Hypersonic flight

Hypersonic flight is flight through the atmosphere below altitudes of about 90 km (56 mi) at speeds greater than Mach 5, a speed where dissociation of air begins to become significant and high heat loads exist. Speeds over Mach 25 have been achieved below the thermosphere as of 2020. ^{[citation needed]}

Hypersonic vehicles are able to maneuver through the atmosphere in a non-parabolic trajectory, but their aerodynamic heat loads need to be managed.

The first manufactured object to achieve hypersonic flight was the two-stage Bumper rocket, consisting of a WAC Corporal second stage set on top of a V-2 first stage. In February 1949, at White Sands, the rocket reached a speed of 8,290 km/h (5,150 mph), or about Mach 6.7.^[1] The vehicle, however, burned on atmospheric re-entry, and only charred remnants were found. In April 1961, Russian Major Yuri Gagarin became the first human to travel at hypersonic speed, during the world's first piloted orbital flight. Soon after, in May 1961, Alan Shepard became the first American and second person to fly hypersonic when his capsule reentered the atmosphere at a speed above Mach 5 at the end of his suborbital flight over the Atlantic Ocean.^[2]

In November 1961, Air Force Major Robert White flew the X-15 research aircraft at speeds over Mach 6.^[3][4] On 3 October 1967, in California, an X-15 reached Mach 6.7.^[5]

The reentry problem of a space vehicle was extensively studied.^[6] The NASA X-43A flew on scramjet for 10 seconds, and then glided for 10 minutes on its last flight in 2004. The Boeing X-51 Waverider flew on scramjet for 210 seconds in 2013, finally reaching Mach 5.1 on its fourth flight test. The hypersonic regime has since become the subject for further study during the 21st century, and strategic competition between the United States, India, Russia, and China.^[7]

The stagnation point of air flowing around a body is a point where its local velocity is zero.^[6] At this point the air flows around this location. A shock wave forms, which deflects the air from the stagnation point and insulates the flight body from the atmosphere.^[6] This can affect the lifting ability of a flight surface to counteract its drag and subsequent free fall.^[8][a]

In order to maneuver in the atmosphere at faster speeds than supersonic, the forms of propulsion can still be airbreathing systems, but a ramjet does not suffice for a system to attain Mach 5, as a ramjet slows down the airflow to subsonic.^[10] Some systems (waveriders) use a first stage rocket to boost a body into the hypersonic regime. Other systems (boost-glide vehicles) use scramjets after their initial boost, in which the speed of the air passing through the scramjet remains supersonic. Other systems (munitions) use a cannon for their initial boost.^[11]

Hypersonic flow is a high energy flow.^[12] The ratio of kinetic energy to the internal energy of the gas increases as the square of the Mach number. When this flow enters a boundary layer, there are high viscous effects due to the friction between air and the high-speed object. In this case, the high kinetic energy is converted in part to internal energy and gas energy is proportional to the internal energy. Therefore, hypersonic boundary layers are high temperature regions due to the viscous dissipation of the flow's kinetic energy. Another region of high temperature flow is the shock layer behind the strong bow shock wave. In the case of the shock layer, the flow's velocity decreases discontinuously as it passes through the shock wave. This results in a loss of kinetic energy and a gain of internal energy behind the shock wave. Due to high temperatures behind the shock wave, dissociation of molecules in the air becomes thermally active. For example, for air at T > 2,000 K (1,730 °C; 3,140 °F), dissociation of diatomic oxygen into oxygen radicals is active: O₂ → 2O^{[13]: 41 [14][15]} For T > 4,000 K (3,730 °C; 6,740 °F), dissociation of diatomic nitrogen into N radicals is active: N₂ → 2N^[13]: 39 Consequently, in this temperature range, a plasma forms:^[16] —molecular dissociation followed by recombination of oxygen and nitrogen radicals produces nitric oxide: N₂ + O₂ → 2NO, which then dissociates and recombines to form ions: N + O → NO⁺ + e^{−[13]: 39  [17]}

