User talk:ZLEA

 Main Talk Awards Sandbox Resources Bird Watching 

Tech News: 2025-23

[edit]

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Weekly highlight

  • The Chart extension is now available on all Wikimedia wikis. Editors can use this new extension to create interactive data visualizations like bar, line, area, and pie charts. Charts are designed to replace many of the uses of the legacy Graph extension.

Updates for editors

  • It is now easier to configure automatic citations for your wiki within the visual editor's citation generator. Administrators can now set a default template by using the _default key in the local MediaWiki:Citoid-template-type-map.json page (example diff). Setting this default will also help to future-proof your existing configurations when new item types are added in the future. You can still set templates for individual item types as they will be preferred to the default template. [1]
  • Recurrent item View all 20 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week.

Updates for technical contributors

  • Starting the week of June 2, bots logging in using action=login or action=clientlogin will fail more often. This is because of stronger protections against suspicious logins. Bots using bot passwords or using a loginless authentication method such as OAuth are not affected. If your bot is not using one of those, you should update it; using action=login without a bot password was deprecated in 2016. For most bots, this only requires changing what password the bot uses. [2]
  • From this week, Wikimedia wikis will allow ES2017 features in JavaScript code for official code, gadgets, and user scripts. The most visible feature of ES2017 is async/await syntax, allowing for easier-to-read code. Until this week, the platform only allowed up to ES2016, and a few months before that, up to ES2015. [3]
  • Recurrent item Detailed code updates later this week: MediaWiki

Meetings and events

  • Scholarship applications to participate in the GLAM Wiki Conference 2025 are now open. The conference will take place from 30 October to 1 November, in Lisbon, Portugal. GLAM contributors who lack the means to support their participation can apply here. Scholarship applications close on June 7th.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

MediaWiki message delivery 23:52, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2025).

Administrator changes

removed

Interface administrator changes

added 0xDeadbeef

CheckUser changes

readded L235

Oversight changes

readded L235

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open to determine whether the English Wikipedia community should adopt a position on AI development by the WMF and its affiliates.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • An arbitration case named Indian military history has been opened. Evidence submissions for this case close on 8 June.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mi presento

[edit]

Perdonami, ma dato che in Commons hai difficoltà a capire quanto scrivo in lingua inglese, con l'aiuto di un ottimo traduttore, ti assicuro, lascio questo messaggio in italiano lasciando a te l'onere della traduzione. Ovviamente non puoi conoscermi, sia perché anagraficamente sei molto più giovane di me sia perché non frequentando, ovviamente, la comunità italiofona di wikipedia non sai che ho iniziato a scrivere di aviazione su it.wiki quanto tu avevi ancora solo sei anni (anche se in realtà la mia iscrizione è del 2006). Questo per dirti che so bene la differenza tra una variante di un Tupolev e un'altra, e se in buona fede pensi che se un utente (io) non sia abbastanza preparato per discutere della problematicità di un'immagine a tema aviazione, beh, basta che tu dia un'occhiata ai miei contributi, basta un click. Ribadisco il concetto che un'immagine dev'essere al servizio del lettore, rispettando un'autenticità, e vedendo ogni tanto negli anni l'esigenza di qualcuno di inserire immagini di anteprime di modelli di aereo ancora poco noti non sia un buon servizio, esattamente come quello di generare facili immagini istruendo IA a supporto di eventi come, restando a tema aviazione, incidenti aerei. Una cosa è utilizzare immagini che spiegano le dinamiche dell'incidente, un altro è creare un'immagine fasulla che riproduca gli effetti dell'incidente; equivale a una Ricerca originale, e IMO è un cancro nel mondo dell'informazione, tanto più su un progetto che è un'enciclopedia. PS: carine le Wikiwings, le tue te le hanno conferite in data 11 giugno 2021, le mie non so dove siano finite nel cassetto, la prima barnstar me l'hanno comunque data nel 2008 (però, diciamocelo, sono tutte medaglie di legno). Buona vita. Threecharlie (talk) 08:41, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Threecharlie Credo ci sia stato un malinteso. Sto usando Google Translate per scrivere questo e l'ho usato per tradurre il tuo messaggio. Diverse parti del tuo messaggio mi sono sembrate volgari, ma presumo che non ci fosse alcuna intenzione di esserlo, quindi lo considererò un errore di traduzione. Sappi che non ho alcuna intenzione di essere volgare nemmeno in questo messaggio, nel caso in cui dovesse apparire tale.
Non sono d'accordo con la tua valutazione dell'immagine. Non ho riscontrato assolutamente alcun segno comune di generazione o manipolazione da parte dell'IA. Le argomentazioni che hai fornito finora non sono state convincenti. Inoltre, se l'immagine fosse stata creata o manipolata dall'IA, mi aspetterei che analisti ed esperti qualificati di IA traessero tali conclusioni, data la sua ampia diffusione sui media. - ZLEA T\C 09:41, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-24

[edit]

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Weekly highlight

  • The Trust and Safety Product team is finalizing work needed to roll out temporary accounts on large Wikipedias later this month. The team has worked with stewards and other users with extended rights to predict and address many use cases that may arise on larger wikis, so that community members can continue to effectively moderate and patrol temporary accounts. This will be the second of three phases of deployment – the last one will take place in September at the earliest. For more information about the recent developments on the project, see this update. If you have any comments or questions, write on the talk page, and join a CEE Catch Up this Tuesday.

