User talk:Chumash11

Welcome!

Hello, Chumash11, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 07:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Electronic cigarette topic area, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

QuackGuru (talk) 14:39, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Centre interarmées d'essais d'engins spéciaux at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CeeGee 08:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC) CeeGee 08:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:20, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kahk, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Fatimid Caliphate used messages stamped on kahk, a type of cookie, as propaganda? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kahk. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kahk), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 01:42, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Centre interarmées d'essais d'engins spéciaux, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Félicette, France's first cat to successfully travel into space, was launched from the Centre interarmées d'essais d'engins spéciaux? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Centre interarmées d'essais d'engins spéciaux. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Centre interarmées d'essais d'engins spéciaux), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:26, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Mashoof, Chumash11!

Wikipedia editor Vexations just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks! I enjoyed reading the article.

To reply, leave a comment on Vexations's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Vexations (talk) 22:36, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sfenj, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that bakers of sfenj, a Maghrebi doughnut, are often nicknamed "Hitler"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sfenj. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sfenj), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And what particular thing caused you to revert my edit out of hand? GliderMaven (talk) 22:45, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This one: RfC on the word "myth" usage with the Genesis flood, as well as the previous section. Your edit seemed to go against WP:NPOV and did not seem relevant to the article; it would have been better suited for the Noah or Genesis flood narrative articles. Sorry for not being more clear earlier; I'm sure that must've been frustrating. Cheers,

--Chumash11 (talk) 17:32, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No. I'm still utterly baffled by your revert. So far as I can see it has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the RFC, my edit doesn't contain, refer to, imply for or go against the word 'myth'. And to write the edit, I simply paraphrased the account in the King James bible, and added the reasons given there for God creating a flood. Exactly which bit of my edit fails NPOV??? GliderMaven (talk) 19:13, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:ASF and to understand why your revert was rejected. jps (talk) 13:09, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hurricane Aircat, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that US Army Hurricane Aircat airboats could ram and sink Viet Cong boats? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hurricane Aircat. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Hurricane Aircat), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Thanks for adding in pictures for the List of Middlebury College Buildings article! Much appreciated. KBurchfiel (talk) 01:27, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chumash11. I ran across you use of about.me here, and don't understand why you added it. Could you explain? --Ronz (talk) 20:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest with you, I have no recollection of adding that and no idea why I did. Maybe I was auto-filling references with reFill and it put it in? Not sure. If you'd like to delete it, please go right ahead. Should I try to avoid about.me in the future? --Chumash11 (talk) 16:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating USS White River (LSM(R)-536).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please do not cut and paste from outside sources. See WP:COPYVIO

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:32, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Onel5969: Thank you for reviewing the article. This copyvio issue is a case of the Wikipedia article and the alleged source of the copyright violation copying from the public domain Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships (DANFS) entry for this vessel. Copying from the DANFS seems to be very common practice for writing about US warships on Wikipedia; one can see it on articles for her sister ships here and here for example. In the reference section of the article, I noted that the article incorporates text from the DANFS: "This article incorporates text from the public domain Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships. The entry can be found here." Please let me know if that addresses some of your concerns. Thank you, --Chumash11 (talk)

Hi. Sorry about the confusion. I'm going to ping a couple of admins who specialize in this sort of thing to take a look at it. Hey Diannaa and Justlettersandnumbers, what do you think about this? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:59, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The source webpage is here, and the corresponding home page for this Navy website is here. The Mobile Riverine Force Association has no right to assert they own this content; it's public domain material and is okay to copy, if properly attributed, which our article does. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:32, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Patrol Air Cushion Vehicle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:41, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may not have noticed, but I started this review over a week ago and would like to see your responses before I continue further.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:00, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've made more comments on this that you need to review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:11, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting on you to address the final round of comments.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:34, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your info GaratAllah (talk) 08:09, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Patrol Air Cushion Vehicle you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Patrol Air Cushion Vehicle for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:41, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Huo Xing. Since you had some involvement with the Huo Xing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:13, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas ^{I'm researching Wikipedia} _Questions? 15:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Middlebury Panthers Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]