User talk:Dunutubble

Hi Dunutubble! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Newatlascamels (talk) 16:12, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to David Campbell (Australian political scientist) have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:58, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At Yves Engler, you added defamatory comments, and the source you cited to support your edit never even mentioned him. Wikipedia has very strict policies about defaming living people. I'm cautioning you to stop this. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:16, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Magnolia667, I apologize if it seemed Defamatory. I did not do any of these things to make a Person look bad. The Wikipedia Page on Genocide Denial said that he Denied the Bosnian Genocide, so I chose to give him that Category. As for Yves Engler, I am merely reporting what he thinks, he is a pretty Significant Figure in Canadian Political Discussion, and I had no Malice intended. Looking back, I realize that my Writing, even though I did not mean any harm, could be interpreted as libellous and disrespectful. It was somewhat biased. I am very sorry and deeply apologize for this. I will try to write more Neutrally and explain it more carefully. I would like to re-edit Yves Engler's Page to write what I had written in more Neutral Words that give context to what he says. Thank you for letting me know. I have no Negative Intentions and was unaware I violated NPOV and made Engler look bad. Please accept my apology.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jailwang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mine. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Children in the military, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islamic Jihad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dunutubble! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 21:52, Saturday, July 3, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kangura, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arusha Accords.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dunutubble! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 15:31, Thursday, July 22, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greater Israel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Miller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 19:18, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, hopefully no hard feelings and don't let that discourage you from writing articles about other things :) ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 20:58, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I'm ok! :) I'm not discouraged at all. Dunutubble (talk) 21:13, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MoonlightVector 19:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Genocide of Christians in North Korea, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
• It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MoonlightVector 20:06, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sukko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Selo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:33, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, this is a notice to inform you that your DYK nomination has been marked for closure. If you still wish for the nomination to continue, please make a comment on the page before it is closed. Thank you and happy editing. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:04, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Solly Wolf, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages British and Emirati.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vanamonde (Talk) 00:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Expulsion of Moroccans from Algeria have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 13:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:M.Bitton, I'm not sure what I did wrong. I reassessed the article importance (I just realized that might not be allowed, if so, I'm sorry).

However, I'd like it if you could explain why you keep reverting my edits about this subject. While I get you probably don't meant to do so, it looks like you repeatedly revert my edits. With best regards, Dunutubble (talk) 13:27, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You keep adding a link to an article that you created to different articles, regardless of whether they have nothing to do with it or are remotely connected to it; and although you may not mean it, it looks like you're trying to inflate its importance. M.Bitton (talk) 13:43, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:M.Bitton I'm sorry if it appears like that. I didn't mean to. Dunutubble (talk) 13:45, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Best, M.Bitton (talk) 14:10, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Canada–Russia relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glinka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Croatia–Serbia genocide case, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Slavonia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 13,196 views (1,099.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2021—nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 11:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Theleekycauldron- Thanks! Dunutubble (talk) 15:03, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As an experienced editor you will be aware of Arbpia requirements. Your recent edits breach the 1RR rule diff 1 and diff 2. Kindly self revert one of these two edits. Thank you.Selfstudier (talk) 15:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Selfstudier-I have removed one of the edits after seeing your message. Thank you for informing me that I made a mistake. Dunutubble (talk) 15:21, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need to remove one of the reverts of my edits that I provided diffs for (the cn tag for mass shooting and the rabbi mention). The edit you reversed is not a revert. Thank youSelfstudier (talk) 15:24, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Selfstudier- How do I revert these edits? Dunutubble (talk) 15:27, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Selfstudier-I reinserted the Citation needed template you wanted me to place.

Sorry if I have caused any troubles. Dunutubble (talk) 15:31, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.Selfstudier (talk) 15:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Selfstudier You're welcome! :) Dunutubble (talk) 15:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have broken the 1R rule again. You may only revert once per 24 hours for AI articles. Kindly self revert.Selfstudier (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Selfstudier-Oh, sorry, I forgot about that rule. I'll undo it immediately.. Dunutubble (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Np. Thanks.Selfstudier (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re your edit at Debrekerbe massacre (a redirect). The redirect is going to an anchor in the target article. Ordinarily, you see redirects going to articles (the top) or to an obvious section header within the target article. You might want to read more about the anchor technique at Template:Anchor.

