List of Araceae genera
From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
This is a list of genera in the plant family Araceae. As currently circumscribed, the family contains over 3700 species into approximately a hundred genera. The family's taxonomy remains in flux, and a full taxonomic treatment integrating the mass of phylogenetic data that has become available in the last 10 years remain to be produced. The classification presented here is informed by the review of Mayo et al. (2013).[1]
Genera[edit]
Taxonomy[edit]
Bogner & Nicolson (1991)[edit]
The following is Bogner & Nicolson's (1991)[87] classification of Araceae as cited in Mayo et al. (1997).[88]
- Araceae
- Subfamily Gymnostachydoideae
- Subfamily Pothoideae
- Subfamily Monsteroideae
- Subfamily Calloideae
- Subfamily Lasioideae
- Tribe Orontieae
- Tribe Anthurieae
- Tribe Lasieae
- Tribe Zamioculcadeae
- Tribe Callopsideae
- Tribe Nephthytideae
- Tribe Culcasieae
- Tribe Montrichardieae
- Subfamily Philodendroideae
- Tribe Philodendreae
- Tribe Anubiadeae
- Tribe Aglaonemateae
- Tribe Dieffenbachieae
- Tribe Zantedeschieae
- Tribe Typhonodoreae
- Tribe Peltandreae
- Subfamily Colocasioideae
- Tribe Caladieae
- Tribe Steudnereae
- Subtribe Steudnerinae
- Subtribe Hapalininae
- Tribe Protareae
- Tribe Colocasieae
- Tribe Syngonieae
- Tribe Ariopsideae
- Subfamily Aroideae
- Tribe Stylochaetoneae
- Tribe Arophyteae
- Tribe Spathicarpeae
- Tribe Zomicarpeae
- Tribe Thomsonieae
- Tribe Areae
- Subtribe Arinae
- Subtribe Arisarinae
- Subtribe Arisaematinae
- Subtribe Atherurinae
- Subtribe Ambrosininae
- Subtribe Cryptocoryninae
- Subfamily Pistioideae
Notes[edit]
- ^ A second date given in parentheses indicate the printed date on the work, when that date differs from the actual date of publication. This may occur because the work was distributed at a different date, or because a book was printed in multiple issues bound together at a later date.
- ^ Although Schott's original publication used both Lysichiton and Lysichitum his later publications used only the former name.
- ^ Since Barton himself credits Nuttall in following Salisbury's (1812, Trans. Hortic. Soc. Lond. 1:267) invalid name, some attribute authorship to that author instead (either in Barton or in Gen. N. Amer. Pl. 1:105, 1818)
- ^ Although Schleiden originally published the genus in an earlier version[7] of that paper, he originally only included one species, W. delilei (≡ Wolffiella hyalina (Delile) Monod). That species was later moved out of Wolffia and into Wolffiella, overlooking that it was already the type of the former name. By the time the problem was noticed in the mid-20th century, Wolffia would have replaced Wolffiella, and the former Wolffia would have had to become Grantia (den Hartog, 1969, Taxon 18(5):591-592), which would have resulted in "intolerable confusion" (McVaugh, 1971, Taxon 20(2-3):384-389) as most of the species of the then Lemnaceae changed genera (two of which similar in name), and so the name was conserved (McVaugh, 1971) with a later date of publication allowing for a valid lectotype to be chosen.[7]
- ^ Schleiden's species is an illegitimate renaming of Linnaeus' Lemna arrhiza and is properly called Wolffia arrhiza (L.) Horkel ex Wimm.
- ^ An illegitimate new name for Eduard Poeppig's Scindapsus occidentalis. The species' correct name is Alloschemone occidentalis (Poepp.) Engl. & K.Krause.
- ^ The species is properly known as Anadendrum microstachyum (de Vriese & Miq.) Backer & Alderw.
