Collins v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co.
 | This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. (May 2024) |
| Collins v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co. | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued April 27–28, 1938 Decided May 31, 1938 | |
| Full case name | Collins v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co. |
| Citations | 304 U.S. 518 (more) 58 S. Ct. 1009; 82 L. Ed. 1502; 1938 U.S. LEXIS 1030 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | 20 F. Supp. 1009 (N.D. Cal. 1937) |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Reed |
| Cardozo took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Collins v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co., 304 U.S. 518 (1938), is a court case in which the appellee, the Yosemite Park and Curry Co., brought this suit to enjoin the California State Board of Equalization and the State Attorney General from enforcing the 'Alcoholic Beverage Control Act' of the State of California, within the limits of Yosemite National Park.
Supreme Court involvement
[edit]The court distinguished between the State's power under the Twenty-first Amendment to regulate the importation of liquor to the state, and its "territorial jurisdiction" over a federal enclave like the park.
The court held that the sections of a California statute which levied excises on sales of liquor in Yosemite National Park were enforceable in the Park, while sections of the same statute providing regulation of the Park liquor traffic through licenses were unenforceable.
See also
[edit]External links
[edit]
Works related to Collins v. Yosemite Park & Curry Company at Wikisource- Text of Collins v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co., 304 U.S. 518 (1938) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress OpenJurist Oklahoma State Courts
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |