Cavalier-Smith's system of classification

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The initial version of a classification system of life by British zoologist Thomas Cavalier-Smith appeared in 1978.[1][2] This initial system continued to be modified in subsequent versions that were published until he died in 2021. As with classifications of others, such as Carl Linnaeus, Ernst Haeckel, Robert Whittaker, and Carl Woese, Cavalier-Smith's classification attempts to incorporate the latest developments in taxonomy.[3][4], Cavalier-Smith used his classifications to convey his opinions about the evolutionary relationships among various organisms, principally microbial. His classifications complemented his ideas communicated in scientific publications, talks, and diagrams. Different iterations might have a wider or narrow scope, include different groupings, provide greater or lesser detail, and place groups in different arrangements as his thinking changed. His classifications has been a major influence in the modern taxonomy, particularly of protists. [citation needed]

Cavalier-Smith has published extensively on the classification of protists. One of his major contributions to biology was his proposal of a new kingdom of life: the Chromista, although the usefulness of the grouping is questionable given that it is generally agreed to be an arbitrary (polyphyletic) grouping of taxa. He also proposed that all chromista and alveolata share the same common ancestor, a claim later refuted by studies of morphological and molecular evidence by other labs. He named this new group the Chromalveolates. He also proposed and named many other high-rank taxa, like Opisthokonta (1987), Rhizaria (2002), and Excavata (2002), though he himself consistently does not include Opisthonkonta as a formal taxon in his schemes. Together with Chromalveolata, Amoebozoa (he amended their description in 1998), and Archaeplastida (which he called Plantae since 1981) the six formed the basis of the taxonomy of eukaryotes in the middle 2000s. He has also published prodigiously on issues such as the origin of various cellular organelles (including the nucleus, mitochondria), genome size evolution, and endosymbiosis. Though fairly well known, many of his claims have been controversial and have not gained widespread acceptance in the scientific community to date. Most recently, he has published a paper citing the paraphyly of his bacterial kingdom, the origin of Neomura from Actinobacteria and taxonomy of prokaryotes.

According to Palaeos.com:

Prof. Cavalier-Smith of Oxford University has produced a large body of work which is well regarded. Still, he is controversial in a way that is a bit difficult to describe. The issue may be one of writing style. Cavalier-Smith has a tendency to make pronouncements where others would use declarative sentences, to use declarative sentences where others would express an opinion, and to express opinions where angels would fear to tread. In addition, he can sound arrogant, reactionary, and even perverse. On the other [hand], he has a long history of being right when everyone else was wrong. To our way of thinking, all of this is overshadowed by one incomparable virtue: the fact that he will grapple with the details. This makes for very long, very complex papers and causes all manner of dark murmuring, tearing of hair, and gnashing of teeth among those tasked with trying to explain his views of early life. See, [for example], Zrzavý (2001)[5] [and] Patterson (1999).[6][7][8] Nevertheless, he deals with all of the relevant facts.[9]

Eight kingdoms model[edit]

The first two kingdoms of life: Plantae and Animalia[edit]

The use of the word "kingdom" to describe a major branch of the living world dates as far back as Linnaeus (1707–1778) who divided the natural world into three kingdoms: animal, vegetable, and mineral.[10][11] The taxa "animal kingdom" (or kingdom Animalia) and "plant kingdom" (or kingdom Plantae) remain in use by some modern evolutionary biologists. The initial targets of Cavalier-Smith's classification, the protozoa were classified as members of the animal kingdom,[12] and many algae were regarded as part of the plant kingdom. With growing awareness that the animals and plants embraced unrelated taxa, the use of the two kingdom system was rejected by specialists. It remains in use in less critical circles.

The third kingdom: Protista[edit]

The sea anemone is an animal that resembles a plant.

By mid-nineteenth century, microscopic organisms were generally classified into four groups:

  1. Protozoa (primitive animals),
  2. Protophyta (primitive plants),
  3. Phytozoa (animal-like plants & plant-like animals), and

In 1858, Richard Owen (1804–1892) proposed that the animal phylum Protozoa be elevated to the status of kingdom.[13] In 1860, John Hogg (1800–1869) proposed that protozoa and protophyta be grouped together into a new kingdom which he called "Regnum Primigenum" (kingdom primitive). According to Hogg, this new classification scheme prevented "the unnecessary trouble of contending about their supposed natures, and of uselessly trying to distinguish the Protozoa from the Protophyta". In 1866, Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) proposed the name "Protista" for the primigenial kingdom and included bacteria in this third kingdom of life.[11] [14])

The fourth kingdom: Fungi[edit]

Japanese popular mushrooms, clockwise from left, enokitake, buna-shimeji, bunapi-shimeji, king oyster mushroom and shiitake.

