Ulmus 'Hertfordensis Latifolia'

Ulmus 'Hertfordensis Latifolia'
GenusUlmus
Cultivar'Hertfordensis Latifolia'
OriginEngland

The elm cultivar Ulmus 'Hertfordensis Latifolia' was listed by Loudon in Arboretum et Fruticetum Britannicum (1838) as "the broad-leaved Hertfordshire Elm",[1] and later mentioned, as Ulmus campestris hertfordensis latifolia, by Boulger in the Gardener's Chronicle (II. 12: 1879), but without description.[2] It was considered "probably U. carpinifolia" (:U. minor) by Green,[3] though broad leaves point to a possible Ulmus × hollandica hybrid identity. Hybrids of this type were once common in eastern Hertfordshire.[4][5]

Description[edit]

Loudon's "broad-leaved" epithet distinguished the tree from his narrow-leaved Hertfordshire elm, U. 'Hertfordensis Angustifolia'.

Pests and diseases[edit]

Though susceptible to Dutch Elm Disease, field elms (see Green's conjecture above) and their hybrids produce suckers and usually survive in this form in their area of origin.

Cultivation[edit]

The Woodland Trust records a small number of mature U. minor and Ulmus × hollandica surviving in Hertfordshire.[6]

Synonymy[edit]

  • Ulmus campestris hertfordensis latifolia: Boulger, in Gardener's Chronicle II. 12: 298 1879.

References[edit]

  1. ^ Arboretum et Fruticetum Britannicum, 3: 1396 1838
  2. ^ Boulger, George (1879). "British Elms". The Gardener's Chronicle.
  3. ^ Green, Peter Shaw (1964). "Registration of cultivar names in Ulmus". Arnoldia. 24 (6–8). Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University: 41–80. Retrieved 16 February 2017.
  4. ^ Richens, R. H., Elm (Cambridge, 1983), p.5
  5. ^ herbariaunited.org, herbarium specimen, broadleaved, long-petioled Hertfordshire elm, near Sawbridgeworth, Herts., 1941
  6. ^ "The Woodland Trust, Ancient Tree Hunt". Archived from the original on 2016-06-24. Retrieved 2016-05-26.