User talk:Psiĥedelisto

Archives

/Archive1 (2016-11-25–2020-05-27) /Archive2 (2020-05-27–2022-01-25)

Hello! Your submission of Osteogenesis imperfecta at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 15:19, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought I would discuss this here instead of at that article.CycoMa1 (talk) 00:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd just like to state for the record that at no time have I suggested that CycoMa1 be sanctioned, and that I strongly object to the way Psiĥedelisto used my comments on my talk page to call for them. The proposal was inappropriate, and unjustified. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:22, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AndyTheGrump: I will respond to you as well outside of general comment on my future plans in below section as you seem most hurt by my action. You wrote to CycoMa1 you lack the necessary skills to usefully contribute to the article in the manner you have been. Please note that in my section, I wrote I'd like to hear your view on what form community sanctions should take. I should not have used the term community sanctions in that sentence and that was a blunder. All I meant was, I'd like to hear your view on what should happen next. I did not mean to imply you were asking for sanctions in the talk page section I linked, and I should not have used a term with such a well defined onwiki meaning. I still think you should state your view as to what should happen next, either here or somewhere else! But clearly—clearly—my involvement is not helping better the article, better civility standards, or better the project in general, when Barkeep49 sees fit to close the section and you see fit to state right here in no uncertain terms you don't think CycoMa1 ought to be sanctioned. So, if not that, I hope everyone will figure out what to do next, because I'm voluntarily self-recusing from furry fandom and its talk page (until 2023-02-09), regardless of any WikiBreak I may or may not take due to being warn out from OI DYK/GA, which was very difficult. If people want to ask me about this incident that can happen on my talk. I am doing this because I believe there are many interested Wikipedians in furry fandom article and I am not essential to finding a resolution in the near term. It's not a font article or something with very few onwiki experts, and I am taking your words to heart—hopefully if I return to trying to comment on that article, I'll have more experience editing controversial topics, which I do not do a lot of, note my user page.

Post scriptum: I did let Barkeep49 know this, but just to say to everyone: I really did not know you can't discuss whether an ANI discussion is needed among a smaller group of editors on an article talk. All the best, Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 19:07, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know I think this proposal is a little unfair. A good amount of you guys are fully aware I have been here since 2020.

Other editors are aware I can identify reliable sources and write in decent English. I have even received barnstars before. So mentorship just feels a thing more appropriate for new editors.CycoMa1 (talk) 19:18, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CycoMa1: I would say your view that it's unfair is the majority view, and I wouldn't want to act against a majority consensus, so it's also my view, thus my self-recusal for having brought it up, so you and other editors that are not me can figure out what happens next without me giving my opinion on your conduct. I don't think my involvement is helping at all—probably something we both agree on! Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 19:21, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To answer Psiĥedelisto's question above, what I think needs to happen next is for everyone to wait for more opinions on how to proceed, or if they aren't forthcoming in a reasonable time, to hold an RfC. It simply isn't appropriate to start talking about 'sanctions' based on the opinions of a very few contributors, after only a couple of days. What I was hoping to achieve by starting the thread on Talk:Furry fandom was to get further input on whether my assessment of the issues with the article was fair, and hopefully, if others agree with me, to convince CycoMa1 that it would be better to leave the article to others. It is one thing to be able to create acceptable stub articles on plant species say, but another thing entirely to be able to tackle a complex subject, requiring a lot more than the regurgitation of factual data from a couple of sources. Being able to write well on complex subjects is a skill that takes time to learn, and using existing Wikipedia articles to do so is far from ideal. I don't want to discourage CycoMa1 from acquiring such skills, I just don't think that the furry article is an appropriate place to do it. I was as blunt as I was in my assessment of the article because I felt the point needed to be got across. As for self-recusing, Psiĥedelisto, that's up to you, but I don't think it is necessary. AndyTheGrump (talk)20:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AndyTheGrump: regarding this statement.

It is one thing to be able to create acceptable stub articles on plant species say, but another thing entirely to be able to tackle a complex subject, requiring a lot more than the regurgitation of factual data from a couple of sources. Being able to write well on complex subjects is a skill that takes time to learn, and using existing Wikipedia articles to do so is far from ideal.

As a little side note I have written articles on a variety of topics. From mythology, evolution, medicine, places, sexology, and so much more.

Some of the things I listed require a bit of understanding of complex topics or issues. I mean come on I literally wrote articles about diseases that affect less than 100 people.CycoMa1 (talk) 20:44, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AndyTheGrump: Noted, but I do, and to explain why—because although I've spent quite a lot of time writing on obscure topics (Mojikyō; Deseret alphabet; Bureau of Immigration Bicutan Detention Center), and turning some of these into GA's, I really overestimated my confidence when dealing with talk pages of contentious topics. Just this word—sanction—you use its very specific definition (anything imposed by a consensus at AN/I), I did not quite understand that nuance, clearly. If I'm going to be more helpful than disruptive in the future to complex talk pages for contentious articles, then I'm going to need time to really read thoroughly everything about WP:DR, what the different WP:AN's are for, what are all the types of sanctions and where they come from (for example, one reason I thought my thread was fine is that it had no force—if a lot of us agree, then CycoMa1 would probably, being a good faith editor, which I do believe, just voluntarily say something like "okay, I'll try this for <however long>"), more essays, and so on. Basically, your comment—quite rightfully—makes me feel incompetent in the area of onwiki WP:DR, and knowing how busy I am, I'm gonna need a year to do all that reading and be very clear about the rules so I don't make blunders that seem obvious from outside and which it seems someone of my account age shouldn't make. But my solitary editing style for almost all of my time here is the problem. If I had no other demands I'd lower it to a month, but that's not realistic for me. So I'm very fine with the year. It helps for everyone to remember their competences. I can't say CycoMa1 is not competently writing prose, which I feel I'm good at, but then not recognize my own incompetence re: WP DR when it's made so manifest, right—that'd be far too hypocritical. The year also includes the fact that this lined up weird for me—I'm around more because of my OI DYK/GA, which ended today right during this. So it's been my commitment to do other free content things—especially work on my font editor, and less Wikipedia, when that's over. Sorry to bother you with my life's minutia, but I want you to understand this is not some silly self-flagellation, I really need a year to do what would take most a month who can dedicate more hours to WP, because I planned to take a WikiBreak as soon as my DYK was over. :-) Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 20:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are probably reading too much into this. There has obviously been a fair bit of miscommunication involved, and I don't think you should hold yourself responsible for most of that. I probably didn't help matters much myself, with my first post above, which with hindsight came across harsher than it needed to. We should probably all treat it as a learning experience. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:49, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Osteogenesis imperfecta, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that osteogenesis imperfecta causes blue eyes (pictured)—and brittle bones? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Osteogenesis imperfecta. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Osteogenesis imperfecta), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Those eyes stare into my soul. Great work here! We don't see too many disorder articles getting to the front page. Panini!^🥪 13:26, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --GRuban (talk) 14:17, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Amakuru, GRuban, and Panini!: Thank you all! 🥰 This was in some ways my hardest article to write, and it took a lot out of me, so I am probably going to take a short WikiBreak now that it passed DYK with my most preferred hook text. I have other plans but need some time to regroup, my fonts won't develop themselves after all. (Not yet anyway—font creating AGI? Well, maybe I am one! 🤖)

(This part cc: AndyTheGrump, CycoMa1.) And my other near term onwiki project, figuring out what to do about furry fandom, (see above section if you care…) turns out I very much misread the room, (typical of me,) so that means at least in the immediate term I will be stepping back from that as clearly I'm not helping, and I try to apply Hippocratic oath to my edits, so when I fail at first, do no harm then we may as well say the Fred version is “if you've already done harm, don't do more”. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 18:49, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 13,999 views (1166.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2022 – nice work!

Bruxton (talk) 15:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:&numero has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Psiĥedelisto, I'd like to let you know that I have boldly added Jueteng to Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge attached to your name. Please let me know if you'd like it to be removed, or add other articles you have worked on that may be relevant! Best, CMD (talk) 06:10, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chipmunkdavis: No problem at all with me. (Very strange how an IP removed this four times, though? Why?) I can't seem to figure out which of my articles may qualify, but if I had to guess Bureau of Immigration Bicutan Detention Center is most likely to, maybe also People of the Philippines v. Ressa, et al. and Disini v. Secretary of Justice; if rewrites are allowed, Quo warranto petition against Maria Lourdes Sereno, and if Japan content is allowed, Mojikyō; if both Japan and rewrites, 2channel. Oh, and if it's not too old, Tagalog profanity. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 22:55, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Mariam Soulakiotis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Constantine ✍ 16:24, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Psiĥedelisto! I recently noticed that you created the redirect User:Psihedelisto in July 2020, and noted that you couldn't create an account with that name. I'd just like to let you know that you can request creation of this doppelganger account (the username is indeed blacklisted due to its similarity with yours by the AntiSpoof extension). Tol (talk | contribs) @ 19:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really know if I'm supposed to comment on the talk page, the edit history, or just here, so let me know if I'm going through the right channels. I think not calling Ralph a sex offender is probably the right decision, since the revenge porn charge isn't punishable by registration as a sex offender in his state. I was under the impression that it was, so my bad on that front. P.S.: Thanks for cleaning up the revenge porn conviction subsection, it looks a lot cleaner than the initial version I wrote! --ShinyDialga777 (talk) 10:03, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mariam Soulakiotis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that convicted serial killer Mariam Soulakiotis, a Greek Old Calendarist abbess, is known in Greece as "Mother Rasputin" for fasting nuns to death? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mariam Soulakiotis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mariam Soulakiotis), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 11,062 views (921.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 04:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Psiĥedelisto

