Template talk:Jessica Jones

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Comics: Marvel This template is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles This template is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Hey User:TriiipleThreat, stop reverting characters that clearly have a history with Jessica Jones. I would easily just revert this like nothing, but...I know you will revert my edit again and stop edit warring. These characters are significant to Jessica. She has more than just two bad guys, and one of them isn't even a villain that she goes up against every issue, that's Spider-Man's archenemy. Your argument doesn't make any sense because they're heroes templates who rarely go up against those baddies. Gave me a solid reason why Jessica only has two villains, and we can't list her other foes and her ally.Geek Pow (talk) 19:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I stated in my edit summary, navboxes are not meant to be WP:INDISCRIMINATE lists. Jones has had only two significant solo outings, one against Purple Man and the other against Green Goblin. In any case the WP:BURDEN is on you to prove otherwise, since you are the one trying to add content.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:21, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

::Jones has had run-ins with those other villains as well. I don't know how you want me to prove to you: you want me to list you the issues or actual references but templates don't use references. For your information I have some Jessica Jones comics and if more importantly this a page even you might like: http://comicvine.gamespot.com/jessica-jones/4005-2265/enemies/

Again, those enemies have had numerous encounters with her, not just two. It's like saying Spider-Man barely fights Shocker. He may not be well known to the public, but he's still an enemy that has had many encounters. P.S. Sorry for the delay, I'm kind of a busy guy. Geek Pow (talk) 06:51, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As you say those are "run-ins", not something that would qualify them to be labeled as a "Jessica Jones enemy". In fact, she encountered most of those as part of a superhero team. The fact is JJ has a very limited solo history, she does have new solo series coming but that's something we can address in the future. You may want refresh yourself with the purpose of WP:NAVBOX, they aren't meant to be exhaustive lists. As JJ's history grows, we wouldn't possibly be able to fit every villain that she has a run-in with in the navbox. BTW, navboxs are supported by referenced content in the body of the article.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 11:13, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

::::Run-ins can be said for all villains. Batman has had run-ins with the Joker, Superman has run-ins with Lex Luthor, etc. I don't know where you she has fought them as a team? Are talking about Avengers or Defenders. BTW, the fact that villains should listed for Jessica Jones is pretty cool, especially since this is on the internet makes it more cooler and a little sadder. Geek Pow (talk) 01:08, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thats a false equivalency. Batman has had more that a mere run-in with the Joker. Same goes for the Superman/Lex Luther. Those villains have had major impacts on those characters. What we're talking about insignificant encounters between Jessica Jones and those characters that you are trying to add. Remember this is an encyclopedia, not a fan site. We do not list every insignificant detail. BTW, JJ is not a member of the Defenders.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 10:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I struck the comments by a block evading sock. Nymf (talk) 06:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the logic of not putting in the Defenders series since it is not JJ centric, but I think it can be included in the bottom row of "Related Articles." IMO it warrants more inclusion in that row than the other current occupants. 161.185.151.51 (talk) 18:00, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]