User talk:Ruyter

When adding {{Prod}} tags to an article, such as you did here, please give a reason for the deletion. Greg Tyler ^{(t • c)} 09:40, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. Just write "concern=No [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]" or suchlike. You could also consider using Twinkle, which allows you to quick add prod, csd and afd tags, amongst other things. Greg Tyler ^{(t • c)} 17:49, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Ruyter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! 59.95.100.255 (talk) 16:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Transphobia"

Regarding my edit to the "transphobia" article: I apologise if I am using the wrong procedure for leaving a message. My edit was intended to move that article in the direction of a more, not less, neutral point-of-view from that around which it appears to be built. The word "transphobia" is, it seems to me, inherently question-begging. My regards, and thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.186.141.221 (talk) 09:44, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That paragraph about Hefner sounds like it was written by his PR department. He didn't change the culture although he liked to say he did. There have always been porn magazines. There have always been men's clubs. His was just a different style. More accessible to middle class men. He was a good marketer. That doesn't mean that he actually changed attitudes about sex. Helen Gurley Brown was a bigger influence on the sexual revolution. Hefner doesn't belong in that article. This article is the first thing people will read when they google 'sexual revolution" so it is important that it isn't just a marketing tool for Playboy corp. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.24.75.11 (talk) 23:13, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I have to remind you that the official name according to the UN is FYROM.  Please do not violate UN resolutions and do not politicize Wikipedia  CarloMagno96 (talk) 09:43, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply] 

Hello:

The content I removed was unsourced description of the objectives of a research grant. I restored my edit. If you feel the need to put it back, you will need to provide references.104.163.139.33 (talk) 21:32, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that information on national geographic channel so I ain't sure what to do.please help Arxeusanion (talk) 17:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, "Positive" is not the correct term here. He exceeded the allowed level of an allowed asthma drug, which even officially has no power enhancing effect at all. The reliable source for its effects could also be the wikipedia page for Salbutamol - among many others, where this fact is clearly stated as well. The use of Salbutamol is limited only because above a certain level it might be suitable to be used as a 'masking agent', for masking traces of real doping substances. The term "positive" refers to whether a - banned - substance is present in human body or not. Salbutamol - as it's an allowed substance - can be present any time below the allowed level, so "positive" or "negative" aren't relevant in this case. Hope this makes sense. Also, the levels of 1000ng/ml and 2000ng/ml are well documented everywhere. For example here: https://www.bbc.com/sport/cycling/42350159 I'm not a regular editor here, so please feel free to add this link to the text.

Thank you.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hunedoara County, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Murder of Louisa Vesterager Jespersen and Maren Ueland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. IWI (chat) 22:22, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Murder of Louisa Vesterager Jespersen and Maren Ueland, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. IWI (chat) 22:28, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have no interest as to whether or not the statement you removed is restored. I will not make the change. However, here are two citations even if not from very credible sources: Arbalest Mike (talk) 16:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3539483/Surgery-addict-s-spent-10-years-305-000-turning-real-life-Ken-doll-rushed-hospital-body-REJECTED-new-nose.html

1. http://thefederalist.com/2017/03/01/transgender-people-need-much-help-human-ken-doll/

Sure. Although I don't believe those two meet BLP source criteria. Thanks, Ruyter - talk 17:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:TPG. When a non-blocked user chooses to remove content from or blank their user Talk page, do not restore the content. They have a right to remove it, per that policy. (The warnings are still in the page history, and their removal shows they are aware of the warnings.) General Ization ^Talk 20:24, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you General Ization, I did not know that. Ruyter - talk 20:25, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(To clarify, non-constructive modifications – not removals – of warning templates or admins/others' comments on the Talk page should be reverted. But not removals.) General Ization ^Talk 20:29, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thank you for your editing, you mentioned that I did not provide reliable resource, I am wondering the reference that I provide is from OHIOLINK which is national wide data base. here is the link for it, https://www.ohiolink.edu/content/about_ohiolink, according to your comments, it is not reliable resource? thanky you

Please revert wikipedia page on Mike Cerrone, screenwriter back to content edit made yesterday, 12/28/18. Per Mike Cerrone — Preceding unsigned comment added by Belindamckl (talk • contribs) 16:42, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ruyter, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Babymissfortune 05:21, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.
^{Babymissfortune} 05:21, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Ruyter! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Babymissfortune 05:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gavvyang (talk) 11:53, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply] 

Hello Ruyter! I noticed that your signature is using the <font> tag. which is considered obsolete. Help about changing this is available at Wikipedia:HTML_5#font. You don't have to go back and change all old uses of your signature (it's not that important), but please consider changing it. Thank you! rchard2scout (talk) 15:11, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me — Ruyter (talk • edits) 15:17, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ruyter. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Nakon 05:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On the Al Toney III page addition,I cited the Worcester District Court decision and pasted in a link in the references.I know everything is the truthful because I was in court,is it the way I'm presenting it?I thought I had everything covered.Thank you in advance for an answer Daubje (talk) 19:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Daubje and Oshwah: Hello Daubje; please take this issue with Oshwah as I'm not able to view the the content you added. Have you read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons? Thanks! — Ruyter (talk • edits) 19:51, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my edit, saying I didn't cite a reliable source. But everything I added was already supported in evidence and sources within the same wiki page itself - and I referenced to the appropriate section: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Margaret_Sanger&stable=0#Eugenics

Which talks about her support for eugenics as well as her claim that she supported reducing birth rate for lower income families.