If you would like to discuss why I chose that method (instead of going to a header), I am happy to discuss that with you. I'm cleaning up the 106 massacre articles (mostly spam) and I see you've jumped in to the project, too. Anyway, just dropping you a note. Platonk (talk) 17:53, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ralph Widdrington (academic), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northumbrian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DGG ( talk ) 04:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

no need to be concerned. everyone who even occasionally nominates articles for deletion is prepared for that sort of thing. But it tends not to help the argument. Around here , often the person who succeeds is the one who stays calm the longest. DGG ( talk ) 02:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

and you may not have realized that there is a degree of reluctance to make articles for individuals who survive a disaster. Often an extreme degree of reluctance, more than I think warranted. Wkiidata items, on the other hand, are made for almost all named persons connected with anything significant. DGG ( talk ) 02:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dunutubble

Thank you for creating Léon Geismar.

User:I dream of horses, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Once you created 25 non-deleted, non-redirect/disambiguation articles, you can self-nominate for autopatrolled.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|I dream of horses}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 21:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Minor barnstar
	For improving Nazmi Zade al-Bagdadi. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 19:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second time I'm aware of where you added an entry regarding the conflict in Myanmar and incorrectly labeled the victims as Rohingyas. Please do not assume that the victims are always Rohingyas and actually read the articles beyond the headlines. CentreLeftRight ✉ 09:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@CentreLeftRight- I'm Sorry :( I misread the article. Dunutubble (talk) 14:12, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking is permitted. You're past 3 reverts now. Please stop.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:27, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo- Sorry. I didn't know that. Dunutubble (talk) 18:30, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not interested. If you want Wikipedia to promote misleading and erroneous material, then so be it. Pikemaster (talk) 23:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dunutubble, that revert is silly. There is NO WAY that this article is going to be deleted--any admin who looks at that article and its sources will tell you so (and I'm speaking as an admin who has closed hundreds of AfDs). That you'd do this and then go on to vote "keep" on the AfD makes it even stranger. I urge you to revert your edit: the article is at DYK and this is just slowing down the inevitable. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 19:09, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry,@Drmies, but this is official Wikipedia policy. I can't change it. Anyways, my edit was reverted by someone else, so it does not matter no longer. Dunutubble (talk) 19:51, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, that is not “official Wikipedia policy”. Don’t know where you got that from. Drmies (talk) 20:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kautilya3 (talk) 12:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dunutubble! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 1947 Jammu massacres several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:1947 Jammu massacres, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Delete others work if you don't know about anything. I spent more than 2 hours for this additional details. Which type of sources that you are expecting from me. If you want sources, then come here. Kingshravan04 (talk) 20:23, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear you felt that way. But all content on Wikipedia must be verified. And the article for Kayamozhi is no exception.

And as for the two hours you spent, I can understand how it feels to have your work reverted- My very first edit was reverted. Sad, yes, but no reason to feel discouraged. Indeed, no article is someone's "own" page, while there's nothing wrong with creating a new page or making major edits to an article, there is when you are opposed to other We have a policy called Wikipedia:Ownership of content that explains why this is so.

If you need more help with editing Wikipedia, I suggest you go take a visit to Wikipedia:Teahouse and if you're still unsure check out Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user. These are useful tools to keep in mind if you're not sure what to do.

With all due respects, Dunutubble (talk) 20:45, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dunutubble, I noticed you re-categorized the Tong Chup massacre from "Chinese War Crimes" to "Massacres committed by the People's Republic of China". This article fits in both categories. I think the latter could be a sub-category of "Chinese War Crimes".

Also, the page about Chinese war crimes was deleted in 2007. This gives the false impression that there weren't any war crimes throughout the claimed 3000 year history of the various dynasties and regimes in China. So this page should be re-created and link to the existing related wiki articles. Please let me know what you think. -Artanisen (talk) 10:46, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. Dunutubble (talk) 13:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Nevermind I asked on the related wiki page. -Artanisen (talk) 09:12, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings @ Dunutubble

Hi I am User:Bookku, usually I find encyclopedic content gaps, create drafts and try to recruit article expansion editors.

Requesting your visit to Draft:Amina Dawood Al-Mufti, and help expand and improve the same. I do have some more drafts which are in need of expansion help that also includes drafts like Draft:Civil life in conflict zones and Draft:Turkish textbook controversies