By 1959, Robert Whittaker proposed that fungi, which were formerly classified as plants, be given their own kingdom. Therefore, he divided life into four kingdoms such as:

  1. Protista, (or unicellular organisms);
  2. Plantae, (or multicellular plants);
  3. Fungi; and
  4. Animalia (or multicellular animals).

Whittaker subdivided the Protista into two subkingdoms:

  1. Monera (bacteria) and
  2. Eunucleata (single celled eukaryotes).[15]

The fifth kingdom: Bacteria (Monera)[edit]

Bacteria are fundamentally different from the eukaryotes (plants, animals, fungi, amebas, protozoa, and chromista). Eukaryotes have cell nuclei, bacteria do not. In 1969, Whittaker elevated the bacteria to the status of kingdom. His new classification system divided the living world into five kingdoms:

  1. Plantae,
  2. Animalia,
  3. Protista (Eunucleata),
  4. Fungi, and
  5. Monera (the kingdom bacteria).[16]

The sixth kingdom: Archaebacteria[edit]

Phylogenetic tree based on Woese et al. rRNA analysis in 1990 [17]

The kingdom Monera can be divided into two distinct groups: eubacteria (true bacteria) and archaebacteria (archaea). In 1977 Carl Woese and George E. Fox established that archaebacteria (methanogens in their case) were genetically different (based on their ribosomal RNA genes) from bacteria so that life could be divided into three principle lineages, namely:

  1. Eubacteria (all typical bacteria),
  2. Archaebacteria (methanogens), and
  3. Urkaryotes (all eukaryotes).[18]

In 1990, Woese introduced domain above kingdom by creating three-domain system such as:

  1. Bacteria,
  2. Archaea, and
  3. Eucarya.[17]

But Cavalier-Smith considered Archaebacteria as a kingdom.[19]

The seventh kingdom: Chromista[edit]

The brown algae are a member of the kingdom Chromista.

By 1981, Cavalier-Smith had divided all the eukaryotes into nine kingdoms.[20] In it, he created Chromista for a separate kingdom of some protists.[21]

Most chromists are photosynthetic. This distinguishes them from most other protists which lack photosynthesis. In both plants and chromists photosynthesis takes place in chloroplasts. In plants, however, the chloroplasts are located in the cytosol while in chromists the chloroplasts are located in the lumen of their rough endoplasmic reticulum. This distinguishes chromists from plants.[13]

Based on the addition of Chromista as a kingdom, he suggested that even with his nine kingdoms of eukaryotes, "the best one for general scientific use is a system of seven kingdoms",[20] which includes:

  1. Plantae,
  2. Animalia,
  3. Protozoa,
  4. Chromista
  5. Fungi,
  6. Eubacteria, and
  7. Archaebacteria.

The eighth kingdom: Archezoa[edit]

In 1983, Cavalier-Smith adapted the term Archezoa, previously used by Haeckel, Perty, and for protists that lack mitochondria.[22] Initially, the taxon included the quite unrelated metamonads and microscopridia, and expanded to include other unrelated taxa such that the term referred to many different groupings of protists. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] He originally considered it as a subkingdom, but by 1989, with the establishment of Chromista as separate kingdom, he treated it as a kingdom.[19]

Composition of Archezoa [39]
1983a 1983b 1987 1989 1990 1991 1993 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Diplomonads + + + + + + + + + + + +
Retortamonads + + + + + + + + + + + +
Oxymonads + + + + + + + + + + + +
Microspora + + + + + + + + +
Hypermastigids + + +
Trichomonads + + +
Mastigamoebids + + + + + +
Pelomyxa + + + + +
Entamoeba + + + + +
Phreatamoeba + +
Trimastix +

Archezoa is now defunct.[40] He now assigns former members of the kingdom Archezoa to the phylum Amoebozoa.[41]

Kingdom Protozoa sensu Cavalier-Smith[edit]

