User talk:Bardofcornish

Thanks, I'd personally like to have a Common critical subjects section rather than a theme section, but I don't know what others would think. I think it would easily cover whatever users wanted in a theme section, but have a better focus on scholars and what they think. I've taken a break from the article for awhile, though. I don't like fights. I use wikipedia for fun, and if it isn't fun, than why bother? Wrad 23:01, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, on your question of why the themes section disappeared. Somebody removed it, saying that it had poor refs. You can see what they said if you look at the page's edit history. I'm actually kind of inclined to agree with them. I may swamp it with a whole bunch of information and good refs in a little while. Wrad 23:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Shakespeare project's first collaboration has ended in success, with William Shakespeare reaching FA status! Congrats to all who chipped in! We also had success in our second collaboration Romeo and Juliet, which is now a GA. Our next step is deciding which article to collaborate on next. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Shakespeare#Next Collaboration to help us choose. Thanks. Wrad 04:12, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Shakespeare Project's new collaboration is now to bring Hamlet to GA status. Wrad 00:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like I'll adopt you? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:46, 02 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd made the change in your page. I'm so excited you decided to take my offer. You seem like a good editor. Before you decide let me just briefly introduce myself. I'm 17 years old and live in Las Vegas, Nevada. I've been with Wikipedia for about 10 months. Mostly what I do is work on wrestling articles or other articles; but mostly wrestling. I see that you like William Shakespeare (I hope). If its alright with you I'd like to know a little about yourself. Also tell me all you want to learn at my talk page and I will do the best I can. Happy Editing! Your friend, --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:48, 02 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it seems to me that you want to get the job done. And I admire that. If you'd like I would be glad to help you citing the sources. Why I'd pick you? Well, because I was cruising around and I came to your page and I saw that you were a very interested editor. If that helps. But again, if you need anything, don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:12, 02 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will. Just in case if I'm not in reach this would help you on how to Cite sources. Are there any other sources that you can find? Just asking. I'm so glad I know another Coldplay fan. What's your favorite song? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:14, 04 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talking about a topic and replying your opinion. Here you can learn more about: Indenting and Bullets. Hope that answers your question. Forgot to ask you, is the Elizabeth Keckly article the way you wanted it to be? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So are you having any problems? Or have you been finding your way through Wikipedia? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:57, 03 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you firing me? No, the only reason I asked is because I've seen your contributions and it seems that you're improving. I'm not making it seem that I don't care. I have been busy, I'll admit to that. But, if there's anything that you're finding hard to do, please don't hesitate to ask. If not, then I think it's time that I graduate you. But, before I do, I need to know if there's something your having problems with. Again, I don't want you to go on that I don't have an interest. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:07, 04 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. You have now graduated from the adoption program.

This user has graduated from the adoption program by Zerorules677! Kudos!

<---(make sure to add this to your userpage). It was a pleasure of meeting you and hope you stick to Wikipedia. Would you be kind to sign my autograph book? Oh, I've been meaning to give you this:

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For taking the time and kindess of welcoming new users to Wikipedia. Keep up the good work. And, Happy Editing. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:13, 04 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for signing. I really appreciate it. Heads up, I fixed your Barnstar. I'll talk to you later and happy editing. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:02, 07 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that most cleanup templates, like "unreferenced", "fact", "cleanup"etc., are best not "subst"ed. See WP:SUBST for more details. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 16:18 23 October 2007 (GMT).

Thanks for joining the Literature project. Hopefully we can do some real good in this area. Wrad 01:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Its been quite sometime. What have you been up to? And I hope your having an easy time here on Wikipedia. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:43, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 ThinkBlue  has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

That's good. You're improving your skills here. Welcoming users is another form of way of helping others, keep up the good work. As for me, I've been active with the wrestling project, joined the Saw project (the film series) and have been warning users of their vandalism. Listen, if there's anything thing you need, don't hesitate to ask me or anyone. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:03, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're editing The Tempest. Can we agree that I won't touch anything above the "Performance History" heading and you don't touch anything below it (except "sources", of course) for the next hour or so, to avoid edit conficts? AndyJones (talk) 15:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks. AndyJones (talk) 15:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 12:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The project above which you had indicated an interest in joining at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals page, is now active at Wikipedia:WikiProject Former Featured articles. John Carter (talk) 18:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy 2008. :) I copied this signature from a member of WikiProject Professional wrestling ---> Bardofcornish. Feel free to fix the signature anyway you'd like. For colors see Web colors, if you'd like to use it. Or you can go here and request the signature of your dreams. If you need any help, you know the deal. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:46, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Will you be using it? Or..... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. If you'd like, I can try to fix your userboxes or get help. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! Many thanks for the star. And I'm sure we'll be working together on the next collaboration (whatever it is!) AndyJones (talk) 08:35, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:57, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:13, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, sure I can help. If its alright with you, can you give me a few days, as I'm currently busy and stuff? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, no hard feelings. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bard, I really appreciate it and it made my day. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You expressed interest in writing for the Wikipedia Sign?post (sorry for the delay in responding). I'm sending this message to everyone who commented, so if you have any questions I haven't answered, please feel free to ask me, and I'll try to respond to specific questions.

