User talk:Lecen

Archives (Index)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Hello. I recently gave a point of view on Talk:Luiz_Inácio_Lula_da_Silva#Requested_move_8_November_2019. You removed what I had written and claimed I may be a sock puppet. I wanted to confirm that I am not (just not a super active editor unless I see something I can improve) but given my inexperience with Wikipedia editing and not wanting to start an edit war. I just wanted to ask if there is something I did wrong and if I am not allowed to give my point of view on that topic. My apologies for contacting you like this, I want to take this as a learning opportunity. Thanks -- Hakimsheriff (talk) 07:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will indeed request a sock puppetry in your case. I'm amazed that an account was reactivated after three years and with the sole purpose of participating in a move request. --Lecen (talk) 14:10, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You might be right. But it's not your judgment to make. EEng 16:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hakimsheriff, I've restored your comment, which should not have been removed. Lecen, you were way out of line removing it. EEng 08:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I tried really hard, but despite all of it... I couldn't care about what you said. --Lecen (talk) 14:10, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You'll care if you're blocked. Don't remove others' comments again based on your vague suspicions. EEng 16:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. I still won't care. Threats such as that is the reason why I stopped writing for Wikipedia. It's the en encyclopedia's loss, not mine. You'll have to try harder. --Lecen (talk) 16:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your inability to learn to follow policies and guidelines is the reason you stopped writing, I suspect; that removing others' posts is a no-no (WP:TPO), as are accusations without evidence (WP:PA), is stuff you learn the first week. I agree it's unfortunate, but if you can't learn to get along then you're no use to the project. EEng 17:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No SPI report, I see. Huh. EEng 01:59, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1868 Brazilian political crisis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to be effectively an abandoned draft in mainspace, almost completely unchanged from when it was first made.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Weirdguyz (talk) 11:41, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]