User talk:HAL333

This Wikipedian remembers Twofingered Typist.

Beautiful Main page today, don't miss the pic by a blocked user (of a 2013 play critical of refugee politics), nor a related video, interviews mostly German, but music and scene. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:42, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ernest Hemingway House you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ernest Hemingway House for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 10:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please join a discussion here regarding whether the terms "First Lady of the United States Designate" and "Second Gentleman of the United States Designate" should be in the infoboxes of Jill Biden and Doug Emhoff, spouses of the president-elect and vice president-elect, respectively. We need to come to a consensus. Thank you for your participation. cookie monster (2020) 755 21:28, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, HAL333. I'm just posting to let you know that Orson Welles filmography – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for December 11, 2020. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 23:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! The Tesla, Inc. article could really use some of your expertise and levelheadedness. I encourage you to take your pen to it. QRep2020 (talk) 09:53, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure - I'll give it a look over. I think with just a bit more polishining, we could get Elon Musk up to Good Article status. ~ HAL333 23:32, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November

In case you are interested in an article related to my question to the arbcom candidates (that you probably saw): L'Ange de Nisida, a FA, and mentioned under #Donizetti on my talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:24, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

... or Hippolyte et Aricie, for that matter --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - looks like you might be manually archiving on Mohsen Fakhrizadeh? Not sure if you knew but you can do it automatically—just go to the history tab and click "fix dead links" and then select the option to archive all links. Thanks again for all your work on this article! AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 20:13, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! That tool is amazing. I don't know how I didn't know about that. Kind of feel like an idiot... Thanks for telling me!

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in post-1978 Iranian politics. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions – such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks – on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

MrClog (talk) 21:43, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Beethoven in 1803

The birthday display! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:36, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I always hate it when I realize a month later that I missed an anniversary. Thanks for telling me! :) ~ HAL333 22:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Serious people celebrate tomorrow, in six minutes as I write this, because baptism is sure, birth is not. Mr. Beethoven - as you may have noticed - has an infobox which got there as a community consensus (talk archive 6). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wuhan Files. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 16#Wuhan Files until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:58, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	Merry Christmas HAL333
	Hi HAL333, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia,    –Davey2010Talk 11:33, 24 December 2020 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Davey, a merry Christmas to you too! ~ HAL333 19:47, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy New Year!
	Hello HAL333: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:58, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

Greetings, it's nice to meet you. I saw your comment on the RfC - if we removed the New York Post reference, would that mollify your concern? The sentence in question has two references so we could just take that one out. Pretzel butterfly (talk) 01:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm concerned about BLP issues - real touchy. Unless more reliable sources are provided, it is undue and I still oppose. ~ HAL333 04:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback! I've been working to incorporate it, finding additional sources and removing sources from conservative media. You can find this draft in my sandbox. Pretzel butterfly (talk) 21:17, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pretzel butterfly, If you need some guidance, feel free to check out the list at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. It's very helpful. ~ HAL333 21:23, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Pretzel butterfly (talk) 21:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As you suggested, I looked up each of the sources in the document. Of the 27 sources in the current draft, 17 are green and 10 aren't listed. Of the 10 unlisted sources, 6 are well-known national brands: PBS, CBS, ABC, and Yahoo News. The remaining 4 unlisted sources are Jewish Insider, Jewish Journal, Jewish News Syndicate, and the San Diego Union Tribune. I'm certainly open to any other advice you might have. Pretzel butterfly (talk) 14:40, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would work on removing the last 4 sources. If you can add even more sources that are green that would work in your favor. ~ HAL333 16:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will do - thank you very much! Stay safe. Pretzel butterfly (talk) 16:44, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @HAL333: How goes it? I came across your article Huey Long in culture had a look at it. I was reviewing it as part of NPP. I notice it hasn't got bibliography section. When you click on Perry (2004) it doesn't go anywhere. It is a dead link I'm assuming your planning to add that in at some point, otherwise how will the reader know who Perry 2004 is? Also I notice the article has an earwig repport earwig that says it is 94.4%. Huge sections seemed to be coppied from somewhere else. Would that be from parent article, or is it in public domain for example? It certainly looks as though it is from the parent article. scope_creep^Talk 16:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I split it from Huey Long in my push to get it up to FA status. I have since added a works cited section. Thanks for pointing that out. ~ HAL333 01:45, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for good wishes! - Happy Wikipedia 20, - proud of a little bit on the Main page today, and 5 years ago, and 10 years ago, look: create a new style - revive - complete! I sang in the revival mentioned. - What do think of this? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Wikipedia 20 to you too! ~ HAL333 01:39, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for support in the end of the infobox wars ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:43, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