Please do help in expanding the draft if any of the topics interests you.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 15:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FDW777 (talk) 17:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Terrorist incidents in Colombia in the 2020s indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. May I ask why you keep adding duplicate infoboxes to different wikipedia articles? You've been doing it for a few articles now and I don't have any clue as to why you're doing that. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 16:14, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Alpha Piscis Austrini - I'm sorry sir. That seems to be an accident. Dunutubble (talk) 16:14, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dunutubble: No worries. You're not the only one who's done that. Quite a few people have been doing that today and I have no clue why. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 16:20, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jax 0677. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Talk:List_of_killings_by_law_enforcement_officers_in_the_United_States,_February_2022. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:41, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jax 0677 - I'm sorry about that. But why did you say I was blanking the content when the page was blank to begin with (and that was the only edit)? Dunutubble (talk) 00:46, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply - "Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers". --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:47, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome! I have read the tips and guidelines and i appreciate the welcome :D

--Cakepops4everr (talk) 15:12, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Cakepops4everr[reply]

@Cakepops4everr - You're welcome :0) Dunutubble (talk) 15:09, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work you are trying to do, make more edits and make more pages — Preceding unsigned comment added by Junkie257 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I fixed your close of this discussion. AfD discussion pages don't get the archive tag like talk page discussions--there's a specific procedure at WP:CLOSEAFD. Please follow this procedure for future closures. Also, personally, in your place I wouldn't have done the close myself after having been involved in the discussion unless I was the nominator, but the result was clear so no harm no foul. Thanks. --Finngall ^talk 17:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for giving me the heads up. No problem. Dunutubble (talk) 17:04, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No it's not lol. Curbon7 (talk) 00:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lviv Raion was only created in 2020. What do these number mean? Did you add up all raions which were later merged into Lviv Raion?--Ymblanter (talk) 22:23, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More is not necessarily better. The (Arts) version is there to get the best from the indiscriminate collection of authority control links for artists and arts-related articles like this one (and has country parameters to specify even further if wanted). This way, one can remove links like [2] or [3] (which doesn't even know that Uderzo is dead since 2020) which have no value at all for a French author on the English Wikipedia (but remain accessible, together with many, many more, at Wikidata for those people that need as many identifiers as possible). Are there any that are suppressed by the (arts) version but which you think should definitely be included any way? Fram (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This edit removed two comments of mine at the page. I understand it was not your intention, but please in the future re-insert the removed comments or contact the editor it effected. Regards.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:35, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Dujail massacre. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 17:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Naveen Shekharappa Gyanagoudar and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31#Naveen Shekharappa Gyanagoudar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:44, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please use italics for the names of newspapers, journals, magazines and their connected websites when editing the current affairs page. Sincerely, MattSucci (talk) 03:22, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

News channels don't require italics! MattSucci (talk) 16:14, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle of Bucha has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a minor edit. Volunteer Marek 00:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dunutubble, I work for ADNOC and I recently posted an edit request on Talk:Sultan Al Jaber. I noticed that you are a member of WP:UAE, so I was hoping you would have an interest in implementing those straightforward edits. Thanks so much. CB at ADNOC (talk) 06:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand you may disagree with my proposals on Bucha massacre but please assume good faith as per WP:AGF. Thank you!JoseLuisMoralesMarcos (talk) 18:02, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I've now reported the above at ANI, if you want to add your two cents. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please use italics for the names of newspapers, journals, magazines and their connected websites when editing the current affairs page. Sincerely, MattSucci (talk) 13:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I forgot again. Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 13:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reuters, CNN and similar news agencies and channels don't require italics. Please take this onboard. MattSucci (talk) 02:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dunutubble!

I would appreciate your help with Draft:Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2022. I'd like to create a balanced, extensive article. That is, if you think such an article is a good idea! If not, please let me know why you think such content doesn't belong on Wikipedia. I'd also appreciate any tips on what to include, omit, rephrase, etc...

Cheers! Mooonswimmer 23:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 2022 Brooklyn attack and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 12#2022 Brooklyn attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 21:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article April 2022 Belgorod and Bryansk attacks, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April 2022 Belgorod and Bryansk attacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle of Vasylkiv has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:00, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There is no reliable sources about Barak Lufan's starts at the Olympics, as I believe reliable sources of this fact could be simply the full results of the event. Just someone called him Olympian after his death. Full results of the Canoe at the 2008 and 2012 Olympics are on Wikipedia (Canoeing at the 2012 Summer Olympics, Canoeing at the 2008 Summer Olympics). It's also easy to find it elsewhere (http://www.olympedia.org/). All results of Barak Lufan at the World senior events are here (https://www.the-sports.org/barak-lufan-canoeing-spf134628.html). And there is no single mention about any olympic starts. Another page: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/victims-of-tel-aviv-terror-attack-two-residents-in-their-20s-1.10729398 (“It is a terrible morning, tragic,” the executive director of the Israel Olympic Committee, Gili Lustig, said Friday. He described Lufan as a skilled kayaker from the Jordan Valley who particularly excelled in the 200-meter race, which was not an Olympic event during the years Lufan competed. It's important to add, that 200-meter races were (!) olympic events in 2012). The article from 2008 https://www.jpost.com/Jerusalem-Report/Beijing-Challenge-Extract "Kolganov is Israel's only kayak competitor in a sport that in past recent games had a larger turnout". About 2012 https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/olympics-2012-israel-taking-all-necessary-measures-to-protect-athletes/2012/07/24/gJQA5bRf6W_blog.html "With 37 Olympic athletes slated to compete in the London Games starting Friday, Israel is..." - and the list of 37 names is here: https://www.olympedia.org/countries/ISR/editions/54 . --Pbk (talk) 16:18, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle of Irpin has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:01, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

