User talk:SafariScribe

SafariScribe is currently experiencing significant stress that may affect their ability to work on Wikipedia. They may choose to work in quieter areas and avoid complicated tasks or areas prone to conflict. They may also respond to talk page or email messages more slowly than usual, and your patience is greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11

January - February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May - June 2024 User talk:SafariScribe/Archive 5 User talk:SafariScribe/Archive 6 User talk:SafariScribe/Archive 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

6 November 2024
From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation shares ANI lawsuit updates; first admin elections appoint eleven sysops; first admin recalls opened; temporary accounts coming soon? In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship Gallery: Why you should take more photos and upload them In focus: Questions and answers about the court case Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats? Technology report: Wikimedia tech, the Asian News International case, and the ultra-rare BLACKLOCK Humour: Man quietly slinks away from talk page argument after realizing his argument dumb, wrong
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

The world was created for all.

No one is perfect even AI's do mis fault. Stay cool, just alert me and I will see it off!

— SafariScribe

If you are here just to castigated me (I know there shouldn't be "d", so it's a mistake; fix it yourself), please don't come here. Find anywhere in your talk page, then ping me for opinion. Welcome to my talk page, and ask questions as you will answer when it's thrown to you. I have no other account and have never edited for any payment whatsoever.

A month ago we talked about an article I wrote. I am a paid contributor. I'm trying to follow all the guidelines and you helped me with that. I added some part to make it more impartial, talking about criticism. This article has already been previously approved by @Qcne. Can you check and see if you can exit drafts again?

Hello. Thanks for suggestions. I want to clarify that I am not related to company. I have used Anime News Network as source mutiple times because it is considered a reliable entertainment website in anime community and is used in multiple articles as sources. Additionaly, I fixed references by adding additional third party as well as sources from company itself. Request to recheck the article if it can be submitted now. Thank You. Coolduckbird (talk) 07:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We dont need citations to the film, we want sources that tells us about the film and how it was produced including the works of the producing company. Here the studio enters. I hope you do understood? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article I made is about the films and tv series made by The Answer Studio. Detailed information of the films as wiki pages are not yet available because not enough articles are made since they are not very famous and most of them are catered towards kids. Although Imdb pages are availabe but it is not a reliable source. I think they are notable enough because they have significant coverage,WP:NEXIST. When other animation studios like Wit Studio started, initially they had just Attack on Titan, but it was notable enough to be made an article of the company. Thank you. Coolduckbird (talk) 11:13, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestions, I have improved the draft. Coolduckbird (talk) 05:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @SafariScribe, could you plz check if the draft is better now? Coolduckbird (talk) 08:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SafariScribe, I'd left a message here a while ago about a request I made of the Brian Chesky article. I was wondering if you had any thoughts on my response to what you had implemented. If you are curious, The Verge also wrote about it. Cheers PY Airbnb (talk) 14:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I was looking for a better source. Please request again, and ping me, and I would be ready to help. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:34, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You rejected my article submission, asking if it was a bio or a company overview, and that's a good question. I think it may be stronger as a company overview, since Boles Aero Manufacturing is one of a handful of mid century trailer manufacturers that still enjoy popularity as collectors items and it would be useful to have a history of the company on Wikipedia. I will rewrite it as such. F18shack (talk) 03:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
103		Lisuride (talk)	Add sources
3		Dutch Cup (ice hockey) (talk)	Add sources
1,002		Vacuum tube (talk)	Add sources
110		Cold cathode (talk)	Add sources
4		Freight rail transport in Turkey (talk)	Add sources
95		Electron-beam welding (talk)	Add sources
22		Geology of England (talk)	Cleanup
392		Hemant Kumar (talk)	Cleanup
131		Charge carrier (talk)	Cleanup
2,860		Trazodone (talk)	Expand
172		Turkish State Railways (talk)	Expand
118		High-speed rail in Turkey (talk)	Expand
41		Thermionic converter (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
33		Chile–Peru relations (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
615		War of the Pacific (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
87		Yüksek Hızlı Tren (talk)	Merge
16		Trained band (talk)	Merge
4		Chabula acamasalis (talk)	Merge
5		NA-29 Peshawar-II (talk)	Wikify
168		Culture of Albania (talk)	Wikify
29		Willard Burleson (talk)	Wikify
17		Jonas Bergquist (talk)	Orphan
9		Sajdaa (talk)	Orphan
3		Spinterface (talk)	Orphan
7		Eindhoven Kemphanen (talk)	Stub
15		Gebze railway station (talk)	Stub
14		7,N,N-TMT (talk)	Stub
14		Oxypertine (talk)	Stub
4		Bill Wensink (talk)	Stub
5		Eaters Limburg (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See here

