Cycle count

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Cycle count" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (September 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article's lead section may be too long. Please read the length guidelines and help move details into the article's body. (December 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

A cycle count is a perpetual inventory auditing procedure, where you follow a regularly repeated sequence of checks on a subset of inventory. Cycle counts contrast with traditional physical inventory in that a traditional physical inventory ceases operations at a facility while all items are counted. Cycle counts are less disruptive to daily operations, provide an ongoing measure of inventory accuracy and procedure execution, and can be tailored to focus on items with higher value, higher movement volume, or that are critical to business processes. Although some say that cycle counting should only be performed in facilities with a high degree of inventory accuracy (greater than 95%), cycle counting is a means of achieving and sustaining high degrees of accuracy. Cycle counting can be used to identify root causes of problems in control processes and then monitor the effectiveness of the actions to eliminate the root causes. In contrast, identifying root causes of inventory errors, agreeing on actions to eliminate them to the point of perfecting control processes is virtually impossible with traditional inventory audit approaches.

Most cycle counting applications use ABC analysis, segregating items into various count frequencies using the Pareto method (see below).

There are several methods of selecting which items to count and with what frequency, and each method has strengths and weaknesses.

The Pareto method, derived from the Pareto principle, is to cycle count inventory by percentage of inventory value. Items with a higher determined value are counted more often, while items that have little movement are seldom counted. This approach is usually based on value which appeals to accountants by minimizing the variance in inventory value. The analysis may also be based on usage from an operational point of view. This is perceived as being more efficient from a supply chain management perspective by concentrating effort on higher volume of use items.^[1] The main shortcoming is that low value items may be ignored and cause an entire assembly line to halt while a minor component is re-ordered.

There are also hybrids of the ABC method. The most common would be to use [cost*usage] and adjusted based on certain criteria that's critical to the organization's performance.

Cycle counting by usage states that items more frequently accessed should be counted more often, irrespective of value. Every time an item is added or removed, there is a risk of introducing inventory variance. Logical inventory zones can be set up to distinguish items depending on how frequently they are touched. This method may be biased against counting higher value inventory or require additional counting to satisfy accounting requirements.

This method conducts inventory checks at key points in the material management process. The inventory is audited at re-order points, when a certain amount is used, or when inventory levels are low.

This method uses statistical process control to audit items with the highest chance of inventory inaccuracy.

Also known as "location based" or "by surface area". Cycle counting that begins from one end of the company to the other. Combing over each rack or shelf, that is assigned per counter. This method may require planning, in which a map of the company is required and counting forms for the recording of stock information that will then need updating to the inventory management system.

The basic process of cycle counting is generate list, audit, review, repeat. It's important to the success of any cycle counting program to have 6S in place prior to beginning.

The implementation of a 6S culture is important.

• Segregate scrap, expired, and, non-conforming materials from good inventory.
• Store items in an orderly matter. Inventory should be properly identified and stacked evenly in the proper location.
• Everything should be clean and without clutter.
• Bulk items have standard pack sizes and WIP quantities are controlled.
• The stored items have limited access. Responsibility of inventory transactions are defined and clearly understood. Develop specialists that are proficient in auditing inventory and finding solutions to inventory errors.
• Conduct and record daily safety observations to ensure auditors are not at risk of injury.

Produce a list of items to audit according to the method best suited for the company.

Verify quantities using trained personnel.

• Define any problems.
• Measure by increasing the regularity of counts for items that may be affected by perceived problem.
• Analyze the data collected from the repeated counts.
• Improve or design a process to bring inventory accuracy into acceptable tolerances.
• Control or verify the performance of the improved process.

To conduct efficient and accurate cycle counts, many organizations use some form of software to implement an inventory control system, which is part of a warehouse management system. These systems may include mobile computers with integrated barcode scanners that allow the operator to automatically identify items, and enter inventory counts via keypad. The software transmits data to a database on a host system which can generate inventory reports.

Based on user defined criteria, the software will select a number of items to count at specific locations for the specified period of time. Ideally, these selections are daily but many companies choose to generate cycle count items weekly.

Many companies perform "mini" physical inventories and call it cycle counts. Instead of using random or system generated part numbers at specific locations to count, they selectively choose specific locations and count everything in those locations. As part of their procedures they rotate throughout the plant with the intention of counting every location a minimum of once each year. This is an effective alternative to true cycle counting where a company may not have the sophistication to utilize cycle counting software.

Cycle counts, like traditional physical inventory counts, can introduce inventory errors if the process is poorly executed. Multiple locations per item, work in process, and lag in paperwork processing can each contribute to errors. This problem can be mitigated with correct cycle count procedures that specify not only the part number to be counted but also the location it should be in. Some experts believe that cycle counting is only effective in companies with a well-defined inventory control procedure and a high degree of inventory accuracy but this has proven not to be true in practice.

Cycle counts should only be conducted by trained and tested personnel to reduce the risks of inventory loss. Physical counts typically count all inventory in a fixed location and later reconcile with the inventory control system. A cycle count may, but not necessarily, start with the inventory control system and reconciles to locations. Its an important distinction when deciding who carries out the audit and how well trained they are. For example, if inventory exists in location A, B, and C and someone physically moves C to D without transaction, the inventory control system will continue to show inventory in A, B, and C. At the time of cycle count, the control system will direct the counter to A, B, and C where they will find C missing. Unless inventory in D, which could be anywhere, is discovered, C runs the risk of being adjusted to 0 and written off. This is why it's important to only use personnel with a proven ability (through testing) to conduct the audits correctly. If the personnel performing the counts is not taken seriously, D may not be picked up unless a physical count is performed so, an operation that relies only on untrained personnel conducting the cycle counts is likely to experience a net loss of inventory.

The goal of cycle counting is to eliminate counting.

• Rossetti, Manuel D.; Collins, Terry; Kurgund, Ravi. "Inventory Cycle Counting - A Review". The Proceedings of the 2001 Industrial Engineering Research Conference. 1: 457–463. Retrieved 10 March 2019.
• Gumrukcu, Seda; Rossetti, Manuel D.; Buyurgan, Nebil (December 2008). "Quantifying the costs of cycle counting in a two-echelon supply chain with multiple items". International Journal of Production Economics. 116 (2): 263–274. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.09.006.
• Wentzel, David E.; Hochberg, Gene A. (16 April 2012). "Reaping the Benefits of Cycle Counting". IndustryWeek. Retrieved 10 March 2019.