User talk:Viplovecomm

Welcome!

Hello, Viplovecomm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 07:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Knv library requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 07:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I noticed your edits on Lok Samvad. Welcome to wikipedia. Also, are you intrested in working with Hindi Wikipedia? That is a wiki that is relatively underdeveloped. For example the CPI(M) article doesn't contain very much. --Soman 09:59, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Asad zaidi, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://pratilipi.in/asad-zaidi. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Safdar.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.jananatyamanch.org/node/25. As a copyright violation, File:Safdar.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Safdar.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Safdar.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Safdar.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Safdar.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 14:42, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Stalin2009.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from a portrait (not "own work"). As a copyright violation, File:Stalin2009.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Stalin2009.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Stalin2009.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Stalin2009.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Stalin2009.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 14:52, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Asad-zaidi.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://bp1.blogger.com/_Iosr5cTHRWY/SHyYM4RAeRI/AAAAAAAAAIw/AssY7xDprSo/s1600-h/Asad.jpg from http://vatsanurag.blogspot.com/2008/07/3.html. As a copyright violation, File:Asad-zaidi.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Asad-zaidi.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Asad-zaidi.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Asad-zaidi.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Asad-zaidi.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 14:52, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Asad Zaidi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:AUTHOR, search reveals only trivial mentions

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hekerui (talk) 15:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brindaji004121.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 15:39, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you stated that the image was taken by someone other than you, so please ask Debjani Basu to send an email from an address associated with him/her to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating his/her ownership of the material and his/her intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. Hekerui (talk) 18:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you reupload the same image? Hekerui (talk) 17:50, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You said you emailed the original author to send in a permission, so I added {{OTRS pending}} to the image file. Please make sure that the original author adds a link to File:Brinda debjani.jpg to his/her email, so the OTRS volunteer can find the image. Best Hekerui (talk) 16:23, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Wikipedia has its servers located in America and therefore the Wikimedia foundation holds that images that are uploaded to Wikipedia without permission of a free license from the original author (photographer, painter, etc.) need to be public domain in America. Images in a book published in India before 1950 may be public domain in India according to the Indian copyright act, but the images have to be public domain in America as well, which would be the case if the author/the authors of the images would be dead for 70 years (as you correctly said) or if the book was published before 1923 (or before 1936, because India signed the Uruguay Round Agreements Act in 1996). If you can provide evidence that the images are free in America, then you can upload them to Wikipedia. If you can provide evidence that they are free both in America and India then they can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, which serves as image repository for all Wikimedia projects. Regards Hekerui (talk) 16:19, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Communist Party of India (Marxist), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Please make sure edit summary explains the edits made. Valid reasons should be provided for removing well sourced content from the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deshabhakta (talk • contribs) 19:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Viplovecomm, this is regarding your recent edits in the Nandigram Conflict section. This content is not sourced from a reliable source. It should be deleted immediately for the same reason. Plus, Its an unnecessarily lengthy commentary. Let me know if you have objection to the removal of this content diff from unreliable sources. Also, you have removed the following well sourced content from the article. This needs to be reinstated.

In 2008, before the Gram Panchayat elections, the armed militia of the party Harmath snatched away the voter identification cards of people in Nandigram. The Times Of India reported that at least 10 to 15 people were admitted in local hospital in critically injured condition.^[1]

--Deshabhakta (talk) 19:33, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know your edits to this are completely unacceptable. Any more edits of this attitude will not be tolerated. I would prefer not to have anyone banned over this but it may be necessary. Please discuss on its talk page. Mr. R00t ^{Leave me a Message} 02:55, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do note that User:1234r00t is not an administrator of Wikipedia, and his/her statements on who should be banned or blocked is his/her personal opinion. --Soman (talk) 20:22, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Communist Party of India (Marxist), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Multiple warnings have already been given but still you are continuing with the vandalistic edits on this article. --Deshabhakta (talk) 18:03, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-- On what behalf you are issuing me these warnings. YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO STOP ME in IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF WIKIPEDIA. By the way you have violated the wikipedia's policy by pushing forwards the BIASED ACTS OF VANDALISM. Ive RESEARCHED the "HARMATH", which you continously pushing forward from 5-6 months continously(every time some user edits that you reverted back your edits, "3R" violation), You have already recieved many warnings of 3R's. Further This Harmath is a propaganda word used by the opposition party leaders like "Mamta Banerjee". General Consensus was against Harmath. Me, NithinJ, and Soman were against it, By the way, we three are the active editors of that article, We have a command over the political issues of India. This warning is unacceptable. -Viplovecomm (talk) 14:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: CPIM. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mr. R00t ^{Leave me a Message} 23:20, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-- Hi Mr. Root, plz. quote the words, in which i've attacked any fellow editor. I just want to improve the quality of articles, why should i attack someone personally. Plz. in this way by sending warning on the things which i've really not committed, you are harrasing me. AND STOPPING ME, from using mine EDITORIAL RIGHTS, which wikipedia has given to all its users to ensure the quality of content. PLZ. STOP POSTING SUCH mails, I am going to complain in the arbitrary committee...

regards.

-Viplovecomm (talk) 04:51, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, an OTRS permission takes a long time to process, because they have a long backlog. Sometimes up to a month. You wrote you had Debjani send an OTRS mail. Everything will be good if she is the copyright holder and the photo is a work for hire. If she is not then the photographer OK is needed. We will find out as soon as the OTRS is processed. But as I said, this can take a while. If nothing has happened by the middle of June I'll ask someone to check. Best Hekerui (talk) 21:55, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks, Yes for sure she is the photographer... Viplovecomm (talk) 13:40, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Viplovecomm. You have new messages at Talk:Communist Party of India (Marxist).
Message added 19:12, 5 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mr. R00t ^{Leave me a Message} 19:12, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Viplovecomm. You have new messages at Deshabhakta's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Deshabhakta (talk) 17:40, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Viplovecomm. You have new messages at Soman's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Soman (talk) 13:57, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I have noticed that you are making personal attacks against me on talk pages. The attacks include use of words like "hooliganism by me". Also, you are expressing intentions to get me somehow blocked from Wikipedia. All this is clearly in violation of Wiki etiquette. I am hereby asking such personal attacks not to be repeated.