Thank you for creating Kaki Thalassa.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:45, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for the multilingual newsletter • Local subscription list

The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at most WMF-hosted wikis. You can join the discussion about this tool for the English Wikipedia is at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Enabling the New Topic Tool by default. You will be able to turn it off in the tool or at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

The Editing team plans to change the appearance of talk pages. These are separate from the changes made by the mw:Desktop improvements project and will appear in both Vector 2010 and Vector 2022. The goal is to add some information and make discussions look visibly different from encyclopedia articles. You can see some ideas at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project#Prototype Ready for Feedback.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

23:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Psiĥedelisto

Thank you for creating Council of Constantinople (1923).

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Psiĥedelisto! After a holiday weekend here in the U.S., I've returned to see if you're interested in revisiting the ongoing discussions at Talk:Wheely. I realize the requests have overlapped a bit, so please let me know if you'd prefer I place a 'request edit' tag on any specific item.

As a reminder, here are the requests:

• here, I've suggested removing Anton's name from citation #37 since there's no byline  Done
• here, I suggested removing mention of some cities because service areas are mentioned in the History section; this request prompted you to expand service areas content in the Services section, including mention of Dubai
• since you mentioned Dubai, I submitted a request here with alternative text about the Middle East expansion and shared other thoughts for improving the History section

I still think there's some redundancy with mentioning service areas in both History and Services, but I leave the editorial decisions to you and other contributors. Thanks again for your continued assistance. Inkian Jason (talk) 15:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Geresh, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiCleanerMan: Wrong template. It wasn't a test. It's an unused template. I agree with the deletion and have marked it per criterion G7 though. Thanks for helping delete unused templates. If you find any more from me just list them and I'll mark them all G7. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 16:25, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

EpicPupper just found out that he was the person who made https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1100000000... which gives me an idea... it's too much of a task to do all on my own, but it would be kind of cool to assemble a list. You wanna help make a subpage of WP:RECORDS for all the GETs on here? jp×g 19:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JPxG: Hahaha it's a really funny idea but perhaps reconsider. If this becomes a widely fought over/sought after metric people will start gaming the system with disallowed automated tools like they do on imageboards. But I'm not totally against if you think there's no risk of that. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 21:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Maqaf has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last one of the templates you created that is unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:06, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiCleanerMan: Thanks, tagged :-) Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 01:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mariam Soulakiotis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 14:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

The new [subscribe] button notifies people when someone replies to their comments. It helps newcomers get answers to their questions. People reply sooner. You can read the report. The Editing team is turning this tool on for everyone. You will be able to turn it off in your preferences.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, since you created the {{unbulleted list citebundle}} template, I'm hoping that you can help me implement it correctly. The sole purpose of the template seems to be to account for the first line break that is otherwise visible in the {{unbulleted list}} template, but the template displays exactly the same (with a line break before the first item) as the regular unbulleted list template. Is there a way to fix this and if so, how? Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 13:55, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

? Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 00:17, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, it does not display this way for me. Tried it on both the old and new interface, as well as on different browsers. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 13:43, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Throast: I receive correct display even in private browser, which would not be affected by my use of Monobook.css: [1].

I suggest you review your user scripts, although it seems you don't partake in them so I really can't say what's wrong.. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 13:48, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Right. Well, too bad. Thanks anyway. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 13:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, so another user brought to my attention that the template also messes with reference chronology, at least in Firefox. Also, the line break issue is present whenever I'm not logged in and even in the iOS app. I have no idea why it displays correctly for you. Love the idea of the template but right now it seems to cause more trouble than it's worth. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 19:38, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Throast: I don't know what you're asking me to do here and I don't know what reference chronology means. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 01:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Simply letting you know. If you're indifferent to errors of templates you created, that's fine of course. I linked the comment where the user explained the issue above. Won't bother you further, cheers Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 01:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Throast: Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't notice the link. I'll look into that. :) Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 01:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Throast: Finally fixed. Let me know what you think. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 20:09, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great, it works for me now! Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 13:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Psiĥedelisto. Thank you for creating Limtiaco v. Camacho. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:14, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mariam Soulakiotis you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mariam Soulakiotis for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 14:01, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I responded but couldn’t preview and editing your username with my iPad failed. Doug Weller talk 18:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: I very much appreciate the ping here. I hope you're doing all right given all that went on and thanks for answering my query. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 03:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! Yes, it was a whirlwind and distracted me from actually doing much editing, but more of a pain than anything else. And ironically, the news it attracted might have been beneficial, especially to American politics. As someone who hasn't voted in a long time (but found a document that I hope will enable me to vote as an expat next year, maybe I've done something useful. Probably not though. :) Doug Weller talk 08:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the candid feedback about editing.