At standard sea-level condition for air, the mean free path of air molecules is about ${\displaystyle \lambda =68\,\mathrm {nm} }$. At an altitude of 104 km (65 mi), where the air is thinner, the mean free path is ${\displaystyle \lambda =1\,\mathrm {ft} =0.305\,\mathrm {m} }$. Because of this large free mean path aerodynamic concepts, equations, and results based on the assumption of a continuum begin to break down, therefore aerodynamics must be considered from kinetic theory. This regime of aerodynamics is called low-density flow. For a given aerodynamic condition low-density effects depends on the value of a nondimensional parameter called the Knudsen number ${\displaystyle \mathrm {Kn} }$, defined as ${\displaystyle \mathrm {Kn} ={\frac {\lambda }{l}}}$ where ${\displaystyle l}$ is the typical length scale of the object considered. The value of the Knudsen number based on nose radius, ${\displaystyle \mathrm {Kn} ={\frac {\lambda }{R}}}$, can be near one.

Hypersonic vehicles frequently fly at very high altitudes and therefore encounter low-density conditions. Hence, the design and analysis of hypersonic vehicles sometimes require consideration of low-density flow. New generations of hypersonic airplanes may spend a considerable portion of their mission at high altitudes, and for these vehicles, low-density effects will become more significant.^[12]

The flow field between the shock wave and the body surface is called the shock layer. As the Mach number M increases, the angle of the resulting shock wave decreases. This Mach angle is described by the equation ${\displaystyle \mu =\sin ^{-1}(a/v)}$ where a is the speed of the sound wave and v is the flow velocity. Since M=v/a, the equation becomes ${\displaystyle \mu =\sin ^{-1}(1/M)}$. Higher Mach numbers position the shock wave closer to the body surface, thus at hypersonic speeds, the shock wave lies extremely close to the body surface, resulting in a thin shock layer. At low Reynolds number, the boundary layer grows quite thick and merges with the shock wave, leading to a fully viscous shock layer.^[18]

The compressible flow boundary layer increases proportionately to the square of the Mach number, and inversely to the square root of the Reynolds number.

At hypersonic speeds, this effect becomes much more pronounced, due to the exponential reliance on the Mach number. Since the boundary layer becomes so large, it interacts more viscously with the surrounding flow. The overall effect of this interaction is to create a much higher skin friction than normal, causing greater surface heat flow. Additionally, the surface pressure spikes, which results in a much larger aerodynamic drag coefficient. This effect is extreme at the leading edge and decreases as a function of length along the surface.^[12]

The entropy layer is a region of large velocity gradients caused by the strong curvature of the shock wave. The entropy layer begins at the nose of the aircraft and extends downstream close to the body surface. Downstream of the nose, the entropy layer interacts with the boundary layer which causes an increase in aerodynamic heating at the body surface. Although the shock wave at the nose at supersonic speeds is also curved, the entropy layer is only observed at hypersonic speeds because the magnitude of the curve is far greater at hypersonic speeds.^[12]

Researchers in China have used shock waves in a detonation chamber to compress ionized argon plasma waves moving at Mach 14. The waves are directed into magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) generators to create a current pulse that could be scaled up to gigawatt scale, given enough argon gas to feed into the MHD generators.^[19]

A rotating detonation engine (RDE)^[20] might propel airframes in hypersonic flight; on 14 December 2023 engineers at GE Aerospace demonstrated their test rig, which is to combine an RDE with a ramjet/scramjet, in order to evaluate the regimes of rotating detonation combustion. The goal is to achieve sustainable turbine-based combined cycle (TBCC) propulsion systems, at speeds between Mach 1 and Mach 5.^{[21] [22] [23]}

Transport consumes energy for three purposes: overcoming gravity, overcoming air/water friction, and achieving terminal velocity. The reduced trip times and higher flight altitudes reduce the first two, while increasing the third. Proponents claim that the net energy costs of hypersonic transport can be lower than those of conventional transport while slashing journey times.^[24]

Stratolaunch Roc can be used to launch hypersonic aircraft.^[25]

Hermeus demonstrated transition from turbojet aircraft engine operation to ramjet operation on 17 November 2022,^[26] thus avoiding the need to boost aircraft velocities by rocket or scramjet.^[27]

See: SR-72, § Mayhem

Two main types of hypersonic weapons are hypersonic cruise missiles and hypersonic glide vehicles.^[b][33] Hypersonic weapons, by definition, travel five or more times the speed of sound. Hypersonic cruise missiles, which are powered by scramjets, are limited to below 30 km (19 mi);^[c] hypersonic glide vehicles can travel higher.