Further, your vandalistic edits on CPI(M) article continue despite having been given several warnings from more than one editors. Please agree to Wikipedia policies and standards so that we can have better articles on Wiki.

--Deshabhakta (talk) 18:22, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've no intentions in making personal attacks on you, and neither I did so on CPIM discussion page. I've problem with your edits and nothing else.
You've said i've recieved warnings from more then one editor! WHAT ABOUT YOU? Majority of users on CPIM article is against your edits, the CONSENSUS AGAINST HARMATH started by me is gaining support and with each passing day more and more editors are expressing their opinion against your BIASED EDITS.
AGAIN I WANT TO CLARIFY I'VE SAID NOTHING AGAINST YOU, BUT YOUR BIASED EDITS. This is the right given to me by the WIKIPEDIA.
-regards. -Viplovecomm (talk) 19:28, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have a feeling that you may have a conflict of interest in writing about the Harmath Conflict. Please read WP:COI before continuing to edit the page. Mr. R00t ^Talk 19:29, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

EDITS BY DESHBHAKTA are a FINE example of COI violation. He has already gave evidences that he belongs to "RIGHT WING IDEOLOGY", and his continous push to HARMATH seems a clear violation of COI. More In GENERAL CONSENSUS AGAINST HARMATH on CPIM talk page, it is clear that deshbhakta is on the wrong side.
Every time either he "Accuses me of doing Copyright violation", and someday you come up with "more new concepts", It is though not a healthy practice to blame a editor every time.
I've not violated COI in any way.
regards. -Viplovecomm (talk) 19:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Harmath should be included in the article. Mr. R00t ^Talk 19:39, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Harmath is supposed to be push forwaded by RIGHT WING BIASEDNESS. General Majority of Editors is against it. From this time with an immediate effect this term is refrained from inserting in CPIM ARTICLE.

-Viplovecomm (talk) 19:51, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:CENSOR and my comment on the talk page. Also, the fact that you are suppressing information leads me to believe that you are pushing an agenda. It may be different than Deshabhakta's but it is still an agenda. Mr. R00t ^Talk 19:55, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-I am supressing nothing, neither censoring. Instead the MAJORITY OF EDITORS wants to REFRAIN USERS FROM PUSHING AN AGENDA BASED ON INCREDIBLE CLAIMS. Indeed his claims on Harmath doesnot well supported by much more references, and he was exaggerating the things.
Many of our editors are against HARMATH, ARE THESE ALL EDITORS WRONG?

Hi. Although I completely agree with regarding Kkm's edits in the Indian parties template, it is not constructive to use the term 'vandalism' when describing differences of opinion. --Soman (talk) 20:23, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-Thanks soman, but what I can use instead of "Vandalism", a better word. Plz. suggest. However his edits were against official ECI status, doesnot it counts as vandalism?
regards
-Viplovecomm (talk) 20:30, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One could have said "unconstructive edits". But in fact, you stated your opinion why you reverted in the edit summary, so then 'vandalism' could simply have been left out and not replaced with any other word.

Also, it is not absolutely necessary that wikipedia follows the exact same classifications as ECI. I think we should use the ECI classifications, but it is our own choice to do so. I was in a lengthy conflict with another editor at Popular Socialist Party (Mexico) some time back, whom claimed that the word 'party' could not be used since the Mexican Election Commission had not recognized it as a party. That was a situation when official registration didn't match reality, obviously PPS is a political party and functions as such. --Soman (talk) 20:45, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-Ok I will, but that edit by kkm gave a feeling that he wants to give some extra pound of fame to NJP and INC. Thats why it was necessary to maintain an equal balanced order for every party.
Citinzendium is better in terms of editorial expression. But I feel the unrestrained order of wikipedia is the secret behind its popularity.
Deng xio Peng, once said "With an open window it is obvious that mosquitoes will come inside along with the fresh air." Now its our duty to filter the fresh air, and remove the MALARIA.

-Warm Regards
-Viplovecomm (talk) 20:57, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my name is Ronk01, I have noticed that several of your talk page posts could constitute personal attacks. I have also noticed several NOPV breaches. I would ask that you avoid such behavior in the future. Thank you, Ronk01 talk, 19:43, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Viplovecomm. You have new messages at Ronk01's talk page.
Message added 03:59, 5 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

A tag has been placed on List of news agencies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud (talk) 19:09, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Pravda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabloid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your contributions to Pravda. In this edit, does the two ibids refer to "White D James, The first Pravda and the Russian Marxist Tradition, Soviet Studies, Vol. 26, No. 2 (Apr., 1974), pp. 181-204"? The use of ibid. is discouraged, as these may become broken as new references are added (WP:IBID). jonkerz ♠talk 15:34, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it refers to that citation only. So from next time i will use op.cit for repeated citations. -Viplovecomm (talk) 17:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I found two more and changed them to the previously cited work, "Elwood Carter Ralph, Lenin and Pravda, 1912-1914, Slavic Review, Vol. 31, No. 2". jonkerz ♠talk 17:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pravda you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Pravda for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Tea with toast (話) 19:34, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Jat People". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 2 June 2013. 

The request for formal mediation concerning Jat People, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. 

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]