Cavalier-Smith referred to what remained of the protist kingdom, after he removed the kingdoms Archezoa and Chromista, as the "kingdom Protozoa". In 1993, this kingdom contained 18 phyla as summarized in the following table.[13] The first major division relied on the basis of presence or absence of dictyosomes, although a Gogli Apparatus was subsequently demonstrated in the 'Adictyozoa'.[42]

# Phylum Assigned to: Characteristics Fate
1 Percolozoa subkingdom Adictyozoa lacks Golgi dictyosomes  
2 Parabasalia subkingdom Dictyozoa
branch Parabasalia 		has Golgi dictyosomes
lacks mitochondria 		 
3 Euglenozoa subkingdom Dictyozoa
branch Bikonta
infrakingdom Euglenozoa 		has Golgi dictyosomes mostly with mitochondria
with trans-splicing of

miniexons

 
4 Opalozoa (flagellates) subkingdom Dictyozoa
branch Bikonta
infrakingdom Neozoa
parvkingdom Ciliomyxa
superphylum Opalomyxa 		has Golgi dictyosomes tubular mitochondrial cristae with cis-spliced introns
predominantly ciliated,
no cortical alveoli 		 
5 Mycetozoa (slime molds) subkingdom Dictyozoa
branch Bikonta
infrakingdom Neozoa
parvkingdom Ciliomyxa
superphylum Opalomyxa 		has Golgi dictyosomes tubular mitochondrial cristae
with cis-spliced introns

predominantly ciliated,
no cortical alveoli

 
6 Choanozoa (choanoflagellates) subkingdom Dictyozoa
branch Bikonta
infrakingdom Neozoa
parvkingdom Ciliomyxa
superphylum Choanozoa 		has Golgi dictyosomes flattened mitochondrial cristae
with cis-spliced introns
predominantly ciliated,
no cortical alveoli 		 
7 Dinozoa (Dinoflagellata and Protalveolata) subkingdom Dictyozoa
branch Bikonta
infrakingdom Neozoa
parvkingdom Alveolata
superphylum Miozoa 		has Golgi dictyosomes tubular mitochondrial cristae
with cis-spliced introns
with cortical alveoli 		Reassigned to Miozoa in Alveolata.[43]
8 Apicomplexa subkingdom Dictyozoa
branch Bikonta
infrakingdom Neozoa
parvkingdom Alveolata
superphylum Miozoa 		has Golgi dictyosomes tubular mitochondrial cristae
with cis-spliced introns
with cortical alveoli 		Reassigned to Miozoa in Alveolata.[43]
9 Ciliophora subkingdom Dictyozoa
branch Bikonta
infrakingdom Neozoa
parvkingdom Alveolata
superphylum Heterokaryota 		has Golgi dictyosomes tubular mitochondrial cristae
with cis-spliced introns
with cortical alveoli 		Reassigned to Alveolata.[43]
10 Rhizopoda (lobose and filose amoebae) subkingdom Dictyozoa
branch Bikonta
infrakingdom Neozoa
parvkingdom Neosarcodina 		has Golgi dictyosomes usually with tubular cristae
with cis-spliced introns 		 
11 Reticulosa (foraminifera; reticulopodial amoebae) subkingdom Dictyozoa
branch Bikonta
infrakingdom Neozoa
parvkingdom Neosarcodina 		has Golgi dictyosomes usually with tubular cristae
with cis-spliced introns 		 
12 Heliozoa subkingdom Dictyozoa
branch Bikonta
infrakingdom Neozoa
parvkingdom Actinopoda 		has Golgi dictyosomes mostly with mitochondria
with cis-spliced introns
has axopodia 		 
13 Radiozoa subkingdom Dictyozoa
branch Bikonta
infrakingdom Neozoa
parvkingdom Actinopoda 		has Golgi dictyosomes mostly with mitochondria
with cis-spliced introns
has axopodia 		 
14 Entamoebia subkingdom Dictyozoa
branch Bikonta
infrakingdom Neozoa
parvkingdom Entamoebia 		has Golgi dictyosomes
with cis-spliced introns
no mitochondria, peroxisomes, hydrogenosomes or cilia transient intranuclear centrosomes 		 
15 Myxosporidia subkingdom Dictyozoa
branch Bikonta
infrakingdom Neozoa
parvkingdom Myxozoa 		has Golgi dictyosomes
with cis-spliced introns endoparasitic, multicellular spores, mitochondria,
and no cilia 		Reclassified as animals in 1998.[44]
16 Haplosporidia subkingdom Dictyozoa
branch Bikonta
infrakingdom Neozoa
parvkingdom Myxozoa 		has Golgi dictyosomes
with cis-spliced introns endoparasitic, multicellular spores, mitochondria,
and no cilia 		Reclassified as animals in 1998.[44][clarification needed]
17 Paramyxia subkingdom Dictyozoa
branch Bikonta
infrakingdom Neozoa
parvkingdom Myxozoa 		has Golgi dictyosomes
with cis-spliced introns endoparasitic, multicellular spores, mitochondria,
and no cilia 		Reclassified as animals in 1998.[44]
18 Mesozoa subkingdom Dictyozoa
branch Bikonta
infrakingdom Neozoa
parvkingdom Mesozoa 		has Golgi dictyosomes
with cis-spliced introns
tubular mitochondrial cristae multicellular with no collagenous connective tissue 		Reclassified as animals in 1998.[44]

