Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Stub sorting

Before proposing or creating a new type of stub, please read How to propose a new stub type.

For discussion about creation of stub types or the hierarchy of stub categories, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals.

This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Stub sorting This page is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting

This WikiProject was featured on the WikiProject report at the Signpost on 13 February 2012.

NOTE: This page is not a forum to suggest the creation of articles. If you wish to create an article on any subject, go to Wikipedia:Articles for creation and follow the instructions there.

Archives

Discoveries page talk archive 2005–Feb 2011 Proposals page talk archive 2005 Proposals page talk archive 2006 Proposals page talk archive 2007–Jun 2008 Proposals page talk archive Jul–Dec 2008 Proposals page talk archive 2009–Feb 2011

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

I recently proposed Amphisbaenidae stubs as a category and {{Amphisbaenidae-stub}} and category: Amphisbaenidae stubs were created. Having applied the template to stub articles under category:Amphisbaenidae, I have discovered that the category tree (like my own notions about lizard classification) is out of step with the latest accepted taxonomy. What was really required was {{Amphisbaenia-stub}} and category: Amphisbaenia stubs, as clade Amphisbaenia is the taxon which now holds the families formerly included in Amphisbaenidae. Would it be in order to create the required new template and category and redirect {{Amphisbaenidae-stub}} and category: Amphisbaenidae stubs? There was already a redirect from {{Amphisbaenian-stub}}, but I'm not convinced that would the right name, because the article is called "Amphisbaenia", not "Amphisbaenian". William Avery (talk) 17:38, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of any objections I will go ahead with the actions outlined above shortly. William Avery (talk) 14:05, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Template talk:Palestine-stub#Requested move 20 March 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 16:13, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi folks - I have all the various sub-sections of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Stub_types on my watchlist, and I haven't noticed anyone updating those lists with the astounding number of newly created stub templates & cats. I'd greatly appreciate it if, when you create a template and/or cat, you would please update those lists - I'm just about keeping up with my various wiki jobs as it is. Thanks!! Her Pegship (?) 17:59, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If a stub-template is renamed (not merged or changed scope), is it sufficient to leave a redirect at the old template name, or should existing uses be replaced with the new name? DMacks (talk) 21:52, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that WP:NOTBROKEN applies - template transclusion via redirect works perfectly well. Many of our commonly-used templates - such as {{asbox}}, {{cn}} and indeed {{tl}} itself - are more commonly used in this way rather than the unredirected form. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:45, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds fine, thanks. DMacks (talk) 10:23, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]