Arctangent series

In mathematics, the arctangent series, traditionally called Gregory's series, is the Taylor series expansion at the origin of the arctangent function:[1]

This series converges in the complex disk except for (where ).

It was first discovered in the 14th century by Indian mathematician Mādhava of Sangamagrāma (c. 1340 – c. 1425), the founder of the Kerala school, and is described in extant works by Nīlakaṇṭha Somayāji (c. 1500) and Jyeṣṭhadeva (c. 1530). Mādhava's work was unknown in Europe, and the arctangent series was independently rediscovered by James Gregory in 1671 and by Gottfried Leibniz in 1673.[2] In recent literature the arctangent series is sometimes called the Mādhava–Gregory series to recognize Mādhava's priority (see also Mādhava series).[3]

The special case of the arctangent of is traditionally called the Leibniz formula for π, or recently sometimes the Mādhava–Leibniz formula:

The extremely slow convergence of the arctangent series for makes this formula impractical per se. Kerala-school mathematicians used additional correction terms to speed convergence. John Machin (1706) expressed as a sum of arctangents of smaller values, eventually resulting in a variety of Machin-like formulas for . Isaac Newton (1684) and other mathematicians accelerated the convergence of the series via various transformations.

Proof[edit]

The derivative of arctan x is 1 / (1 + x2); conversely, the integral of 1 / (1 + x2) is arctan x.

If then The derivative is

Taking the reciprocal,

This sometimes is used as a definition of the arctangent:

The Maclaurin series for is a geometric series:

One can find the Maclaurin series for by naïvely integrating term-by-term:

While this turns out correctly, integrals and infinite sums cannot always be exchanged in this manner. To prove that the integral on the left converges to the sum on the right for real can instead be written as the finite sum,[4]

Again integrating both sides,

In the limit as the integral on the right above tends to zero when because

Therefore,

Convergence[edit]

The series for and converge within the complex disk , where both functions are holomorphic. They diverge for because when , there is a pole:

When the partial sums alternate between the values and never converging to the value

However, its term-by-term integral, the series for (barely) converges when because disagrees with its series only at the point so the difference in integrals can be made arbitrarily small by taking sufficiently many terms:

Because of its exceedingly slow convergence (it takes five billion terms to obtain 10 correct decimal digits), the Leibniz formula is not a very effective practical method for computing Finding ways to get around this slow convergence has been a subject of great mathematical interest.

Accelerated series[edit]

Isaac Newton accelerated the convergence of the arctangent series in 1684 (in an unpublished work; others independently discovered the result and it was later popularized by Leonhard Euler's 1755 textbook; Euler wrote two proofs in 1779), yielding a series converging for [5]

where and

Each term of this modified series is a rational function with its poles at in the complex plane, the same place where the arctangent function has its poles. By contrast, a polynomial such as the Taylor series for arctangent forces all of its poles to infinity.

History[edit]

