fine as it is. I don't see any value in a redirect of an article with fifty sources an a GA nom, honestly.  Logical Premise ^Ergo? 17:29, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Logical Premise. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Reflectivity range has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary; subject doesn't demonstrate meeting WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DannyS712 (talk) 23:25, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]