- ^ Although Adanson originally called the species Dracontium pertusum, the combination Monstera pertusa was assigned by Schott (1830, Wiener Z. Kunst 4:1028), the first author to accept Adanson's genus and create combinations in it, to Pothos pertusum Roxb. (currently known as Rhaphidophora pertusa (Roxb.) Schott).
- ^ Some sources cite Gen. Aroid.:pl. 83 (1858), but there is no reason to believe that the May issue of Bonplandia, which Schott himself cite as the place of publication in Genera Aroidearum Exposita was published with that much delay.
- ^ Treated now as Cyrtosperma merkusii (Hassk.) Schott.
- ^ The species is now known at Lasia spinosa (L.) Thwaites.
- ^ The year when the work was completed.
- ^ The species, which is an illegitimate renaming of Loddiges' Calladium zamiifolium, is correctly known as Zamioculcas zamiifolia (G.Lodd.) Schott.
- ^ The correct name is Aglaonema nitida (Jack) Kunth. Schott's original type species may have been meant to be a renaming of William Roxburgh's Calla oblongifolia (=Aglaonema marantifolia Blume), but Schott mistakenly cited only Heinrich Friedrich Link's Arum integrifolium as a synonym, rendering the type species' new name illegitimate; he would later (1832, Melet. Bot. 1:20) rename it Aglaonema integrifolium. (Nicolson, 1969, Smithsonian Contr. Bot. 1:5)
- ^ The species' name is illegitimate as it is based on the same type as Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (Dennst.) Nicolson, which is the correct name.
- ^ This species is now treated as a synonym of Anchomanes difformis (Blume) Engl.
- ^ Properly treated as Apoballis rupestris (Zoll. & Moritzi ex Zoll.) S.Y.Wong & P.C.Boyce.
- ^ If the designation by Pfeiffer (1872, Nomencl. Bot. 1:265) is valid, the type is Arisaema speciosum, otherwise, the designation by Britton and Brown (1913, Ill. Fl. N.U.S., ed. 2. 1:442) of A. nepenthoideshas priority.
- ^ Although the original description included only this species, which is listed as type in Index Nominum Genericorum, the name is not included in any standard databases for unknown reasons.
- ^ This number does not account for many more species that remain undescribed or untransferred from original placement in the discredited Microcasia (Boyce & Yeng 2013; Webbia 67(2):139-146).
- ^ This species was until recently placed in its own subfamily, which was found (Cabrera et al. 2008; Am. J. Bot. 95(9)1153-1165:1160) to be nested within Aroideae. A new, comprehensive taxonomy of the family remains to be published, but Cabrera and al. characterized the demoting of the subfamily back to tribal status as the most sensible option.
- ^ A first part comprising 10 pages and 6 plates was issued in quarto format in 1803, but this edition was abandoned, and the more common folio edition began publication 2 years later.
- ^ IPNI and ING gives a part of Schott's Aroideae issued in 1855 as the place of publication, but the premier monograph gives the 1856 publication, which is the only one that could be verified.
- ^ Schott originally published the genus the year before(Oesterr. Bot. Wochenbl. 7:85) as Hapale, but then chose to alter the name as it was homonymous with a now disused genus of marmosets. This new name was later conserved (Brummitt 1984; Taxon 33(4):707) over the original form.
- ^ Multiple sources give the year of publication as 1853 (Oesterr. Bot. Wochenbl. 3:369), but Schott merely notes after describing his Dracunculus crinita that "a genus Helicodiceros will probably be justified" ("Eine Gattung «Helicodiceros» dürfte hierdurch begründet werden."), which fails to satisfy the requirement of the ICN's article 36.1 (see also Rickett and Stafleu, 1959, Taxon 8(7):231).
- ^ The species' correct name is Montrichardia arborescens (L.) Schott
- ^ Treated as a synonym of Peltandra virginica (L.) Schott
- ^ Tenore's name was an unnecessary renaming of Thunberg's earlier Arum ternatum. The correct name for the species is Pinellia ternata (Thunb.) Makino.
