User talk:Donmike10

I expanded Let the Devil Wear Black and nominated if for DYK with you listed in the credits. Joe Chill (talk) 03:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading this media, It would be appreciated if you could add :

• 1-2 paragraphs explaining what is shown in the image.

As well as helping those categorising the image, it will help place the image in context and allow other users of the image (including academics) to make better use of the image :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:09, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On June 16, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Let the Devil Wear Black, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt (talk) 00:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 03:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you are using template:otheruses4 instead of template:about cf. [1].

Please compare [2] and [3].174.3.101.230 (talk) 02:39, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Um. Yep. So? I'm not against people making changes to what I do. That's part of the fun. I just write them that way. Donmike10 (talk) 02:52, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don, Ignore him. He is a banned user. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:04, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:24, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reference for this figure? I had understood the movie approximately broke even, before syndication, DVD sales, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.110.104.80 (talk) 12:09, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure - I'll add a reference.Donmike10 (talk) 16:07, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great work on creating these and replacing the succession boxes with them. Lugnuts (talk) 07:01, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I try and do my best. Donmike10 (talk) 16:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The July 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:02, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The August 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2010 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting five coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next year; members are invited to nominate themselves if interested. Please do not vote yet, voting will begin on September 15. This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:44, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I see that you have worked on director templates. I have some concerns about the extent of breaking up certain bodies of directed works by decade. Could you please share your thoughts at this discussion? Erik (talk | contribs) 23:24, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About Template:Peter Greenaway: WP:NAVBOX is pretty clear in that unlinked text should be avoided in navigation templates, so the release years shouldn't be there unless necessary for disambiguation. It doesn't say anything in particular about groups for different decades, but the default for any smaller navbox is to have no groups; there is no reason to inflate it with groups when none are needed. Grouping by decade is no natural way to break down a filmography, and although I think such groups can be handy for really large filmographies, this is not the case with Peter Greenaway.

The topic was recently up for debate at WP:FILM here where I explained my arguments in more detail. I would appreciate if we could discuss this instead of reverting each other with empty edit summaries. At the very least, the Peter Greenaway template should be changed back to include all articles under its scope, not just the movies. Smetanahue (talk) 22:28, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:21, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Octoberr 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:44, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The November 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:52, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Don, I completely agree with you regarding your stance on Notability and I could use you assistance with something if you would be so kind. Please drop me an email to rob1 (at) rockabilly (dot) net thanks Robman94 (talk) 01:29, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The December 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:02, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