Hypersonic vehicles are much slower than ballistic (i.e. sub-orbital or fractional orbital) missiles, because they travel in the atmosphere, and ballistic missiles travel in the vacuum above the atmosphere. However, they can use the atmosphere to manoeuvre, making them capable of large-angle deviations from a ballistic trajectory.^[10] A hypersonic glide vehicle is usually launched with a ballistic first stage, then deploys wings and switches to hypersonic flight as it re-enters the atmosphere, allowing the final stage to evade all existing nuclear missile defense systems, which were designed for ballistic-only missiles.^[36]

According to a CNBC July 2019 report (and now in a CNN 2022 report), Russia and China lead in hypersonic weapon development, trailed by the United States,^{[37][38][39][7][40]} and in this case the problem is being addressed in a joint program of the entire Department of Defense.^[41] To meet this development need, the US Army is participating in a joint program with the US Navy and Air Force, to develop a hypersonic glide body.^[49] India is also developing such weapons.^[50] France and Australia may also be pursuing the technology.^[10] Japan is acquiring both scramjet (Hypersonic Cruise Missile), and boost-glide weapons (Hyper Velocity Gliding Projectile).^[51]

China's XingKong-2 (星空二号, Starry-sky-2), a waverider, had its first flight 3 August 2018.^{[52][53][54][55]} In August 2021 China launched a boost-glide vehicle to low-earth orbit, circling Earth before maneuvering toward its target location, missing its target by two dozen miles.^[56][57] However China has responded that the vehicle was a spacecraft, and not a missile;^[58] there was a July 2021 test of a spaceplane, according to Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Zhao Lijian;^[59][60][61] Todd Harrison points out that an orbital trajectory would take 90 minutes for a spaceplane to circle Earth (which would defeat the mission of a weapon in hypersonic flight).^[59] The US DoD's headquarters (The Pentagon) reported in October 2021 that two such hypersonic launches have occurred; one launch did not demonstrate the accuracy needed for a precision weapon;^[56] the second launch by China demonstrated its ability to change trajectories, according to Pentagon reports on the 2021 competition in arms capabilities.^[62]

In 2022, China unveiled two more hypersonic models.^[63][64] An AI simulation has revealed that a Mach 11 aircraft can simply outrun a Mach 1.3 fighter attempting to engage it, while firing its missile at the "pursuing" fighter.^[65] This strategy entails a fire control system to accomplish an over-the-shoulder missile launch, which does not yet exist (2023).^[65]

In February 2023, the DF-27 covered 1,900 km (1,200 mi) in 12 minutes, according to leaked secret documents.^[66] The capability directly threatens Guam, and US Navy aircraft carriers.^[66]

In 2016, Russia is believed to have conducted two successful tests of Avangard, a hypersonic glide vehicle. The third known test, in 2017, failed.^[67] In 2018, an Avangard was launched at the Dombarovskiy missile base, reaching its target at the Kura shooting range, a distance of 5,955 km (3,700 mi).^[68] Avangard uses new composite materials which are to withstand temperatures of up to 2,000 °C (3,630 °F).^[69] The Avangard's environment at hypersonic speeds reaches such temperatures.^[69] Russia considered its carbon fiber solution to be unreliable,^[70] and replaced it with new composite materials.^[69] Two Avangard hypersonic glide vehicles (HGVs)^[71] will first be mounted on SS-19 ICBMs; on 27 December 2019 the weapon was first fielded to the Yasnensky Missile Division, a unit in the Orenburg Oblast.^[72] In an earlier report, Franz-Stefan Gady named the unit as the 13th Regiment/Dombarovskiy Division (Strategic Missile Force).^[71] In 2021 Russia launched a 3M22 Zircon antiship missile over the White Sea, as part of a series of tests.^[73] "Kinzhal and Zircon (Tsirkon) are standoff strike weapons".^[74] In February 2022, a coordinated series of missile exercises, some of them hypersonic, were launched on 18 February 2022 in an apparent display of power projection. The launch platforms ranged from submarines in the Barents sea in the Arctic, as well as from ships on the Black sea to the south of Russia. The exercise included a RS-24 Yars ICBM, which was launched from the Plesetsk Cosmodrome in Northern Russia until it reached its destination on the Kamchatka Peninsula in Eastern Russia.^[75] Ukraine estimated a 3M22 Zircon was used against it, but apparently did not exceed Mach 3 and was shot down 7 February 2024 in Kyiv.^[76]

