User talk:ReyBrujo

This user may have left Wikipedia. ReyBrujo has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

I am working on improving Zelda II: The Adventure of Link to Featured Article status and noticed that you have made substantial contributions to the article. If you have time, I would be delighted if you could help with this endeavor. Thanks in advance! Gary King (talk) 21:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am improving The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass to Featured Article status and noticed that you made substantial changes to the article recently. If you have time, I would be delighted if you could help out with this project. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 03:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ReyBrujo - I saw your comment over on Biographicon (here: http://www.biographicon.com/discussion/a17v2 ) about the GNU Free Documentation License and Wikipedia bios and replied, but I thought I should reply here as well. The GNU Free Documentation License is referred to in the Archive (history) page of every biography that came from Wikipedia. For example: http://www.biographicon.com/history/i599n/Deng_Xiaoping But it sounds like it was too hard to find given a reasonable effort, so we probably need to do something different. Please let me know what you think. I'd like to talk about this. Thanks! -Ethan Herdrick 71.198.202.86 (talk) 04:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you are right, I missed that! Thanks for the clarification, and for dropping by here. I suggest a "License" link at the bottom, including the information in the Terms of Service section, or in the About section (which are the ones where people usually check first and foremost). Good luck! -- ReyBrujo (talk) 04:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [1] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 04:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is being discussed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Alternative_outlets#Biographicon - any changes anyone makes make it easier to move Wikipedia content over to Biographicon would be much appreciated. Guy Macon (talk) 00:41, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - I am alerting you that we are preparing a Request for Mediation regarding Gavin.collins. BOZ (talk) 04:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am alerting you that we are now considering a Request for Arbitration regarding him as an alternative to mediation, and would like your opinion on the matter. BOZ (talk) 13:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you recently removed a citation I had used in List of best-selling video games to back up a combined US and Eur sales figure. The reason you gave was that "VGChartz is not a reliable source." I am not necessarily disputing this, but I have just gone over WP:V and I cannot seem to find which criterion VGChartz fails under. Looking at this company's potentially biased self-reporting (eg. here, here, or here) it appears to be reliable enough to me. Could you perhaps point me to the appropriate section where your criteria for reliability are explained? Cheers, -Thibbs (talk) 22:09, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS - I hope you don't mind me "hijacking" this portion of your talk. I probably should have created a new section, but this one was already so appropriately titled... Thibbs (talk) 22:09, 26 April 2008 (UTC) shifted to this new section Thibbs (talk) 23:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [2] -- ~~

I suppose I have phrased myself poorly. I am interested in why VGChartz fails WP:V for reliability. Does it? Essentially I'm asking if this is wikipedia policy you are applying or WikiProject Video Games policy. I can understand your edit if you are applying WPVG policy but as far as I can see WPVG does not have a monopoly on editorial policy within any part of wikipedia's boundaries. Perhaps I am wrong. Anyway don't get me wrong. I approve wholeheartedly of WPVG and if this is WPVG policy I will bow to their wishes. It does strike me as startlingly arbitrary that they have decided upon the magicbox as their reliable alternative to VGChartz. As User:Kung Fu Man pointed out in the first example of VGChartz' unreliability, VGChartz does seem to have explanations for its figures whereas the magicbox is almost devoid of this kind of information. For all the average person knows they could be pulling these figures out of the magichat.

All in all, I realize you are but one person and if I have problems with WPVG's decisions regarding reliability of VGChartz or the magicbox I should take it up with them. To clarify, though, (and I 'm not sure if you know but...) did WPVG take WP:V into account when choosing the magicbox over VGChartz to form the bulk of their citations or was this nothing more than a simple vote of preference? Thanks for being so attentive to my concerns. -Thibbs (talk) 23:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [3] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 01:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I've taken so long to respond. My non-wiki work is currently on the hectic side. So I went back through months worth of archives at WPVG and now I can better understand your cursory reversion of my initial edit at List of best-selling video games‎. The only thing that still eludes my research (and I haven't gone through everything yet by a long stretch) is where you folks have been getting your information about the techniques VGChartz or the magicbox employ. I have scoured their websites and while I find minimal information on VGChartz, I find abolutely no information listed at the magicbox. Having merely skimmed some of the archived WPVG posts I thought I saw something about a WPVG member having written to or otherwise interviewed the VGChartz people to learn what goes on in their case, but I didn't see anything other than speculation about how the magicbox collates its figures. If you know the answer off-hand it would save me a bunch of time, but if you are busy or don't know I'm sure the information can be found somewhere in the archives. Can you remember this detail?

Secondly, I think that for clarity's sake all pages subject to the VGChartz ban should include the {{consensus}} tag as featured in List of best-selling video games‎'s talk page. Furthermore, I think that this tag should be linked to the discussion leading to a definitive consensus from WPVG (if there is one). If there is none, I suggest that a summary be written to distill arguments against VGChartz down to a few well-sourced problems as collected and synthesized from all prior discussion (archived and otherwise) of its failures as a reliable source. I think this would be very helpful to WPVG. It was suggested in one of the archived discussions that the two biggest culprits for reintroduction of VGChartz as a source are non-WPVG-member wiki-editors who are only seeking to add one data-point or are non-neutral VGChartz-pushers if I may coin a novel charge. Speaking as an editors in the first class of re-introducers, such an explanation of VGChartz' inadequacies would have been sufficient to quiet any of my doubts if I had been directed there and I believe this would probably be equally true for other WPVG tyros. Of course I am not suggesting that you, User:ReyBrujo, take on this admittedly large task yourself, but in general does this sound like a good idea to you? Unfamiliar as I am with the internal machinations of WPVG, could a task force be set up to accomplish such a thing? In your experience is the recurrent re-introduction of VGChartz as a source a high-level or low-level problem for WPVG articles?

Thanks for your time. -Thibbs (talk) 05:03, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [4] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 18:02, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 06:07, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was in the process of creating a page for a regional ska band who has gained national attention, and it was suggested to be deleted, before I had the chance to work out all the bugs —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flatfootedninja (talk • contribs) 18:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [5] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 00:59, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Due to popular demand, HAU has a new look. Since the changes are so dramatic, I may have made some mistakes when translating the data. Please take a look at WP:HAU/SA and make sure your checkmarks are in the right place and feel free to add or remove some. There is a new feature, SoxBot V, a recently approved bot, automatically updates your online/offline status based on the length of time since your last edit. To allow SoxBot V to do this, you'll need to copy [[Category:Wikipedians who use StatusBot]] to your userpage. Obviously you are not required to add this to your userpage, however, without this, your status will always be "offline" at HAU. Thanks. Useight (talk) 01:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight (talk) 22:32, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Riverwind the Plainsman cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roberto. This is FocalPoint from Greek Wikipedia. Could you run your little query again to refresh the el:User:ReyBrujo/Articles missing interwikis. Since the page is too big, it would be better to save the results of the query in two/three pages if you do not mind. Many thanks from Wikiproject Interwiki.--FocalPoint (talk) 19:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was fast. Thank you.--FocalPoint (talk) 21:27, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [6] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 22:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:NDS BrainTrainingForAdults.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you may know, the StatusBot responsible for maintaining the status of the Highly Active Users was taken offline. We now have a replacement in the Qui status system. This semi-automatic system will allow you to easily update your status page found at Special:Mypage/Status which the HAU page code is now designed to read from. If you are already using Qui (or a compatible system) - great! - no action is needed (other than remembering to update your status as necessary). If not, consider installing Qui. You can also manually update this status by changing the page text to online, offline, or busy. While it is not mandatory, the nature of HAU is that people are often seeking a quick answer from someone who is online and keeping our statuses up-to-date will assist with this. Note if you were previously using your /Status page as something other than a one-word status indicator, your HAU entry may have been set to "status=n" to correct display issues. Please clear this parameter if you change things to be "HAU compatible". Further questions can be raised at WT:HAU. This message was delivered by xenobot 23:01, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear I'm not the only one who laughed seeing MediaWiki_talk:Watchlist-details#I_think_four_notifications_at_one_time_is_one_too_many as a watchlist notice! Too funny - I almost thought it was a joke. -- Natalya 10:17, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I was a bit perplexed by the redirect when I couldn't find the title anywhere in the article. I suspected it was an alternate name of some sort, but wanted someone who was familiar with the setting to provide the appropriate context. Horologium (talk) 03:33, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey ReyBrujo, I was wondering if you could help me. I have been having problems with a belligerent user partaking in an edit war on [[Forrest Griffin]. I know you do not know much about Mixed Martial Arts (well I don't know if you do or don't) but my pleas for admin arbitration on the matter have gone unheeded so I was wondering if you could provide a neutral 3rd opinion on the subject. He is claiming that a fights decision was not seen as controversial even though I have provided much evidence to the contrary (please see the discussion page on said article). He has made edits that have distorted references on the page so that they cite things they should not be referencing and so that is why I believe his edits are in bad faith. I also think this because I and two other users were partaking in a discussion on how to solve this problem and he went ahead and made his own edits and undoing any reversions made to them. Please help me here because I don't want this person to simply get his way by brute force. That is not the wikipedia way.--Xander756 (talk) 05:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On the list it says MGS4 has sold 3.31 million units but when I clicked the reference, no where on that site does it say anything about MGS4's sales. In fact, it says a different game sold 3.31 million. Is this coincidence? --Xander756 (talk) 14:23, 15 August 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Nevermind, seems I click the wrong reference.

Hola Rey, vengo a molestarte un poco, he decidido ayudar a extender el articulo Sensation en la wikipedia en español, y quería preguntarte si podías hacerme el favor de traducir esta info del evento escrita por los organizadores aquí. No te preocupes, si no tienes tiempo lo entenderé y no hay prisa, yo estaré buscando mas informacion para agregar, nos vemos!--AS990 (talk) 00:32, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion at Talk:Liancourt Rocks regarding:

1. Whether the proposed Disputed Islands infobox is neutral in its presentation of basic article information
2. Whether there is a valid reason to exclude the proposed infobox from the article

I should note that I am involved in the discussion, but I do not want to influence your opinion should you choose to offer one. I merely want some uninvolved editors to view the discussion and then offer an opinion. If you choose to participate, please post your opinion in the RFC comments section there. Thank you for your time. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 05:40, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the article's talk page. [7] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 17:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!  :)

As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Wikipedia DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the WikiProject D&D talk page for more details. :) BOZ (talk) 19:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have put some work into the Gary Gygax article, which I have nominated for a GA review. If there is anything you can do to help it get passed, please join in! Also, feel free to comment on the D&D WikiProject talk page regarding our efforts to get articles in the 0.7 release. BOZ (talk) 03:19, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey mate, I was wondering whether you could translate "Do not speak English? Click here." into Spanish for me. I have my own welcome template that I use to welcome new users, and I'd like to have this phrase on them in the five official languages of the UN, as they are the Earth's predominant languages. So if you could, drop me a line with the translation, if you can't, no biggie either. Thanks! +Hexagon1 ^(t) 05:10, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [8] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 13:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Also, this may be a really ignorant question (my Spanish is unfortunately non-existent), but doesn't Spanish have an inverted quotation mark at the start of sentences? ¿Like this? Is this an exception or should I insert it? +Hexagon1 ^(t) 13:55, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [9] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 03:36, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! +Hexagon1 ^(t) 05:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The DMOZ search template (Dmoz2) is being considered for deletion because it violates WP:ELNO #9. I'm sending you this notice because of your previous participation in the TfD discussion for the DMOZ category template. Anyone interested in discussing the fate of Open Directory Project (DMOZ) search links is invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Dmoz2. Thank you. Qazin (talk) 06:54, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. :) If you hadn't heard, Gary Gygax and Wizards of the Coast have recently been promoted to "Good Article" status. I was also thinking of nominating Dragonlance and Forgotten Realms, and I figured I'd contact you since you've done some work on at least one of those. See the project talk page for discussion on that. BOZ (talk) 20:11, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I want to let you know that there has been a request for comment for user conduct initiated on User:Pé de Chinelo, a user in which you have been mentioned. If you have anything you wish to add to the RFC, please do so. Thank you, MuZemike (talk) 08:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the direct link is Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Pé_de_Chinelo as I couldn't find it easily chocobogamer LOOK AT WHAT I DID 11:00, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your assistance with this article would be helpful. Please see the article and/or its talkpage for the issues that you could provide assitance with. shadzar-talk 05:16, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tosão (talk) 22:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

have noticed the revert-athon tonight... time to request semiprotection? chocobogamer mine 01:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [10] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 02:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ReyBrujo. I guess your referring to my recent editing of the "best selling games" article. Now I've read your past discussions about the reliability of the VGChartz.com website and that is one of the websites I selected for my citation. I also agree with your questioning of this website see as I've looked up games on this site and saw figures that didn't quite add up but I thought it was just me. Now I know my suspicions were justified. However, three out of the five games I posted had two citation each. One being VGChartz and the other backing VGChartz figures somewhat so I would like to know why those citation weren't reliable sources? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.55.219.220 (talk) 02:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [11] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 03:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've seen a lot of {{maintained}} templates on Dragonlance-related articles which say that you maintain them, although on many of these you haven't edited them in a long time. Would you mind the removal of some of the maintained templates? Thanks. -Drilnoth (talk) 14:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. I keep an eye on most of them, but I am on indefinite wikibreak, so it makes sense to remove those templates. -- ReyBrujo (talk) 03:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [12] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 03:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Rey, we're keeping an eye on all the Dragonlance pages as well now, too, with the public D&D watchlist. :) BOZ (talk) 03:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm checking too, but can you find a source with the LTD of Guitar Hero World Tour? Going by November and December NPDs, the Wii version is over 1.2 million ([13]. TJ Spyke 01:22, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [14] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 03:26, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the blanking. That page already loads slowly (due to it being over 150K, maybe handheld games should be split off into their own page?), but I also kept getting Wikimedia errors and must have accidentally pasted the PS3 info over the PSP date. As for the dead link, I realize the error was on my end as I mistyped the URL. TJ Spyke 19:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [15] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 19:58, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Vivendi source is only for StarCraft while the Edge one likely includes the expansion pack. TJ Spyke 02:46, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you're interested in Mother 3, I request that you provide your assistance in the article. Thanks! - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 18:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You left a question about the notability of Halite by putting[16] a notability template to the article. I have written about notability on the article talk page. Would you comment there? I am also interested in how can we improve the references on the article. I think they are in quite a good state now. 82.203.170.153 (talk) 23:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the article talk page. [17] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 23:47, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! Just letting you know that we have nominated Dragonlance to be a Good Article, and it is currently up for review. :) BOZ (talk) 00:12, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Click here for understanding.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by IAmTheCoinMan (talk • contribs)

Replied on the article talk page. [18] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 16:50, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look at his 'input' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Tom_Lennox. Its Pe De Chinelo isn't it? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/P%C3%A9_de_Chinelo (who is permanently banned by the way) I'm not sure what to do so if you agree can you contact the right people? Just need to get it sorted ASAP if so, Cheers mate chocobogamer mine 21:07, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [19] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 15:52, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This little form letter is just a courtesy notice to let you know that a proposal to merge the projects Wikipedia:WikiProject Free images, Wikipedia:WikiProject Fair use, Wikipedia:WikiProject Moving free images to Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration into the newly formed Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media has met with general support at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Files. Since you're on the rosters of membership in at least one of those projects, I thought you might be interested. Conversation about redirecting those projects is located here. Please participate in that discussion if you have any interest, and if you still have interest in achieving the goals of the original project, we'd love to have you join in. If you aren't interested in either the conversation or the project, please pardon the interruption. :) Thanks. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:22, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:GBA DragonBallZ BuusFury.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:12, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perdón... soy de exaltarme... me disculpas? --190.50.73.242 (talk) 02:30, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [20] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 02:36, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Extra album cover 2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. – Quadell ^(talk) 15:13, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SYN does not necessarily forbid to add up numbers, only if it is not agreed between the authors that it is correct to do so. Do you doubt, that it is ok to add up, as we did, the numbers, taken from the references? | FHessel (talk) 01:27, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [21] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 13:29, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On the one hand you are trying to keep up wikipedia standards in terms of WP:SYN, on the other hand you are adding wrong numbers with a reference (I am assuming in your favor, that it has been done unintentionally), which are cited with a nonexisting header saying something absolutely different, than the reference does itself. Please be more careful, when citing references. This kind of misinformation could quickly discredit wikipedia and especially this page. |FHessel (talk) 10:34, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [22] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 13:29, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have to excuse me, I made a mistake. The part of the text on the right is placed below advertisements, plus I had the width of my browser window reduced, so I did not notice it. I will restore your changes. | FHessel (talk) 13:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [23] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 15:01, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added large images for both the Gray and Gold NWC cartridges. They are on the same blog article and are listed with Creative Commons license you recommended. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjgames (talk • contribs) 17:16, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [24] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 18:22, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How is my source unreliable? Y2J The Evil Twin (talk) 19:00, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [25] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 21:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed your edit to List of Wii games that use the Nintendo GameCube controller. The wikilink you put in your edit summary refers to using VGChartz for citing sales numbers at whatnot, I don't believe it really works in reference to VGChartz (p)reviews. Anyways, I haven't reverted your edit (since the ign link i put up seems to be a better fit), but I felt I might as well inform you.

Peace out, Thegreyanomaly (talk) 03:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [26] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 03:46, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The source I used for the worldwide total doesn't specifically state the amount sold in Japan. While the bulk of those other sales are probably Japan (Australia/New Zealand is probably tiny), I can't say that. Maybe using the term "Other regions" or something like that? TJ Spyke 22:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [27] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 01:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I said on the talkpage that I am in support of removing the release date. TJ Spyke 02:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For the sales of Crash Bandicoot 2: Cortex Strikes Back, it says 5.17 million approximately: 3.87 million in US, 1.3 million in Japan. so unless it sold 0 in the rest of the world then I was right with the sales all along, and you were wrong. Y2J The Evil Twin (talk) 13:28, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [28] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 16:46, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's still saying it sold 0 in the rest of the world. You could at least say 5.17 million +. Y2J The Evil Twin (talk) 16:50, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [29] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 18:18, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I just sent you an email. Amsaim (talk) 20:51, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Me cagé de la risa con esto!.

Una pregunta, conoces el Wikipedia:Argentina-related regional notice board?

Saludos, Mariano(t/c) 11:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [30] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 16:43, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Te entiendo perfectamente, yo tambien estoy hasta la manija con Wikimedia Argentina, y sobretodo con 2 crios! Suerte, --Mariano(t/c) 22:52, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would you support reformatting the current page so that it utilizes the {{Book list}} template? Others were talking about it, but nothing really happened.

Here's an example of what I have in mind: "x". --Kroova (talk) 23:12, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [31] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 20:07, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i'll do it tomorrow. TJ Spyke 05:43, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I saw you on there, so I must ask if you can tell me what it takes to activate an account there. « ₣M₣ » 05:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [32] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 14:23, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Extra album cover 2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:12, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best_selling_games

I notice this page references The Magic Box and I was wondering how reliable the source was? Why did we chose to go with that source? Can we use this source in other articles? They do not list their source for this chart (that I see.) Thank you for your time.--108.2.2.183 (talk) 20:06, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! We once discussed at the VG wikiproject about the difference between VGChartz and Magic Box. The difference between both sites is that VGChartz does extrapolation between different sources, whereas TMB was considered a sales archive (they get numbers from NPD for USA and Famitsu for Japan, without extrapolating).

In good faith we consider TMB a good source, because we cannot prove they tweak the numbers as they wish (like VGChartz). Most of their numbers for old games are virtually impossible to come upon, since there aren't that many references for them nowadays. And yes, the numbers can be used in other articles. I have been hoping to replace TMB with multiple sources (I prefer having as many sources as possible) but we are kind of forced to keep it for very old games of the NES era.

Cheers! -- ReyBrujo (talk) 23:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked all over that site, and while I see they have modern numbers from NPD I can't find any indication that the numbers on the page in question actually come from NPD. As far as I can find, they just showed up one day in December 2006 or January 2007.[33][34] I don't see any mention of it in their forum archives from around that time either,[35] despite there being threads about both the November 2006 and December 2006 NPD numbers. Anomie⚔ 00:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In reference to this discussion on Mortal Kombat sales.--108.2.231.19 (talk) 03:26, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [36] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 02:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if you meant I was joking, I did poke fun at Anomie's strong resistance to give undue weight to the MK2 sales. I appreciate your help in moving forward.--SexyKick 04:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Every Little Thing (band). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Every Little Thing (band). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I invite you to ask a mod/admin to tell me or you to show me where on wikipedia it says that a reference cannot have multiple sources instead of continuing reverting. You're the only editor that keeps reverting it so you must think that this is a rule when it isn't. If you choose to protect the article I'll ask the mod/admin to give me a reasonable explanation and/or make an account and continue including the sourced Uncharted numbers. Thanks. 68.204.45.10 (talk) 01:44, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [37] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 02:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And if you had read what I said you would have seen that I asked you to point out where it says that it's a WP rule, not to where you state your opinion on what the rule should be. Thanks. 68.204.45.10 (talk) 06:52, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm writing on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation to let you know of some upcoming changes to Wikipedia. On May 13, we will be changing the the default skin on the English Wikipedia to Vector instead of Monobook. This change may affect some gadgets and extensions, so I wanted to let you know as you appear to be the author of/involved with one of the most widely used gadgets on the English Wikipedia. For further details, please check out the post on Village Pump.

Thanks!

Howief (talk) 21:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me with this? I am kinda new to this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmacadar (talk • contribs) 21:09, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Portland Chinooks , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Shootmaster 44 (talk) 16:55, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Dragonlance has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Dragonlance has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:07, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IMG 0062.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell ^(talk) 18:23, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia policy allows us to link to legal streamed copies of albums. It would be useful to draw up a guideline on how and when to link to such albums; however, there is concern that it may not be appropriate as the music would not be available in all parts of the world. Is the benefit of having access to the music for most users outweighed by the fact that some users will follow a link to find the music is not playable in their region? Your view would be helpful at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 02:32, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aloha!

My name is Victor and I work with the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that supports Wikipedia. We're chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community around the world, including those from readers, editors, and donors. Stories are absolutely essential for any non-profit to persuade new people to support the cause, and we know the vast network of people who use Wikipedia have so much to share.

I find stories that drive our annual fundraising efforts. It's important to convey the incredible diversity of people who've come to rely upon Wikipedia every day.

I'd really like the opportunity to interview you to tell your story, with the possibility of using it in our materials, on our community websites, or as part of this year’s fundraiser to encourage others to support Wikipedia.

I will be in Buenos Aires from the 10th - 11th of March 2012.

I'm hoping you will elaborate on your story with me. Please let me know if you're inclined to take part in the Wikipedia Stories Project!

Thank you,

Victor Grigas

user:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Victor Grigas (talk) 01:52, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the user's talk page. [38] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 02:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lost Wars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost Wars until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Neelix (talk) 22:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Reybrujo,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.9.34.167 (talk) 20:52, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaos War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaos War until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Neelix (talk) 16:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article War of Souls has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for elements of fiction.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 16:26, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article War of Souls is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War of Souls until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Neelix (talk) 01:57, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Dragonlance wars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Neelix (talk) 21:15, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ola, Mr. ReyBrujo. I need your help. My Spanish is so little, that I can't understand what it's meaned from newspapers. Please tell me the concrete facts from costarican "La Nasion". The links shall be sended later. If cou can help me please answer to my request. Vahe (talk) 16:39, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kuliglig , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Image2012 (talk) 13:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be better to do so. Image2012 (talk) 13:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Goldmoon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 06:06, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:GoldmoonRiverwind.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 06:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:DL GoldmoonAndDhamon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 06:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wizards of High Sorcery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for elements of fiction.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 17:28, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SturmAndFlint.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 October 24 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

• File:ELT Commonplace.jpg
• File:ELT CommonplaceDVD.jpg

Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:22, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Junction, Illinois, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Closeapple (talk) 05:26, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ELT Untitled4Ballads.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Mathandchess, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SL93 (talk) 19:19, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Dragonlance locations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dragonlance locations (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 12:17, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ELT SasayakaNaInori.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article War of the Lance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War of the Lance (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dragonlance events has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shooterwalker (talk) 15:39, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ELT Grip.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article American Comparative Literature Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable subject; clearly does not pass WP:GNG or WP:ORG. Article was created in 2006 when notability guidelines were extremely lax and has slipped through the cracks. Could find no sources whatsoever that could possibly make this pass notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]