User talk:Filmssssssssssss

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Shearonink (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One thing - be careful of over linking. We only want the first time something is mentioned to be a wikilink. Secretlondon (talk) 19:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Intforce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, National Museum of China, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. intforce (talk) 11:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You need to preview your edits. You couldn't have even looked at National World War I Museum either before or after you wrecked it, and you did other malformed edits here and here. Slow down. — Smuckola(talk) 20:12, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your attention to the Qing emperors, but MOS:CHINESE#Introductory sentences says the Hanzi should be "either in the first sentence or in an info box." There is an info box on these pages, so no need for Hanzi in the lead sentence. Cheers in any case! ch (talk) 19:55, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Disappearance of Anthonette Cayedito, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't revert you the second time, but I can't say I disagree with it--there was no closing punctuation, I think there was a line break in it, and there was something wrong with the reference or the reference name. This is obviously a high-visibility article, so please be careful, and check preview, before you post an edit. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 00:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I notice that you don't provide edit summaries to your edits. It's very helpful and useful to other editors if you do so, and WP:FIES explains why this is so. Please review that guideline. I invite you to consider adding edit summaries to your edits, which will also have the benefit of reducing the number of reversions to your edits, as other editors will be able to read and understand your edit rationales. Thanks. Moncrief (talk) 23:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ndjdx 82.131.31.189 (talk) 14:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can we just st discuss this man. 24.89.118.190 (talk) 09:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 05:46, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please don't replace infobox portraits with older photos for no reason. Also, please use edit summaries when editing. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 22:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

seconded. --Erp (talk) 15:28, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I reverted your edit for clarity and to remove jargon on the article. If you wish, feel free to edit the page again to indicate that it was a high-rise fire, as that would be the more appropriate terminology. Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 22:07, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Palace of Westminster does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Paris1127 (talk) 01:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Filmssssssssssss: Hello, I asked you back in December 2021 to please use edit summaries. You have continued to make countless contributions without an edit summary. Would you mind please, please, giving a brief explanation of your edits? It really isn't that difficult. Thank you. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 01:57, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn more about adding images and making edits. I've improved two of your edits now:

• At Copts, I added a "thumb" parameter to the "File" link, and changed the caption from "Coptic_diaspora_map" to "Coptic diaspora",[1] to improve your edit there.
• Similarly,[2] at Australians, with your edit there.
• You can see the difference between them, if you view Copts before and after, and Australians before and after

When you make an edit, you can use the "Show preview" function to see how your changes are going to look on the page. I don't normally deal with images in articles, so if you plan to do more of that, it would be more efficient overall if you checked your changes, and picked up some ideas on how to make sure the improvements are the best they can be. _signed, Willondon (talk) 23:47, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xie of Xia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mang.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Don Ross (acoustician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Submariner.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CactiStaccingCrane. I noticed that you recently removed content from SpaceX without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 00:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. —Svārtava (t/u) • 03:58, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've noticed you reverting some vandalism. One minor thing -- when you are warning users, instead of {{uw-vandalism1}}, you should subst the template, ie. {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}. There are tools that can semi-automate this process like Twinkle. Good job otherwise :) >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 16:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I noticed what you were doing at Kentucky there - thank you for that. Just a tip - you might want to consider installing WP:Twinkle. It looks like you went to some considerable effort to remove all that nonsense; amongst other useful stuff, Tinkle would have allowed you to remove it all with a single mouse click. It's not a separate application or anything - it just adds a few buttons to the screen when you're reading/editing through your regular browser. Cheers Girth Summit _(blether) 17:19, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, good job with fighting vandalism. I noticed that you are not using a linked signature on your comments after the templates. To do it properly you can use the signature and timestamp button on the menu or you can add this code: --~~~~