These tests have prompted US responses in weapons development.^[77] By 2018, the AGM-183^[78] and Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon^[79] were in development per John Hyten's USSTRATCOM statement on 8 August 2018 (UTC).^[80] At least one vendor is developing ceramics to handle the temperatures of hypersonics systems.^[81] There are over a dozen US hypersonics projects as of 2018, notes the commander of USSTRATCOM;^{[80][82][79][83][84][85]} from which a future hypersonic cruise missile is sought, perhaps by Q4 FY2021.^[86][87][88] The Long range precision fires (LRPF) CFT is supporting Space and Missile Defense Command's pursuit of hypersonics.^[91] Joint programs in hypersonics are informed by Army work;^[92][93] however, at the strategic level, the bulk of the hypersonics work remains at the Joint level.^[98] Long Range Precision Fires (LRPF) is an Army priority, and also a DoD joint effort.^[93] The Army and Navy's Common Hypersonic Glide Body (C-HGB) had a successful test of a prototype in March 2020.^[99][97] A wind tunnel for testing hypersonic vehicles was completed in Texas (2021).^[100] The Army's Land-based Hypersonic Missile "is intended to have a range of 2,300 km (1,400 mi)".^{[101]: p.6  [48][102][103][104][105]} By adding rocket propulsion to a shell or glide body, the joint effort shaved five years off the likely fielding time for hypersonic weapon systems.^[106][107] Countermeasures against hypersonics will require sensor data fusion: both radar and infrared sensor tracking data will be required to capture the signature of a hypersonic vehicle in the atmosphere.^[112] There are also privately developed hypersonic systems,^[113] as well as critics.^[114][115]

DoD tested a Common Hypersonic Glide Body (C-HGB) in 2020.^[99][116] The Air Force dropped out of the tri-service hypersonic project in 2020, leaving only the Army and Navy on the C-HGB.^{[117][118][119]} According to Air Force chief scientist, Dr. Greg Zacharias, the US anticipates having hypersonic weapons by the 2020s,^[120] hypersonic drones by the 2030s, and recoverable hypersonic drone aircraft by the 2040s.^[121] The focus of DoD development will be on air-breathing boost-glide hypersonics systems.^[122] Countering hypersonic weapons during their cruise phase will require radar with longer range, as well as space-based sensors, and systems for tracking and fire control.^{[122][123][108][124]} A mid-2021 report from the Congressional Research Service states the United States is "unlikely" to field an operational hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV) until 2023.^[125]

On 21 October 2021, the Pentagon stated that a test of a hypersonic glide body failed to complete because its booster failed; according to Lt. Cmdr. Timothy Gorman the booster was not part of the equipment under test, but the booster's failure mode will be reviewed to improve the test setup.^[126] The test occurred at Pacific Spaceport Complex – Alaska, on Kodiak island.^[127] Three rocketsondes at Wallops Island completed successful tests earlier that week, for the hypersonics effort.^[127] On 29 October 2021 the booster rocket for the Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon was successfully tested in a static test; the first stage thrust vector control system control system was included.^[128] On 26 October 2022 Sandia National Laboratories conducted a successful test of hypersonic technologies at Wallops Island.^[129][130] On 28 June 2024 DoD announced a successful recent end-to-end test of the US Army's Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon all-up round (AUR) and the US Navy's Conventional Prompt Strike. The missile was launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility, Kauai, Hawaii.^[131]