The phylum Opalozoa was established by Cavalier-Smith in 1991.[45]

Six kingdoms models[edit]

By 1998, Cavalier-Smith had reduced the total number of kingdoms from eight to six: Animalia, Protozoa, Fungi, Plantae (including red and green algae), Chromista, and Bacteria.[44]

Five of Cavalier-Smith's kingdoms are classified as eukaryotes as shown in the following scheme:

Eukaryotes are divided into two major groups: Unikont and Bikont. Uniciliates are cells with only one flagellum and unikonts are descended from uniciliates. Unikont cells often have only one centriole as well. Biciliate cells have two flagella and bikonts are descended from biciliates. Biciliates undergo ciliary transformation by converting a younger anterior flagellum into a dissimilar older posterior flagellum. Animals and fungi are unikonts while plants and chromists are bikonts. Some protozoa are unikonts while others are bikonts.

The Bacteria (= prokaryotes) are subdivided into Eubacteria and Archaebacteria. According to Cavalier-Smith, Eubacteria is the oldest group of terrestrial organisms still living. He classifies the groups which he believes are younger (archaebacteria and eukaryotes) as Neomura.

The 1998 model[edit]

Kingdom Animalia[edit]

In 1993, Cavalier-Smith classified Myxozoa as a protozoan parvkingdom. By 1998, he had reclassified it as an animal subkingdom. Myxozoa contains three phyla, Myxosporidia, Haplosporidia, and Paramyxia, which were reclassified as animals along with Myxozoa. Likewise, Cavalier-Smith reclassified the protozoan phylum Mesozoa as an animal subkingdom.

In his 1998 scheme, the animal kingdom was divided into four subkingdoms:

He created five new animal phyla:

and recognized a total of 23 animal phyla, as shown here:

Kingdom Protozoa[edit]

Under Cavalier-Smith's proposed classification system, protozoa share the following traits:

  • they have or are descended from organisms with mitochondria
  • they have or are descended from organisms with peroxisomes
  • they lack collagenous connective tissue
  • they lack epiciliary retronemes (rigid thrust-reversing tubular ciliary hairs)
  • they lack two additional membranes outside their chloroplast envelope

Organisms that do not meet these criteria were reassigned to other kingdoms by Cavalier-Smith.

The 2003 model[edit]

Kingdom Protozoa[edit]

In 1993, Cavalier-Smith divided the kingdom Protozoa into two subkingdoms and 18 phyla.[13] By 2003 he used phylogenic evidence to revise the total number of proposed phyla down to 11: Amoebozoa, Choanozoa, Cercozoa, Retaria, Loukozoa, Metamonada, Euglenozoa, Percolozoa, Apusozoa, Alveolata, Ciliophora, and Miozoa.[43]

Unikonts and bikonts[edit]

Amoebozoa do not have flagella and are difficult to classify as unikont or bikont based on morphology. In his 1993 classification scheme, Cavalier-Smith incorrectly classified amoebas as bikonts. Gene fusion research later revealed that the clade Amoebozoa, was ancestrally uniciliate. In his 2003 classification scheme, Cavalier-Smith reassigned Amoebozoa to the unikont clade along with animals, fungi, and the protozoan phylum Choanozoa. Plants and all other protists were assigned to the clade Bikont by Cavalier-Smith.[43]

Cavalier-Smith's 2003 classification scheme:

Cladogram of life[edit]

By September 2003, Cavalier-Smith's tree of life looked like this:[46]

In the above tree, the traditional plant, animal, and fungal kingdoms, as well as Cavalier-Smith's proposed kingdom Chromista, are shown as leaves. The leaves Eubacteria and Archaebacteria together make up the kingdom Bacteria. All remaining leaves together make up the kingdom Protozoa.

