User talk:ForgottenScot

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

Many issues. First, there's a high copyright violation with this site [1], although it's predominantly due to the references. But, as importantly, the article's unreadable in its current state, even if it met the criteria for inclusion. Have a close look at any similar article, e.g. this Scottish clan, and you'll get a good idea of how it needs to be written, structured, organised and referenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Irvings of Bonshaw and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Irvings of Bonshaw, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 23:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! ForgottenScot, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KJP1 (talk) 23:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Clan Irvine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Primefac (talk) 12:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ForgottenScot (talk) 14:52, 27 February 2018 (UTC) Thank you Primefac for your comment which is appreciated. I think this needs to go to dispute resolution immediately. Thank you. Forgotten Scot.[reply]

ForgottenScot (talk) 14:52, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]