... and proud today of a pic I took --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:39, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

... and another today, and the next round of operas (see my user page, under "keep") --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:20, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Today: Jerome Kohl - remembered in friendship --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw your comments for the Bach cantata, thank you! I gave it a section header, to make it easier for the delegate to see how many commented, and to avoid edit conflicts. The article will change, because - due to the section above yours - we decided to split the recordings part off to a dedicated article. I also found new sources. Please keep watching. - I think Jerome would have liked that more readers were interested in Stockhausen than in him yesterday ;) - he was always so modest, and the music in focus not his person. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wish I had chance to work with Mr. Kohl, but I'm glad to be able to do my small part towards his Stockhausen articles. ~ HAL333 20:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yesterday I changed the references for Stockhausen's works mentioned in the lead from "harv" to "sfn", and plan to do one work a day, today Chöre für Doris, see here. Help welcome ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, HAL333. I'm just posting to let you know that List of amphibians of Texas – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for February 5. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 23:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet! Thanks for notifying me. ~ HAL333 01:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hal, the Elon Musk talk page takes the cake for the most insanely messy one I've ever seen. I mean what?????. SO many banners, I tried to clean up a little, but since it looks like you edit there, can you remove some of the less pertinent warnings (I wouldn't know which to remove, since I don't go to the page much)? At the moment, the amount of warnings completely defeats the purpose, since there's so many none of them attract any attention, if that makes sense. Save us from this monstrosity...! Aza24 (talk) 06:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That whole page is a mess to be honest. I'll get at it. ~ HAL333 14:50, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to align the ToC and the banners next to one another maybe to consolidate space? Though that probably would only work on desktops...

The Talk page is a mess for sure and partly because (mostly brand new) editors do not seem to appreciate looking at archives or even the entire article itself first before suggesting some update that has been considered previously, often many times! I do not know how to combat it though except with some additional functionality, but one of my ideas in that vein got shot down quickly. It is puzzling. QRep2020 (talk) 15:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, there's not much we can do... ~ HAL333 20:44, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

looks much better now, thank you! There isn't much we can do at the moment, but there are many thoughts being developed at Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 34#Thinking about a radical reduction of talk page banners. Aza24 (talk) 22:53, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully something comes of it. ~ HAL333 02:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The banner section on Talk: Elon Musk does present much better now though. On my computer, I can see the tippy-top of the ToC box penetrate above the fold for the first time. QRep2020 (talk) 17:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's much better now. Hopefully newcomers will pay attention to it. ~ HAL333 17:36, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your salient and hilarious points on that COI complaint, HAL. The whole thing stinks to high heaven. I think I am going to ignore it unless some action is taken against my account. QRep2020 (talk) 17:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to. ;) The allegation doesn't seem to have gained much steam, so I don't think you'll be affected. ~ HAL333 17:50, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! I appreciate someone who isn't just a yes-man. That codon list has been greatly improved since I nominated - largely thanks to your advice. ~ HAL333 14:10, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You made some very helpful comments to the list Michael Curtiz filmography. I am humbly asking if you could return to it and offer support. Thanks. Jimknut (talk) 20:31, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Walter1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. casualdejekyll (talk) 01:24, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for how... weird this message is, this is my first time using Twinkle and it appears it pegged you as a new user when this is clearly not the case. Still, I'd like to know what that article even IS, since it looks like you have experience enough to know how to create an article... casualdejekyll (talk) 01:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I messed up the redirect. Sorry about that. ~ HAL333 01:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uh... that still doesn't explain anything. My first thought with that was "it's probably a messed up redirect", but the Alien: Covenant article doesn't mention anything by that name. casualdejekyll (talk) 20:28, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The plot summary alone mentions the name nine times... ~ HAL333 20:30, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Great work tidying up Elon Musk and removing the effusiveness that can creep onto articles about high profile CEOs. When do you think it will be ready to be reconsidered for a grade increase? QRep2020 (talk) 08:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Probably in month or so. I appreciate it. (= ~ HAL333 14:05, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Hal333, we have been talking on the Elon Musk talk page. Have you realised how fun it is that ALL my suggestions have now been implemented in the Elon Musk article by you? I find that really funny as you was a big opponent of my suggestions from the beginning and strongly disagreed. What changed? Did an admin look at the page and agreed with my points that the article did by NO means uphold the quality for an objective Wiki article?