Drew

Cryptohydrate (talk) 05:06, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 23:09, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your creation of the article New Era Publications International ApS v. Carol Publishing Group and Jonathan Caven-Atack. Grorp (talk) 03:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Psiĥedelisto. Thank you for your work on New Era Publications International ApS v. Carol Publishing Group and Jonathan Caven-Atack. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Psiĥedelisto. Thank you for your work on Bogusław L. Jackowski. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for creating the article. I hope you will create more articles in the future! But please fix the orphan issue on the article. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thank you! Fixed orphan issue. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 07:23, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Psiĥedelisto! I wanted to ask if you could complete the DYK review here: Template:Did you know nominations/Maureen Keleher and St. Francis Hospice, Hawaii (The DYK submission won't progress without a final green tick.) Thanks again for all your advice, your feedback was helpful in improving the article, and I see you have also uncovered some of the interesting history behind the Sisters of St. Francis. Cielquiparle (talk) 10:59, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cielquiparle: Thank you for the ping. Accidentally broke my computer. Did my review and answered on my own dyk too. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 05:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

This newsletter includes two key updates about the Editing team's work:

1. The Editing team will finish adding new features to the Talk pages project and deploy it.
2. They are beginning a new project, Edit check.

Talk pages project

The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the Talk pages project. Nearly all new features are available now in the Beta Feature for Discussion tools.

It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "Add topic" button. You will be able to turn them off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Please tell them what you think.

An A/B test for Discussion tools on the mobile site has finished. Editors were more successful with Discussion tools. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.

New Project: Edit Check

The Editing team is beginning a project to help new editors of Wikipedia. It will help people identify some problems before they click "Publish changes". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please watch that page for more information. You can join a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Empath, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that mirror neurons may explain the phenomenon of empaths? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Empath. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Empath), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Philippines topic navigational boxes has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —⁠andrybak (talk) 23:15, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Psiĥedelisto: I am impressed with the work you did on New Era v Carol/Atack and especially the infobox. Case designations are gobbledegook to me, so I don't feel qualified to make any decent infoboxes using Template:Infobox court case. There are about 9 of the extant litigation articles with no infoboxes (Category:Scientology articles needing infoboxes). Would you be interested in making infoboxes for them, or finding the esoteric 'case info' to put in the parameters and I'll stick it in there? Any help would be appreciated, if you're interested. Grorp (talk) 02:14, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Grorp: Like Arenz and Röder v. Germany? Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 05:28, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Psiĥedelisto: Holy cow, that's a beauty! Yes, like that! Grorp (talk) 05:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Grorp: Church of Scientology of California v. Armstrong is yikes and needs two. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 07:32, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Psiĥedelisto: Only two? Some of these guys were involved in litigation for decades, with cases going back and forth and appeals and [oh, the headache], like Lawrence Wollersheim, Arnie Lerma and Gerry Armstrong. Yikes is right. Grorp (talk) 07:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Grorp: In general I am just following the ad hoc rules I made up for articles like GSIS–Meralco bribery case, which is my most court case infoboxes per article at three. They are in brief:

1. If the case is consolidated at any point it gets a single template.
2. The highest court that hears the case decides the seal. Id est, if certiorari is denied at any point then the court below decides the seal.

Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 07:49, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Psiĥedelisto: That's cool. I can't believe you straightened out the Armstrong cases... 8 cases into 2. See, I knew you knew more about this case stuff than I could do. I spent a whole day just trying to fill out the Gerry Armstrong article, and I don't consider it finished. I dared not touch the case article at the time. Eventually I want to get a good grasp of the scope of what we have here in Wikipedia and make a navbar and/or table-list of cases and litigants, and straighten out the categories (Category:Scientology litigation, Category:Scientology and law). There are too many articles falling through the cracks. Grorp (talk) 07:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Grorp: I'm not sure it's totally done but WP:WORKINPROGRESS so if I made an error another editor will correct it eventually hopefully. I'll try to do some of the others but all Scieno litigation is complex. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 08:03, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Psiĥedelisto: Complex... that's for sure. I really appreciate you doing this. It helps get me closer to the next stage of my project (as mentioned above). Grorp (talk) 08:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think that obituary might actually refer to someone else. It mentions someone who earned an EdD late in life and who was a therapist, but it says nothing I can see about an MD, psychiatry, or UCLA. I notice that the [facebook.com/DrJudithOrloff/ Facebook page] of the MD is active as of two days ago, there is no mention of any death, and a March post specifically refers to a planned April event. Odd similarities, but it seems like a different person. Larry Hockett (Talk) 09:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Larry Hockett: I'm sorry but the only options that are coming to mind are

• double life
• made up parents’ names / early history to avoid doxing while alive

. Her Twitter is inactive. Born in Philly, and someone keeps removing clairvoyant from page from a Boulder, CO IP address, but we never had this issue when she was alive. I think someone has taken over her "brand" perhaps. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 14:38, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Larry Hockett: Nevermind. Doxed both of them, (I don't think admitting to knowing how is against policy as long as I don't post any of the results), and you are right: Judith Orloff of Boulder, CO ≠ Judith Orloff of Boulder, CO. Wow. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 14:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Larry Hockett: Addendum: Orloff seems to have no ties to Colorado and I mistook her for that because some webpages that come up when you search for “judith orloff colorado” on Google show the picture of the MD we use despite being about the teacher. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 14:44, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking a look at that. A weird situation for sure, with both of them being involved in mental health and academia. I thought there might be an issue, but I wasn't confident enough to edit the entry any further. Thank you for taking care of it. Larry Hockett (Talk) 15:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hide the Pain Harold (András Arató).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This file was tagged for speedy deletion for WP:F7 reasons by a Wikipedia administrator named JJMC89. I'm only adding the above notification as a courtesy. If you disagree with the assessment of the non-free use of this file, you should follow the instructions given above or in the template added to the file's page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: I really appreciate the heads up and disputed the tag. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 03:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:NUJP logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Article uses IPA (Greek) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:07, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Psiĥedelisto Thank you for translating the chair law article into English! I have added information on chair laws into the Right to sit article for Chile, Argentina, Mexico, Spain, and Uruguay. Are you aware of chair laws in any other Spanish-speaking countries? I haven't been able to find anything on suitable seating laws in Japan. The Philippines and Puerto Rico once had seating laws, but they may have been repealed. EDIT - the last mention I have found is from a presidential decree in 1974. I think the first seating law was passed in the Philippines during US rule, but the earliest source in the article mentions a law from 1952. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 20:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bohemian Baltimore: Regarding the Philippines, its Labor Code remains good law. But do note, the guarantee as exists as of Republic Act №11058 is significantly watered down; only applies to women, and only if sitting won't affect their productivity. See the full law's 2022 edition as amended and renumbered courtesy of the DOLE: [2]; [3]. No idea about other countries, sorry. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 02:43, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Psiĥedelisto. Thank you for your work on United States v. Gratkowski. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:22, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks :o) Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 03:19, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I heard the good news, congratulations on the purchase. I guess you need to fill out a COI declaration for 420chan now too? Will we get /a/ back? Anyway, I removed 420chan.org from MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist by the way, it was apparently added in 2009 because of Grawp of all people (lel). jp×g🗯️ 10:04, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JPxG: It's a bit complicated isn't it as I wrote 420chan, but certainly I can't edit it further sans {{edit request}}. Actually I'm a bit unsure what to do with the domain. I'm considering leasing it for $420/yr. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 19:16, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi can you please translate "Are you fine/okay?"in Japanese please. 41.114.239.24 (talk) 23:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noted several minor inaccuracies in this file you produced in 2017, some relating to relatively recent geological understanding of current Iceland geology. Rather than change all the relevant en:Wikpedia pages rather than just the ones where your picture is obviously inconsistent with the text do you object to me asking for permission to overload my svg based on yours to the file. I have of course no objection to you doing this yourself. I have noted your very useful contributions over time. My file is at File:Outline of Iceland Deformation and Volcanic Zones.svg ChaseKiwi (talk) 23:35, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ChaseKiwi: Done, I uploaded your file over mine and fixed the licensing infromation. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 08:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Updated license on my effort and I think the information on each commons page now matches for files that for moment are identical. Keep well ChaseKiwi (talk) 21:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctioned Suicide has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Cat or other (talk) 00:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Approx has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nickps (talk) 22:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:51, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]