User talk:Losipov

Welcome to Wikipedia, Losipov! Thank you for your contributions. I am HiLo48 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 (talk) 03:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ani Lorak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mot. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apple Maps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:15, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apple Look Around, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central District.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apple Look Around, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Takamatsu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Central Michigan University people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Orleans Jazz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apple Maps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Barbara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Losipov. I saw your edit at 2021 storming of the United States Capitol and just wanted to point out that, according to the Manual of Style, Wikipedia uses logical quotation style; see WP:LQ. I undid some of your punctuation changes that contravened this policy. Lester Mobley (talk) 15:54, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apple Maps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bumble.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apple Maps, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Limburg and Urbach.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Losipov. I saw your post at WP:MCQ#Is there actually a limit as to how many logos you can put in an article?. While trying to figure exactly what files you were referring to in that post, I noticed something unrelated to images about your recent edits. For some reason, most of them are being marked as WP:MINOR even in cases (likely adding or removing content such as names, images, etc.) when they wouldn't be considered as such. Perhaps you've recently tweaked something in your user preferences which is marking all of your edits as minor. In any case, you probably should try and follow WP:MINOR#Things to remember, particularly when editing what's likely goign to be a highly edited/watched and potentially contentious article, just to avoid any unnecessary problems with others. Just check the "This is a minor edit" box located above the "Publish changes" button and uncheck it if the edit isn't clearly beyond any doubt a minor one. As for your question about logos, myself and some other editors have responded there; so, feel free to ask any other questions about logo use there. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Apple Maps

added links pointing to Phoenix, Orange County, Castle Rock, Brookfield, Burbank, Carrollton, Glendale, Lakewood, Gainesville, Williamsport, Santa Cruz, Everett, Glencoe, Washingtonian, Buena Vista, Kirkland, Kenmore, Lake City, Buford, Torrance, Loveland, Malibu, San Mateo, Greeley, Mill Creek, Manhattan Beach, Steamboat Springs, Rutherford, Villa Grove, Snohomish, Morrison, Lisle, Gunnison, Lemont, Maple Valley, Ouray, Dawsonville, Westcliffe, Redmond, Berkeley, Georgetown, Victor, Julian, Roswell, Portland and Cuchara

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Infrastructure policy of the Joe Biden administration has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Entirety of contents are already included in Build Back Better Plan and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, while this article includes around a thousand views per month average against multiple thousand on the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs act article and tens of thousands of views on Build Back Better Plan

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bill Williams 17:19, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why do I hear William Tell Overture? Oh yes, Kentucky Derby time! Great work on expanding the Derby page a bit more! -Dogger Knight, Wikilove Chef Dogger Knight (talk) 16:26, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Losipov

Thank you for creating Beth Van Schaack.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:41, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Losipov