I mean, something drastically must have happened because with a snap you implemented ALL my feedback in the article. Suddenly gone was all the biased parts in the "Views"-section. So I just wanted to say thanks for implementing all my feedback - please write to me another time when you need to know how one of your articles can get better.

Best, — Preceding unsigned comment added by BoMadsen88 (talk • contribs) 08:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad that you're happy. All the content remains on the subarticle Views of Elon Musk. ~ HAL333 11:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Haha dont you worry my friend. In time you will also get forced to edit that section as well to my suggestions. Ohh how I like being right. BoMadsen88 (talk) 11:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Huey Long has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

In the Historical reputation section, this sentence appeared:"One of the few biographers to praise Long was T. Harry Williams, who classified Long's ideas as modified or neo-populism." I changed "neo-populism" to "neo-populist" which I think is the correct wording. However, "modified" seems to be missing the name of a political school of thought and doesn't make sense as it stands. Otherwise, I think the article is in good shape.

Best of luck with it moving forward..

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I really appreciate it! ~ HAL333 19:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I just decided to remove "modified". ~ HAL333 20:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dune (2021 film) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know I left you a reply on the RfC talk page. Have a good day! Grahaml35 (talk) 02:23, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2A04:4A43:457F:3021:5CB8:8513:C328:5B6F (talk) 00:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jolly good! I wonder who this fellow could be... ~ HAL333 01:27, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just out of curiosity, why did you remove the Stanley Kubrick userbox from your user page? Did you change your mind? Songwaters (talk) 18:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was crude. ~ HAL333 19:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

...as in you didn't like the way it looked aesthetically? Songwaters (talk) 19:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, as in not in good taste. ~ HAL333 21:41, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Bach comments! The delegate is counting a bit, can you perhaps add a bolded support? ... after the first other one which hasn't happened yet ;) - I met an obituary today, a very unusual one. Bach music pictured ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and I even got a few more supports by now ;) - Today, we have a DYK about Wilhelm Knabe, who stood up for future with the striking school children when he was in his 90s, - a model, - see here. - Further down on the page, there are conversations about the current arb case request - I feel I have to stay away - in a nutshell: "... will not improve kindness, nor any article". - Yesterday, I made sure on a hike that the flowers are actually blooming ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Today, we have Doris Stockhausen on her 97th birthday ;) - Great, your FAC, will continue after this message and a few infoboxes and a DYK due today and sunshine ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate it. :) ~ HAL333 16:11, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Message, sunshine, expansion of DYK article and some iboxes done. Forgot food ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:42, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 12:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Cormac McCarthy has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cormac McCarthy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Urve -- Urve (talk) 19:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I was wondering if you could proofread 51st Academy Awards regarding featured list promotion. I would appreciate the feedback. Please note that since this is an older iteration of the ceremony, it may look a little different than recent ones (see 1st Academy Awards).