donmike10, Is there any way that we can leave off the specifics of the present job on Woody Widenhofers' page, being that it has no relevance to his football career (which is the reason he has a page). I think a generally statement will provide sufficient information. thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.154.20 (talk) 00:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:1.5 Liter of Arrowhead.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:20, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Donmike10, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Donmike10. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:04, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, unfortunately WP policy notes that you can't use non-free media in your user space, even under fair use rationale. Just a heads up --Errant ^(chat!) 23:47, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Thanks for the heads up. Donmike10 (talk) 00:52, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:12, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:09, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my deletion of the external link to the trailer: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hanna%27s_War&diff=prev&oldid=422875887 . have you looked at that site? It's clustered with facebook and twitter links and offers a trailer in moderate quality. And why should a trailer be linked anyway? I previously had asked here for guidence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film#External_links . Cheers :) -Koppapa (talk) 17:40, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - the site has a lot of useless garbage but it has the full trailer even if it's in moderate quality. Think about if you were a kid in school and happen to stumble across the article. You have never seen or heard of the film and it's not available for rental. It peaks your curiosity and you get to watch the trailer for it. This shows you about the fact it's some kind of random b-movie from the 80s. you get the actors, the situation etc. in a way which could never be properly explained in words. We are here to provide information. This trailer does just that; it provides so much information in a variety of ways. Deleting the link to the trailer is just us removing information, no matter how trite it may seem at times. There is no upside to removing it - only a downside. Donmike10 (talk) 18:00, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:39, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, because you did not interlink them to the main template like most other subsystems of templates, I did not notice them until after I had created the more standard format. Then, having created a whole new system, it was a matter of which ones were "better". If you had linked them to the main template with footers, I would not have created new ones. See how most of the other main templates are linked to the subsystems by footers.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. before I reorganized all the categories, the main templates were not even in the subcats of Academy Awards templates. This is another reason I did not see your templates.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:33, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Squirt.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 00:57, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from File:Squirt.JPG, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 01:31, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Crystal Geyser 750 ml.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 01:47, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:40, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 16:38, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011 project coordinator election has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to vote here by October 29! Erik (talk | contribs) 11:58, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films based on Isaac Bashevis Singer works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 13:52, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Donmike10! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 15:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:37, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Club Extinction film.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 18:05, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Sauerkraut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tartar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you're trusting IMDB so blindly. Anyone can add content to it. I've read the whole James Curtis biography on Spencer Tracy, which goes into a lot of detail about the film, and there is no mention of them going to Ecuador. Hell, there's no way Tracy would've agreed to that. All the acting was shot in Cuba and LA. --Lobo (talk) 22:38, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2012 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the distribution list. GRAPPLE X 00:38, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Here Comes the Boom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reggie Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American Blue Note, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eddie Jones and Jonathan Walker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Donmike can you please let me know why you removed a critique i wrote for the movei Summertree. With thanks Marriette (usertalk). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marriette (talk • contribs) 06:59, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mariette. I actually felt really bad removing your well thought out review, as I'm sure your intentions are obviously good. Unfortunately, we are here to act as an encyclopedia and we are against individuals posting their own reviews or opinions. There are policies which have been established among the editors that govern which reviews can be used ie published in a major periodical, etc. Think about if everyone could simply write their review on a film page. You could have millions of people attempting to add their own thoughts on a particular film and it would be maddening.Donmike10 (talk) 17:55, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Donmike Thanks for taking the time to explain.... i was not sure of the rules as it looked as tho' anyone could contribute...but yes that would be a bit mad! lol. Have a great day. Regrds — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.99.105 (talk) 22:57, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Canadian people convicted of child sexual abuse, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nouniquenames 15:27, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Man Who Loved Cat Dancing (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why you made all the changes here[4] when everything was just fine the way it was. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 05:47, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Link rot, so filled in the references using reflinks.Donmike10 (talk) 17:24, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Africles such as the one on Ellen Bethea should only be in categories that are mentioned in the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:54, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If someone removes an article from a category because something is not mentioned in the article, you should not revert them. You are free to edit the text of the article and then add the relevant category, but just reverting them should not ever be your course of action.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:56, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as you are free to edit and ADD info to the article. By removing a valuable category, you are removing really necessary info. If you want to add something to the body of the article, please do. but don't remove necessary information.Donmike10 (talk) 00:59, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the category is not mentioned at all in the article, it can not be used for the person in question.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:01, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Um. Says who? Please refrain from deleting necessary info. You are welcome to add it. Donmike10 (talk) 01:02, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Savage Seven, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page László Kovács (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I see you mistook who I was regarding my message towards. I was referring to the IP user, and I completely agree with the format you have been making sure it stays at. Sorry if I cause any troubles or whatnot. --Recollected (talk) 18:34, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. It's always appreciated. Donmike10 (talk) 19:13, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 54th Berlin International Film Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magnifico (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Two Idiots in Hollywood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim McGrath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:26, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Orphans French.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 14:31, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CHOMPS film.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 03:52, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Natalie Portman may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ] for her role in the film and later wrote the foreword to Bowers' book, ''Ballet Beautiful''.<ref>{{cite web|author=June 12, 2012 |url=http://www.wwd.com/eye/lifestyle/mary-helen-bowers-on-ballet-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Donmike10. I have proposed renaming an article that you created. Feel free to join in the discussion, at Talk:Rude Awakening (1989 film)#Proposed rename. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 15:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Nick Offerman page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Terror Circus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I had changed the article to a redirect was due to the lack of coverage in reliable sources. All I could find was two reviews. Other than that all that I could really find were passing mentions about this in relation to its director or brief reviews in places such as VideoHound's database-esque movie book. If you can find a few more reviews or perhaps proof that this has screened since then at a film festival (I'm not picky, even small ones will be fine) then I have no problem with it being re-created. I tried finding some but had very little success myself. In any case, this wasn't an arbitrary decision made just because- we really need more coverage to assert that this passes notability guidelines for films. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2 reviews is enough for notability, but why in the world would anyone want to remove info makes no sense to me. It actually may help someone with plot, characters, info.Donmike10 (talk) 18:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• No, they're not. Two reviews is not enough to establish notability or show a depth of coverage. We need just a little more. I'm nominating this for AfD. THis has nothing to do with wanting to remove info just to remove it. My thing is that we hold all articles to the same standard as the next one. I don't expect coverage of Citizen Kane proportions, but I would like a little more coverage than what we currently have. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:21, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nightmare Circus (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nightmare Circus (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:27, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I would again really like to ask that instead of saying that the two reviews are enough, that you please do some work on finding sources yourself to show notability. I've seen many, many articles deleted due to a lack of coverage despite having 1-2 reviews, so please try looking for sources. There's a chance that others might find some while they're looking since it's now up for AfD, but you really shouldn't rely on other people to do the work for you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:27, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've never understood why in the world someone would want to remove information that could potentially be useful to someone. Someone may want to know about this odd, peculiar film for whatever reason, and you want them to be redirected to the director? How does that help anybody? It only hurts and doesn't help. Donmike10 (talk) 22:23, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:ITSUSEFUL isn't a policy that we keep articles by. You need to show coverage in reliable sources. Don't get me wrong- I get frustrated over notability guidelines as well, but they're there for a reason and we have to abide by them. On a side note, Letterboxd is a website where anyone can sign up with an account and post a review, so that isn't considered to be a usable source to show notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just can't fathom why removing what could possibly be even one little bit of potentially useful information would outweigh having it gone altogether. Donmike10 (talk) 06:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Douglas Booth page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Justine Bateman page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Inspecteur Lavardin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cash Money Records may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• to-the-center-stage-interview-2/ |title=Sap: From the Back of the Boards to the Center Stage [INTERVIEW |publisher=AllHipHop.com |date=2012-02-14 |accessdate=2014-08-20}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:09, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films set in a fictional country, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:13, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rafferty Polish.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ruby Cairo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cassidy Gifford, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Blue Bloods and God's Not Dead. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lolly Madonna XXX.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:17, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Air America (film) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the CBS Studio Center page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Michael Nyqvist page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alain Moussi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alain Moussi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TomStar81 (Talk) 06:23, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jane Wall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Racing Demon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Bottega Louie page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Weekend Pass.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 20:22, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Weekend Pass.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Editør (talk) 12:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So I assume the other one can be removed. – Editør (talk) 08:41, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Totally cool. Donmike10 (talk) 16:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Weekend Pass.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Editør (talk) 08:42, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 90 Minutes in Heaven (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/90 Minutes in Heaven (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't we just get rid of every Wikipedia article while we're at it? Oh yeah, they supply information to people, that's why. Donmike10 (talk) 16:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Rob Huebel page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Dudikoff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Reserve. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Don Stephenson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Stephenson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 09:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colony (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nelson McCormick. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Projectionist 1971.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Louis Leterrier page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Marianna Palka page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Aubrey O'Day page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Carly Chaikin NAMI.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Thora Birch - Konerko.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:12, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]