User talk:Kmccook

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people She should not be given alerts for those areas.

Thanks for uploading Image:ProgressiveLibrarian.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sdrtirs (talk) 01:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

	Editors like you keep the machine working
	Hi there! I see you building up the article on James B. Carey. A very interesting life. (And coincidental death date.) I wonder if there is yet more information on his experiences in the CIO. Anyway, it takes a lot of effort to make something from scratch like that. Thank you for your hard work! groupuscule (talk) 18:36, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Grumman J2F Duck shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. - BilCat (talk) 00:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lyman Gilmore may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Pioneer" by Stephen Barber. ''Nevada County Historical Society'', Volume 30, No. 2. April, 1976.)</ref> The printed story indicated accidental causes, but another version hinted that the fire was

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:47, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Anouar Benmalek, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://ecrivainsmaghrebins.blogspot.com/2009/10/anouar-benmalek.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 03:15, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aine Ni Mhuiri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recognition of my work! I really appreciate that. Let me know if you see anything interesting for me to do over the summer.Petercannon usf (talk) 17:43, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zoë Wicomb may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ''Zoë Wicomb''' ([[Namaqualand]], November 23, 1948 in Namaqualand, South Africa is a [[South Africa]]n author .

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:38, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The New Press (imprint), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://thenewpress.com/about/about-new-press.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:42, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The New Press (imprint) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New Press (imprint) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:25, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Last call for opinions on RFC at Wikipedia page for page protection extension. User:Pundit is in support of increasing gender equality at Wikipedia and another user is opposed to User:Pundit's efforts. RFC ends on the 14th. LawrencePrincipe (talk) 19:39, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for your great work on the University of Chicago Graduate Library School page. Petercannon usf (talk) 00:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University of Chicago Graduate Library School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nuclear Energy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Association for Library and Information Science Education may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *Library Media Connection (LMC Magazine), ALISE Youth Services and School Library Media SIGs (for research papers addressing library and information science issues for children and young adults.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - I saw you did some page curation at Jennie Allen. The article was created by a user of the same name, which is an almost sure sign of a WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY. Best to leave them a {{uw-autobiography}} notice to let them know that this is frowned upon, and to get them to refrain from making further significant edits to the article.

I'm debating on whether to propose it for deletion, as all the sources are affiliated with her publisher or her non-profit group. --Drm310 (talk) 20:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Isiah C. Smith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lake Helen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I worked on it some more. Do you like or approve of my changes to the article.AdditionSubtraction (talk) 03:46, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	Many Thanks
	Thanks for editing the page. I've added some more info and I see where there's a link from the University of the West Indies page. Hope this all improves the entry. Sfbja14 (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've only just started out with it, plan to do a lot more work on it soon. ProfessorTofty (talk) 15:13, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my article and your kind comments. Richlevine00 (talk) 02:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The Wikipedia Motivation Barnstar
		This is recognition of all the work you do to promote this excellent resource in all your courses.Petercannon usf (talk) 19:46, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is a proposal at the IdeaLab that may interest you. Lightbreather (talk) 20:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know that you have your Internationalisation preference set to "She edits wiki pages" (yeah!), but you aren't a member of Category:Female Wikipedians? I hope that you'll add yourself! Lightbreather (talk) 23:56, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you. Kmccook (talk) 00:05, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you like kittens! (Somebody ought to add puppy love - but I love 'em both.)

Lightbreather (talk) 00:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lizzie Pitts Merrill Palmer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charles Merrill and Palmer Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since WikiProject Women as proposed at the IdeaLab may take some time to realize, and based on a discussion on the proposal's talk page, I have started a test Kaffeeklatsch area for women (cis, lesbian, transgender) only. If interested, your participation would be most welcome. Lightbreather (talk) 19:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: The MfD for the Kaffeeklatsch was closed with the result page kept,[2] and this notice[3] re the WMF non discrimination policy was put on my page by Harej. (In a nutshell, the klatsch does not violate the policy.)