Essentially, what I'm looking for is writers who can step in and write on subjects that are newsworthy from week-to-week. The content of the stories obviously varies each week depending on what's happening; this is discussed below.

There are three major parts to writing an article:

1. Choosing a topic
2. Writing the article
3. Submitting the article

As said above, topics will vary from week-to-week. For this week, these particular issues may be newsworthy:

• Bureaucratship candidacies — There are a lot of bureaucratship candidacies this week, for the first time in about six or seven months. I'm personally covering this one for next week, but this is a good example of what might be newsworthy.
• Encyclopedia of Life — This encyclopedia of species has been getting some press, and relates somewhat to Wikimedia project Wikispecies.
• Hidden categories — For those technically inclined, this is a new feature that has some interesting implications.

For more ideas, and for ideas in the future, check the tip-line -- there are usually some good ideas there.

Once you've decided on a topic, make sure to sign up for it in the newsroom, under "Special stories", so that users aren't duplicating each others' work (though multiple writers are certainly free to work together on a story).

Now, you've decided on a topic and signed up for it. To write it, create a subpage in your userspace. For my story this week on the bureaucratship candidacies, for example, I'll create it at User:Ral315/Bureaucratship candidacies. The name isn't a big deal, of course -- I'll change it if necessary.

Formatting the story isn't important; for your first article, you should mainly focus on writing a good story, and I'll take care of the formatting when we publish. Try to write it in a newspaper-like tone, avoiding personal comments and opinions in favor of straight-forward facts. The size of an article varies based on what the story is, but a good minimum goal for most stories is two-to-three good paragraphs. Longer articles are even better, so long as they're well-written.

Now, all you have to do is post a link to the article in the newsroom, where you signed up for it earlier. That's it! You're done!

Again, if you have any questions at all, please contact me, and I'll try to respond as soon as possible.

Thanks for your interest in writing for the Signpost. Ral315 (talk) 03:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:18, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:46, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 20:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 15:24, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy Birthday	from the Birthday Committee
	Wishing Bardofcornish a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!

--SMS ^Talk 06:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Bardofcornish, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

wwesocks^sign 08:50, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Birthday Committee wishes you a very happy birthday! Enjoy your special day.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:13, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:03, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:25, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:17, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:51, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! The current Shakespeare Project Collaboration is Romeo and Juliet. This project is currently going a thorough peer review and copyedit before moving on to FAC. The link to the peer review is Wikipedia:Peer review/Romeo and Juliet/archive1. Have a look! « Diligent Terrier Bot (talk) 20:43, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice you're using one of the {{motd}} templates, run by Wikipedia:Motto of the day. You may have noticed that some of the mottos recently have been followed by a date from 2006, or on occasion simply "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia". The reason for this is that Motto of the day is in some very serious need of help. Participation in the project, which has never been especially high, has dropped considerably over this past summer, to the point we have had several days where no motto was scheduled to appear at all. Over the past several weeks, I've been the only editor scheduling mottos at all, but there aren't enough comments on some of these mottos to justify their use. If we do not get some help - and soon - your daily mottos will stop. In order for us to continue updating these templates for you, we need your help.

When you get a chance between your normal editing, could you stop by our nominations page and leave a few comments on some of the mottos there, especially those that do not have any comments yet? This works very simply; you read a motto, decide whether or not you like it, and post your opinion just below the motto. That's it - no experience required, just an idea of what you personally like and what you feel reflects Wikipedia and its community. If you do have past experience with the project, then please close some of the older nominations once they've got a decent consensus going. There are directions on the nominations page on how to do this.

If you have any questions, please let me know, or post on the project's talk page. I'm looking forward to reading your comments on the suggested mottos, and any additional suggestions you'd like to make. Until then, happy editing! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:30, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion going on regarding the project's policy on how information on characters should be represented in articles on Shakespeare's plays. Please take part by clicking Talk:Romeo and Juliet#Character Analysis. Further context, if needed, can be found by scanning the two previous talk sections on the page as well. Sent by §hepBot (Disable) at 04:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC) per request of Wrad (talk)[reply]

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington. In April, we met with some local Wikipedians to learn what they would like to know about other editors’ history and activities (within Wikipedia) when interacting with them on talk pages. The goal of those sessions was to gather feedback to help design an embedded application that could quickly communicate useful information about other Wikipedians. We have now created a few images that we feel represent some of what our participants thought was important. We would appreciate it if you took a few minutes of your time to complete an online survey that investigates whether or not these images would be useful to you. Your quick contribution would be very valuable to our research group and ultimately to Wikipedia. (When finished, the code for this application will be given over to the Wikipedia community to use and/or adjust as they see fit.)

Willing to spend a few minutes taking our survey? Click this link.

Please feel free to share the link with other Wikipedians. The more feedback, the better! The survey is completely anonymous and takes less than 10 minutes to complete. All data is used for university research purposes only.

Thank you for your time! If you have any questions about our research or research group, please visit our user page. Commprac01 (talk) 21:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Additional details about our research group are available here.

Hey, Bardofcornish. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!-- Vatsan34 (talk) 15:15, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Bardofcornish! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 00:59, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi Bardofcornish! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by: Visiting our website for resources, events, and more Meet other women and share your story in our profile space Participate at and "like" our Facebook group Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience! Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:59, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.

Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been sent by pjoef on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]