Buffers and chain coupler

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Buffers and chain couplers (or couplings) – also known as "buffers and screw", "screw", and "screwlink" – are the de facto International Union of Railways (UIC) standard railway coupling used in the EU and UK, and on some railways in other parts of the world, such as in South America and India, on older rolling stock. Buffers and chain couplers are an assembly of several devices: buffers,[1] hooks and links, or turnbuckle screws.[2]

Screwlink coupler and buffers – the UIC de facto standard in the EU and UK – on a British diesel locomotive

On the modern version of the couplers, rail vehicles are mated by manually connecting the end link of one chain which incorporates a turnbuckle screw into the towing hook of the other wagon, drawing together and slightly compressing the buffer pairs, one left and one right on each headstock. That limits slack, and lessens shunting shocks in moving trains. By contrast, vehicles fitted with the semi-automatic Janney Type E coupler can experience significant jarring during mating and shunting. Very early rolling stock had "dummy buffers", which were simple rigid extensions of the frame, but they were improved with the use of rubber pads behind the buffer face[3] and later by enclosed mechanical, then hydraulic, springs to damp possible jarring. Each chain incorporates both a hook and a turnbuckle.

Variants

[edit]
[edit]
Three-link coupling on an antique tank wagon. There is no hook at the end of the chain, nor is there a turnbuckle.

A peculiarly British practice was the "loose-coupled" freight train, operated by the locomotive crew and a "guard" at the rear of the train, the successor to the brakesman of earlier times. That train type used three-link chain couplings for traction and side buffers to accept pushing forces but, since such trains were not fitted with an automatic through-train braking system, there were no pipes to connect between the vehicles. The last vehicle of the train was a heavily ballasted guard's van with its brakes controllable by a handwheel operated by the guard.

The slack between vehicles coupled in this way was very convenient when starting heavy trains with a relatively low-powered locomotive on the level or on a rising gradient. On the driver's command the guard would apply his brake as hard as possible. The driver would then gently reverse to close up the wagons on to their buffers. Then the locomotive would be driven ahead, picking up the load wagon by wagon, thus giving an easy start up the gradient. Wagons of that era did not have roller bearings and the grease-lubricated plain bearings exerted considerable resistance to motion, especially on a cold day, so starting wagon-by-wagon in this way allowed the locomotive to move off with low initial resistance.

The disadvantage of that convenience was that the guard could be badly thrown about as the train changed speed due to the inter-wagon gaps opening or closing. In the worst case, the jerks could break a coupling or cause a derailment. A skilled guard would observe or listen to his train and apply or release his brake to keep the last few couplings reasonably taut, acting as a shock-absorber. The same effect occurred when the route changed gradient. When going over a hill the rear of the train would catch up with the wagons held back by the locomotive, but the guard could minimise that. That method of train working was why the guard, just like the driver, was required to prove his route knowledge before being given charge of a heavy train. Loose-coupled trains travelled at low speeds and were phased out in the 1970s.[4]

An improvement on the loose-coupled train is the "Instanter" coupling, in which the middle link of a three-link chain is specially triangular shaped, so that when lying "prone" it provides enough slack to make coupling possible, but when the middle link is rotated 90 degrees, the length of the chain is effectively shortened, reducing the amount of slack without the need to wind a screw. The closeness of the coupling allows the use of inter-vehicle pipes for train brakes. Three-link and Instanter couplings can be operated entirely from the side of the wagons, using a shunter's pole, which has a hook on the end, and is safer when shunting is being done. Similarly, the screw-adjustable coupler can be connected by a shunter's pole once it has been unscrewed. Ordinary three-link couplings have been superseded by instanter, screw or buck-eye couplers in UK freight trains today.