Regards, --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:53, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your RC patrolling work. Just wanted to give you a heads up that this probably wasn't a good use of standard rollback. The IP editor removed text that was partially unsourced and partially incomprehensible, with an accurate edit summary. This was a content dispute, not vandalism, so standard rollback with no edit summary wasn't the right tool. agtx 13:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cho has left the USSS.2401:7400:4007:5104:B589:DA2D:1773:24A7 (talk) 14:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're the wrong person https://dealbreaker.com/2021/12/citadel-hires-secret-service-agen please apologise. 2401:7400:4007:5104:B589:DA2D:1773:24A7 (talk) 14:26, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your concern, but my edits aren't vandalism. High school pages are full of "notable alumni" that are really non-notable, unsourced additions. I am merely removing those. There are a lot so I understand why it looks like section blanking. It isn't. 76.94.59.40 (talk) 15:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have no idea why my edits on Tarski's axiomatization of the reals are constantly being rolled back by you. The proof in the section Tarski's axiomatization of the reals#How these axioms imply a field before my edits claims that Tarski's axioms imply that "the real numbers are also Dedekind-complete, divisible, and Archimedean, but Tarski's original source never proved that the axioms form a total order, let alone a divisible group and Archimedean group. As a result, the proof needs to be elaborated to show that the real numbers are a divisible group and Archimedean group from Tarski's axioms, which is what I have done in my edits. As a result, I am going to revert the edits back to the state it was before the rollback. Thanks. 96.63.208.31 (talk) 17:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for the feedback. As I am editing through a mobile phone, I am struggling to punctuate and construte my sentence in a formal tone. I hope you I have a great day ahead! Useaho (talk) 15:11, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the paragraph that I removed from the Catherine Tramell page. It is poorly written, barely coherent nonsense and has no place on Wikipedia. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.11.73.170 (talk) 18:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concerns, but cannot just blank pages without approval -Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You helped yesterday but they are back.

Please, help, there's a vandalic user that during more than a year has tried to delete it. Please, help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.202.17.248 (talk) 17:44, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

guessing you use tools to help you. They need some tweaks... 65.127.183.235 (talk) 16:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted your edits, because I saw that you had added

"pf its airing" Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at edits carefully before reverting. Sometimes removing a large amount of text is valid. 128.151.71.7 (talk) 13:24, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

got it, -Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your efforts in counter-vandalism... Keep it going! Volten001 ☎ 13:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I used imperial measurements on a page relevant to the US of A.

You've got a problem, not me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.183.10.84 (talk) 16:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At the page Ozyorsk, Chelyabinsk Oblast, you reverted an edit I made. Why has my edit been reverted? 83.87.200.140 (talk) 15:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. I see that you have reverted your revert 83.87.200.140 (talk) 15:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you are not monitoring my talk page, I will repost the same content here for your consideration:

== Reverts ==

Hi,

I understand your concerns, but next time cite sources before removing large amounts of content 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to "cite sources" in such an instance, though to help out trigger-happy reverters on vandalism patrol such as yourself User 2601:196:180:8d80:1d68:17d0:e86b:f982 linked the appropriate section of the Wikipedia Manual of Style for you to reference - and you still blindly reverted their edit. As well as the previous dozen, all of which had appropriate edit summaries (clearly indicating the work was methodical and constructive, and defintely NOT vandalism), in one mass revert. You may blank my warning on your talk page, but any repeat actions such as these indeed will be escalated to administrative review, as vandalism patrol is not a blank ticket to abuse your editing privileges at others' expense. 2601:196:180:8D80:11A3:8F01:3CB:69E5 (talk) 13:46, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not abusing my editing privileges 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:51, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By definition you are, mass reverting obviously constructive article edits (complete with edit summaries) under guise of vandalism patrol, and further impugning the edits as activity that belonged in the editor's sandbox. Then repeat reverting. And blanking your talk page to cover your trail. None of this is constructive. Try becoming familiar with WP:MOS and taking the time to familiarize yourself with edits before you revert them.2601:196:180:8D80:11A3:8F01:3CB:69E5 (talk) 14:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Never_Fear&diff=next&oldid=1138237850Bar Harel (talk) 17:58, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work though ❤️ Bar Harel (talk) 18:00, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no source, no citation. But I think that everyone having heard of the Bridge of Sighs would understand the reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.166.148.86 (talk) 18:41, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Filmssssssssssss. I am @Archer1234. I observed your recent reports at WP:AIV and noticed a couple of things that you should be aware of. First, every new report should go at the bottom. You have been adding them to the top of the section (just underneath the comment that reads List begins BELOW this line). Second, each report should include an asterisk * at the beginning as the pages lists all reports as a bulleted list. As a consequence of the way you have been doing it, when the bot detects that the account/IP you are reporting has been blocked it removes it, but it also removes all of the items below it as it thinks they are comments of your report. So, I'd appreciate it if you could adjust how you add future reports. Thank you. — Archer1234 (t·c) 14:36, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As a regular admin at AIV, I don't care what order the reports are in because they shouldn't be there for very long. The asterisk is helpful though, so we don't confuse the bots! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:40, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Filmssssssssssss. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:40, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

