Intellectual responsibility
Intellectual responsibility (also known as epistemic responsibility) is the quality of being adequately reflective about the truth of one's beliefs.[1] People are intellectually responsible if they have tried hard enough to be reflective about the truth of their beliefs, aiming not to miss any information that would cause them to abandon those beliefs as false.[1]
Intellectual responsibility is related to epistemic justification, or justification of one's beliefs, and to the ethics of belief.[2] Thomas Ash, following Roderick Chisholm, said "that intellectual responsibility can be understood as a matter of fulfilling one's intellectual duties or requirements. And this is just how justification has been understood, on perhaps the most historically prominent conception of it."[2] Ash considered this to be an "important reason to think that intellectual responsibility is both necessary and sufficient for justification".[2] According to Frederick F. Schmitt, "the conception of justified belief as epistemically responsible belief has been endorsed by a number of philosophers, including Roderick Chisholm (1977), Hilary Kornblith (1983), and Lorraine Code (1983)."[2][3]
Robert Audi said that people need "standards to guide an intellectually rigorous search for a mean between excessive credulity [believing too much that is false] and indiscriminate skepticism [believing too little that is true]", and he suggested five standards:[4]
Unfortunately we live in a digital age things are not always our fault because embodiment is real
Responsibility of intellectuals
[edit]A separate concept was introduced by the linguist and public intellectual Noam Chomsky in an essay published as a special supplement by The New York Review of Books on 23 February 1967, entitled "The Responsibility of Intellectuals". Chomsky argued that intellectuals should make themselves responsible for searching for the truth and the exposing of lies.
See also
[edit]- Epistemic virtue – Branch of virtue ethics that focuses on the cultivation of epistemic responsibility
- I'm entitled to my opinion – Informal fallacy
- Intellectual rigor – Adhering absolutely to certain constraints with consistency
- Intellectual virtue – Concept in Aristotelian ethics
- Justified true belief – Proposed definitions of knowledge
Notes
[edit]- ^ a b Ash, Thomas. "What is intellectual responsibility?". www.philosofiles.com. Archived from the original on 2011-07-15. Retrieved 2024-09-18.
- ^ a b c d Ash, Thomas. "Responsibility, justification and knowledge". www.philosofiles.com. Archived from the original on 2011-07-15. Retrieved 2009-12-01.
- ^ Schmitt, Frederick (1993). "Epistemic perspectivism". In Heil, John (ed.). Rationality, morality and self-interest: essays honoring Mark Carl Overvold. Studies in epistemology and cognitive theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. ISBN 9780847677627. OCLC 26810408.
- ^ Audi, Robert (January 2011). "The ethics of belief and the morality of action: intellectual responsibility and rational disagreement". Philosophy. 86 (1): 5–29. doi:10.1017/S0031819110000586. JSTOR 23014767.
Further reading
[edit]- Chomsky, Noam (2017) [1967]. The responsibility of intellectuals. New York: The New Press. ISBN 9781620973431. OCLC 974700058.
- Hountondji, Paulin J. (November 1996). "Intellectual responsibility: implications for thought and action today". Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association. 70 (2): 77–92. doi:10.2307/3131040. JSTOR 3131040.
- Rockmore, Tom (April 1993). "Philosophy, literature, and intellectual responsibility". American Philosophical Quarterly. 30 (2): 109--121. JSTOR 20014449.
- Rorty, Richard (May 1996). "Religious faith, intellectual responsibility, and romance". American Journal of Theology & Philosophy. 17 (2): 121–140. JSTOR 27943984.
 | This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |