User talk:Krystaleen
Hello! Krystaleen, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 02:41, 24 March 2012 (UTC) |
Changes[edit]
Changes | |
Why did you change my changes on Brian littrell for especially on his heart surgery I added more information and that's why people go to Wikipedia for INFORMATION now I ain't gonna swear cause I might get told off by you, k so I just want to know why you changed the information. BSBNKOTB5IVEfan (talk) 18:47, 12 May 2013 (UTC) |
- Your writing style is very unencyclopedic, use last name instead of first name. Your addition was unsourced, if you rewrite that paragraph and add a reliable source to back it up, it would be fine.--Krystaleen 03:32, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
ok can you tell me or help me i don't know what sources i would need to use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BSBNKOTB5IVEfan (talk • contribs) 17:10, 19 May 2013 (UTC) Can you help me please? How do I write something that is encyclopedic without you changing it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BSBNKOTB5IVEfan (talk • contribs) 18:12, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- You should read around, there are a lot of guides in wikipedia. Wikipedia:REF for starters, and on the right hand side of that page there are links to a lot of other basic wikipedia guides.--Krystaleen 02:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Edit warring?[edit]
I replaced a reference that was a dead link and added two sources. I then switched their places and that's where you come in and revert me for the sake of reverting. That by definition is disruption and will be reported if you choose to make a of it 69.165.246.181 (talk) 03:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- How will me creating an account improve/justify your recent edits on that article? 69.165.246.181 (talk) 03:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- I've fixed the dead link and it's now a working link. The sources I provided, both of them, are sufficient, and support the statement adequately. The source you posted, that Uncoverdiscover.com one is unreliable, and you posted bare links as references instead of filling all the titles, article dates, author, etc properly. Your edits are disrupting and you're about to violate WP:3RR policy. Actually it looks like you may have.--Krystaleen 04:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Um no I'm the one who removed the dead link (see my edit summary there). If you've added a source relevant to the statement and directly supporting it, that's all i care about. I switched the sides of the previous sources that I added cuz the Washington times article was directly verifying the statement. 69.165.246.181 (talk) 05:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nope, I fixed the link, if you've bothered to check. And both of my sources do directly support the statement, yes even the first one, if you bothered to actually read the article.--Krystaleen 05:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
"Crawling Back" image[edit]
Yeah, that's pretty clearly a fake; thanks for pointing it out. It's gone now. DS (talk) 23:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 1[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Nick & Knight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Charleston, Phoenix, Vogue, Trocadero, Orpheum, Civic Theatre and Center Stage
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Sovereign[edit]
You can listen to the album on iTunes radio.HotHat (talk) 04:20, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Exo[edit]
Hi! from an editorial point of view it is not our job to announce if kris has left or not. The press conference said NOTHING about Kris not being an official member of the band anymore. The press conf merely announced that for the time being, since they are unable to contact Kris, the band will promote with 11 members. SM has NOT announced that he is no longer a band member. We cannot make conclusions on our own, we can only write what the sources write. And the sources DO NOT say his no longer an official member. Technically as long as the court decides otherwise, his contract remains valid. when Kris or his lawyer will release a statement that Kris no longer considers himself Exo, we can cite that. It's too early in the procedure for us to draw conclusions. It's not Wikipedia's job to draw conclusions. You can cite what the source says, NOTHING ELSE. Teemeah 편지 (letter) 14:55, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- They didn't exactly say "for the time being" did they? I don't know I think it's pretty clear he's left.--Krystaleen 16:27, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Exo no longer promotes with 11 members. Ever since Luhan left on the 10th October, Exo promotes with 10 members. Therefore, to claim as of the submission date Exo promotes with 11 members is misleading.
- No it is accurate. Nowhere does it say that currently they promote with 11 members, only that as of the lawsuit date they promoted with 11 members.--Krystaleen 09:22, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
"On May 15, 2014, S.M. Entertainment confirmed through an interview that EXO-M's leader, Kris, had filed a lawsuit against the agency to terminate his contract.[50] as of the submission date of the lawsuit the band promotes with 11 members." To say that as of the submission date Exo promotes with 11 members implies they have been promoting with 11 members from the 15th May 2014 until now, especially since no similar sentence was inserted after stating Luhan has filed his lawsuit. The second sentence as it is may not be incorrect but it is misleading and confusing.
- Uh no that's not what "as of" means. Now if you want to add the info that as of now they promote with 10 members you can do so but you must add a reliable source. Also you can't say "currently" because it's not encyclopedic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Current--Krystaleen 16:46, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
I would prefer to delete that sentence rather than add another similar one after Luhan. Would you object to that?
- No, go ahead. Other editors might have a problem though, I'm not sure. Oh and please sign your posts on talk pages.--Krystaleen 00:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
EXO[edit]
Since when is a Wordpress fan blog [1] an acceptable source? Teemeah 편지 (letter) 16:48, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- I was just reverting the unconstructive edits. You're right the Wordpress isn't a reliable source and thus has to be removed.--Krystaleen 16:56, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Krystal. I declined your speedy deletion nomination of the above article, because there were credible claims of notability for this particular singer, particularly based on the Billboard sources, not to mention a few other reliable sources. The subject is also likely to be notable, IMO. In practice, I generally only do speedy deletion nominations for articles that lack sources, or rely exclusively on non-independent ones. Otherwise it's better to send articles with questionable sourcing to AfD. Thanks, I, JethroBT drop me a line 07:36, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, but the sources seem pretty trivial to me. The only notable sources that actually talk about her is the biography one and the billboard one. The others only mention her in passing, or about EPs or songs she features in as a background vocalist.--Krystaleen 08:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Your old comment on Exo's article[edit]
Hi. I just noticed the comment you left about a month ago on the talk page of the Exo article. It was about how you feel use of the term "comeback" on kpop articles is not good. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Popular culture works on kpop articles, and editors would love to hear your point of view. Kpop articles have a real problem with being too tailored to suit the desires just of hardcore kpop fans. Feel free to leave a message on the talk page of the page I linked! :) Shinyang-i (talk) 10:12, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Backstreet Boys Doc Movie Poster.jpeg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Backstreet Boys Doc Movie Poster.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Cinderella Special Edition OST.jpg listed for deletion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cinderella Special Edition OST.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Newsies Original Broadway Cast Recording.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Newsies Original Broadway Cast Recording.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
File:In a World Like This (Deluxe World Tour Edition).jpg listed for deletion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:In a World Like This (Deluxe World Tour Edition).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:27, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Re: In a World Like This Tour[edit]
I do not appreciate being told I'm doing something wrong when I am not. Like you, I'm just trying to provide accurate information. If you read the edit history, you will see that my edits DO provide an explanation/summary.
- (cur | prev) 05:56, 25 May 2015 50.155.157.164 (talk) . . (57,097 bytes) (+519) . . (source for perth opening act) (undo)
- (cur | prev) 05:44, 25 May 2015 50.155.157.164 (talk) . . (56,578 bytes) (-2,336) . . (there is a reason why the city/venue is specified, start a blog if you a want show by show setlist) (undo)
However, you CHOSE to blindly revert edits because they do not agree with how you want this article to be displayed. I am doing nothing short of reiterating to you things that were told to me by other editors and admins. You have been warned of this in the past. If you CHOSE to actively continue this behavior. I will direct this to the attention of the admins.50.155.157.164 (talk) 05:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- You can't remove sourced content and replace it with something else, and not provide a source. The set list is fully backed by a source so I don't know why you keep removing that. Second, the rest of the opening acts are sorted chronologically, not alphabetically so I don't know why you keep putting the opening acts for Australians dates which is in May up there. Third, the cities/shows are properly cited from their official site backstreetboys.com/events and it's listed there as Recife so if you think their official site is wrong please provide a source.--Krystaleen 12:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
IAWLTT Band[edit]
Hello, wanted to ask you a question. In the In a World Like This Tour article, there is a list of the group members and the instruments they play. There seems to be confusion with this. Many of the articles I've read indicate there is no live band for this tour. Maybe it needs to be reworded but are you inferring the group is also the band?Itsbydesign (talk) 05:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- Yes the group members play instruments but only during the acoustic session. As written on the paragraph: "Typically a show of this tour consists of 22–23 songs, including an acoustic set of 4–5 songs during which the group members play instruments." Hopefully that's clear enough.--Krystaleen 06:01, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 3[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hymns (Michael W. Smith album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victory in Jesus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 16[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Disney Tsum Tsum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 101 Dalmatians. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Tekken 7[edit]
Hello,
In the controversies section of the article a blog is sourced for one of the statements from the producer. Said blog is referencing a tweet by the producer. I replaced the blog link with a direct link to the tweet but our pal Osh33m reverted the change with the vague statement "the original ref was filled in". I looked up the guidelines and didn't find a definitive ruling on blogs vs direct tweets as sources. Can you help clarify? If he's gonna start an edit war I'd prefer to know what I'm getting into. Thanks! Hogo~enwiki (talk) 12:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if twitter isn't allowed as a source but if there's a website it's preferable. Is this the Forbes link?--Krystaleen 14:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 22[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dead 7, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dan Miller and Everclear. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 5[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael W. Smith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Not sure if you are interested in this[edit]
http://www.wikigodpod.com/home/83 When I saw it, I thought you might be interested in it though. Cheers. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:10, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Hey thanks for the heads up! I'll check it out ASAP :)--Krystaleen 09:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:01, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
We'd like to invite you to participate in a user study closely related to SuggestBot. User:Another Article is seeking to understand more about the workflow and time commitment of contributors to the English Wikipedia. As part of this study you will occasionally be prompted to answer questions about your editing activity, and these questions should never take more than a minute or two to complete. The intended length of the study is two weeks, but your actual time commitment is totally up to you. If you would like to see more details you can read the project proposal at Research:Measuring editor time commitment and workflow (on meta), but if you are feeling bold and would like just like to sign up right now you can add the line importScript("User:Another_Article/workflowstudyclient.js");
to your common.js
. Contact User:Another Article if you have any questions about this study!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.