User talk:Rajmama

Hi Rajmama! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kumbharacha Ganpati and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kumbharacha Ganpati, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 23:47, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Past Declined notices must remain with the article until it is accepted. David notMD (talk) 10:14, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read Wikipedia:Notability (films), and add independent reliable sources (such as reviews in major newspapers or magazines).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kumbharacha Ganpati and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kumbharacha Ganpati, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rajmama! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to move draft to article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kumbharacha Ganpati. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rajmama. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kumbharacha Ganpati, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:23, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rajmama. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kumbharacha Ganpati".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:20, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Predator: Murder In A Courtroom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 10:41, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sangramsingh Thakur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 09:35, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Ghaath (2023 film), Rakkhosh and Indian Predator: Murder In A Courtroom. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:42, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No sign of notability per the general notability guidelines or the notability guidelines for actors. Nettv4u and filmibeat are not reliable sources, and mentions of his name are not significant coverage. The outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sangramsingh Thakur still applies. Sangramsingh Thakur is create protected after multiple recreations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sangramsingh Thakur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 07:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rajmama. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 08:05, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, what is your connection to Sangramsingh Thakur? --bonadea contributions talk 15:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea I dond know him very well but i just know about him he is a artist.and I'm just starting contributions in wikipedia and I am also going to start article of more people who are related to Indian Predator series. Rajmama (talk) 03:30, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove any Articles for Creation notices or comments from declined drafts. The comment "Do not remove this line!" refers to the line, not just to the comment itself. --bonadea contributions talk 08:15, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea User:Akevsharma is an Sockpuppet blocked by user:RoySmith Rajmama (talk) 03:57, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Indian Predator: Murder In A Courtroom, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 10:16, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea let me know how to add name of Artist in article. Rajmama (talk) 15:57, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mukesh Chhabra, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ugly and Peekay. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rajmama, Please can you explain why you moved Draft:Mukesh Chhabra from draft to mainspace when it had been submitted for review? Do you have any paid connection or COI with the subject? Jamiebuba (talk) 07:54, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jamiebuba I'm a Indian Wikipedian and Draft:Mukesh Chhabra is an know Casting Director in India. Thats why I am extended this draft and added reliable sources after that moved to Article Space. Rajmama (talk) 08:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rajmama, I need your help to create a new wikipedia article. Creation07 (talk) 12:21, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rajmama, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username CNMall41, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sangramsingh Thakur, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sangramsingh Thakur (2nd nomination).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CNMall41}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CNMall41 (talk) 20:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41if you think Sangramsingh Thakur are not eligible for wikipedia article then remove it to Draft space. Use draft option instead of Deletion. Thank You Rajmama (talk) 18:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is that it was already in draft space and declined at least three times prior to you moving it to mainspace. This gives the impression that you have no intention to improve the draft based on editor comments so AfD was the best option in this instance. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rajmama: Do not move articles to draft space during an active deletion discussion. I've reversed this action, which frankly I'm surprised went unnoticed as long as it did. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:37, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]