In September 2021, and in March 2022, US vendors Raytheon/Northrop Grumman,^{[132][133][134]} and Lockheed^[135][136] respectively, first successfully tested their air-launched, scramjet-powered hypersonic cruise missiles, which were funded by DARPA.^[c] By September 2022 Raytheon was selected for fielding Hypersonic Attack Cruise Missile (HACM), a scramjet-powered hypersonic missile by FY2027.^[137][138]

In March 2024 Stratolaunch Roc launched TA-1, a vehicle which is nearing Mach 5 at 10.67 km (6.63 mi) in a powered flight, a risk-reduction exercise for TA-2.^[139] In a similar development Castelion launched its low-cost hypersonic platform in the Mojave desert, in March 2024.^[140]

In 2022, Iran was believed to have constructed their first hypersonic missile. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the commander of the Air Force of the Islamic Republic of Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps, announced the construction of the Islamic Republic's first hypersonic missile. He noted: "This new missile was produced to counter air defense shields and passes through all missile defense systems and which represents a big leap in the generation of missiles"^[141] and has a speed above Mach 13.^[142] but Col. Rob Lodwick, the spokesman for the Pentagon on Middle East affairs said that there are doubts in this regard.^[143]

In 2021, DoD was codifying flight test guidelines, knowledge gained from Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS), and the other hypersonics programs,^[144] for some 70 hypersonics R&D programs alone, as of 2021.^[145][146] In 2021-2023, Heidi Shyu, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (USD(R&E)) is pursuing a program of annual rapid joint experiments,^[147] including hypersonics capabilities, to bring down their cost of development.^[148][149] A hypersonic test bed aims to bring the frequency of tests to one per week.^[150][151]

Other programs

France,^[125] Australia,^[125] India,^[152] Germany,^[125] Japan,^[125] South Korea,^[153] North Korea,^[154] and Iran^[155] also have hypersonic weapon research programs.^[125]

Australia and the US have begun joint development of air-launched hypersonic missiles, as announced by a Pentagon statement on 30 November 2020. The development will build on the $54 million Hypersonic International Flight Research Experimentation (HIFiRE) under which both nations collaborated on over a 15-year period.^[156] Small and large companies will all contribute to the development of these hypersonic missiles,^[157] named SCIFIRE in 2022.^[158][137]

In May 2023 Ukraine shot down a Kinzhal with a Patriot.^[159] IBCS, or the Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System is an Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) capability designed to work with Patriots and other missiles.

Rand 2017 assessment

Rand Corporation (28 September 2017) estimates there is less than a decade to prevent Hypersonic Missile proliferation.^[160] In the same way that anti-ballistic missiles were developed as countermeasures to ballistic missiles, counter-countermeasures to hypersonics systems were not yet in development, as of 2019.^{[10][161][70][162]} See the National Defense Space Architecture (2021), above. But by 2019, $157.4 million was allocated in the FY2020 Pentagon budget for hypersonic defense, out of $2.6 billion for all hypersonic-related research.^[101] $207 million of the FY2021 budget was allocated to defensive hypersonics, up from the FY2020 budget allocation of $157 million.^{[145][163][47]} Both the US and Russia withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty in February 2019. This will spur arms development, including hypersonic weapons,^[164][165] in FY2021 and forward.^[166] By 2021 the Missile Defense Agency was funding regional countermeasures against hypersonic weapons in their glide phase.^{[167][168][169]} James Acton characterized the proliferation of hypersonic vehicles as never-ending in October 2021; Jeffery Lewis views the proliferation as additional arguments for ending the arms race.^[170] Doug Loverro assesses that both missile defense and competition need rethinking.^[171] CSIS assesses that hypersonic defense should be the US' priority over hypersonic weapons.^{[172][d][173][174]}

As part of their Hypersonic vehicle tracking mission, the Space Development Agency (SDA) launched four satellites and the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) launched two satellites on 14 February 2024 (launch USSF-124).^[175][176] The satellites will share the same orbit, which allows the SDA's wide field of view (WFOV) satellites and the MDA's medium field of view (MFOV) downward-looking satellites to traverse the same terrain of Earth. The SDA's four satellites are part of its Tranche 0 tracking layer (T0TL). The MDA's two satellites are HBTSS or Hypersonic and ballistic tracking space sensors.^[e]