Thank you for creating Constance Milstein.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:29, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Marcela Escobari. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
413		TvOS (talk)	Add sources
22		Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (talk)	Add sources
5,550		MacOS version history (talk)	Add sources
44		University of Washington School of Law (talk)	Add sources
17,795		Google Maps (talk)	Add sources
6		United States Arctic Research Commission (talk)	Add sources
510		IOS 14 (talk)	Cleanup
1,702		MacOS Big Sur (talk)	Cleanup
220		Mac OS X 10.0 (talk)	Cleanup
20		Speculation about Donald Trump's Cabinet (talk)	Expand
761		IPadOS (talk)	Expand
10		Social Security Fairness Act (talk)	Expand
160		Robert Bork Supreme Court nomination (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
892		Coverage of Google Street View (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
134		Claris (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
28		Bidenomics (talk)	Merge
73		Economic policy of the Joe Biden administration (talk)	Merge
17		Extended Climate Warfighter Clothing System (talk)	Merge
24		George W. Bush judicial appointment controversies (talk)	Wikify
1,679		Macintosh (talk)	Wikify
29		Adliswil (talk)	Wikify
4		Brahms Mount (talk)	Orphan
2		Abdullah Baiat (talk)	Orphan
28		Arko Mukhaerjee (talk)	Orphan
49		Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (talk)	Stub
13		Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (talk)	Stub
103		Donald Blome (talk)	Stub
20		Trikut cable car accident (talk)	Stub
54		Tiffany M. Cartwright (talk)	Stub
42		Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:19, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ashish Vazirani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ashish Vazirani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 11:48, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Losipov! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 11:48, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See your edit to Salaria atlantica where you wikilinked Morocco, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking, as a rule of thumb countries and well known geographic entities should not be wikilinked in articles.Quetzal1964 (talk) 11:30, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Quetzal1964 Thanks for the heads up. Although, I do have a question regarding it. If I get rid of the red link and just link Morocco like I did, would that be satisfactory given that it removes an unnecessary link? Or would that still be an issue as described in the manual? I'm just curious. This is the first time I've seen this policy. Thank you in advance. Losipov (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Red links are fine, someone could write an article on the river in the future. The manual is a guide to good practice. I sometimes create articles based on finding redlinks, like John Frederick Whitlie Quekett, I am sure other editors do that as well. Reading back my original post, it couldn’t be more Scottish in its use of the word see.Quetzal1964 (talk) 21:35, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Nate Fick. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Nathaniel Fick. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Nathaniel Fick. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. GoingBatty (talk) 00:16, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrienne Wojciechowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrienne Wojciechowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Curbon7 (talk) 21:50, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi.

I’m sorry, but the sourcing here isn’t helping the subject meet our General Notability Guidelines. The sources provided are all primary and government sources.

Being a nominee is also not a qualification for a Wikipedia article.

We need *significant* in-depth coverage (that is independent of the subject - meaning no purely promotional pieces, government websites, social media, press releases, paid coverage) in notable major media outlets or by notable publishers about Ashish Vazirani. Examples: magazine and newspaper reviews and features about Ashish Vazirani specifically; books or peer-reviewed white papers written ABOUT Ashish Vazirani; television and radio features ABOUT Ashish Vazirani.

If those are available, please improve this submission. If not, then it might not be the right time (WP:TOOSOON for Ashish Vazirani to have a Wikipedia article.

I hope you will consider improving existing Wikipedia content about other subjects of interest!

If you have any questions please ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ashish Vazirani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ashish Vazirani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 20:22, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Losipov

Thank you for creating Henry V. Jardine.

User:CollectiveSolidarity, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The article may have more sources as time goes on

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CollectiveSolidarity}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 22:44, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dmartin969. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Apple Maps, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The information you added is not accurate according to Apple's Feature Availability page. Wikipedia does not allow statements based on original research to placed into articles. –DMartin 00:47, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

— xaosflux ^Talk 14:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people). Wikipedia uses the subject's most common name for articles. Peter Secchia only used his middle initial in formal contexts, and – as seen in the sources the article is referenced from – is usually referred to as simply "Peter Secchia". There's no other article in WP with that name, so there's no need to include his middle initial, and we do not include middle initials just because we can, as you seem to be arguing. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 00:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop it. I've notified you here that there is a problem with these kinds of edits, and you are continuing to do them. Don't do that. Jason A. Quest (talk) 19:13, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Losipov,