• https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kupffer

--92.77.57.1 (talk) 14:34, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a reason my dear. The different versions of Wikipedia, eg German, French, English have different policies guiding notability, and research have, not sure but likely, researched that English Wikipedia has more strict rules than others. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you can think what you want, but i think it's correct. --92.77.57.1 (talk) 14:38, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @SafariScribe,

I have seen you have recently accepted a draft from AfC, now located at The Shulgin Index, Volume One: Psychedelic Phenethylamines and Related Compounds. Isn't it better if we move it to The Shulgin Index: Volume One, or just The Shulgin Index? I believe it is too long and can be moved. If you have no objection, I am ready to move it.

Thanks ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

While analyzing the sources, I noticed that you accepted this draft within about six minutes of its creation. Do you have access to The Telegraph? Did you observe that the subject is also the article’s author? Personally, I would have declined it and requested additional references. Please be mindful of your Schumacher's level velocity, as it may not be beneficial to the project. Regards. Hitro talk 19:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There was a tag in the article that indicates the need for sources. Draftifying it appears to be a problem since you could have waited for some hours or even days. Before you start coming here, please did you search for sources, like a WP:BEFORE; because I see WP:SIGCOV. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:43, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Mary Robertson. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hitro talk 21:21, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Mary Robertson. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and I believe UPE issue is here. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hitro talk 00:20, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please I have no COI or UPE. Thanks. @HitroMilanese, why did you draftify an article twice? @Asilvering please intervene. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry @SafariScribe, I didn't get your ping here for some reason. I have reminded Hitro that this is an out-of-process redraftification and should be reversed. -- asilvering (talk) 00:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SafariScribe, this is absolutely wonderful work and feedback! Thank you so much for your work to make Wikipedia what it is today. The wikipedia community is proud to have you!

I have corrected all of your suggestions. It just so happens I was logged in when you left your comment - so I was able to get editing straight away.