By 2006, Cavalier-Smith's microbial tree look like this: Cavalier-Smith's Tree of Life, 2006[cstol 1]

 [A] 

Chlorobacteria

 [B] 

Hadobacteria

 [C] 
 [D] 

Cyanobacteria

 [E] 
 [F] Gracilicutes

Spirochaetae

Sphingobacteria (FCB)

Planctobacteria (PVC)

Proteobacteria s.l.

 [G] 

Eurybacteria

 [H] [I] 

Endobacteria (Bacillota)

 [J] 

Actinobacteria

 [K] Neomura  
 [L] 

Archaea

 [M] 

Eukarya

Legend:
[A] Gram-negative with a peptidoglycan cell wall like Chlorosome.
[B] Oxygenic Photosynthesis, Omp85 and four new catalases.
[C] Glycobacterial revolution: outer membrane with insertion of lipopolysaccharides, hopanoids, diaminopimelic acid, ToIC and TonB.
[D] Phycobilin chromophores.
[E] Flagella.
[F] Four sections: an amino acid in HSP60 and FtsZ and a domain in RNA polymerases β and σ.
[G] Endospores.
[H] Gram-positive Bacteria: hypertrophy of the wall peptidoglycan, sortase enzyme and a loss of the outer membrane.
[I] Glycerol 1-P dehydrogenase.
[J] Proteasome and phosphatidylinositol.
[K] Neomura revolution: Replacement of peptidoglycan by glycoproteins and lipoproteins.
[L] Reverse DNA gyrase and ether lipid isoprenoids.
[M] Phagocytosis.

  1. ^ Cavalier-Smith T (2006). "Cell evolution and Earth history: stasis and revolution". Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 361 (1470): 969–1006. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1842. PMC 1578732. PMID 16754610.

By 2010 new data emerged that showed that Unikonts and Bikonts, originally considered to be separate because of an apparently different organization of cilia and cytoskeleton, are in reality more similar than previously thought. As a consequence, Cavalier-Smith revised the above tree and proposed to move its root to reside in between the Excavata and Euglenozoa kingdoms.[47]

Seven kingdoms model[edit]

In 1987, Cavalier-Smith introduced a classification divided into two superkingdoms (Prokaryota and Eukaryota) and seven kingdoms, two prokaryotic kingdoms (Eubacteria and Archaebacteria) and five eukaryotic kingdoms (Protozoa, Chromista, Fungi, Plantae and Animalia).[48]

