Hyperbolic quaternion

In abstract algebra, the algebra of hyperbolic quaternions is a nonassociative algebra over the real numbers with elements of the form

${\displaystyle q=a+bi+cj+dk,\quad a,b,c,d\in \mathbb {R} \!}$

where the squares of i, j, and k are +1 and distinct elements of {i, j, k} multiply with the anti-commutative property.

The four-dimensional algebra of hyperbolic quaternions incorporates some of the features of the older and larger algebra of biquaternions. They both contain subalgebras isomorphic to the split-complex number plane. Furthermore, just as the quaternion algebra H can be viewed as a union of complex planes, so the hyperbolic quaternion algebra is a pencil of planes of split-complex numbers sharing the same real line.

It was Alexander Macfarlane who promoted this concept in the 1890s as his Algebra of Physics, first through the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1891, then through his 1894 book of five Papers in Space Analysis, and in a series of lectures at Lehigh University in 1900.

Like the quaternions, the set of hyperbolic quaternions form a vector space over the real numbers of dimension 4. A linear combination

${\displaystyle q=a+bi+cj+dk}$

is a hyperbolic quaternion when ${\displaystyle a,b,c,}$ and ${\displaystyle d}$ are real numbers and the basis set ${\displaystyle \{1,i,j,k\}}$ has these products:

${\displaystyle ij=k=-ji}$

${\displaystyle jk=i=-kj}$

${\displaystyle ki=j=-ik}$

${\displaystyle i^{2}=j^{2}=k^{2}=+1}$

Using the distributive property, these relations can be used to multiply any two hyperbolic quaternions.

Unlike the ordinary quaternions, the hyperbolic quaternions are not associative. For example, ${\displaystyle (ij)j=kj=-i}$, while ${\displaystyle i(jj)=i}$. In fact, this example shows that the hyperbolic quaternions are not even an alternative algebra.

The first three relations show that products of the (non-real) basis elements are anti-commutative. Although this basis set does not form a group, the set

${\displaystyle \{1,i,j,k,-1,-i,-j,-k\}}$

forms a loop, that is, a quasigroup with an identity element. One also notes that any subplane of the set M of hyperbolic quaternions that contains the real axis forms a plane of split-complex numbers. If

${\displaystyle q^{*}=a-bi-cj-dk}$

is the conjugate of ${\displaystyle q}$, then the product

${\displaystyle q(q^{*})=a^{2}-b^{2}-c^{2}-d^{2}}$

is the quadratic form used in spacetime theory. In fact, for events p and q, the bilinear form

${\displaystyle \eta (p,q)=-p_{0}q_{0}+p_{1}q_{1}+p_{2}q_{2}+p_{3}q_{3}}$

arises as the negative of the real part of the hyperbolic quaternion product pq*, and is used in Minkowski space.

Note that the set of units U = {q : qq* ≠ 0 } is not closed under multiplication. See the references (external link) for details.

The hyperbolic quaternions form a nonassociative ring; the failure of associativity in this algebra curtails the facility of this algebra in transformation theory. Nevertheless, this algebra put a focus on analytical kinematics by suggesting a mathematical model: When one selects a unit vector r in the hyperbolic quaternions, then r ² = +1. The plane ${\displaystyle D_{r}=\lbrace t+xr:t,x\in R\rbrace }$ with hyperbolic quaternion multiplication is a commutative and associative subalgebra isomorphic to the split-complex number plane. The hyperbolic versor ${\displaystyle \exp(ar)=\cosh(a)+r\sinh(a)}$ transforms D_r by

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}t+xr&&\mapsto \quad &\exp(ar)(t+xr)\\&&=\quad &(\cosh(a)t+x\sinh(a))+(\sinh(a)t+x\cosh(a))r.\end{aligned}}}$

Since the direction r in space is arbitrary, this hyperbolic quaternion multiplication can express any Lorentz boost using the parameter a called rapidity. However, the hyperbolic quaternion algebra is deficient for representing the full Lorentz group (see biquaternion instead).

Writing in 1967 about the dialogue on vector methods in the 1890s, historian Michael J. Crowe commented

The introduction of another system of vector analysis, even a sort of compromise system such as Macfarlane's, could scarcely be well received by the advocates of the already existing systems and moreover probably acted to broaden the question beyond the comprehension of the as-yet uninitiated reader.^[1]

Later, Macfarlane published an article in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 1900. In it he treats a model for hyperbolic space H³ on the hyperboloid

${\displaystyle H^{3}=\{q\in M:q(q^{*})=1\}.}$

This isotropic model is called the hyperboloid model and consists of all the hyperbolic versors in the ring of hyperbolic quaternions.

