User talk:PadFoot2008

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present.

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan the Balkans or Eastern Europe He should not be given alerts for those areas.

A tag has been placed on Category:States and territories disestablished in 1304 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:07, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PadFoot, hope you remember me!

I have made some changes in Shivaji's article. Though I have not removed any info but added some from my side as the previous lead missed many parts like directly going from 1656 to 1665 without a mention of why Aurangzeb invaded Shivaji's dominions etc. So added those briefly. Also, after 1665 not a single mention about what happened till his death so added briefly that part.

I have written it to you as I'm not frequently active on Wikipedia so I may not answer frequently to persons who have queries or your queries as you seem to be active in such articles. So please don't revert it blindly. All the info added by me are sourced (WP:RS) and important which are suitable for the lead. The previous lead missed major parts the current seems better understandable to the reader. The lead is certainly not very long as you could compare it to articles like Aurangzeb, Napoleon, Alexander etc. Moreover, I have only provided important info in the article nothing has been removed by me you could see that.

I have provided you why and what i have changed in the article. Hope you'll find it better too.

Regards. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 17:50, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PadFoot, Recently you removed some maps from Awadhi language. I agree that repeated maps should be removed. But you removed a map which was explaining regions or districts of Awadhi language. That needs to be restored. Regards Blaada (talk) 15:17, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at these changes by multiple users. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:59, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is PadFoot2008. Thank you.Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 14:10, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[1]. Heraklios 21:13, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battles involving the Maratha Confederacy has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shakakarta (talk) 15:13, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

At this point, my thinking is "hang onto it for the arb case" tbh. -- asilvering (talk) 21:33, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering, means? I should wait? PadFoot (talk) 08:10, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mind if I bring up (at AE) the comment you removed? I don't want to Streisand it if you'd prefer to forget about it. But I think it's relevant context for the dispute (not yours, further down the page) where we're talking about starting an arbitration case. -- asilvering (talk) 16:01, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes @Asilvering, you can bring it up there, if it helps. PadFoot (talk) 16:21, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It's helpful to know that it's not just driving admins crazy. -- asilvering (talk) 16:37, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following sanction now applies to you:

You are topic-banned from India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, broadly construed, and are warned for canvassing. An exception to the topic ban is made for participation in the forthcoming WP:ARCA request Indian military history and any resulting case.

You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the appeal process. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you.  -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 13:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are involved in a recently filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Indian military history and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks, Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 16:14, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee has opened an arbitration case titled Indian military history in response to an arbitration enforcement referral. You are receiving this notice because you are a named party to the case and/or offered a statement in the referral proceedings.

Please add your evidence by June 5, 2025, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage.

For a guide to the arbitration process, please see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you are on the update list for Indian military history. Due to an influx of evidence submissions within 48 hours of the evidence phase closing, which may not allow sufficient time for others to provide supplementary/contextual evidence, the drafters are extending the evidence phase by three days, and will now close at 23:59, 8 June 2025 (UTC). The deadlines for the workshop and proposed decision phases will also be extended by three days to account for this additional time.

For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help towards making the content produced as diverse and broad as possible!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:14, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PadFoot2008, in the open Indian military history arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the proposed decision, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Proposed decision. For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 19:43, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]