Additional capabilities of Tranche 0 of the National defense space architecture (NDSA), also known as the Proliferated warfighting space architecture (PWSA) will be tested over the next two years.^[176][181]

Aircraft

• I-Plane^[182]
• 14-X
• Avatar (spacecraft)^[183]
• Advanced Technology Vehicle^[184]
• DARPA XS-1^[185]
• Destinus hydrogen-powered hypersonic aircraft. A prototype was tested last year.^{[186][24][187]}
• Dream Chaser^[188]
• NASA X-43^[189][190]
• HyperSoar^[191]
• HyperStar hypersonic passenger airliner^[192]
• Falcon HTV-2^[193]
• Boeing Commercial Airplanes hypersonic airliner Concept^[194][195]
• Lockheed Martin SR-72^[196]
• Kholod
• Ayaks waverider spaceplane
• Programme for Reusable In-orbit Demonstrator in Europe (PRIDE)
• Sänger II^[197]
• HyShot
• Hytex^[198]
• Horus^[199]
• SHEFEX
• Skylon^[200]
• Reaction Engines A2
• Hypersonic Air Vehicle Experimental (HVX)^[201][202] with Concept V aircraft^[203]
• Spartan^[204]
• HEXAFLY^[205]
• SpaceLiner^[206]
• STRATOFLY^[207]
• Zero Emission Hyper Sonic Transport
• Hermeus Quarterhourse unmanned hypersonic demonstrator designed to land and take-off on conventional runways.^[208]
• Hermeus Halcyon hypersonic transport^[209]
• Venus Aerospace Stargazer hypersonic airliner^[210] with rotating detonation rocket engine^[211][212]
• POLARIS Raumflugzeuge GmbH is developing and testing a hypersonic spaceplane for the German Armed Forces in Peenemünde^[213][214]

Bombers

• Expendable Hypersonic Air-Breathing Multi-Mission Demonstrator ("Mayhem")^[215] Based on § HAWC and HSSW: "solid rocket-boosted, air-breathing, hypersonic conventional cruise missile", a follow-on to AGM-183A. As of 2020 no design work had been done. By 2022 Mayhem was to be tasked with ISR and strike missions,^[216] as a possible bomber.^[217][218] Leidos is preparing a system requirements review, and a conceptual design for these missions.^[219] Draper Labs has begun a partnership with Leidos.^[218] Kratos is preparing a conceptual design for Mayhem, using Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) digital engineering techniques in a System design agent team, a collaboration with Leidos, Calspan, and Draper.^[220] DIU is soliciting additional Hypersonic and High-Cadence Airborne Testing Capabilities (HyCAT), for Mayhem.^[221]

Cruise missiles

• Advanced Hypersonic Weapon (AHW)^[222]
• Hypersonic Air-breathing Weapon Concept (HAWC, pronounced "hawk"). September 2021: HAWC is DARPA-funded. Built by Raytheon and Northrop Grumman, HAWC is the first US scramjet-powered hypersonic missile to successfully complete a free flight test in the 2020s.^{[223][132][133][224][101]} DARPA's goals for the test, which were successfully met, were: "vehicle integration and release sequence, safe separation from the launch aircraft, booster ignition and boost, booster separation and engine ignition, and cruise".^[132] HAWC is capable of sustained, powered maneuver in the atmosphere.^{[134]: minute 0:55} HAWC appears to depend on a rocket booster to accelerate to scramjet velocities operating in an oxygen-rich environment.^[225][226] It is easier to put a seeker on a sub-sonic air-breathing vehicle.^[227] In mid-March 2022 a HAWC Scramjet was successfully tested in an air-launched flight by a second vendor.^[135][136] On 18 July 2022 Raytheon announced another successful test of its Hypersonic Air-breathing Weapon Concept (HAWC) scramjet, in free flight.^[228][229]
  1. MoHAWC is a follow-on to DARPA's HAWC project. MoHAWC will seek "to further develop the vehicle’s scramjet propulsion system, upgrade integration algorithms, reduce the size of navigation components, and improve its manufacturing approach".^[230]
• Hypersonic Conventional Strike Weapon (HCSW - pronounced "hacksaw")^[119] passed its critical design review (CDR)^[231] but this IDIQ (indefinite duration, indefinite quantity)^[231] contract was terminated in favor of ARRW because twice as many ARRWs will fit on a bomber.^[232]
• Kh-45 (cancelled)
• Zircon^[233][234]
• Hypersonic Technology Demonstrator Vehicle
• / Brahmos-II
• Hycore^[153]