The 1890s felt the influence of the posthumous publications of W. K. Clifford and the continuous groups of Sophus Lie. An example of a one-parameter group is the hyperbolic versor with the hyperbolic angle parameter. This parameter is part of the polar decomposition of a split-complex number. But it is a startling aspect of finite mathematics that makes the hyperbolic quaternion ring different:

The basis ${\displaystyle \{1,\,i,\,j,\,k\}}$ of the vector space of hyperbolic quaternions is not closed under multiplication: for example, ${\displaystyle ji=-\!k}$. Nevertheless, the set ${\displaystyle \{1,\,i,\,j,\,k,\,-\!1,\,-\!i,\,-\!j,\,-\!k\}}$ is closed under multiplication. It satisfies all the properties of an abstract group except the associativity property; being finite, it is a Latin square or quasigroup, a peripheral mathematical structure. Loss of the associativity property of multiplication as found in quasigroup theory is not consistent with linear algebra since all linear transformations compose in an associative manner. Yet physical scientists were calling in the 1890s for mutation of the squares of ${\displaystyle i}$,${\displaystyle j}$, and ${\displaystyle k}$ to be ${\displaystyle +1}$ instead of ${\displaystyle -1}$ : The Yale University physicist Willard Gibbs had pamphlets with the plus one square in his three-dimensional vector system. Oliver Heaviside in England wrote columns in the Electrician, a trade paper, advocating the positive square. In 1892 he brought his work together in Transactions of the Royal Society A^[2] where he says his vector system is

simply the elements of Quaternions without quaternions, with the notation simplified to the uttermost, and with the very inconvenient minus sign before scalar product done away with.

So the appearance of Macfarlane's hyperbolic quaternions had some motivation, but the disagreeable non-associativity precipitated a reaction. Cargill Gilston Knott was moved to offer the following:

Theorem (Knott^[3] 1892)

If a 4-algebra on basis ${\displaystyle \{1,\,i,\,j,\,k\}}$ is associative and off-diagonal products are given by Hamilton's rules, then ${\displaystyle i^{2}=-\!1=j^{2}=k^{2}}$.

Proof:

${\displaystyle j=ki=(-ji)i=-j(ii)}$, so ${\displaystyle i^{2}=-1}$. Cycle the letters ${\displaystyle i}$, ${\displaystyle j}$, ${\displaystyle k}$ to obtain ${\displaystyle i^{2}=-1=j^{2}=k^{2}}$. QED.

This theorem needed statement to justify resistance to the call of the physicists and the Electrician. The quasigroup stimulated a considerable stir in the 1890s: the journal Nature was especially conducive to an exhibit of what was known by giving two digests of Knott's work as well as those of several other vector theorists. Michael J. Crowe devotes chapter six of his book A History of Vector Analysis to the various published views, and notes the hyperbolic quaternion:

Macfarlane constructed a new system of vector analysis more in harmony with Gibbs–Heaviside system than with the quaternion system. ...he...defined a full product of two vectors which was comparable to the full quaternion product except that the scalar part was positive, not negative as in the older system.^[1]

In 1899 Charles Jasper Joly noted the hyperbolic quaternion and the non-associativity property^[4] while ascribing its origin to Oliver Heaviside.

The hyperbolic quaternions, as the Algebra of Physics, undercut the claim that ordinary quaternions made on physics. As for mathematics, the hyperbolic quaternion is another hypercomplex number, as such structures were called at the time. By the 1890s Richard Dedekind had introduced the ring concept into commutative algebra, and the vector space concept was being abstracted by Giuseppe Peano. In 1899 Alfred North Whitehead promoted Universal algebra, advocating for inclusivity. The concepts of quasigroup and algebra over a field are examples of mathematical structures describing hyperbolic quaternions.

The Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh published "Hyperbolic Quaternions" in 1900, a paper in which Macfarlane regains associativity for multiplication by reverting to complexified quaternions. While there he used some expressions later made famous by Wolfgang Pauli: where Macfarlane wrote

${\displaystyle ij=k{\sqrt {-1}}}$

${\displaystyle jk=i{\sqrt {-1}}}$

${\displaystyle ki=j{\sqrt {-1}},}$

the Pauli matrices satisfy

${\displaystyle \sigma _{1}\sigma _{2}=\sigma _{3}{\sqrt {-1}}}$

${\displaystyle \sigma _{2}\sigma _{3}=\sigma _{1}{\sqrt {-1}}}$

${\displaystyle \sigma _{3}\sigma _{1}=\sigma _{2}{\sqrt {-1}}}$

while referring to the same complexified quaternions.

The opening sentence of the paper is "It is well known that quaternions are intimately connected with spherical trigonometry and in fact they reduce the subject to a branch of algebra." This statement may be verified by reference to the contemporary work Vector Analysis which works with a reduced quaternion system based on dot product and cross product. In Macfarlane's paper there is an effort to produce "trigonometry on the surface of the equilateral hyperboloids" through the algebra of hyperbolic quaternions, now re-identified in an associative ring of eight real dimensions. The effort is reinforced by a plate of nine figures on page 181. They illustrate the descriptive power of his "space analysis" method. For example, figure 7 is the common Minkowski diagram used today in special relativity to discuss change of velocity of a frame of reference and relativity of simultaneity.

On page 173 Macfarlane expands on his greater theory of quaternion variables. By way of contrast he notes that Felix Klein appears not to look beyond the theory of Quaternions and spatial rotation.