- ^ Now known as Sauromatum venosum (Dryand. ex Aiton) Kunth.
- ^ Due to confusion with a later, similarly titled work by Zollinger which has the same standardised abbreviation, some sources erroneously give 1854 as the date of publication.
- ^ Properly attributed to Brongniart in Schott (who says he is quoting Brongniart's description from a letter without adding any details of his own: "Wir bringen nachstehend den uns vom Autor überlassenen Gattungskarakter dar, indem wir uns nicht erlauben, demselben Eigenes anzufügen."), not Brongniart ex Schott, and not cited to Gen. Aroid.:pl. 65 (1858).
- ^ Now known as Theriophonum minutum (Willd.) Baill.
References[edit]
- ^ Mayo, Simon J.; Bogner, Josef; Cusimano, Nathalie (2013). "Recent Progress in the Phylogenetics and Classification of the Araceae". In Paul Wilkin and Simon J. Mayo (ed.). Early Events in Monocot Evolution. Systematics Association Special Volume Series. Cambridge University Press. pp. 208–242. ISBN 978-1-107-01276-9.
- ^ Brown, Robert (1810). Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae et Insulae Van Diemen. London: R.Taylor. p. 337.
- ^ Schott (1857). "Aroideae". Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt. 7 (8): 61–62. doi:10.1007/BF02059440.
- ^ a b c d e f g Linnaeus (1753). Species Plantarum (in Latin). Stockholm: Laurentii Salvii.
- ^ Barton, William P. C. (1817). Vegetable Materia Medica of the United States. Vol. 1. Carey & Sons=. p. 124.
- ^ Les, Donald H.; Crawford, Daniel J. (1999). "Landoltia, a new genus of duckweed". Novon. 9 (4): 530–533. doi:10.2307/3392157. JSTOR 3392157.
- ^ a b c Schleiden, M.J. (1829). "Prodromus Monographiae Lemnacearum oder Conspectus Generum Atque Specierum". Linnaea (in German). 13: 385–392.
- ^ Schleiden, M.J. (1844). "Prodromus Monographiae Lemnacearum oder Conspectus Generum Atque Specierum". Beitrage zur Botanik, Erste Band (in German). Wilh. Engelmann. pp. 229–236, 233.
- ^ Hegelmaier, F. (1896). "Systematische Übersicht der Lemnaceen". Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie (in German). 21 (3): 268–305, 303.
- ^ a b c d e f Schott, H.W. (1829). "Für Liebhaber der Botanik" [For Botanical Amateurs]. Wiener Zeitschrift für Kunst, Litteratur, Theater und Mode (in German). 1829 (3): 732, 779–780, 803, 828, 892, 1180, 1280.
- Aglaonema, p. 892
- Anthurium, p. 828
- Dieffenbachia, p. 803
- Philodendron, p. 780
- Syngonium, p. 780
- Typhonium, p. 732
- ^ Hotta, Mitsuru (1976). "Notes on Bornean Plants III. : Pedicellarum and Heteroaridarum, two new genera of the aroids". Acta Phytotaxa et Geobotanica. 27 (3–4): 61–65.
- ^ a b Schott, H. (1857). "Aroideae". Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt. 7 (9): 69–70. doi:10.1007/BF02059776.
- ^ a b c d e Schott, Heinrich Wilhelm (1858). Genera Aroidearum exposita (in Latin). Vienna: Caroli Ueberreuter.
- ^ a b Schott, H.W. (1863). "Araceae, pars prior, nova genera et species". Annales Musei Botanici Lugduno-Batavi. 1 (10): 122–131, 221, 278–286.
- ^ a b Schott, H.M. (1857). "Aroideae Honkongense". Bonplandia (in German). 5 (3): 44–45.
- ^ Kunth, Karl Sigismund (1841). Enumeratio Plantarum Omnium Hucusque Cognitarum. Vol. 3. Stuttgart: J.G. Cott. p. 59.
