Template talk:Hindu temples in Haryana

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Hinduism This template is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles India This template is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Requesting eminent members to please help in synchronising the two templates. "48 kos" template is a part of larger series - "Hindu temples in Haryana". Main template is about bigger & more famous temples , while 48 kos template is an exhaustive list of all big/small/famous/not so popular temples included in one particular pilgrimage. The main list will continue to carry some major temples which are re-mentioned in sub-list too. Requesting you to please help in adjusting the template accordingly. Thanks. Manoj Khurana (talk) 07:40, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not quite sure what you think should be done here. This template already contains a link to the 48 kos parikrama of Kurukshetra article. Grouping the more famous of those temples into a sub-section in this navbox would be possible, but it would interfere with the geographical grouping; thus I don't think that would be an improvement. Including the other navbox in this one would defeat the purpose of having two templates at all; then every page meant to show just the bigger temples would automatically show all the others, too. Huon (talk) 09:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded the template and content, you are welcome to expand

• All 22 current districts have been added to the template
• At least one major temple added per district, more needs to be added, this is not suppsoe to be an exhausted list, add only prominent temples that are of historical value or the ones that see high pilgrimage or regular divotees traffic
• Several of the temples I added are prominent enough to warrant a wikipedia article of their own, but they do not yet have a wikipedia article on those, I will try to create more but you are welcome to create articles on historic and trith temples of your district and link back here please.

Thanks. Being.human (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]