kindly allow me to put correct information about malhun hatun. some users are unnecessarily reverting my edits. she is the main character. and I have edit all information series accordingly. you can check. help me please 103.131.214.255 (talk) 21:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 103.131.214.255,

Are you properly citing sources? That could be the problem 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Doofus—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:59, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This edit by Crystallizedcarbon has been reverted by an admin - Filmssssssssssss

Hello! Hope you are having a good day. I wanted to bring attention to your reports, specifically, you can see all the ones in this revision: [3]. For a specific edit, see [4]. Your reports are malformed. You are doing part of it correctly, but the ending curly braces need to be on the same line, otherwise the bot gets confused and doesn't delete the reports correctly.

On one line, we have *{{IP Vandal template part, and on the second line we have the }} for the end of the template. These need to be moved up so the correct report is *{{IPvandal template/Vandal template}} <reason here>. Also, just a reminder, to report IPs you would use the IPVandal template, and for regular users, you would use the Vandal template. I just wanted to give you a heads up, and in the future, it would probably be best if you used Twinkle or a different antivandalism tool to make the reports, so we don't have this issue again. Thanks for your time, and have a good day! Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 20:51, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you reinstate the vandalism to to this article? Bibliosporias (talk) 09:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, mistake made 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will try to be more careful when reverting next time 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello mr. Filmsssssssss, This is regarding the page you edited on Wikipedia = Mumtaz Kazi

Please “hyperlink” the page SUREKHA YADAV inside the page of Mumtaz Kazi so that you will get all the proofs necessary to highlight the wrong Fact that Mumtaz Kazi is NOT first, but she is second in every category. First is Surekha Yadav in each and every type of sub-category of Indian Trains. Please make these correct and legal corrections as Surekha Yadav is far more senior than Mumtaz Kazi and we need to respect the FACTS !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.91.75.189 (talk) 17:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your 's' key needs fixing. Deal with that before preaching your message of anti-vandalissssm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.213.146.202 (talk) 16:52, 15 March 2023 (UTC) User blocked by admin - 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:55, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there's no need to give all four warnings like a bot. For obvious bad faith (ie not just someone seeing if they really can edit) or repeated vandalism, you can start at level 2 or 3 or even 4im. I'll block if they've had enough of a hint that what they're doing is disruptive, so if they ignore a level 3 (for example) feel free to report them to AIV. But please not both. If you decide to give them another warning, don't report them to AIV unless they vandalise after that one, and if you decide to go straight to AIV, just skip the final warning. All the best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