- ^ Beccari, Odoardo (1877). "Aracee Della Malesia e Della Papuasia Raccolte Da 0. Beccari". Malesia: raccolta di osservazioni botaniche intorno alie piante dell'arcipelago indo-malese e papuano publicata da Odoardo Beccari. Vol. 1. Genova: Instituto Sordo-Muti. p. 265.
- ^ Adanson, M. (1763). Familles des plantes. Vol. 2. Paris: Vincent. p. 460.
- ^ Hasskarl, J. K. (1842). "Plantarum genera et species novae aut reformatae javenses". Flora. 25 (2 suppl. 1): 1–16, 11.
- ^ Poeppig, Eduard (1845). Nova Genera ac Species Plantarum quas in Regno Chilensi Peruviano. Vol. 3. Leipzig: Friedrich Hofmeister. p. 91.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Schott, Heinrich; Endlicher, Stephan (1832). Meletemata botanica (in Latin). Vienna: C. Gerold.
- ^ Hay, Alistair (1988). "Anaphyllopsis: A new neotropical genus of Araceae—Lasieae". Aroideana. 11 (2): 25–31.
- ^ a b Schott (1857). "Einiges über Lasia Loureiro's". Bonplandia (in German). 5 (8): 122–129.
- ^ Griffith, William (1851). "Monocotyledonous Plants". In John McClelland (ed.). Notulæ ad Plantas Asiaticas. Vol. 3. p. 149.
- ^ Engler, A. (1911). "IV. 23C Araceae-Lasioideae". Das Pflanzenreich (in German). 48: 1–130, 36.
- ^ de Loureiro, João (1790). Flora Cochinchinensis (in Latin). Lisbon: Typis, et expensis academicis. p. 81.
- ^ "New Garden Plants". The Gardeners' Chronicle. New Series. 18 (446): 70–71. 1882.
- ^ Gagnepain, F. (1941). "Pycnospatha Thorel mss., nov. gen. Aracearum". Bulletin de la Société botanique de France (in French). 88 (4–6): 511–512. doi:10.1080/00378941.1941.10834263.
- ^ Schott, Heinrich (1857). Aroideae Maximilianae. Carl Gerold & sons. p. 3.
- ^ de Candolle, Alphonse; de Candolle, Casimir (1879). Monographiae Phanerogamarum. Vol. 2. Paris: G. Masson. p. 208.
- ^ a b c Schott, H. (1856). Synopsis Aroidearum complectens enumerationem systematicam generum et specierum hujus ordinis (in Latin). Vienna=: Typis Congregationis Mechitharisticae.
- ^ Don, George (1839). Sweet's Hortus Britannicus (3d ed.). London: James Ridgway. p. 631.
- ^ Decaisne, J. (1834). "Description d'un herbier de l'ile de Timor" [Description of an herbarium from Timor Island]. Nouvelles Annales du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle (in French). 3: 333–501, 366.
- ^ Bassi, Ferdinando (1763). Ambrosina, novum plantae genus (in Latin). Bologna: Laelium a Vulpe.
- ^ Schott, H. (1853). "Eine Aroidee". Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 3 (40): 313–314. doi:10.1007/BF02056581.
- ^ Schott, H. (1857). "Aroideen-Skizzen" [Aroidea notes]. Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 7 (50): 398–399. doi:10.1007/BF02071618.
- ^ Schott, H. (1858). "Aroideen-Skizzen" [Aroidea notes]. Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 8 (10): 317–318. doi:10.1007/BF02106032.
- ^ Ridley, H.N. (1913). "Some Bornean Aroideae". Journal of Botany, British and Foreign. 51: 201–202.
- ^ Graham, John (1839). Catalogue of the Plants Growing in Bombay and its vicinity. Bombay: Government Press. p. 252.
- ^ von Martius (1831). "Ueber die Art der Befruchtung bei einigen Aroideen und über die Charakteristik mehrerer Gattungen dieser Familie" [On the methods of fertilisation in certain Aroids and on the characteristics of several genera of the family]. Flora (in German). 14 (2): 449–460, 459.