Center-buffer-and-chain(s)

[edit]
Narrow gauge flat wagons, 750 mm (2 ft 5+12 in). Note the single buffer with a hook on the right side and a chain on the other

On some narrow-gauge lines in Europe, and on the Paris Metro, a simplified version of the loose-coupler is used, consisting of a single central buffer with a chain underneath. Sometimes there are two chains, one on each side of the coupler. The chain usually contains a screw-adjustable link to allow close coupling. These variants are also used elsewhere. On sharp curves, a single centre buffer is less likely to be subject to buffer-locking. The Eritrean Railway also uses a centre buffer and chain coupler.

Problems with buffers and chain

[edit]

Buffer-locking

[edit]
Buffer-locking

On sharp reverse curves, the buffers can become locked by slipping over, and on to, the back of each other. Although careful track design makes this a rare occurrence, a series of derailments at Stuttgart Central Station in 2012 were caused by buffer-locked wagons. Buffer-lock could occur on very sharp switches on rolling stock with the older, rounded buffers. Newer buffers are rectangular and are wider than they are tall. Buffers and chain couplers allow curves to have around 150 m (492 ft) radius, but sharp S-curves are not allowed. If it were not for the couplers, much sharper curves could be allowed, provided the train is not too long.[5]

Variation with gauge

[edit]

The width between the buffers tends to increase as the track gauge increases and decrease as the track gauge decreases, which means that if wagons are changed from one gauge to another, the buffers might no longer match. That is because the buffers are originally extensions of the frames, which are spaced according to the gauge of the track. As well, the height of the buffers is usually lower on narrow gauge railways, corresponding to the generally lower height of the rolling stock. Therefore, narrow gauge railways often use centre couplers without buffers.

However, in the case of Iberian broad gauge railways, the height and spacing of the buffers are the same as for standard gauge railways in Europe including Great Britain, in order to allow through-running of rolling stock by the use of bogie exchange.

Dimensions

[edit]

Buffers and chain couplers tend to have the two buffers spaced according to the gauge, but especially in Europe this is modified to the standard gauge value to allow interrunning by means of bogie exchange.

Dimensions showing variation of spacing by gauge:

Name Gauge Height Separation Region
Standard gauge 1,435 mm (4 ft 8+12 in) 1,054 mm (41.5 in) 1,727 mm (68.0 in)[6] Great Britain, European mainland
Metre gauge 1,000 mm (3 ft 3+38 in) 0,756 mm (29.8 in) 1,248 mm (49.1 in) Senegal and Mali[7]
Burkina Faso and Ivory Coast.
Broad gauge 1,520 mm (4 ft 11+2732 in) 1,063 mm (41.9 in) 1,727 mm (68.0 in) Dual-gauge (Europe/Russia) sleeping car[8]
Broad gauge 1,668 mm (5 ft 5+2132 in) Iberian gauge 1,050 mm (41.3 in) 1,720 mm (67.7 in) Spain and Portugal
Broad gauge 1,676 mm (5 ft 6 in) 1,067 mm (42.0 in) 1,955 mm (77.0 in) India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka
[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ EN 15551:2009+A1:2010 Railway applications – Railway rolling stock – Buffers
  2. ^ EN 15566-2009+A1:2010 Railway applications – Railway rolling stock – Draw gear and screw coupling
  3. ^ Hagarty, Donald D. (October 1997). "Engineers of the Sydney Railway Company — 5: the Consulting Mechanical Engineer Mr J.E. McConnell". Australian Railway Historical Society Bulletin. 48 (720). Australian Railway Historical Society, New South Wales Division: 366. ISSN 0005-0105.
  4. ^ "WSR :: West Somerset Railway :: Couplings". Archived from the original on 26 September 2006. Retrieved 12 November 2006.
  5. ^ Green, J. I. T. (6 November 1964). "Buffer Locking on Reverse Curves". Railway Gazette. 120 – via trid.trb.org.
  6. ^ Steam Spirit, Vol 1, p 129
  7. ^ Jane's World Railways 1969-1970 edition
  8. ^ Railway Gazette International Sept 2012, p 108
[edit]