got it, thanks 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:03, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i saw that you reverted my edit without explaining why. Could you give me a hint what was wrong with the addition? I am sure you did not think the paragraph was perfect before... 2001:9E8:85:6D00:0:0:0:486 (talk) 18:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your concerns. please refer to WP:GF good faith editing, some edits may not be vandalism, however they might not be necessary, if you have enay questions, please contact me on this talkpage- Best, 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:25, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So you do not see a contradiction in the sentence "X removes A and B from C, but B cannot be removed."?? 2001:9E8:85:6D00:0:0:0:486 (talk) 18:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will revert the edit, and restore your edit 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:30, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 :) 2001:9E8:85:6D00:0:0:0:486 (talk) 18:40, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Filmssssssssssss. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have repeatedly attempted to make the comments regarding the dating of Isa more netural POV. There is no decisive evidence for a date in the Babylonian exile. While some scholars refer to those chapters as "deutro-Isaiah" other, very reputable scholars, do not. While SOME scholars believe in a late date, other, very reputable scholars disagree. So stating that it IS dated from the Babylonian exile is not accurate, but rather that, in the view of some scholars, it dates from that time period. 173.71.213.235 (talk) 19:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User has been blocked for edit warring 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:32, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greenland no longer uses dst and its only the thule air base and ittoqqortoormiit that uses dst 174.94.97.125 (talk) 00:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for reaching out. I saw that you had inserted the edit directly into the page, disrupting the structure of the article. If you go back to your version of the edit, you will see that the first thing readers will see is a random sentence in full uppercase inserted directly into the article with no context. If you must, please post this in the talk page for the site.

Thanks, 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you removed content from Nathan White's wiki page. The content on the coaching was 100% accurate and truthful. The send paragraph waa also accurate, he has no background or education in the field. I do apologize, the second paragraph was sarcastic, in many respects, but I'm uncertain of your role: were you notified by Nathan white? How did, or why did you modify a wiki page without verifying content truthfulness? What is your role with Wikipedia, if any? If you could respond, I'd appreciate it. I do not believe, and I think the public perception is simply that Wikipedia is NOT meant to be a biased self promotion. Period. That is exactly what Mr White's page is, self built, self directed, self promotion. He should stick to his blog or use social eduard, not inhabit Wikipedia. Please advise, if you could. Respect,

Hi, Please see/refer to WP:NPOV. The edit you made seems to violate this policy. Also (This goes with all Wikipedia talkpages), leave your message at the bottom of the page. In this case, I have added a very large "Click here to leave me a note or start a topic". Please keep this in mind when editing other users' talkpages-𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:03, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok. I reviewed. Would it be better if one was to get confirmation or provide documentation to you, that illustrates the facts detailed? Ie. An email from the district detailing the abuse and specifics of the firing? That sort of thing.

Thank you for the clarification. If you could detail how one can update on this subject, it would be appreciated- as example of what one would seek: can one note under an "education" headline, often found on wiki pages, that no journalism degree was obtained? Or is this- and the link was appreciated and helpful, thank you - only driven by what's in media? I ask because some of what this person has posted is really only known to him and not necessarily anyone else, nor published on web or media: these alleged small regional awards, the alleged volunteer posts, the alleged obscure elected positions...things of that nature are not necessarily tracked or accountable back to a media story. Can one remove those or report them to be removed? 159.2.160.132 (talk) 22:14, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, again...its appreciated, this info you've provided. May I ask: how can anything this Nathan white be confirmed? There are no citations, no evidence of his claimed or alleged accomplishments. Nothing, at all. I'm not trying to be smart, but a person could just come into here and fabricate a life or career. How is Nathan White's alleged career or listing of alleged accomplishments, verifiable or confirmed? 159.2.160.132 (talk) 22:23, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that you are not trying to be malicious. You need to cite the information and place the citation on the article. As you may know, this is important not only within Wikipedia but in most (if not all) of academia. Please refer to WP:CS for a guide to citing on the site.

A rule of thumb is that if it is not cited anywhere, then you shouldn't put it in the article.

𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 22:24, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, very much. For your understanding, patience and taking time to explain. Much appreciated and best wishes. Great work/job, btw. You do important work, with little thanks or fanfare. Without you, it's the "wild west" out there, and the policing and editing is very necessary and appreciated! 159.2.160.132 (talk) 22:58, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, if you have any questions about the site, please feel free to reach out to me or my colleagues (Admins, etc) on Wikipedia. Again, I'm glad you are here to contribute, unlike a lot of other IP's I've encountered here 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cottonwood Canyon (Kane County, Utah), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kane County.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did put a reason in my edits. I removed two paragraphs that were redundant, added a source to a claim, and cleaned up the article. 2600:1700:604:CC00:B1C5:3B21:A70A:75E8 (talk) 16:59, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I've reviewed your edit and decided to reinstate it at the discretion of other editors

𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your regular work on anti-vandalism as seen at WP:AIV. Thank you and keep up the good work. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:53, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Great work RC patrolling and catching/reporting vandals so they don't disrupt Wikipedia.

-- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 02:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, the second barnstar today! Thanks very much! 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 02:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Either ways, great work catching that vandal in The David Pakman Show today. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 02:53, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that it wasn’t the perfect edit as I am quite new new Wikipedia but I personally think that the letter from William De la pole, Duke of Suffolk to his son before his died is important and should be on his Wikipedia page. If you could tell me what I can do to make it a good contribution.

82.42.163.170 (talk) 17:19, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I've reviewed your edit and deemed it to be appropriate. I've reinstated it at the discretion of other editors

Thanks, 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 00:11, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just a note that editors (both registered and IPs) can generally remove warnings and other information on their own talk page. See WP:BLANKING for more information. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blaze Wolf were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The image doesn't really show the Canyon at all. Just the Wasatch Mountains.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beaver Canyon (Beaver County, Utah) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Filmssssssssssss! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have 2 questions; i accidntally found your account while surfing on recent changes, how do i change references on pages when the format is just something like [References something] Second question how do i change my username Okascfklk (talk) 21:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okascfklk (talk) 21:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Okascfklk[reply]

Hi Okascfklk, Thank you for reaching out

1, what do you mean by "References"? Do you mean you need help citing sources?

2, Usernames can be changed only by global renamers; requests should be made at Wikipedia:Changing username. User accounts with few or no edits might not be renamed, as it is quicker and easier to simply create a new account.

3, Please proofread your entries on Wikipedia talkpages, even if it means making multiple edits. Others may by a little bit more nitpicky than me when it comes to adding proofread/spellchecked entries.

Hope this helps, 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1. Yes when im editing source i cant change it because the references section is not fully written down so i cant change anything, i am also quite nitpicky

2. Ill change it when i have a reasonable amount of edits

3. Yes Okascfklk (talk) 21:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I see an example of what you are describing? This would be much better for me to see an example so that I can better help you 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to add the references of Bernardo del Carpio as an estimate of leading the Basque army in the Battle of Roncevaux Pass, tried to add a reference but idk how to add it