Thank you for creating Arthur W. Brown.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for contributing. However, a biography of a living person requires more than a single reference. A person's notability for Wikipedia is typically established through significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 11:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul W Thank you for the advice. Brown's nomination has not been submitted to the Senate yet, but when it is, there will be more sources added. Isn't that normal when a page gets started? Some other user made a mention of it to me earlier. Regardless, I understand the need for more sources and will add them eventually. Thanks again. Losipov (talk) 06:06, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Losipov. During New Page Patrols, I see all levels of citation from zero, to one, to multiple. For Biographies of Living People, none or only a single reference usually warrants some action. I could see that Brown's article might be expanded once the nomination is made and further details about him are published in reliable sources, so I just tagged the page and sent a message; in other cases, I have sometimes moved a page to Draft status so that it can be improved/expanded before publication to mainspace. Paul W (talk) 08:25, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Donna Ann Welton, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:43, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on B. Bix Aliu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://amcham-pl.glueup.com/event/amcham-monthly-meeting-and-briefing-with-u-s-ambassador-team-24090/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Losipov. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ashish Vazirani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This edit adds a link to Seton Hall University School of Law in the middle of a quotation in the middle of a reference. Yes, searching for article titles may help find potential links, but not every occurrence of an article title needs a Wikilink. Alansohn (talk) 03:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Alansohn Thanks for pointing that out. Usually when I do these kinds of edits, I err on the side of caution and won't put in anything that introduces errors. I seem to have missed that, so I appreciate the heads up. That said, these kinds of edits are helpful for specifying the article in question. For example, some articles will link to the university as a whole, but not the law school so it adds time to some extent in finding the article (if this makes sense). Overall, though, I agree with you and will take that into consideration. Losipov (talk) 03:59, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. Again, just a heads up to take into account. Alansohn (talk) 04:04, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You added a wikilink to an article using Find link. Perhaps you could explain how you did that. Mcljlm (talk) 18:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mcljlm Here's the tool: https://edwardbetts.com/find_link/University_of_Antwerp

I use this for linking articles to other pages. Hope this helps. Losipov (talk) 18:14, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that @Losipov and clicked "jump to random article" didn't understand how to use it. Mcljlm (talk) 08:57, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mcljlm if there are results, they'll be listed below the search bar. Just click on a title and you'll be directed to the "editing" part of an article. I typically avoid results that look like they're part of a reference, or if the link will mess things up (if this makes sense). I use the "show preview" option before publishing any edits so that I know its done correctly. If you are gonna use the tool just use it with caution. That's all there is to it for the most part. Losipov (talk) 17:36, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Losipov. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ashish Vazirani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm glad you're trying to make Wikipedia better. However, your use of the Find Link Tool is utterly erratic. With it, you add completely random links to random people who are not implied in the article. Use the tool only when writing your articles, otherwise it is impossible to keep track of all your link changes. MarcusTraianus (talk) 07:58, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MarcusTraianus Thanks for reaching out. This may or may not explain it, but I use that tool for notable people, specifically government ministers/secretaries and other figures like that (maybe a bit too much at one time, if I may admit). I try my best to be careful with the tool, as I don't want to create any problems in the article or have it be the wrong person being added. If this also helps, I get at least some context from the original article before linking others; if the context matches, then I go ahead and make the edits (if this makes sense). I'm sort of confused about the "completely random links to random people part". If you're referring to your reversion of Vladimir Antonov-Ovseenko, all I did was add more specification to the link which might have accidentally caused the redirect. I myself don't see this as random. The point here is that I do try to be careful with the tool and not have these problems arise.

On a side note, please don't think that I'm trying to vandalize articles or include disruptive edits. Those aren't my intentions. You might have mentioned this in your original comment, but I wanted to say it regardless. Again, thank you for reaching out. Losipov (talk) 16:06, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Surely, I see that your edits are made with good faith and I have no intentions to blame you. And I'm not trying to prevent you from using this tool completely. I just advise you to double check any links made with that tool, as they can bring chaos or erratic links that can stay for years unnoticed.