Cavalier-Smith and his collaborators revised the classification in 2015, and published it in PLOS ONE. In this scheme they reintroduced the classification with the division of prokaryotes superkingdom into two kingdoms, Bacteria (=Eubacteria) and Archaea (=Archaebacteria). This is based on the consensus in the Taxonomic Outline of Bacteria and Archaea (TOBA) and the Catalogue of Life.[49]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Cavalier-Smith, T. 1978. The evolutionary origin and phylogeny of microtubules, mitotic spindles and eucaryotic flagella. BioSystems 10: 93-114.
  2. ^ C. Jeffrey. 1982. Kingdoms, Codes and Classification. Kew Bulletin: 37: 403-416
  3. ^ Blackwell, Will H. (2004). "Is It Kingdoms or Domains? Confusion & Solutions". The American Biology Teacher. 66 (4): 268–276. doi:10.2307/4451669. JSTOR 4451669.
  4. ^ Scamardella, Joseph M. (1999). "Not plants or animals: a brief history of the origin of Kingdoms Protozoa, Protista and Protoctista". International Microbiology. 2 (4): 207–216. PMID 10943416. S2CID 16939886.
  5. ^ Zrzavý, J (2001). "The interrelationships of metazoan parasites: A review of phylum-and higher-level hypotheses from recent morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses". Folia Parasitologica. 48 (2): 81–103. doi:10.14411/fp.2001.013. PMID 11437135.
  6. ^ Patterson, David J. (1999). "The Diversity of Eukaryotes". The American Naturalist. 154 (S4): S96–S124. doi:10.1086/303287. PMID 10527921. S2CID 4367158.
  7. ^ "Apusomonadida". Archived from the original on 2008-09-07. Retrieved 2016-02-11.
  8. ^ Eukarya Archived 2010-12-20 at the Wayback Machine.
  9. ^ "Origins of the Eukarya". Archived from the original on December 20, 2010. Retrieved February 9, 2009.
  10. ^ Dan H. Nicolson. Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?. Proceedings of a Mini-Symposium on Biological Nomenclature in the 21st Century held at the University of Maryland on 4 November 1996. Edited by James L. Reveal
  11. ^ a b Scamardella, JM (1999). "Not plants or animals: A brief history of the origin of Kingdoms Protozoa, Protista and Protoctista". International Microbiology. 2 (4): 207–16. PMID 10943416.
  12. ^ Penny, Douglas A.; Waern, Regina (1965). Biology. An Introduction to aspects of Modern Biological Science. Vancouver Calgary Toronto Montreal: Pitman Publishing. pp. 626–40.
  13. ^ a b c d Cavalier-Smith, T (1993). "Kingdom protozoa and its 18 phyla". Microbiological Reviews. 57 (4): 953–94. doi:10.1128/mmbr.57.4.953-994.1993. PMC 372943. PMID 8302218.
  14. ^ Kutschera, U. Haeckel's 1866 tree of life and the origin of eukaryotes. Nat Microbiol 1, 16114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.114
  15. ^ Whittaker, R. H. (1959). "On the Broad Classification of Organisms". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 34 (3): 210–26. doi:10.1086/402733. JSTOR 2816520. PMID 13844483. S2CID 28836075.
  16. ^ Weeks, Benjamin S.; Alcamo, I. Edward (2008). Microbes and Society (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. p. 32. ISBN 978-0-7637-4649-0. Robert Whittaker (1969) five kingdoms.
  17. ^ a b Woese, Carl R.; Kandler, Otto; Wheelis, Mark L. (1990). "Towards a Natural System of Organisms: Proposal for the Domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 87 (12): 4576–9. Bibcode:1990PNAS...87.4576W. doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576. PMC 54159. PMID 2112744.
  18. ^ Woese CR, Fox GE (November 1977). "Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 74 (11): 5088–90. Bibcode:1977PNAS...74.5088W. doi:10.1073/pnas.74.11.5088. PMC 432104. PMID 270744.
  19. ^ a b Cavalier-Smith, T. (1989). "Archaebacteria and Archezoa". Nature. 339 (6220): 100–101. Bibcode:1989Natur.339..100C. doi:10.1038/339100a0. PMID 2497352. S2CID 30405691.
  20. ^ a b Cavalier-Smith, T (1981). "Eukaryote kingdoms: Seven or nine?". Bio Systems. 14 (3–4): 461–81. doi:10.1016/0303-2647(81)90050-2. PMID 7337818.
  21. ^ Cavalier-Smith, T. (1986). "The kingdom Chromista : Origin and systematics". Progress in Phycological Research. 4: 309–347.
  22. ^ Cavalier-Smith, T. (1987). "Eukaryotes with no mitochondria". Nature. 326 (6111): 332–333. Bibcode:1987Natur.326..332C. doi:10.1038/326332a0. PMID 3561476.
  23. ^ Cavalier Smith, T. 1983. A six-kingdom classification and a unified phylogeny. Endocytobiology 2:1027–1034.
  24. ^ Cavalier Smith, T. 1987. Eukaryotes with no mitochondria. Nature (London) 326:332–333.
  25. ^ Cavalier Smith, T. 1987 The origin of eukaryote and archaebacterial cells. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 503:17–54.