I described it in my edit summary but i doubt anyone can see it

For reference, i edited it with source code. Just easier for me Okascfklk (talk) 21:37, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Add "<ref>" before the citation, as well as the same thing after the citation but with "/" before "<ref" after the end of the citation 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. And how can i translate pages? Okascfklk (talk) 21:41, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use Google Translate or some other software, but do not add non- English information to pages other than citations. Also regarding citations, use Easybib or another free citation generator to guide you through this process 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Okascfklk (talk) 21:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please don't report vandals to AIV until they've vandalised after an appropriate warning. There is no point leaving a warning then reporting them to AIV before they've edited again. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you were patrolling recent changes at the same time as me, and I wanted to thank you for helping to deal with all of those vandals :) Cheers! Fakescientist8000 19:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to 2023 Sudan clashes: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Firestar464 (talk) 00:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for this 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 00:43, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed on my WatchList that you recently reverted vandalism to the Joan Finney article by User talk:2604:CA00:1C8:99B3:0:0:662:1A25, and I was wondering if you were recommending any further action should be taken to either block this user or semi-protect the article because other recent acts of vandalism to the Joan Finney article by that user have also been reverted. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments regarding this matter. TommyBoy (talk) 00:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep an eye out for any unconstructive edits this IP performs until May. If he does not make unconstructive edits until May, the April edits will become stale, and we will have to wait for another 4 reverted edits in order to qualify for a block 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 01:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for following up with me. The other user who recently reverted edits by User talk:2604:CA00:1C8:99B3:0:0:662:1A25 to the Joan Finney article also recommended against blocking the user or semi-protecting the article, but I will keep an eye on the article on my WatchList.--TommyBoy (talk) 02:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Article patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here! There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Might have been a bit harsh, don't you think? 157.231.120.86 (talk) 11:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Our block on your IP was justified. You vandalize, we block. Vandalize again, and we will block you for longer. We have already done this 3 times on your IP. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Onanist 157.231.120.86 (talk) 14:46, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not accept any changes in the members status per consensus on the talk archive Talk:Loona/Archive 1#"Former members". Lightoil (talk) 01:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Filmssssssssssss you say you are on vacation yet you continue to edit. Can you please respond? Lightoil (talk) 05:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I will remove that template, forgot to do so 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this was a perfectly legit edit you reverted: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Solar_deity&oldid=1152056987

I removed a bunch of stuff that is unrelated to the article and is already discussed on the Christmas page (which is linked to). The relevant part, the specific theory that relates to Sol Invictus, was left intact. The Zodiac section has been marked for years as unreliably sourced and looks like original research, so I removed that too. Rather than revert the whole edit, please edit back in the specific information you think is missing from the edit. Reverting the edit did not leave the article in a better state. 76.135.106.145 (talk) 07:42, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve reinstated your edit at the discretion of other editors 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 12:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I don't quite know how wikipedia edit work i didn't know we needed to justify it, but basically it mentioned Mill, a 19th century philosopher in the 17th century tab so i figured i'd just put the content in the right time tab ? If that makes sense ! 91.180.120.64 (talk) 13:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your edit, and I appreciate your efforts. Next time, please use the edit summary next time so it does not get confused for bad faith edits

Thanks, 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for all your hard anti-vandalism work. Your username shows up every minute on my watchlist at AIV! Tails Wx 18:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand, plain and simple. 157.231.120.86 (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look at your edits, “Brian ‘’’Pancake’’’ Wells” is one example.

We blocked you for disruptive editing. Please read my philosophy on my userpage, as well as WP:DE 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:39, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://minorplanetcenter.net/mpec/K23/K23J48.html is the latest announcement, and as I was typing this, we got another one. 108.160.120.19 (talk) 03:10, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your citing, but we don't need edit summaries containing personal statements, such as "I'm very tired and I need a nap". Please keep all edit summaries orderly and professional

Thanks, 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 03:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I quite literally spent hours in front of a screen just refreshing and editing. (And I'm just human as well - I spent most of yesterday evening just editing and citing. I was expecting to do more of it today but I'm actually exhausted and I really do need some kind of nap.) 108.160.120.19 (talk) 03:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You're doing great lately! Reverting vandalism faster than I can find them. — AP 499D25 (talk) 13:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:46, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Thanks for good work, keep it up! DreamRimmer (talk) 17:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:17, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For all your work :) -ASHEIOU (THEY/THEM • TALK) 18:39, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:39, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi im not sure why my edit about the link between bryan and benjamin ferry was pulled! Somd peopld mighg bf interested to know he is related to an interesting architect! 2A00:23C5:E930:1801:19E1:107E:9E0D:7131 (talk) 19:25, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to source this information from a reputable source or scholarly article, not something you personally know. Also, consider spellchecking your messages before posting 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sorry to see that you erased my addition as propable "vandalism". In fact, Alfred Kerr must have been quite unique in his time: witty, sarcastic, sharp (as a knife? *lol*) and some kind of "arbiter elegantium". But alas, quotable sources from pre-war Germany are scarce. I do remember that some renowned historian made that claim about him, in a book about Hitler from the Fifties, that my father owned ... Can you try and set up an "Wikipedia Research" on such a topic ? kind regards L.H. 46.114.223.56 (talk) 21:48, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you are talking about. I checked your log and the only thing you have in it is your edit to my talkpage 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 12:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I simply don't get it. It says (on the "Judith Kerr" page),that you reverted one edit (mine). I think at 19:03.. . ? / or so it seems to me... and of course I didn't check what kind of number was indicated, as I simply wouldn't have time to log in / sign on or whatever ;-) 46.114.220.176 (talk) 14:40, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1. Please try not to use multiple accounts when editing, This way, you can avoid being mistaken for Sockpuppetry.