Kind regards,

W

Qetuadgjzcbm (talk) 13:55, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SafariScribe, sorry to bother you, but I just wanted to ask, is YouTube a reliable source? Because I see it all over articles (especially music-related ones), and there's a whole template for it and everything. I also observed that for my King of Love article, the citation for Instagram was removed. I guess I kind of see why but I was just curious and wanted to double-check if YouTube was reliable. Cheers! OsigbemheEJB (talk) 03:17, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check WP:RSPYT. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SafariScribe. Do you have time to review an edit request I posted on the Creative Planning Talk page? You helped me with my previous request about updating the infobox so I thought you might be interested in the topic. No worries if you're busy, though! CreativePlanningAngela (talk) 14:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for not responding on time. Vanderwaaalforces seems to have....done the needful. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:52, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Vanderwaalforces was very helpful. Genuinely appreciate the assistance I've received so far from Wikipedia editors. CreativePlanningAngela (talk) 18:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for loving Wikipedia and her editors; don't forget you're one by all virtue. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:31, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SafariScribe, could you please point out the external link issue on the Kraków Gate in Lublin page? I browsed the guidelines again, and nothing is clicking. There is one external link on the page, in the references, and it is a reliable source, I think, for the heritage designation alone. That is all it is used for currently. Please respond if it is convenient, and thanks for your help with the page. OldPolandUpdates (talk) 14:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't tag anything, please check the log. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I checked the history and an external links template was added here [1] by SafariScribe possibly in error I have removed it. Theroadislong (talk) 15:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry @OldPolandUpdates, that should have been "uncategorized" tag. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I recently have made a AfC submission that you recently declined- you left a reason that the school is not notable. I have heavily revamped and found references and added them to the text- Do you have any comment on what specifically needs to be added to the article and also what you think of what I recently added? Thanks, ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 _{join in on the tea talk} 18:11, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I don't have, thanks. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 _{join in on the tea talk} 15:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pietro Sfair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lebanese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the consensus was to restore Kingdom of Albania (medieval), not make it the primary topic over the Zogist state. Srnec (talk) 21:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done thanks! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:37, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SafariScribe, I have corrected the article according to your recommendations that we wrote about in the message, please check it if it is correct now. As I wrote earlier, I have written permission from the author of the website to use information from the website that I use as a reliable source. Please check, I hope that with your help the project will be accepted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Willfried_Segebrecht Best regards Grzegorz Gordonwg (talk) 09:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SafariScribe, please check my article, I have improved it according to your recommendations. Gordonwg (talk) 03:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
716		Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami (talk)	Add sources
39		Raul Manglapus (talk)	Add sources
110		Al-Badr (East Pakistan) (talk)	Add sources
162		Ghulam Azam (talk)	Add sources
21		2013 Bangladesh anti-Hindu violence (talk)	Add sources
5		St Nicolas Church, Pevensey (talk)	Add sources
46		Ateneo de Naga University (talk)	Cleanup
298		Ateneo de Manila University (talk)	Cleanup
50		Emotional prosody (talk)	Cleanup
134		International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh) (talk)	Expand
43		Újpest (talk)	Expand
20		Hajógyári Island (talk)	Expand
155		Soundscape (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
19		Ateneo de Iloilo (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
19		National Theatre (Budapest) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
48		Certified teacher (talk)	Merge
566		Chaldean Catholic Church (talk)	Merge
10		Searchlight (album) (talk)	Merge
86		Speech perception (talk)	Wikify
165		Sound localization (talk)	Wikify
47		Ferencváros (talk)	Wikify
8		Les inqualifiables (talk)	Orphan
6		Louis Carreon (talk)	Orphan
3		Mohamed Chrif Tribak (talk)	Orphan
10		Shahid (Algeria) (talk)	Stub
44		Kwassa kwassa (talk)	Stub
6		Abdul Khaleque Mondal (talk)	Stub
31		Mohammad Tajul Islam (talk)	Stub
3		Rose Shahfa (talk)	Stub
29		Daily Naya Diganta (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yo, earlier today you declined the submission of my article Draft: Beadle Family Massacre (1782) on the grounds of "references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published" I would like to ask you for some assistance on improving my article. Bdblakley29 (talk) 15:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read HELP:YFA. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you SO much, Safari Scribe, for reviewing my first article: Amikam Toren. I really appreciate you taking the time to do this. Also thank you for cleaning up - and improving - some of the text, and the technical edits you did. It's so great that experienced user's, like yourself, are helping beginners, like me. All the very best x 2025Newbie (talk) 11:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy too. Thanks. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I need some advise on the following page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Urban_Diary_(Hong_Kong)

which is a translation of the Wiki_zh page: https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-hk/%E5%9F%8E%E5%B8%82%E6%97%A5%E8%A8%98

It has been declined twice for citation issue, but I have checked the sources and they are from well known news sources and official (government) sources. I wonder what is wrong with them. Thank you. Arutoria (talk) 12:25, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia (s) of every language varies by their policy, e.t.c. That an article was accepted in its Chinese version doesn't mean it would, in English. YouTube is not a reliable source, and seeing your draft, it doesn't appear to meet WP:NORG. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:47, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted.

What a shame. I was planning to bring some niche pages from ZH to EN.