The earliest person to whom the series can be attributed with confidence is Mādhava of Sangamagrāma (c. 1340 – c. 1425). The original reference (as with much of Mādhava's work) is lost, but he is credited with the discovery by several of his successors in the Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics founded by him. Specific citations to the series for include Nīlakaṇṭha Somayāji's Tantrasaṅgraha (c. 1500),[6][7] Jyeṣṭhadeva's Yuktibhāṣā (c. 1530),[8] and the Yukti-dipika commentary by Sankara Variyar, where it is given in verses 2.206 – 2.209.[9]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Boyer, Carl B.; Merzbach, Uta C. (1989) [1968]. A History of Mathematics (2nd ed.). Wiley. pp. 428–429. ISBN 9780471097631.
  2. ^ Roy 1990.
  3. ^ For example: Gupta 1973, Gupta 1987;
    Joseph, George Gheverghese (2011) [1st ed. 1991]. The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics (3rd ed.). Princeton University Press. p. 428.
    Levrie, Paul (2011). "Lost and Found: An Unpublished ζ(2)-Proof". Mathematical Intelligencer. 33: 29–32. doi:10.1007/s00283-010-9179-y. S2CID 121133743.
    Other combinations of names include,
    Madhava–Gregory–Leibniz series: Benko, David; Molokach, John (2013). "The Basel Problem as a Rearrangement of Series". College Mathematics Journal. 44 (3): 171–176. doi:10.4169/college.math.j.44.3.171. S2CID 124737638.
    Madhava–Leibniz–Gregory series: Danesi, Marcel (2021). "1. Discovery of π and Its Manifestations". Pi (π) in Nature, Art, and Culture. Brill. pp. 1–30. doi:10.1163/9789004433397_002. ISBN 978-90-04-43337-3. S2CID 242107102.
    Nilakantha–Gregory series: Campbell, Paul J. (2004). "Borwein, Jonathan, and David Bailey, Mathematics by Experiment". Reviews. Mathematics Magazine. 77 (2): 163. doi:10.1080/0025570X.2004.11953245. S2CID 218541218.
    Gregory–Leibniz–Nilakantha formula: Gawrońska, Natalia; Słota, Damian; Wituła, Roman; Zielonka, Adam (2013). "Some generalizations of Gregory's power series and their applications" (PDF). Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computational Mechanics. 12 (3): 79–91. doi:10.17512/jamcm.2013.3.09.
  4. ^ Shirali, Shailesh A. (1997). "Nīlakaṇṭha, Euler and π". Resonance. 2 (5): 29–43. doi:10.1007/BF02838013. S2CID 121433151. Also see the erratum: Shirali, Shailesh A. (1997). "Addendum to 'Nīlakaṇṭha, Euler and π'". Resonance. 2 (11): 112. doi:10.1007/BF02862651.
  5. ^ Roy, Ranjan (2021) [1st ed. 2011]. Series and Products in the Development of Mathematics. Vol. 1 (2 ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 215–216, 219–220.
    Sandifer, Ed (2009). "Estimating π" (PDF). How Euler Did It. Reprinted in How Euler Did Even More. Mathematical Association of America. 2014. pp. 109–118.
    Newton, Isaac (1971). Whiteside, Derek Thomas (ed.). The Mathematical Papers of Isaac Newton. Vol. 4, 1674–1684. Cambridge University Press. pp. 526–653.
    Euler, Leonhard (1755). Institutiones Calculi Differentialis (in Latin). Academiae Imperialis Scientiarium Petropolitanae. §2.2.30 p. 318. E 212. Chapters 1–9 translated by John D. Blanton (2000) Foundations of Differential Calculus. Springer. Later translated by Ian Bruce (2011). Euler's Institutionum Calculi Differentialis. 17centurymaths.com. (English translation of §2.2)
    Euler, Leonhard (1798) [written 1779]. "Investigatio quarundam serierum, quae ad rationem peripheriae circuli ad diametrum vero proxime definiendam maxime sunt accommodatae". Nova acta academiae scientiarum Petropolitinae. 11: 133–149, 167–168. E 705.
    Hwang Chien-Lih (2005), "An elementary derivation of Euler's series for the arctangent function", The Mathematical Gazette, 89 (516): 469–470, doi:10.1017/S0025557200178404
  6. ^ K.V. Sarma (ed.). "Tantrasamgraha with English translation" (PDF) (in Sanskrit and English). Translated by V.S. Narasimhan. Indian National Academy of Science. p. 48. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 March 2012. Retrieved 17 January 2010.
  7. ^ Tantrasamgraha, ed. K.V. Sarma, trans. V. S. Narasimhan in the Indian Journal of History of Science, issue starting Vol. 33, No. 1 of March 1998
  8. ^ K. V. Sarma & S Hariharan (ed.). "A book on rationales in Indian Mathematics and Astronomy—An analytic appraisal" (PDF). Yuktibhāṣā of Jyeṣṭhadeva. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 September 2006. Retrieved 2006-07-09.
  9. ^ C.K. Raju (2007). Cultural Foundations of Mathematics : Nature of Mathematical Proof and the Transmission of the Calculus from India to Europe in the 16 c. CE. History of Science, Philosophy and Culture in Indian Civilisation. Vol. X Part 4. New Delhi: Centre for Studies in Civilisation. p. 231. ISBN 978-81-317-0871-2.

References[edit]