Updates for editors

  • Wishlist item The watchlist expiry feature allows editors to watch pages for a limited period of time. After that period, the page is automatically removed from your watchlist. Starting this week, you can set a preference for the default period of time to watch pages. The preferences also allow you to set different default watch periods for editing existing pages, pages you create, and when using rollback. [4]
Screenshot of the visual improvements made on talk pages
Example of a talk page with the new design, in French.
  • The appearance of talk pages will change at almost all Wikipedias (some have already received this design change, a few will get these changes later). You can read details about the changes on Diff. It is possible to opt out of these changes in user preferences ("Show discussion activity"). [5][6]
  • Users with specific extended rights (including administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, and stewards) can now have IP addresses of all temporary accounts revealed automatically during time-limited periods where they need to combat high-speed account-hopping vandalism. This feature was requested by stewards. [7]
  • This week, the Moderator Tools and Machine Learning teams will continue the rollout of a new filter to Recent Changes, releasing it to several more Wikipedias. This filter utilizes the Revert Risk model, which was created by the Research team, to highlight edits that are likely to be reverted and help Recent Changes patrollers identify potentially problematic contributions. The feature will be rolled out to the following Wikipedias: Afrikaans Wikipedia, Belarusian Wikipedia, Bengali Wikipedia, Welsh Wikipedia, Hawaiian Wikipedia, Icelandic Wikipedia, Kazakh Wikipedia, Simple English Wikipedia, Turkish Wikipedia. The rollout will continue in the coming weeks to include the rest of the Wikipedias in this project. [8]
  • Recurrent item View all 27 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week.

Updates for technical contributors

  • AbuseFilter editors active on Meta-Wiki and large Wikipedias are kindly asked to update AbuseFilter to make it compatible with temporary accounts. A link to the instructions and the private lists of filters needing verification are available on Phabricator.
  • Lua modules now have access to the name of a page's associated thumbnail image, and on some wikis to the WikiProject assessment information. This is possible using two new properties on mw.title objects, named pageImage and pageAssessments. [9][10]
  • Recurrent item Detailed code updates later this week: MediaWiki

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

MediaWiki message delivery 01:14, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2025
1 — 31 May
Volume 3 — Issue 5
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
Article of the month
Artist's impression of the Mars Odyssey spacecraft

2001 Mars Odyssey is a robotic spacecraft orbiting the planet Mars. The project was developed by NASA, and contracted out to Lockheed Martin, with an expected cost for the entire mission of US$297 million. Its mission is to use spectrometers and a thermal imager to detect evidence of past or present water and ice, as well as study the planet's geology and radiation environment. The data Odyssey obtains is intended to help answer the question of whether life once existed on Mars and create a risk-assessment of the radiation that future astronauts on Mars might experience. It also acts as a relay for communications between the Curiosity rover, and previously the Mars Exploration Rovers and Phoenix lander, to Earth. The mission was named as a tribute to Arthur C. Clarke, evoking the name of his and Stanley Kubrick's 1968 film 2001: A Space Odyssey.

Odyssey was launched April 7, 2001, on a Delta II rocket from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, and reached Mars orbit on October 24, 2001, at 02:30 UTC (October 23, 19:30 PDT, 22:30 EDT). As of March 2025, it is still collecting data, and is estimated to have enough propellant to function until the end of 2025. It currently holds the record for the longest-surviving continually active spacecraft in orbit around a planet other than Earth, ahead of the Pioneer Venus Orbiter (served 14 years) and the Mars Express (serving over 20 years), at 23 years, 8 months and 1 day. As of October 2019 it is in a polar orbit around Mars with a semi-major axis of about 3,800 km or 2,400 miles.

Image of the month
International Space Station after LF1

Starting with Zarya in November 1998, the assembly of the International Space Station continued on a regular basis until the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster, which resulted in a nearly three-year pause from November 2002 to July 2005. This image shows the ISS following the installation of the second External stowage platform. ESP-2 was launched on 26 July 2005 on board Discovery as part of STS-114.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 209. Total number of members: 434.

May Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list: here.