Looks like the plan is on hold now. Arutoria (talk) 14:17, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, if there are good articles that meets WP:GNG, you can easily translate them from any language to here. Don't be discouraged my dear. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:04, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SafariScribe, I hope you are having a great day. I recently submitted an article for publication and wanted to follow up. I had been advised by Memer15151 that using the company website as a source was appropriate, and they confirmed that it would be considered reliable. However, I the article isn't published. Could you kindly advise me on the best course of action moving forward? Thank you for your time and assistance. Bluebox57 (talk) 15:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please link the draft. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Opera Orlando - Wikipedia Bluebox57 (talk) 21:37, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CNMall41's comment needs to be addressed, and it says: At the moment, the majority of the content in the draft is not supported by a reliable source. The information needs to be removed or sourced. See WP:INCITE which will also assist. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:01, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you notice the PD-notice for the Federal Register references? I am aware of Wiki's copyright rules, but the Federal Register is public domain as notated and available for publishing its Wikipedia article.

From Federal Register site. "§ 2.6 Unrestricted use. Any person may reproduce or republish, without restriction, any material appearing in any regular or special edition of the Federal Register." Fb2002 (talk) 22:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please link the draft. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, as a new author who seemingly took on a bigger challenge than expected in drafting a living person’s bio, I would appreciate your advice.

What can I do to get this draft bio of Mary Beth Goodman ready for publication? You recently rejected it and in response I asked questions on the draft’s talk page about alternative sources and why the existing sources are insufficient. Perhaps you can give me more detailed feedback?

The person being profiled has mostly been a diplomat or civil servant so the sources to substantiate her bio are not diverse: they are government sources or other organizations citing the government ones—but it seems editors don’t find those credible. I don’t know how to proceed.

Your help is appreciated. 🙏 Lfdigests (talk) 20:58, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will look over, and get back to you. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear SafariScribe: although you are an experienced wiki-editor, you misunderstand what constitutes reliable sources. The bibliography article about South African singer Orville Peck comprises citations from the most reliable databases: Scopus, EBSCO and ProQuest. I respectfully ask you to rescind your denial, and approve the bibliography article about Orville Peck. Please note, that there is a separate article about this singer Orville Peck. The criteria for approving Bibliographic articles are different from the criteria for regular articles. PLease see another biblio article, that I worked on before: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Mearsheimer_bibliography . This should give you an example how bibliographic articles are different from regular articles. If you think, that "articles about" -unlike 'articles by"- do not belong to biblio-articles, you need to specify the exact wiki-policy, that state this. As far as I can see, you were wrong in making this distinction. If you understand my arguments, please approve my biblio-article about this amazing South African singer. Walter Tau (talk) 23:00, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Walter Tau, and welcome to my talk page. Unfortunately, I regret to say, "I am not going to accept that draft". Why? Its still a big mess, and most of the contents there aren't verifiable or would likely make a reader interested. To crown it all, another prominent editor has dropped a very important aspect of Wikipedia's "do not", where your draft applies. It is "Wikipedia is not a directory and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. If people want to know about him or works written about him, they can still browse those sources you've provided there. Thanks for your hardwork though. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am very surprised that it was flagged for not worthy of a Wikipedia article when it's a very high profile case in Australia. My links prove that it was covered extensively in the Melbourne News. So I'm very surprised that was flagged. And considering I just reported on the murder of a teenage girl 30 years ago, I am surprised that it could be flagged as not neutral. A website that has long articles about silly memes for this to be flagged as not credible enough seems very surprising and hurtful. And I think I deserve a second chance before I change it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Prue_Bird_Disappearance 365scarlet (talk) 12:47, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and welcome. Try reading HELP:YFA. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate the quick review! The academic notability source was exactly what I needed, I'm sorry I didn't find it first. Still learning the ropes here, so I appreciate the clear guidance. I'll dig around a bit more to see if there's enough independent coverage to meet the requirements, and if not, try my hand somewhere else. Any other advice is welcome. Grepless (talk) 19:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Please try reading very very well, WP:NACADEMIC. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but his was a bad mainspace move. He does not meet GNG. GiantSnowman 19:22, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Thank you. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Postcinematicbodies (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Trust (German organization) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Draft article declined: This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article.

