User talk:Hellginner

Hello, I'm Soetermans. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 21:03, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Staged, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:01, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Staged, you may be blocked from editing. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:57, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lorian, I want you do look at this episode again, at the 3 minutes and 18 seconds mark. And this episode, at the 1 minute and 18 seconds mark. And this episode, at the 2 minutes and 8 seconds mark. And this episode, nine seconds in. BackStaged. Now I would like you to apologise for calling this correct information correct and retract your warning, since it was wrong to give, and either restore my edit to Staged, or allow me to restore it. I am fine with either. Hellginner (talk) 12:36, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in your recent edit to Stranger than Fiction (2006 film), you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. I'm not sure why you repeatedly linked "Harold Crick", but worse than the repeated linking is the fact that you created a bunch of useless WP:CIRCULAR links that just redirected readers back to the article about the film. Please be more careful going forward. DonIago (talk) 16:49, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:TotalTruthTeller24 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TotalTruthTeller24. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 23:24, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]