The problem with Vladimir Antonov as he is of both Russian and Ukrainian heritage, and because of that, his name pronunciation differs in these two languages. Until his conventional English name is resolved, that redirect link should stay. MarcusTraianus (talk) 16:58, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've added Associated Press News deleting the correct title Associated Press. May I ask its reason? Egeymi (talk) 17:37, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Egeymi That might have been a mistake when I ran the article through reFill (or it might be a citation error). It wasn't intended. Thank you for pointing that out. Losipov (talk) 20:59, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Robin Dunnigan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Currently, they do not meet WP:GNG or any of the SNGs. In addition, the article is very close paraphrase of the .gov page, and needs proper attribution.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:22, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Losipov. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Donna Ann Welton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Vernon Treweeke, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:14, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page TheDetroiter.com, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Stanley Leonard, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:53, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hazel Guggenheim McKinley, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:05, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Apple Maps, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. –DMartin 18:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Richard H. Riley, IV, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:20, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Vernelle FitzPatrick, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:23, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Bryan David Hunt, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:23, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Tobin John Bradley, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:02, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Konfuz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DIVINE 06:57, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to LSP discography. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 05:01, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please add sources to the peaks at Okean (Mari Kraimbrery song)? I didn't delete the data but it needs sources. --Muhandes (talk) 07:28, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Muhandes thanks for reaching out. I doubled checked the Russian Wikipedia and that article does not cite any sources in the section you're referring to (if you're referring to the charts, of course). I understand it needs sources, so I can try to add them if I come across them. But just a heads up, I added the expansion tag for other editors who want to pitch in. Losipov (talk) 17:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that other wikis may have lower standards, but the English Wikipedia requires sources. There are also guidelines about which charts to use, and I think some of these charts will not pass those guidelines (for example, YouTube charts are usually shunned upon). Since no sources are going to be available in the immediate future, I removed the section. Feel free to reintroduce it with sources. Muhandes (talk) 10:14, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Muhandes That's fair. And just a heads up, I've been merely trying to translate them (as in, articles) from the Russian Wiki to here; I wasn't looking for sources to include. But I do understand the need for sources. Let me know if you have any other questions/concerns. Thanks again! Losipov (talk) 15:19, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs serious cleanup prior to being moved to mainspace

Richard H. Riley IV, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Pbritti (talk) 07:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Carpimaps was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The two Detroit Free Press seems fine. The Detroit News and AACSD just mentions the school in passing or is a routine announcement. Can you find coverage beyond just its establishment? If you can't, you should just add the info to the pre-existing section in Wayne State University.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Ilitch School of Business and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 11:35, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Little improvement since being moved from mainspace.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vernelle FitzPatrick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 15:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Little improvement since being moved from mainspace.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bryan David Hunt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 15:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help me wikification and give it notoriety this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Casey_(BMX) Jusaset (talk) 21:24, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jusaset Thanks for reaching out. A couple of things I noticed:

1. The vast majority of the sources there only exist because of his death. I would try to find other sources like someone else suggested.

2. There seem to be a ton of grammatical errors throughout the article so make sure to fix them up.

I'll copyedit and check the citations, but other than that I'm not sure if I can make the article notable. I'd ask the Wikipedia Help Desk as someone there might be more helpful than I could. Again, thanks for reaching out. Losipov (talk) 21:39, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please, Thanks --Jusaset (talk) 21:41, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for removing vandalism from Lakeshore Hospital. We appreciate this, but unfortunately your edit was not successful in restoring the article to its pre-vandalised state. For future reference, it is better to deal with vandalism by checking the article's page history to determine how it appeared before it was vandalised. You can then restore the whole article, or the relevant part of it, to an appropriate earlier version. If you simply delete the visible vandalism then any content removed or overwritten by the vandal is lost. See How to deal with vandalism for details. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 22:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, OG Buda, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 09:18, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rosa DeLauro, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Donna Ann Welton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 10:51, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the edits you mark as "minor" are not minor edits. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Read Help:Minor edit for more information and stop marking major edits as minor. Sundayclose (talk) 23:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundayclose what edits (or kinds of edits, rather) are you referring to, if I may ask? Losipov (talk) 23:43, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundayclose follow-up to my question: if you're referring to Findlink and Hyphenator edits, the "minor edit" box is automatically checked for both. Aren't those considered "minor" since they generally change very little about the article itself (like you mentioned with "meaning")? To me at least, this seems to be the case. Losipov (talk) 23:49, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't use Findlink or Hyphenator, but I looked at many of your edits and they are not minor. I hope you have read WP:MINOR: "A good rule of thumb is that edits consisting solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of the content should be flagged as minor edits". If you use an automated editor, you are still responsible for the edit. If it is not a minor edit, please uncheck the minor edit box. I use Twinkle, but before I save an edit I always make sure it is correct, which includes whether it's a minor edit. Sundayclose (talk) 00:47, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundayclose I think I should've clarified those tools. Hyphenator basically "formats" ISBNs by adding dashes and also upgrading it to ISBN 13 if possible. It's a rather minor change to the citation. Findlink simply adds a wikilink to an article if there isn't one already. From what you've described, and that page, Hyphenator usage counts as minor editing but adding a wikilink with Findlink does not? Do I have that right or am I missing something?