I noticed a key link broken so I updated - covers the organization in a paragraph and footnote. Also added award.

There several interviews (both primary and secondary) that mention the organization in several paragraphs. I saw on another article: "interviews are not inherently unreliable and can present a mix of independent secondary coverage and own statements, and all statements are verifiable consistent with WP:V and WP:RS"

Curious your thoughts on which sources are needed.

Had used wiki article as a guide for sourcing and can't tell how the sources are substantially different: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emily_Segal

Thank you very much. Postcinematicbodies (talk) 04:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and welcome to Wikipedia. Sources should be reliable and may include newspapers and magazines (notable national and international), peer reviewed journals, e.t.c. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:44, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you!

I fixed a broken link to a peer review journal that covers the organization in a paragraph and a footnote and added a link to an award I found. I'm curious if this would help with the notability issues and I should resubmit or if I should continue collecting references?

In terms of in depth coverage - there's one peer reviewed journal, a leading digital arts magazine and a leading European fashion magazine in addition to a government award. Postcinematicbodies (talk) 15:56, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accpeting Draft:Jorge Kurchan? What were you thinking? Fram (talk) 08:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! You've draftified it. There is no problem. Thank you for this type of correction; it helps me alot. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:32, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is a problem, in that you are still making such basic errors. Fram (talk) 10:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SafariScribe -- I've declined this as test edits are permitted or even encouraged in userspace; G2 explicitly does not apply to this space. More generally, using speedy with "unspecified reason" is usually not the correct move; if it doesn't fit into one of the established categories then speedy is generally not appropriate. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 17:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, can you explain your reasoning for declining this one as not meeting WP:NPROF? I wouldn't say I'm 100% confident it can't be deleted at AfD, but he certainly meets my "good enough for AfD to have a go at it" bar. -- asilvering (talk) 21:02, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Facbgc (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Hugh Owen Medal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for your time and comments on my Draft:Hugh_Owen_Medal article. I wanted to better understand the issues with reliability of sources for this national research medal. I have attempted to identify appropriate secondary sources, as it will largely be university/institutional news releases that will independently announce the annual award winners (alongside the Learned Society of Wales' own announcements). Would these not count as quality/reliable/independent secondary sources? I have also attempted to identify other independent sources, such as the British Educational Research Association, as well as from Senedd Cymru, the Welsh Parliament (national legislature).

(I have also just updated the draft article with 2024 Medal winner, as well as some general tidying)

Facbgc (talk) 11:44, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Facbgc, you're doing great with the writing, however the draft doesn't meet WP:NAWARDS. The sources were a bit funny and from a look, they don't meet WP:SIGCOV. Source 1 is verifiable especially with giving information about the award, but because it is a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE, we couldn't use it to determine notability. The bbc article was all about "Dillwyn Medal", and fails to verify anything to where it was used as a source. The article from 'bera.ac.uk' is likely a paid publication, otherwise advert. Without leaning much on above, the YouTube links should be removed as they aren't reliable. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:26, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SafariScribe.

Thank you for reviewing my page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Register.BG

Unfortunately I did not understand why exactly the publication was denied. I would like to ask for help publishing my article about "Register.BG". Can you please share your opinion what we can do to have this page published? The company "Register.BG" is popular in Bulgaria and it is the top level domain registry in the country. The company has its roots from the late 1980s and it has a rich history in contribution of the development the internet society. I added all possible references that I found online, however the page publication was denied. Some of the sources are very credible including the ones from ICANN - which is a well known non-profit organization selected by the US government to manage and develop the internet zone. Can you please give me an advice what else i can do to have this page accepted.

Kind Regards! Nick Nickpetersen2023 (talk) 15:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]