User talk:Supparluca

• 2006
• 2007

You may be interestd in stating your opinion about Talk:Graubünden#Requeste move. --Checco (talk) 13:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey supparluca, long time no see. i have a great timing for logging back in and finding a new circus has started. I think in the future, it is not worth reverting over these silly issues, simply go to someone like Lar and have him mediate. Of course you are correct that the map should show both Alto Adige and South Tyrol. But, you know very well the agenda that Gryfindor and Rarelibra have had now for such a long time. At this point, I just can't comprehend why they do this... Anyway, I'll support you, of course. Icsunonove (talk) 20:15, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi supparluca, where there ever a resolution on that image on the province of italy page? rarelibra told me he had agreed with my idea to use a multi-term image name, and i assume to also include all the names in the image (per agreement with lar). i just wanted to check if we need to get everyone to clarify this on the trentino-alto adige/seudtirol page, or what. cheers, Icsunonove (talk) 17:11, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on my page. Icsunonove (talk) 20:29, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These "people" like PhJ, Gryffindor, Matthead -- amazing... Icsunonove (talk) 22:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, similar to the request made for Val Gardena, can you provide an opinion for this page request? I'm familiar and have visited this town a few times, and even the local inhabitants use "Ortisei" for basic promotion in English. Icsunonove (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid, Luca, ortiseiani is pure nonsense (I prefer an answer on your talkpage -thanks) --Moroderen (talk) 08:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Supparluca, thank you! Well, I can imagine it isn't used very often, but I found it in the it.wiki article. I find strange also the demonym "gardenesi" for people from Ortisei, though. I don't know.--Supparluca 09:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Supparluca, I was looking at the discussion on the T-AA/ST page just now. You know what, sometimes it is really bothersome looking back at what happened with regard to Wikipedia on this province. I'm rather disgusted how German speakers decided that the Germanic way is the only way, and thus the way that must be used in English. The original method that was being used, as I'm sure you remember, was simply to translate everything directly from German Wikipedia. This happened in English Wikipedia, and also Esperanto, Netherlands, etc. The thing I don't like is how much of an arrogant and pushy behavior it is. It is amazing how much of a fight we had to go through, and be called so many names by a lot of fools, just because we pushed to have dual-language names that capture proper English and Italian usage. They blindly go and say that none of the Italic names are real, all invented by Tomei, but a lot of that is bogus. A majority of these names are the historic Roman/Italic/Ladin names of these places. Obviously, some are spelled slightly differently for Standard Italian (Bolzano versus Bolzan or Balsan), and even many of the German words are derived from the original Ladin language of the entire Trentino-Alto Adige. So in fact when they try to bury the Italian words they are also burying the original-original names of these places. Given that this is an Italian province for nearly a century now, the place names should of really been simply in the standard language of the country. Then, of course maintain all the local language names in the body of the articles, along with the historical names in a toponym section. Anyway, I'm still shocked by the pushiness of these people, that they can insist to name places in another country simply as they want. Imagine if the tables were turned? Icsunonove (talk) 03:23, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Supparluca, do you have a commons account so that you can fix this: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Provinces_of_Trentino-South_Tyrol Obviously it should be T-AA/ST like in English and Simple English Wikipedia. Icsunonove (talk) 19:21, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Supparluca, could you check out the discussion going on in the Latin Wikipedia with regard to Trentino-Alto Adige? I think the name they have is simply the Latin for Trentino-South Tyrol, which is as incorrect as it was when they had English as only this. Would appreciate it. Icsunonove (talk) 21:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm in the mud with the pigs again, look at what Noclador does. I need to quit this Wikipedia. He accuses me, of anyone, Italianization. I truly feel sorry for people who live in Bolzano-Bozen and act like him. It is a disaster to humanity in fact. Icsunonove (talk) 16:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at [1]. I'd appreciate your comments, given now also how my best pals Gryffindor and PhJ are throwing stones. I'm so ashamed by such human behavior, I can not express it well enough. Icsunonove (talk) 20:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Category:Alto Adige has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for Discussion page.

Thanks for your suggestion. You're right that it's the way the procedures were disregarded that bothered me in this nomination. I have never taken part in any discussion on this issue before, and this is because personally, despite what seems to be the rather fragile consensus, I still prefer "South Tyrol", for the entirely pragmatic reason that at least in the UK that's how most people still refer to the area in question - and this is the English language Wikipedia, not the UN. So I'm not sure whether I would want to go so far as to nominate a change that I personally dislike :) , although if someone else nominated it in the proper way, in the circumstances I expect I would support it. But I will think it over.HeartofaDog (talk) 11:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the Template_talk:Regions_of_Italy. Bye,Piccolo Modificatore Laborioso (talk) 00:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please do not change the name or URL of a reference you did not retrieve as you did again at

• Vadena
• Ritten
• Sand in Taufers
• Villanders
• (Earlier request: 1. request, 2. request)

This may be regarded by other users as low level Disruptive editing. Regards Gun Powder Ma (talk) 23:48, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You change the names of existing URLs (and references) constantly, so you need to explain your moves. Since the links couldn't work better, the question is what is your rationale for changing perfectly workable URLs? What guidelines support your action? Why do you do this? Gun Powder Ma (talk) 02:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey supparluca, I asked Aitias if we should post a complaint regarding YellowMonkey. I saw he did a similar thing to you. He out of the blue banned me for sock puppetry, then changed to reverting against consensus, then would only say "per the AN/I board" -- for a complaint against Noclador that I made. :) Do you think we should go ahead and take the time to lodge a complaint? Part of me is tired of wasting my time with this sort, the other part feels we should protect others from this behavior in the future. By the way, do you like the "mission" that Gun Power Ma and Noclador are on? I especially enjoy how Gun Power Ma knows everything now and is out to set Wikipedia straight. :] Icsunonove (talk) 05:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Trentino-Alto Adige Provinces.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Trentino-Alto Adige Provinces.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. noclador (talk) 18:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on People's Party (province of Bolzano), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Anachronistic name - there exists no "Province of Bolzano"

Speedy deletion of Category:German-language media in the province of Bolzano[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:German-language media in the province of Bolzano, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Anachronistic name - there exists no "Province of Bolzano" since 1972

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Category:German-language media in the province of Bolzano|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 18:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)since 1972[reply]

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 18:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your favorite topic has come up again at Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names)#Meran.2FMerano. Really, both sides of the ethnic divide should be heard from, so your comments will be welcome. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 03:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually none of the ethnic divide should be heard from. English uses Merano on maps, encyclopedias, etc.. and therefore, that is what should be used. Enough with the German nazionalism on here. Icsunonove (talk) 10:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is stuff like this childish garbage that makes me tired of contributing on here Archaic names. I'm having much more fun working on my cars, engineering research, etc. Supparluca, rolling around in the mud with such people is a waste of our lives. :) Icsunonove (talk) 10:30, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Barcellona. Since you had some involvement with the Barcellona redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 01:45, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Alto Adige has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Diabetology Ltd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diabetology Ltd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diabetology Ltd until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:48, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]