  1. United States Starship — 8 Starlink Simulators (27 May at 23:36:28 UTC) (partial failure)
  2. China Long March 4B — Tianwen-2 (28 May at 04:00 UTC) (success)
 Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 30 May 2025.
Spaceflight articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 7 28 15 8 58
FL 3 4 4 11
FM 123 123
A 1 2 2 5
GA 11 27 33 55 1 127
B 15 84 200 220 1 520
C 45 163 583 784 32 1,607
Start 16 143 1,017 2,591 444 4,211
Stub 9 205 2,043 245 2,502
List 10 120 108 236 1 33 508
Category 1,266 1,266
Disambig 46 46
File 223 223
Portal 55 55
Project 109 109
Redirect 2 42 132 1,244 1,420
Template 527 527
NA 1 1
Other 28 28
Assessed 105 579 2,209 6,075 3,623 756 13,347
Unassessed 12 123 135
Total 105 579 2,209 6,087 3,623 879 13,482
Monthly Changes

Since April 2025, three new mid-importance, nine new low-importance, and three new unknown-importance articles have been created, for a total of 15 new articles. There is also one less B-class article, 14 more C-class articles, six more Start-class articles, four less Stub-class articles, and three more lists.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:50, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Removing airliner specifications for no reason

[edit]
No point in continuing this

I’m noticing that this user is removing what he calls “excess” information on pages for aircraft, notably in the specifications sections. As an aircraft enthusiast I can say on behalf of others like me some of that information is incredibly useful. Notably in the case of the Boeing 737 removals information on the 737-100 can’t be found anywhere else, similar situation with the 707, now there’s no pages with info on any variant but the -320B. I understand that to the typical viewer it may seem excess, but to me here’s how I’m breaking it down: 90% of people looking at these articles are aircraft enthusiasts and want to see all of this information. The other 10% viewing these articles aren’t viewing it for specifications, they’re just glossing over it. Planeandaquariumgeek (talk) 07:10, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Planeandaquariumgeek My edits are to bring the articles in line with WP:AIRSPECS, which has been the standard for over two decades. The tables were added later against consensus and never supposed to be there. Unfortunately, their presence has encouraged the false notion that Wikipedia is meant to be a quick reference for aircraft variant specifications rather than an encyclopedia. We need to put an end to that before the problem worsens. - ZLEA T\C 15:52, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Such tables existing does not present any such notion. There is zero harm at all in them existing here, and by removing them you are actively making Wikipedia worse. Electricmemory (talk) 03:30, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Go bud! Planeandaquariumgeek (talk) 03:38, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To be clear, I have no interest in the demographics of the readers (which you give absolutely no evidence for, by the way). Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for everyone. We aren't a quick reference for aircraft specs because some readers might want them. Most aviation encyclopedias only include one set of specs for an entire aircraft type because it gives the reader an idea of what is typical for that type. Other resources exists for readers who want more. - ZLEA T\C 16:03, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is absolutely no reason whatsoever to remove it if it already exists. AIRSPECS and whatever can go to hell. You are erasing valuable information purely because a style guide written by one person twenty years ago claims it shouldn't be there. Electricmemory (talk) 03:29, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly, that’s my point. Do all of Wikipedia a favor and start reverting this moron’s edits. Planeandaquariumgeek (talk) 03:38, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately it's not that simple. Electricmemory (talk) 03:40, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly, but that is a start. Planeandaquariumgeek (talk) 04:02, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at your talk page you don't have a stellar record yourself. Despite my opinion on this I know better than to just revert everything immediately. Electricmemory (talk) 04:04, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I was an idiot at one point, and I’m still what many would consider a rookie for sure. That being said a more experienced editor should definitely handle this and it seems you’re just that. Planeandaquariumgeek (talk) 05:48, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 230, June 2025

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:41, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-25

[edit]

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Updates for editors

Updates for technical contributors

  • Recurrent item Detailed code updates later this week: MediaWiki

In depth

  • Foundation staff and technical volunteers use Wikimedia APIs to build the tools, applications, features, and integrations that enhance user experiences. Over the coming years, the MediaWiki Interfaces team will be investing in Wikimedia web (HTTP) APIs to better serve technical volunteer needs and protect Wikimedia infrastructure from potential abuse. You can read more about their plans to evolve the APIs in this Techblog post.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

MediaWiki message delivery 23:36, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AIRMOS

[edit]
Ignoring consensus will get you nowhere

Seriously, what the hell is your issue with aircraft specs?? If a table for example on the 737 MAX contains sourced information for all variants, why does that matter?? Some people are indeed using Wikipedia to browse for that sort of thing, and others who aren't are not affected by its presence whatsoever. I don't give a flying fuck about some style guide written twenty years ago that you steadfastly stand by despite it plainly being wrong... Electricmemory (talk) 03:32, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, you're changes well-rounded tables to specs templates that are just worse in every way possible. You're doing so without any regard for the actual content or look of the section. Electricmemory (talk) 03:44, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Electricmemory I don't give a flying fuck about some style guide written twenty years ago that you steadfastly stand by despite it plainly being wrong... You do realize that your personal preference does not override a 20+ year old consensus, right? Feel free to start a WP:ANI discussion if you feel I've broken some policy by adhering to a long-standing consensus. - ZLEA T\C 04:57, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Scratch that, it seems I will be taking you to ANI tomorrow morning. Such a blatant involved close will not be tolerated. - ZLEA T\C 05:10, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-26

