User talk:Saimmx

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JJPMaster was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Article wizard/Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SM-A136B and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JJP_Master (she/they) 14:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saimmx! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JJPMaster (she/they) 14:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saimmx,

Thank you for creating SM-A135F.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I'm glad to see you making your own redirects these days.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|JJPMaster}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JJP_Master (she/they) 05:46, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and happy new year! Saimmx (talk) 05:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, there aren't actually any problems with the redirect. This message was automatically placed by the tool I was using to mark the pages as reviewed. I'm still glad to see you making your own redirects these days. JJP_Master (she/they) 05:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, G-Mode, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 17:02, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I am sorry to that. Is Steam a reliable source from the way you see? Saimmx (talk) 16:17, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary sourcing would be better, but a primary source like that would be fine. Waxworker (talk) 13:52, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. User:Bluethricecreamman (Talk·Contribs) 13:51, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Censorship in Taiwan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thediplomat.com. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By saying sock puppets in my summary, I meant Poiwert1 and DirectorSteveScott, who restored all of the reverted edits in 1252382103 and again 1249223553. Akishima Yuka (talk) 11:50, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for providing the context. However, I must say I was still unhappy with the revert since many (to say at least) constructive edits were just... disappeared. And the resorted version had some issues - But since suckpuppets is not tolerated on Wikipedia, maybe I should stop complaining. Saimmx (talk) 15:48, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kitamura Sae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 12:57, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sae Kitamura, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:01, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sae Kitamura you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GoldRomean -- GoldRomean (talk) 02:43, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sae Kitamura you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sae Kitamura for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GoldRomean -- GoldRomean (talk) 04:04, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 June 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sae Kitamura, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sae Kitamura (pictured) has had her university students contribute to the Japanese Wikipedia as part of their coursework? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sae Kitamura. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sae Kitamura), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 June 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Erena So, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Hong Kong porn actress (pictured) once invited her cyberbullies to talk? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Erena So. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Erena So), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 30,866 views (2,572.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]