User talk:Dclemens1971

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristina Baehr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristina Baehr until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shinsi Bohansetr (talk) 06:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathan Ingen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Ingen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shinsi Bohansetr (talk) 09:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Maina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Maina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shinsi Bohansetr (talk) 09:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joel Millanguir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Millanguir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shinsi Bohansetr (talk) 09:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Forest Building you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Forest Building for comments about the article, and Talk:Forest Building/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 13:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia
		This award is given in recognition to Dclemens1971 for accumulating at least 500 points during the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Rack and pinion Award
		This award is given in recognition to Dclemens1971 for accumulating at least 15 points during each week of the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete it, please keep it forever, it should have its own page. don't delete it 70.167.159.125 (talk) 17:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion will take place and the community will decide. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How can I join the discussion, I am desperate to save it please! 70.167.159.125 (talk) 18:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I removed the G3 tag from Immaculate Constellation, as I don't think it qualified as a hoax There ARE non-hoax sources available, albeit incredibly limited. It feels more like the author saw something, asked an AI to write an article in good faith, and it just hallucinated a lot of things; its probably also WP:TOO SOON for an article. Cheers! Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 17:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Guessitsavis Yeah, the sources I saw it in were all deprecated at WP:RSP so it def had the flavor of a hoax/conspiracy theory, especially combined with the fake citations to nonexistent sources. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:58, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Really? I didn't think NewsNation got deprecated, I didn't see it at RSP. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 18:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dclemens1971, this is just a friendly reminder that when closing moves, be sure to remove the requested move template in the section on the talk page. When you closed Talk:Tico and Friends#Requested move 8 October 2024, it seems the template was left behind. You can see I've removed the template here. Also, you left a generic {{old move}} talkpage banner, but its always a good idea to make sure to fill in the parameters. If you don't want to have to do this manually, consider some user scripts that do this: I've recently installed BilledMammal's Move+ script. Kindly, Bobby Cohn (talk) 20:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bobby Cohn Thanks for the pointer and the correction. I wanted to try my hand at closing a move discussion and this seemed like an appropriate one. I appreciate the guidance. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the team! Bobby Cohn (talk) 23:20, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dclemens1971, article, was delete on (AFD_link) now again created by a new sleeper-sock (Lordo'Web) account, draft was submitted by This IP & IP was blocked in true block evasion. Page was first time created by (R2dra)[1] check plz g4 & g5 apply here to many new socks should also be block. Many other slipper sock accounts also found with evidences. Some actions salting these titles and strick against against these sock required.

• [[R2dra]] // [[Lordo'Web]][2][3] [4][5]

• [R2dra // WikiWhizKid1999] [6] [7]

• [Lordo'Web // WikiWhizKid1999][8][9]

• [Lordo'Web // WikiWhizKid1999][10][11][12][13]

Largely overlapping socks with master

One another user also liking to be slipper sock account ==> (Prabhanshu Singh Rajput).[14][15]