On a side note, I can definitely be more careful in the future. Losipov (talk) 03:38, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Losipov!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Losipov. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Steps such as checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline are mandatory and will take a few minutes per article.
• Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any required steps.
• Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:58, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jennifer M. Adams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer M. Adams until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 15:32, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Ann M. Yastishock. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Let'srun (talk) 21:51, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Losipov,

This article is tagged for speedy deletion, CSD G4. I would move it to Draft space and work through AFC so it doesn't get deleted. This is the only way I know to overcome an AFD "Delete" decision. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:30, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz Thank you, but I can't move it to the draftspace without deleting Draft:Big Baby Tape. How can I get the speedy deletion nomination put on hold for now until I can get it sorted out (ie: make this version a draft and getting rid of that other one)? I'll take your advice and work through AfC on this. Thanks in advance for your response. Losipov (talk) 22:46, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Aydar Akhatov, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for declining as unsourced. It is probably not true. The IP is submitting a lot of unsourced stub drafts, some of which are untrue and so are hoaxes. I think that the IP is a vandal. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Losipov. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Draft:Raghvendra Sharma, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Block happened after the page was created. Thank you. BangJan1999 03:56, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BangJan1999 thanks for the heads up. I had a discussion on another editor's talkpage and they clarified what the criteria was. Go ahead and decline if you want, I won't contest it. Losipov (talk) 03:58, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When tagging a page for speedy deletion under WP:G5, you need to include the name of the sockmaster rather than the sockpuppet. WP:G5 is for block evasion, rather then for sockpuppetry and WP:G5 only applies if there is evidence that block evasion is occurring. If you're unsure of the sockmaster, feel free to contact the blocking admin. Thank you. BangJan1999 03:58, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ruslan Kurbanov (activist), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:42, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Losipov! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 00:11, Monday, July 31, 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Shahram Bozorgmehr, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:54, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Bryan David Hunt. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Let'srun (talk) 17:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Heather Variava. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Let'srun (talk) 18:08, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Shahram Bozorgmehr, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:33, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Losipov If possible, could you might consider correcting this grammatical mistake in this article? Jaffa riots

The riot resulted in the deaths of 47 Jews and 48 Arabs, 146 Jews and 73 Arabs were wounded, and hundreds more were made homeless..

To: The riot resulted in the deaths of 47 Jews and 48 Arabs, injured 146 Jews and 73 Arabs, and displaced hundreds more. 𝙸𝚛𝚠𝚒𝚗 𝙳𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚗𝚏𝚎𝚕𝚍 (talk) 09:08, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Losipov. Thank you for your work on Gayazovs Brothers. User:Oaktree b, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add more sources to the Gayazovs Brothers article, they would be notable as they've released 3 albums on Warner Music Russia, but we need additional sources that talk about them. We only have listings from Apple Music charts, which aren't a sign of notability per wikipedia's criteria for musical groups.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Oaktree b}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Oaktree b (talk) 02:43, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Oaktree b thanks for the review! I understand more sources are needed; I didn't bring over all of the information from the Russian Wikipedia, so I added the expansion tag at the top. Again, thank you for reaching out. Losipov (talk) 06:00, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]