- ^ a b Miller, Phillip (1754). The gardeners dictionary (4th abr. ed.). London: John and James Rivington.
(Because the pagination in the original work, when present at all, can be best described as idiosyncratic, only links are given here. A facsimile edition with continuous pagination exists.) - ^ Jumelle, Henri (1928). "Un Nouveau Genre malgache d'Aracées" [A new Madagascan genus of Araceae]. Annales du Musée Colonial de Marseille. Série 4 (in French). 6 (2): 21–24.
- ^ Fischer, F.E.L.; Meyer, C.A. (1845). "Asterostigma, eine neue Pflanzengattung aus Brasilien" [Asterostigma, a new plant genus from Brazil]. Bulletin de la Classe Physico-Mathématique de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences de Saint-Pétersbourg (in German). 3 (10–11): 148–149.
- ^ a b Boyce, Peter C.; Wong, Sin Yeng (2008). "Studies on Schismatoglottideae (Araceae) of Borneo VII: Schottarum and Bakoa, two new genera from Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo". Botanical Studies. 49 (4): 393–404.
- ^ Nicolson, Dan H. (1984). "Suprageneric Names Attributable to Araceae". Taxon. 33 (4): 680–690, 690. doi:10.2307/1220785. JSTOR 1220785.
- ^ Ventenat, Et.P. (1800). "Dissertation sur le genre Arum". Magasin Encyclopédique (in French). 4: 461–472.
- ^ Urban, I. (1895). "Diagnosen neuer Arten und kleinere Mitteilungen" [Diagnoses of new species and minor communications]. Notizblatt des Königlichen botanischen Gartens und Museums zu Berlin (in German). 1 (1): 18–32, 27.
- ^ Jumelle, Henri (1919). "Les Aracées de Madagascar" [The Araceae of Madagascar]. Annales du Musée Colonial de Marseille. Série 3 (in French). 7 (2): 179–189, 187.
- ^ Schott, H. (1857). "Aroideen-Skizzen" [Aroidea notes]. Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 7 (52): 414–415. doi:10.1007/BF02073220.
- ^ Engler, A. (1878). "Chlorospatha Kolbii Engl". Gartenflora. 27 (4): 97–98.
- ^ Buchet, Samuel (1939). "Un nouveau genre malgache d'Aracées" [A new Madagascan genus of Araceae]. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France (in French). 86 (1): 23–24. doi:10.1080/00378941.1939.10834145.
- ^ a b Gonçalves, Eduardo G. (2005). "Two new Andean genera for the tribe Spathicarpeae (Araceae)". Willdenowia. 35 (2): 319–326. doi:10.3372/wi.35.35214.
- ^ Wydler, H. (1830). "Plantarum Quarundam Descriptiones". Linnaea (in Latin). 5: 423–430.
- ^ Palisot-Beauvois, A.M.J.F. (1803). Flore d'Oware et de Bénin, en Afrique. Paris: Bleuet. p. 3.
- ^ Nicolson, Dan H. (1968). "Filarum, a new genus of peruvian Araceae". Brittonia. 18 (4): 347–349. doi:10.2307/2805151. JSTOR 2805151. S2CID 36483133.
- ^ Hotta, Mitsuru (1981). "A new genus of the family Araceae from West Sumatra". Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica. 32 (5–6): 142–146.
- ^ Brown, N.E. (1882). "Four New Genera Of Aroideae". Journal of Botany, British and Foreign. 20 (7): 193–197.
- ^ Appendix generum et specierum novarum et minus cognitarum, quae in horto regio botanico Berolinensi coluntur. Berlin: C. Feisteri. 1855. p. 2.
- ^ Wong, Sin Yeng; Boyce, Peter C. (2010). "Studies on Schismatoglottideae (Araceae) of Borneo IX: A new genus, Hestia, and resurrection of Apoballis". Botanical Studies. 51 (2): 249–255.