'Associated Press' doesn't need to be written in italics. If you are finding this complicated, check the font in the Wikipedia articles for these companies. MattSucci (talk) 14:20, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Innican Soufou (talk) 04:28, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest starting a discussion on the talk page.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2022 Sweden riots. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 18:48, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. We seemed to step on each others toes in our eagerness to get Draft:Politics and War out of mainspace. Happy to restore it to mainspace if you are content that a PROD would succede. Equally if there is a history of deletion could it be speedily deleted as a recreation of a deleted page? Regards  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   21:05, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Associated Press doesn't need to be italicised in current events. I have notified you of this on various occasions, so please learn this and save me and others from having to correct it. Regards, MattSucci (talk) 14:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Me4ysŁaw (talk) 14:26, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have done considerably more than one revert at Shireen Abu Akleh, and the odd thing is you have yet to even make an appearance at the talk page. Kindly stop reverting and start discussing, thanks. nableezy - 00:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Siege of Chernihiv has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:27, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Love of Corey. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Renaud Camus, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Love of Corey (talk) 01:33, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Washington Post and France24 are pretty solid sources. I don't think you understand how WP:RSP works. Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 01:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm sorry. I thought you were the one who added this. I didn't go far enough in the page history, apparently. Love of Corey (talk) 01:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of 2022 Sweden riots at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --evrik ^(talk) 03:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This applies to recently deceased individuals too, stop adding the suspects name until we are 1.) a little further out 2.) it complies with WP:BLP and WP:SUSPECT. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:16, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't saying he was the suspect, I was saying that's who Abbott identified the shooter as. Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 21:17, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And that shouldn't be included until it meets WP:SUSPECT/BLP. Especially not as it just happened. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:18, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dunutubble

Thank you for creating 2022 Gondar funeral attack.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the redirect.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

most of your posts are supportive of my position, that facts should never be hidden, but then what is that one line "He may have lost his privacy, but that doesn't mean his family, friends, close ones, etc. lost theirs"???? that seems to be in direct OPPOSITION to everything else you've posted, implying his name/image should NOT be reported!

i had to double, triple check to believe it was really u posting that. what gives? 2601:19C:527F:A680:2177:A157:A3DE:7DA2 (talk) 16:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to this quote:

most of us have no such sympathy and say go ahead and expose the bastard! he lost any right to privacy through his actions.

I don't have a problem with including a picture but I think that the approach that someone "lost their privacy" doesn't make sense. Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 16:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

my poor attempt at irony. but your reply does come off as opposing everything your other posts advocate! as in, wiki SHOULD strive to be "morally righteous" on behalf of his family, friends, close ones. etc.

i thought it was a chesapeake77 reply at first! 2601:19C:527F:A680:2177:A157:A3DE:7DA2 (talk) 16:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dunutubble, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 09:38, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dunutubble

Thank you for creating Quito Israeli Embassy bombing.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:26, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I removed an uncited sentence from Yosef Avidar. It can be added back with a reference. SL93 (talk) 12:54, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 6,674 views (556.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 03:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 8,867 views (738.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 03:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, ISWAP is listed as a participant in Boko Haram insurgency. ISWAP is not a part of herder-farmer conflicts, so it makes no sense to put that in Owo attack. At best some civilians have accused herders of being complicit but not being the assailants themselves. And the authorities haven't blamed them.

Regardless I suggest changing the article name of Boko Haram insurgency to Jihadist or Islamist insurgency in Nigeria. 2402:8100:21C2:B0C5:0:0:74CB:D1A8 (talk) 15:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dunutubble. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Israel-Africa Relations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dunutubble

Thank you for creating 1948 Tel Aviv bus station bombing.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dunutubble

Thank you for creating Fajja bus attacks.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:01, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Terrorist incidents in Norway in the 2020s indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:02, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]