  26. ^ Cavalier Smith, T. 1989. Archaebacteria and Archezoa. Nature (London) 339:100–101.
  27. ^ Cavalier Smith, T. 1990. Microorganism megaevolution: integrating the fossil and living evidence. Revue de Micropalêontologie 33:145–154.
  28. ^ Cavalier Smith, T. 1991. Archamoebae: the ancestral eukaryotes? Biosystems 25:25–38.
  29. ^ Cavalier Smith, T. . The evolution of cells. pp 271–304 in S. Osawa and T. Honjo, eds. Evolution of life. Springer, Berlin.
  30. ^ Cavalier Smith, T. 1992. Percolozoa and the symbiotic origin of the metakaryote cell. Endocytobiology 5:399–406.
  31. ^ Cavalier Smith, T. Kingdom Protozoa and its 18 Phyla. Microbiological Reviews 57:953–994.
  32. ^ Cavalier Smith, T. 1995. Zooflagellate phylogeny and classification. Cytology 37:1010–1029.
  33. ^ Cavalier Smith, T. 1997. Amoeboflagellates and mitochondrial cristae in eukaryote evolution: megasystematics of the new protozoan subkingdoms Eozoa and Neozoa. Archiv für Protistenkunde 147:237–258.
  34. ^ Cavalier Smith, T. 1997. Zooflagellate phylogeny and the evolution and classification of protozoa. Page 65 in Programme and abstracts, Tenth International Congress of Protozoology, Sydney.
  35. ^ Cavalier Smith, T. 1998. A revised six–kingdom system of life. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 73:203–266.
  36. ^ Cavalier Smith, T. 1999. Zooflagellate phylogeny and the systematics of protozoa. Biological Bulletin (Woods Hole) 196: 393–395.
  37. ^ Cavalier-Smith, T.and Chao, E. 1995. The opalozoan Apusomonas is related to the common ancestor of animals, fungi and choanoflagellates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 261:1–6.
  38. ^ Cavalier-Smith, T.and Chao, E. 1996. Molecular diversity of the free-living archezoan Trepomonas agilis and the nature of the first eukaryote. Journal of Molecular Evolution 43:551–563.
  39. ^ Patterson, D. J. 1999. The diversity of eukaryotes. American Naturalist, Supplement 65: 96-124.
  40. ^ Cavalier-Smith, T.; Chao, E. E. (1996). "Molecular phylogeny of the free-living archezoan Trepomonas agilis and the nature of the first eukaryote". Journal of Molecular Evolution. 43 (6): 551–62. Bibcode:1996JMolE..43..551C. doi:10.1007/BF02202103. PMID 8995052. S2CID 28992966.
  41. ^ Cavalier-Smith, T. (2004). "Only six kingdoms of life". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 271 (1545): 1251–62. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2705. PMC 1691724. PMID 15306349.
  42. ^ Herman, E. K.; Yiangou, L.; Cantoni, D. M.; Miller, C. N.; Marciano-Cabral, F.; Anthonyrajah, E.; Dacks, J. B.; Tsaousis, A. D. (2018). "Identification and characterisation of a cryptic Golgi complex in Naegleria gruberi". Journal of Cell Science. 131 (7). doi:10.1242/jcs.213306. PMC 5963838. PMID 29535209.
  43. ^ a b c d e Cavalier-Smith, Thomas (2003). "Protist phylogeny and the high-level classification of Protozoa". European Journal of Protistology. 39 (4): 338–348. doi:10.1078/0932-4739-00002.
  44. ^ a b c d e f Cavalier-Smith, T. (2007). "A revised six-kingdom system of life". Biological Reviews. 73 (3): 203–66. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1998.tb00030.x. PMID 9809012. S2CID 6557779.
  45. ^ Cavalier-Smith, Thomas (1993). "The Protozoan Phylum Opalozoa". The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 40 (5): 609–15. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.1993.tb06117.x. S2CID 84129692.
  46. ^ Stechmann, Alexandra; Cavalier-Smith, Thomas (2003). "The root of the eukaryote tree pinpointed". Current Biology. 13 (17): R665–6. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00602-X. PMID 12956967.
  47. ^ Cavalier-Smith, Thomas (2010). "Origin of the cell nucleus, mitosis and sex: Roles of intracellular coevolution". Biology Direct. 5: 7. doi:10.1186/1745-6150-5-7. PMC 2837639. PMID 20132544.
  48. ^ Cavalier-Smith, Thomas (1987). "The origin of eukaryotic and archaebacterial cells". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 503 (1): 17–54. Bibcode:1987NYASA.503...17C. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb40596.x. PMID 3113314. S2CID 38405158.
  49. ^ Ruggiero, Michael A.; Gordon, Dennis P.; Orrell, Thomas M.; Bailly, Nicolas; Bourgoin, Thierry; Brusca, Richard C.; Cavalier-Smith, Thomas; Guiry, Michael D.; Kirk, Paul M.; Thuesen, Erik V. (2015). "A higher level classification of all living organisms". PLOS ONE. 10 (4): e0119248. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1019248R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119248. PMC 4418965. PMID 25923521.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cavalier-Smith%27s_system_of_classification&oldid=1195042082"