[edit]

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Weekly highlight

  • This week, the Moderator Tools and Machine Learning teams will continue the rollout of a new filter to Recent Changes, releasing it to the third and last batch of Wikipedias. This filter utilizes the Revert Risk model, which was created by the Research team, to highlight edits that are likely to be reverted and help Recent Changes patrollers identify potentially problematic contributions. The feature will be rolled out to the following Wikipedias: Azerbaijani Wikipedia, Latin Wikipedia, Macedonian Wikipedia, Malayalam Wikipedia, Marathi Wikipedia, Norwegian Nynorsk Wikipedia, Punjabi Wikipedia, Swahili Wikipedia, Telugu Wikipedia, Tagalog Wikipedia. The rollout will continue in the coming weeks to include the rest of the Wikipedias in this project. [11]

Updates for editors

  • Last week, temporary accounts were rolled out on Czech, Korean, and Turkish Wikipedias. This and next week, deployments on larger Wikipedias will follow. Share your thoughts about the project. [12]
  • Later this week, the Editing team will release Multi Check to all Wikipedias (except English Wikipedia). This feature shows multiple Reference checks within the editing experience. This encourages users to add citations when they add multiple new paragraphs to a Wikipedia article. This feature was previously available as an A/B test. The test shows that users who are shown multiple checks are 1.3 times more likely to add a reference to their edit, and their edit is less likely to be reverted (-34.7%). [13]
  • A few pages need to be renamed due to software updates and to match more recent Unicode standards. All of these changes are related to title-casing changes. Approximately 71 pages and 3 files will be renamed, across 15 wikis; the complete list is in the task. The developers will rename these pages next week, and they will fix redirects and embedded file links a few minutes later via a system settings update.
  • Recurrent item View all 24 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week. For example, a bug was fixed that had caused pages to scroll upwards when text near the top was selected. [14]

Updates for technical contributors

  • Editors can now use Lua modules to filter and transform tabular data for use with Extension:Chart. This can be used for things like selecting a subset of rows or columns from the source data, converting between units, statistical processing, and many other useful transformations. Information on how to use transforms is available. [15]
  • The all_links variable in AbuseFilter is now renamed to new_links for consistency with other variables. Old usages will still continue to work. [16]
  • Recurrent item Detailed code updates later this week: MediaWiki

In depth

  • The latest quarterly Growth newsletter is available. It includes: the recent updates for the "Add a Link" Task, two new Newcomer Engagement Features, and updates to Community Configuration.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

MediaWiki message delivery 23:18, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 June 2025

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Missing the forest for the trees

[edit]

You have not attempted to engage in any thoughtful discussion about this, instead choosing to go straight to ANI and a very much unnecessary arbitration request. You accuse me of disruptive behavior but then jump straight to begging admins to block me over something that can be handled by a thorough discussion on a project page. ANI will not fix your problems. And I highly suggest you stop speaking in a tone that suggest you believe yourself to be higher than others around you. Electricmemory (talk) 20:09, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have also multiple times reverted me and others for "ignoring consensus" when such consensus is both non-binding, and severely outdated. The RFC on the project page and no clear consensus, despite your claims otherwise. As for missing the forest for the trees- you are repeatedly removing information tables that are better in every way than the specs template, purely because a twenty year old sentences is telling you to. That's not "improving wikipedia", it's making it worse because you refuse to accept change. Electricmemory (talk) 20:12, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
One has to wonder if you're really interested in solving this, or if you just want to get your way, given you have refused any real form of mediation or dispute resolution, and have instead gone straight to ANI in an attempt to have everyone who disagrees with you blocked. Electricmemory (talk) 20:24, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly what "thoughtful discussion" are you talking about? You came to me with uncivil attacks and berated me for following a style guide you disagree with, and topped it all off with an involved close. You were the one practically begging to be blocked; I merely brought up your behavior to those who needed to see it. The archaic table situation on a minority of aircraft type articles follows no written standard. There is nothing of encyclopedic note in said tables that cannot me covered in-text in the variants sections.
Also, please get your facts straight. I never made an arbitration request on this matter. You will also notice that I did not bring all the editors I disagree with to the ANI case. The case has nothing to do with your opinions or beliefs, but rather your behavior. I also am open to mediation, just not with users whose first interaction with me lacked any form of civility. - ZLEA T\C 22:35, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ZLEA&oldid=1297230679"