I don't know how the proposed WikiProject Women at the IdeaLab will fare, but one step at a time, I guess. Lightbreather (talk) 01:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for starting the Josephine Adams Rathbone page. I was wondering if you were planning on expanding it. I ask because she looks interesting and I might expand it myself, but certainly don't wish to "step on any toes" if you plan to do so yourself. (I have PLENTY of other projects to do as well.) --ThaddeusB (talk) 04:56, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just did my 1000th Wikipedia edit. I added a photo of the Cleveland Public Library to the entry on Linda Eastman. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_Eastman

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For your 1000th edit as an inspiration to us all!Petercannon usf (talk) 18:23, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:DawsonAlma (1).jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

| |{{Template:User clean start}}

|

|Usage |- I realize that older accounts I used, none of which are particularly contentious, may confuse admins. So I am no longer using them. I had used them less and less but now realize the need to retire them. This is my only current account.Kmccook

.

|

|

I created the page link below as as basis of recognition of effort made by women to document women's achievements. I notice that many women in NAB are not in Wikipedia. Might be a good project to review entries. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notable_American_Women,_1607-1950;_a_Biographical_Dictionary. I have reached out to several editors on this topic and if I received response it was positive.Kmccook (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I commend this article. Ware, Susan. "Writing Women's Lives: One Historian's Perspective." Journal Of Interdisciplinary History 40, no. 3 (Winter 2010): 413-435.

I have removed specific projects from the Historical page for school and university projects because I think that this has been damaging to the projects as they have been singled out for deletion. I am not sure how this kind of thing happens, but to lessen opportunity I deleted specific examples. Makes me sad.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted it because a one-line mention of a walking stick just sounds unimportant. For starters, is a "kylin" the same thing as a qilin? If so, then why is it spelled differently? Does the walking-stick have a profound, qilin-related impact on the plot? Does this "kylin-headed" walking stick have notability outside of the book? That, and "In Popular Culture" sections should not be a laundry list of every appearance the subject has made. If you think it's notable, then the onus is on you to explain and cite why it is notable.--Mr Fink (talk) 21:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

kmccook responds: Yes, it is a variant spelling and as I noted when I reverted this it is mentioned multiple times in the book--The Last Dickens that uses the kylin throughout and in the final sequences, but if the onus is on me (bold letters, you sound very stern) I can't do much more to convince you. It is not worth an edit war. Kmccook (talk) 22:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the kind of bully behavior that happens at WP, too.

Female Scientists Told To Add A Male Author To Their Study 

see http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/01/sexist-peer-review_n_7190656.html

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will be retiring from Wikipedia soon and wanted to let you know that I am closing down the Kaffeeklatsch. Thanks for expressing an interest in a place for women Wikipedia editors. Sorry I couldn't develop it. Lightbreather (talk) 19:27, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ruskin, Florida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uzita. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kmccook, I recently came across the above talkpage and was surprised to see that it had no wikiprojects but the following words:

IP user 24.92.174.244 is adding unnecessary templates without sufficient explanation. This appears to be vandalism as IP User 24.92.174.244 is focusing on women librarians who are noted for social justice and labor activism.

There is an unidentified IP user vandalizing librarian entries,

Looking at the page's history I see that you removed all of its projects and added the above words in April 2015. Sorry, but I don't understand what this means as the projects have been added by different editors and appear relevant to the article subject. I have reinstated the projects. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:47, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:08-Johnny-Cash-Nudie-suit-timeline-bb11-style-2016-billboard-1000.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:08-Johnny-Cash-Nudie-suit-timeline-bb11-style-2016-billboard-1000.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 03:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. When you create a new category, it's really important that you categorise it to put it within the category hierarchy so that humans and maintenance bots can find it. Browsing the existing hierarchy or using WP:HOTCAT are both good ways to find suitable parent categories. In doing so you may find categories that duplicate the new one - for instance I'd suggest that Category:Authors' libraries is close enough to Category:Literary archives for separate categories to be WP:Overcategorization. Cheers Le Deluge (talk) 18:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello & thank you, but these are their books, not their papers. I was looking at the Ransom Center collection and saw that they not only accept archives but also the books off shelves of authors. I can see why they merge in categories, tho. Thank you. Kmccook

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/flo79. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed and I paraphrased some. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:37, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was paraphrased and cited. but I'm glad the page has remained. Mr. Logan was impt. to rockabilliy legacies. Kmccook (talk) 12:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply] 

Your addition was flagged by a bot as a potential copyright violation and was assessed by myself. Your addition contained quite a bit of overlap with the source webpage, requiring copyvio clean-up. Please don't add copyright material to this wiki. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:49, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This was not looked at carefully. To me discourages participation. Perhaps the topic was not to your liking but this was  dispiriting. Bots can be used one way or the other depending on bias and individual preference. 

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep putting the four tildes ~~~~ in your Edit summaries? It's not needed. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:59, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that was how to show I did it. What did I screw up now? and how on earth did you see I was doing it? I think an admin told me to do it. 

The kind of page you're looking at right now -- any page with "Talk" in it, like User talk:TenPoundHammer or Talk:Main Page -- that is where you use the tildes. Not in edit summaries (which is the really long skinny box saying "Edit summary" on any page). Like, right after the word "sentence" in this sentence. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:07, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

for your disgusting generalised statements here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Harvey_Weinstein_sexual_abuse_allegationsSimply-the-truth (talk) 15:00, 30 October 2017 (UTC) It continues More Women Say Harvey Weinstein Sexually Assaulted Them[reply]

The post was not addressed to you.Kmccook (talk) 16:52, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was im afraid. You tarred all male editors with the same disgusting accusations. If I made such a general claim about females im sure you would be very offended. You really do need to apologise for these sexist remarks?Simply-the-truth (talk) 10:50, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• @Kmccook: I'm concerned that User:Simply-the-truth is trying to kindle an argument here, so let me step in. Your comment was not addressed to anyone specific, just a comment accusing Wikipedia's editors of being unwilling to cover the topic. You have to be careful, as the wording accused a great many editors of sexism. Many of us are committed to maintaining good, factual and neutral coverage of these topics, including myself. I'm not asking for you to apologise or say anything at all, but bear this in mind next time before you post. And if you feel provoked by User:Simply-the-truth, don't rise to the bait. Anywikiuser (talk) 12:13, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The majority of editors are men. Initially the Weinstein harassment posts were moved to their own page that was then slated for deletion and required a discussion to retain This certainly was not all male all editors, but the fact that the article had a deletion discussion startd with this statement: "Like everything else controversial in the news, this incident blew up overnight and will likely die down soon. If it continues garnering significant and important coverage beyond the original story, like California's or New York's statute of limitations for rape allows for charges against Weinstein, if there's a trial, an uncovered sex ring, crimes were committed, and so on, then I would say this article is appropriate. This story really has no impact right now other than Hollywood and politicians covering their behinds," was almost an instantaneous Wikipedia modeling of victim blaming. I know most editors have objectivity at heart. I believe Simply-the-Truth is a vandal. Thank you for your support. Kmccook (talk) 13:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• You're welcome, and thanks. Yes, the AfD nominator made the wrong decision, and I too am glad that the rest of us overruled it. Anywikiuser (talk) 13:23, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hope you dont mind me commenting here again. I was never looking for an argument at any time. I truly was greatly offended by the wording of your remarks. The things that man has been accused off are terribile, so to be painted as the same by poor wording was not nice at all. I now accept that this was all that it was, slightly poor wording and my wrong take on what @Kmccok was saying. So no apology needed at all, and I apologise if I upset you as well, never my intention. Have a great rest of the week! Simply-the-truth (talk) 09:35, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In a 2014 article Collins body-shamed Senator Barbara Mikulski for being petite in stature with the title, "Barbara Mikulski’s Hottest Moments " which appeared in the Daily Caller. This is a fact. I have explained at the dispute site that belittling people of petite stature is mean-spirited.

See here. Thanks. PaulCHebert (talk) 17:59, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia makes me weep. I have found Wikipedia to be a very hostile place, sometimes. Full of themselves editors delete because they can. They cite rules and regulations to cover their meanness. As do most tyrants. I have tried to encourage young people to edit but a speedy deletion can crush their desire. Once in a while an editor is kind and helps the new person but the more frequent response to a new person's efforts is "off with their head." Wikipedia makes me weep.Kmccook (talk) 14:40, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya -- I cleaned this up a little but it was really good already. Now approved! Jessamyn (talk) 22:13, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Matthew Kaminski, from its old location at User:Kmccook/Matthew Kaminski musician. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 04:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]