I did put it in a link in my addition, to the word eugenics:

This claim as well as her opinions in favor of eugenics such as reducing birth rates for lower income families, are often used to support this highly controversial point of view.

You mention there is no reliable source - please explain, no source for what part of my edit? There is a whole section on her support for eugenics. I linked to it. You can't argue against that since it is in the page itself.

Please reconsider, either bring back my edit, provide another comparable text, or explain specifically which part of my edit is wrong or lacking a reliable source. And if you do think there is no reliable source for my edit, please explain how this entire section is still on wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Margaret_Sanger&stable=0#Eugenics

Otherwise, you are just proving the point that this page is very biased and unreliable.

I'm just trying to get rid of some of the heavy bias tone in this article. Keeping it as is only hurts wikipedia's reputation IMHO. Spetel (talk) 17:45, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Spetel: Hello Spetel, thank you for contacting me.

I find your addition unclear, as the phrases "this claim" and "this highly controversial point of view" in your addition seem to be referring to the same thing: i.e. the quotation "as evidence she led a calculated effort to reduce the black population against their will". Please correct me if that isn't right.

Second, the word "often" is problematic as a weasel word. The reader might ask who in particular is supporting "this view"? And it would be preferable to have an inline-citation to back that up. Thank you. (Please note I have no strong interest in Sanger.) — Ruyter (talk • edits) 18:21, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In context, it all seems to make sense to me.

In any case, this sentence: "conspiracy theorists have attempted to exploit" that is already in the article is very biased and cannot stand.

It not only claims critics to be "conspiracy theorists", not as a quote from a source but rather as a fact, but further more by saying "attempted" it strongly suggests, again as a fact, that this was an attempt that failed and is false. This is not the case, these are 2 point of views that are both supported by all the outside sources quoted and the current sentence takes a strong bias towards which view is right and which is false.

Feel free to correct the bias in this sentence using your own editing, I tried 3 times already and being blocked.

Ultimately, I would have the original sentence modified to something like:

In light of her opinions in favor of eugenics such as reducing birth rates for lower income families, this quote was taken "as evidence she led a calculated effort to reduce the black population against their will". However, New York University's Margaret Sanger Papers Project says that the letter would have been meant to avoid the mistaken notion that the Negro Project was a racist campaign.

Keeping the same references at the end. What do you think about that option?Spetel (talk) 19:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Spetel: I have changed the language of the original sentence to better reflect the source. I can't guarantee it won't be changed in the future *shrug*. If you have further concerns about the article, please discuss them on the article's talk page. Thanks! — Ruyter (talk • edits) 20:50, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ruyter! You created a thread called Question regarding WP:SUSPECT at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:06, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Bronze STiki Barnstar of Merit
		Congratulations, Ruyter! You're receiving this barnstar of merit because you recently crossed the 5,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Babymissfortune 05:29, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Roberts edits have been made — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:3E80:D00:10:0:0:0:182B (talk) 20:30, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carnage (comics). Legobot (talk) 04:35, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Assamese people. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1976 Tangshan earthquake. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of photographers. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of most-subscribed YouTube channels. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of box office records set by It. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alexander the Great in the Quran. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ruyter! You created a thread called Poorly formatted table in Composition of the human body article at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Country data New Caledonia. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Princess Zelda. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Rfc. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ronna McDaniel. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of wars involving the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Ahnentafel. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ruyter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Murders of Louisa Vesterager Jespersen and Maren Ueland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:06, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electric smoking system. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Audi Q3. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Goop (company). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:31, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Constantinople. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Free Palestine Movement. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Wuerl. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tucker Carlson. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:NYC Pride March. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sabine Weyand. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sturmabteilung. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of largest hospitals. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kate Dover. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:21 Savage. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Idles (band). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Senate of Canada. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Arrowverse. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Operation Lam Son 719. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Knights of Columbus. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ruyter! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service for one or both of the Good Article nomination categories "Arts" and "Everyday life".

You may have noticed that the Feedback Request Service has been inoperative for a number of months, and Yapperbot is currently in the process of taking over from Legobot in performing the requests. In that process, the subscription categories have been updated to match the current categories used by the Good Articles project, and neither "Arts" nor "Everyday life" is used anymore.

What this means is:

• If you were subscribed to "Arts", your preference has been transferred to Art and architecture as a new category, which you have automatically been opted in to. You may also be interested in Music and/or Media and drama; however, you have not automatically been opted in to these. If you wish to opt in to these, you should follow the process below.
• If you were subscribed to "Everyday life", you have been unsubscribed entirely from that category, as the category is too vague to assign to any of the new, more specific, categories.

You are encouraged to review your FRS preferences to ensure that they match your interests; there are a number of new categories you can now opt in to additionally. To do this, you should:

1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
2. If you were previously subscribed to "Arts" and wish to unsubscribe from "Art and architecture", scroll to that subheading and remove your {{Frs user}} template.
3. If you wish to subscribe to an additional category, you should do so by pasting {{Frs user|{{subst:currentuser}}|limit}} underneath the relevant heading, where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
4. Publish the page.

Please note that any subscription preferences you had with the FRS for requests for comment have not been affected by these changes.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on Yapperbot's operator's talk page. Thank you!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 21:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Seal of Zion, Illinois on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lima Liturgy on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:33, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Palaiologos on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Buruli ulcer on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kolkata Metro on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Arc Héré on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Stony Brook (Charles River tributary, Boston) on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:32, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Martín Insaurralde on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Éomer on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:TWA Flight Center on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Life replacement narratives on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Nagpur on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:32, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ureter on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]