2. You added information that seems correct, but is unsourced. You need to cite your information you found.

(A rule not just specific to Wikipedia) 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:40, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. right you are, but- as I mentioned, alas : I'm not the scholar needed to fulfil this task. Perhaps Wikipedia does not only need permanent cleaning and editing, but also some subroutine that helps to connect "unsourced" additions to the sources of enlightenment (or keepers of the books, savants who are ... exactly what ? .. not just a being like Terry Pratchett's discworld's orang utang - librarian ? ) ... I mean , before an addition is formally accepted to a page ?

just a random thought... 46.114.220.176 (talk) 16:53, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Put it in the page talkpage. Then we will decide on it 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for your anti vandal work I see you have been doing on many articles User101FrOas (talk) 20:06, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you may need to delete the funny vandalism list on your userpage per WP:DENY - IMO, I wouldn't want to give the vandals a "hall of fame". -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 00:09, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, will do that now 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:59, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Have I given you one already? Eh, whatever. Also, just noticed you and I are about neck and neck in terms of edits ;) Keep up the good work! 47.227.95.73 (talk) 01:24, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I really appreciate your efforts fighting vandalism. It’s always great to see a productive IP 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 01:42, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would be grateful if you could explain your revert at the article Talk page, as your edit summary was somewhat obscure. Many thanks. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 13:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 205.239.40.03,

Thank you for reaching out.

When editing, please keep descriptions brief and short, especially on disambiguation pages.

Thanks, 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Even if the definition is essentially wrong? I think your explanation might be more useful at the article Talk page, not here. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 13:20, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Post your discussions at the article talkpage 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:22, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 13:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:25, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted my rationale. A "discussion" generally includes more than a single contributor. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 13:26, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody will respond eventually 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:28, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, perhaps somebody who made the reverts. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 13:34, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

والدتك عاهرة وسوف أراها الليلة وسوف تشاهدها 37.252.89.246 (talk) 02:14, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your hateful message has been noted, will report to AIV 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 02:15, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's no need for passive agressive messages implying that I wouldn't consiously make such a change. There was no mistake on my part. The map is misleading, I removed it, you didn't approve of my change, so you reverted it. Just look at wikipedia's own article on internet censorship at usa and ask yourself whether usa has the proper color in the map. 91.138.173.212 (talk) 13:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will revert my edit and restore your edit, apologies on my behalf 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:49, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

|}

Hello Filmssssssssssss,

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp ^connect on IRC.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Hi @Filmssssssssssss, thanks for reverting vandalism! I wonder if you are interested in our ongoing study for anti-vandalism patrollers. The study aims to evaluate AI models that power recent change filters, Huggle, SWViewer, and many other anti-vandalism tools. Your feedback can be really helpful! If you're interested, please check out our recruitment page for more information. Thank you for your consideration! Tzusheng (talk) 02:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Filmssssssssssss,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devils Garden (Arches National Park), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Double Arch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Great work. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 16:51, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arches National Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dark Angel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]