Glide vehicles

• AGM-183A air launched rapid response weapon (ARRW, pronounced "arrow")^{[224][235][101][236]} Telemetry data has been successfully transmitted from ARRW —AGM-183A IMV-2 (Instrumented Measurement Vehicle) to the Point Mugu ground stations, demonstrating the ability to accurately broadcast radio at hypersonic speeds;^[237][238] however, ARRW's launch sequence was not completed, as of 15 Dec 2021.^{[88][239][240]} Hundreds of ARRWs or other Hypersonic weapons are being sought by the Air Force.^[241] On 9 March 2022 Congress halved funding for ARRW and transferred the balance to ARRW's R&D account to allow for further testing, which puts the procurement contract at risk.^[242] A production decision on ARRW has been delayed for a year to complete flight testing.^[243][244] On 14 May 2022 an ARRW flight test was successfully completed, for the first time.^[245][246] There have been 3 successful tests of ARRW in 2022; however the Air Force is requiring 3 additional successful tests of an All-Up Round (AUR) before making a production decision.^[247] No production decision will be made in 2024.^[229] The USAF now intends to end the ARRW development program, as of 29 March 2023.^{[248][249][138][250][251]} A B-52 flying out of Anderson AFB in Guam fired an All-Up-Round AGM-183A Air-launched Rapid Response Weapon (ARRW); the AUR was tested at Reagan test site in the Pacific on 17 March 2024.^[252]
• DARPA Tactical Boost Glide vehicle^{[253][254][255]}
• HGV-202F

Aircraft

• North American X-15 (crewed)^[256]
• Lockheed X-17^[257]
• NASA X-43
• Boeing X-51^[258]
• WZ-8^[259]
• HSTDV^[260]

Glide vehicles

• Avangard^[261]
• DF-ZF
• Hwasong-8^[154]
• Unnamed^[154]

Spaceplanes

• Space Shuttle orbiter (crewed)
• Buran (human-rated, only flew without crew)^[262]
• RLV-TD^[263]
• Boeing X-37^[264]
• Shenlong^[265]
• IXV^[266]
• BOR-4^[267]
• Martin X-23 PRIME^[268]
• ASSET^[269]
• HYFLEX^[270]
• Reusable experimental spacecraft (disputed)
• Jiageng-1^[271]

Aircraft

• Silbervogel (Sänger bomber)^[272]
• Keldysh bomber^[273]
• Tupolev Tu-360, follow-on to Tu-160
• Tupolev Tu-2000^[274]
• Lockheed L-301

Spaceplanes

• Boeing X-20 Dyna-Soar
• Rockwell X-30 (National Aerospace Plane)
• Orbital Sciences X-34
• Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-105
• Tsien Spaceplane 1949^[275]
• HOPE-X^[276]
• XCOR Lynx
• Lockheed Martin X-33^[277]
• Hermes^[278]
• Prometheus^[279]
• HL-20 Personnel Launch System
• HL-42
• BAC Mustard^[280]
• Kliper^[281]
• HOTOL
• Valier Raketenschiff^[282]
• Rockwell C-1057^[283]

• Hypersonic effect
• Supersonic transport
• Lifting body
• List of X-planes
• Thunderbird 1

• David Wright and Cameron Tracy, "Over-hyped: Physics dictates that hypersonic weapons cannot live up to the grand promises made on their behalf", Scientific American, vol. 325, no. 2 (August 2021), pp. 64–71. Quote from p. 71: "Failure to fully assess [the potential benefits and costs of hypersonic weapons] is a recipe for wasteful spending and increased global risk."

• A comparative analysis of the performance of long-range hypervelocity vehicles
• (2022) Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC)