User talk:ShulMaven

Hello, ShulMaven! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! —Sadat (Masssly)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:31, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hudson Heights, Manhattan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:04, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Rosh Hashanah Terror Tunnel Plot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Rosh Hashanah Terror Tunnel Plot until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jprg1966 ^(talk) 06:39, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Palestinian tunnel warfare in the Gaza Strip, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gaza and Palestinian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You made good arguments for keeping it. At the very least it should be a redirect to the Hannibal Directive article. Plus it was done so quick there wasn't time to grab the current contents for those who might decide to.

I know deletion could be appealed; I've never done it before. Also not sure if redirect would be done through an appeal. Any thoughts? Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 20:37, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no policy-based justification for a redirect to Hannibal Protocol. SPECIFICO talk 00:18, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing against it and sometimes it is done. Just thought he made some good arguments and might be interested in idea. Also, please see WP:Wikihounding. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 01:00, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's absurd. It would be a POV Easter-egg redirect supported by OR belief contrary to RS reports of the event. SPECIFICO talk 03:20, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ShulMaven,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Murder of Yafim Weinstein should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Yafim Weinstein .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 16:17, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ShulMaven,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether 2014 Jerusalem tractor attack should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Jerusalem tractor attack .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 16:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ShulMaven,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Murder of Yafim Weinstein should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Yafim Weinstein .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, scope_creep 16:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kidnapping in Islamism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kidnapping in Islamism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 01:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! ShulMaven, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:11, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Kidnapping in Islamism page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kidnapping in Islamism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Mundo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kidnappings by Islamists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Hoops gza (talk) 00:16, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kidnapping in Islamism, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Hoops gza (talk) 00:18, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Jerusalem tractor attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Jerusalem tractor attack (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Determinator p t c 13:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is a good scholarly source if you want I can send it to you [1]--Shrike (talk) 11:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Terrorism Research and Analysis Consortium (TRAC) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 21:39, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Killing of Roi Rotberg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 04:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Killing of Moshe Barsky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 04:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Killing of Roi Rotberg

added a link pointing to Gaza

Terrorism Research & Analysis Consortium

added a link pointing to WGBH

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Killing of Roi Rotberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killing of Roi Rotberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 23:45, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not going to reconsider turning down an A7 for an article in which multiple people have argued keep at AfD. Otherwise, I don't think there's particularly anything where it's best for me to get involved; let the AfD run it's course. WilyD 07:23, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slavery in 21st century Islamism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Death of François Murad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Alexius08 (talk) 08:50, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had to revert your edit because you removed the fact that Silverstein called her "Negro" (this is the most important thing, not that he said "Israel is your master"). Apparently Shabazz defends the racists as long as they are against Israel, despite having a picture of Martin Luther King (another black who supported Israel) and Malcom X on his user page. I ask you not to aid him by deleting the racist slur used by Silverstein. On the other hand, we could add in the following sentence, without removing anything: According to the Jewish Press, Silverstein also said that "the Israel Lobby is her Master." since The Times of Israel doesn't report that. Thanks and sorry.--Veritnight (talk) 19:19, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, calling her "negro" is much worse, because Malcom X used the term "house slave" to refer to black people who opposed his radical views of racial segregation (MLK was one of them), but I seriously doubt that Malcom ever used the term "negro" to disqualify other fellow African-Americans. And I'm convinced that he would've deplored the use of such an offensive word by a white man against a black woman, simply because she supports Israel (btw, Israel is full of black Jews of Ethiopian origin). In any case, you can add anything you want, I'm only asking you not to remove the sourced information. Given the fact that in America the "n word" as they say is such a tabu and offensive word, I'm surprised that nobody sued Mr Silverstein.--Veritnight (talk) 19:38, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of villages depopulated during the Arab–Israeli conflict may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * Malhamiyah, 1902 According to Edward Said, the Jewish farming village of [[Menahemia]]) was established in 1902 on land purchased by the [[Jewish Colonization Association]] in and 1901;

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ShulMaven. I noticed that you changed the Meimad article to refer to the party in the past tense. Has it been dissolved? If so, could you give me a link? Would be interesting to know what happened and when (so I can add it to the article). Cheers, Number 57 11:03, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shimon Glick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Sinai Hospital. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The HP page is amply documented; the Presbyterian church website clearly states their position on divestment, which is corroborated by the major media citations. The controversy surrounds why the Presbyterian church divested, and the church is unambiguous on why it divested.--Wmatchin (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:38, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Meimad page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:48, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to HaLiba may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 30 October 2014}}</ref> The name HaLiba, is an acronym for Ha Lev Ha Yehudi b'Har HaBayit (Literal translation: The Jewish Heart on the Temple Mount, but the organization often calls itself

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Faris Odeh may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Odeh was reportedly at the front of a group of young Palestinians [[[[Palestinian stone-throwing|throwing rocks]] at Israeli troops at the Karni crossing, when Israeli

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Suicide attack may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:36, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Palestinian stone-throwing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

neologisms

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huldra (talk) 20:39, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Netanel Arami is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Netanel Arami until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article..Huldra (talk) 22:23, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Palestinian stone-throwing page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help) and a duplicate page number error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the William Napier (astronomer) page, your edit caused a duplicate page number error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you have broken 1RR on Gaza City‎. I´m not going to report you, but please be more careful in the future. Expect the next violation to be reported, Huldra (talk) 20:03, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Um..., you replaced unsourced, wildly fictitious information that I had removed form an article back into an article and come here to accuse me of having removed bad facts? Excuse me?

See Talk:Gaza City, where your concern is already answered. Btw, I absolutely prefer academic sources on history, but the given source still holds according to present standard. As you should know now; 1RR can only be broken if there is obvious vandalism etc. It can *not* be broken for what your POV feels is an "improvement". Cheers, Huldra (talk) 21:52, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a new source? But neither do I see how this cn be sources. There were no Canaanites and no Philistines in the Roman period. Idumeans, Nabateans, Greek speakers - but no Canaanites.ShulMaven (talk) 22:03, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

?Have you looked recently at the 2 AFDs you started? It is possible to withdraw your nomination, in the case of Arami to do so contingent on the end of the investigation.ShulMaven (talk) 22:08, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Vehicle ramming as a terrorism tactic page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:39, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For all your hard work on all the Israel related topics and creating great articles - Galatz (talk) 18:30, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you deserve any civility, and your talk page/edit history goes a long way in showing that. You appear to be one of the worst kinds of Israelis/pro-Israel people-- you're even pro "settler".

So no, I'm not going to worry about "not treating you with civility". The kyle 3 (talk) 15:49, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Killing of Yehoshua Weisbrod is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killing of Yehoshua Weisbrod until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huldra (talk) 21:23, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Killing of Sergeant Almog Shiloni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killing of Sergeant Almog Shiloni until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huldra (talk) 21:24, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Alon Shvut stabbing attack, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Islamic Jihad and Tekoa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've raised the issue of your 1RR violation at ANI - Nattybumpo has been blocked, I can't see why you shouldn't be also. Dougweller (talk) 19:32, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI#Violation of 1RR rule by User:Natty4bumpo but you could have searched for your name there or told me on my talk page why you think you shouldn't be blocked. Dougweller (talk) 20:15, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've been lucky twice. Please understand that there are basically 2 reasons that will allow more than 1 revert in 24 hours. One is when reverting very obvious vandalism (not just a content change you think is wrong), the other is when living people are involved and you are positive there is a violation of WP:BLP - and if you're wrong, you might be blocked in such a case. Dougweller (talk) 08:48, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember why I never got around to it; I probably just forgot about it. In any case, I have no objection to you starting an AfD. Thanks for the initiative. Neutrality^talk 20:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Silent Intifada page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Levine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 2014 Jerusalem synagogue massacre page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

    ←   ZScarpia   03:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the article to a neutral title. Neutrality is one of our fundamental principles.

You left your note on Drmies' user page. They do not appear to have edited since, but you should leave a new note at User talk:Drmies regarding your recreation of the page. That is where messages for editors should go. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't followed this, but if this was a killing then "death" is not NPOV, but an obfuscation. If it was not a killing, then death is appropriate. NPOV does not require that we call killings "deaths", as most deaths are not killings, and that word choice only serves to obfuscate. --Epeefleche (talk) 22:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of Netanel Arami is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Netanel Arami until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huldra (talk) 22:45, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain why you struck through a vote on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Bonehill? -- GB fan 01:57, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the vote. Do not ever strike a vote without giving a very good reason. -- GB fan 03:23, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At the time I struck it through, the user had been blocked. I thought that I was following routine procedure. That page was being edited by some people exhibiting very unusual editing behavior. I edit on Israeli/Arab issues, where editors are aggressively partisan, but don't hold a candle to Brit editors fighting about racism.ShulMaven (talk) 03:30, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He had been blocked for 24 hours for edit warring. Just being blocked is not a reason to strike a vote. If you ever feel a vote should be struck, you MUST clearly explain in the edit summary why you struck the vote. I would limit the striking of votes to only a few reasons, sockpuppets of banned or blocked editors, voting multiple times (usually in this case it is just the Keep or Delete portion that is struck), offensive material (completely remove not just strike through) and personal attacks (completely remove not just strike through). Hope this helps. -- GB fan 12:01, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, you didn't post that question to my talk page; you posted it to my user page, where it doesn't belong.

Secondly, I have no knowledge about the behaviour of any anonymous IP numbers. It's certainly true that the IP in question has happened to post comments to some AFDs where I also did, but they've also participated in many AFDs where I didn't, and I've participated in many AFDs where they didn't. And a simple IP lookup reveals that whoever they are, they don't even live in the same country as I do. The fact that the IP and I occasionally cross paths on some of the same AFDs really isn't anything other than coincidental, because AFDs where the IP and I don't intersect are far more common. As far as I can tell, the IP and I only intersect when the topic under discussion is a politician, and not when I initiate or participate in a discussion about any other topic — which in all likelihood means the IP just reads Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Politicians rather than actively following me.

I've been contributing to Wikipedia for over a decade, for the record — I'm quite familiar with the rules around sockpuppetry, and have never violated them in any way (in fact, I have a pretty strong record of enforcing them when I've come across violations.) Bearcat (talk) 03:36, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I wasn't saying you were. But you wrote... of an innovative construction method used.. where is the proof that it was in any way innovative? This is why the entry feels overly promotional and not encylcopaedic. It isn't really the type of content that is appropriate in a school article any way, however I guess it maybe could go as an external link... (without the 'innovative'). - Bleaney (talk) 19:03, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Ibolya Ryan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Ibolya Ryan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huldra (talk) 00:32, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your positive comment! I appreciate it. Thanks also for the job done on the article. I am really trying to understand many of the rules here, some of them looks odd to me. For instance, why was the section about employer's attempt to collect money for body repatriation removed? This was properly referenced as per the Wikipedia rules. Sometimes I don't understand why certain things are done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.203.160.17 (talk) 21:18, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

• On the November 2014 Jerusalem vehicular attack page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
• On the 2014 United Arab Emirates attack page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help) and a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of terrorist incidents, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lone wolf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

• On the Steven Salaita page, your edit caused a duplicate page number error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
• On the House demolition in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ali Muhammad Brown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Orange. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skunk_(weapon) It became a propaganda article.Ashtul (talk) 11:33, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have filed a request at WP:DRN about an issue in an article that you have been involved in. Welcome to discuss it there. --IRISZOOM (talk) 00:05, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Death of François Murad, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ShulMaven. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Death of François Murad".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Death of François Murad}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 03:38, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Ibolya Ryan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Ibolya Ryan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 15:30, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Terrorism Research & Analysis Consortium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrorism Research & Analysis Consortium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

NotReallySoroka (talk) (formerly DePlume) 03:41, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Yafim Weinstein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Yafim Weinstein (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 09:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]