User talk:Viewmont Viking

Hello Viewmont Viking, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. McDoobAU93 23:30, 10 June 2012

Reverting of my James Burke amendment - the story of Burke copying his classmate is true! I am the son of the classmate! So I heard it straight from the horse's mouth, why is it reverted? Dirk Wickenden (talk) 13:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You failed to provide a reliable source. Canterbury Tail talk 13:39, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the reliable source? Dirk Wickenden (talk) 14:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No you are not, and neither is your parent. Fails Wp:RS. Canterbury Tail talk 14:32, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been given all the information you need on your talk page. By continuing to claim that you either do not know what you are doing, do not understand, and continue to argue with well established editors, you are causing a disruption to Wikipedia. If you choose to be, as you say a martyr, we are not stopping you. You can choose not to edit Wikipedia, or you can choose to review what has been shared with you learn from it and start anew following the guidelines established.--VViking_TalkEdits 14:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Viewmont Viking, that is a harsh response to a very new editor. Don't be bitey, established editors should instruct editors unfamiliar with Wikipedia's many guidelines, not drive them away from the project so they now have a bad attitude about Wikipedia and its editors. We were all new once. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:43, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liz I appreciate the work you do with Wikipedia. I can see how people could view this edit as harsh/bitey. I am not going to "make excuses" for this edit, only to say that I could have written it differently and in a less bitey way, but I stand by the premise of the message. I will try to be less bitey in the future.--VViking_TalkEdits 13:38, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but you have been reverted by HazzelDazzleDoDah. At no point did I admit to anything being incorrect. That is just wrong. Sorry. We are slogging it out on the user's talk page. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 15:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what I said is it? I said you didn't know it to be correct, which is what you did say... HazzelDazzleDoDah (talk) 15:27, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be real, at this point the stupid I'm having to deal with from numerous angles is getting tiring and I have far more important things to do. Enjoy the rest of your day. HazzelDazzleDoDah (talk) 15:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It adds that you can hear the person talk, argue, and explain. It adds to the profile by delineating the career and specific scholarly approach of the scholar. Just like the entry on German philosopher Jürgen Habermas has links to two youtube interviews he gave; or the one on French sociologist and philosopher Michael Foucault has a link to the Foucault Audio Archive of the University of California, Berkeley. I could continue this ad libitum. Psychedilly Circus (talk) 18:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]