--Birdienest81 (talk) 21:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! I'll get to it soon. ~ HAL333 22:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've left some comments at the review page for McCarthy. (Leaving a talk page note since I'm not sure if you're watching that page.) I think it's very close to being promoted. Most of my feedback is copyedits, though there is an image copyright issue that needs to be answered. Thanks for being my first GA review, I've learned a lot about the process. Urve (talk) 04:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cormac McCarthy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cormac McCarthy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Urve -- Urve (talk) 19:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, HAL333. I'm just posting to let you know that DNA and RNA codon tables – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for March 19. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 03:45, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	I noticed you've taken Huey Long to FA status - and perhaps I should've waited until it's officially passed - but he's one of my favorite political figures and I wanted to show my thanks for you improving his article! Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 23:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, he's a fascinating figure. Thanks for the barnstar, Elliot321! ~ HAL333 23:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Elon Musk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Elliot321 -- Elliot321 (talk) 23:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Could you possibly proofread 2012 Summer Olympics medal table for featured list promotion? This is my first non-film related list I have decided to nominate for FL. I would appreciate the feedback, although I may or may not respond quickly.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 05:51, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to. I'll get at it soon. ~ HAL333 03:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Zagreus on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed this nomination of yours. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 13:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Death of Jeffrey Epstein has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

I masked a few sentences cited using likely unreliable sources, but this hasn't made any difference to the sense of the article. I would suggest you combine the Autopsy and Autopsy Report sections into one. The Autopsy section had a citation tag on one statement. I found and added a reliable citation. Then I discovered the same information with a different citation is repeated in the Autopsy Report section. This is describing the lawyers' dissatisfaction. Also, the li nk at the end of the article only provides a title page to Epstein's autopsy not the whole thing (as far as I can tell). Best of luck with the FAC when you get to it..

Regards,

Thanks - I appreciate it. ~ HAL333 21:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing Bach's cantata composed for today, - perhaps listen. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just did. And thanks for your note for Lepricavark. ~ HAL333 18:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

... and the first performance was on a Palm Sunday which is today, and Yoninah's obituary with the beginning of Passover today - putting some little ego-battles in perspective (and I don't remember how many of those notes I left for L.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Chris Cuomo on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Thomas McInerney on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, finally finished my work and cleared some time to do reviewing. My sense of this one is that the last two commenters either will or won't respond to PresN, and either way, he's likely to promote ... unless they raise a fuss. I could be wrong. If this one needs help to get over the finish line, ping me. - Dank (push to talk) 00:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I appreicate that Dank. I feel pretty good about that nomination. And if you need any reviewing or help from me, feel free to ask. Cheers! ~ HAL333 23:22, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A review from time to time on my plant lists would be nice, but don't sweat it. - Dank (push to talk) 23:49, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April corner[edit]

wild garlic

Congratulations to your FA! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:20, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gerda! Hopefully there's more to come. :) ~ HAL333 16:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of TFA on 30 August? It could be noted in WP:TFARP. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:42, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have a reservation there for the day, but it could go next year also. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding me about that. I decided to reserve September 8 (the day Long was shot). ~ HAL333 23:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Memories on the Main page today, Psalm 115 thinking of Yoninah, Christa Ludwig and Milva, - voices that made the Earth a better place. Sad that the psalm hook didn't appear on Earth Day as planned, but better pictured and late than going unnoticed ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:00, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Dartmouth College for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:59, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind collapsing the discussion at Talk:University of Mississippi so we can reset it? It's gotten unnecessarily personal and I apologize for my part in that. I think that if we refocus on a clear question it will be a lot more productive. I'm happy to share a draft with you in advance. ElKevbo (talk) 22:08, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that gesture and assure you that there are no hard feelings. But I think it would be best if we left the discussion open and uncollapsed. I've presented all of my thoughts on the issue and am moving on. I think we should just wait around and see if other editors pitch in and how the consensus turns out. ~ HAL333 22:12, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pavol Hnilica on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A reviewer has requested that I remove all the "site links", and I don't mind, as long as there's a link on the talk page to the version of the page that has the site links, for the benefit of article writers. Would you rather I leave the site links in or remove them? I'm asking because you reviewed List of plant genera named for people (A–C), and I want to be consistent with this in all four lists in the series. (A reply here is fine, if you prefer.) - Dank (push to talk) 21:04, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dank, I'm indifferent to the issue myself and tend to let the nominators do stuff their own way. That being said, I have a great deal of respect for TRM and generally defer to what he says. I'll try to review your list soon, but I am incredibly busy in real life. Hopefully within the next