- ^ Bunting, George S. (1975). "Nuevas Especies para la Revision de las Araceas Venezolanas" [New species for the revision of Venezuelan Araceae]. Acta Botánica Venezuélica. 10 (1/4): 263–335, 264. JSTOR 41740660.
- ^ Dalzell, N.A. (1852). "Contributions to the Botany of Western India". Hooker's Journal of Botany and Kew Garden Miscellany. 4: 107–114, 289–295, 341–347, 289.
- ^ Gonçalves, Eduardo G. (2012). "Lorenzia (Araceae — Spathicarpeae): A New Genus from Northern Brazil Supported by matK Sequence Data" (PDF). Systematic Botany. 37 (1): 48–52. doi:10.1600/036364412X616620. S2CID 84134456. Retrieved 2013-09-20.[permanent dead link]
- ^ Schott (1857). "Mangonia, eine Aroidea" [Mangonia, an Aroid]. Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt. 7 (10): 77. doi:10.1007/BF02060095.
- ^ Crüger, Hermann (1854). "Westindische Fragmente: II. Montrichardia, eine neue Aroideengattung" [West Indies Fragments II. Montrichardia, a New Aroid Genus]. Botanische Zeitung. 12 (2): 25–27.
- ^ Schott, H. (1857). "Aroideen-Skizzen" [Aroidea notes]. Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 7 (51): 406–407. doi:10.1007/BF02071943.
- ^ Wong, Sin Yeng; Boyce, Peter C. (2010). "Studies on Schismatoglottideae (Araceae) of Borneo XI: Ooia, a new genus, and a new generic delimitation for Piptospatha". Botanical Studies. 51 (4): 543–552.
- ^ Rafinesque, C.S. (1819). "Prodrome des nouveaux genres de plantes observés en 1817 et 1818 dans l'intérieur des États-Unis d'Amérique" [Prodromus of new genera of plants observed in 1817 and 1818 in the interior of the United States of America]. Journal de Physique, de Chimie, d'Histoire Naturelle et des Arts. 89 (2): 96–107.
- ^ Schott, H. (1857). "Aroideen-Skizzen" [Aroidea notes]. Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt (in German). 7 (54): 421–422. doi:10.1007/BF02230209.
- ^ Hotta, M. (1965). "Notes on Schismatoglottidinae of Borneo. I.". Memoirs of the College of Science, Kyoto Imperial University, Series B. 32 (1): 19–30, 29.
- ^ Tenore, Michele (1839). "Della Pinellia nuovo genere nella famiglia delle Aroidee; memoria". Atti della Reale Accademia delle Scienze, Sezione della Società Reale Borbonica. 4: 57–71.
- ^ "New Garden Plants". The Gardeners' Chronicle. New Series. 11 (1): 138. 1879.
- ^ Engler, A. (1901). "Protarum Engl. nov., Eine neue interessante Gattung der Araceen von den Seschellen". Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie. 30 (Supp. 67): 42.
- ^ Engler, A. (1893). "Araceae Africanae". Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie. 15 (4): 447–466, 455.
- ^ Schott, H.G. (1860). Prodromus systematis Aroidearum. Vienna: Typis Congregationis Mechitharisticae. p. 214.
- ^ Moritzi, A. (1846). Systematisches Verzeichnis der von H. Zollinger in den Jahren 1842-1844 auf Java gesammelten Pflanzen, nebst einer kurzen Beschreibung der neuen Gattungen und Arten. Solothurn: Verlag des Verfassers. p. 83.
- ^ Boyce, Peter C.; Wong, Sin Yeng (2009). "Schottariella mirifica P.C. Boyce & S.Y. Wong: a new name for Schottarum sarikeense (Araceae: Schismatoglottideae)". Botanical Studies. 50: 269–271.
- ^ Schott, H. (1859). "Aroideenskizzen". Bonplandia (in German). 7 (11): 163–165.
- ^ Hooker, J. (1831). "Spathicarpa hastifolia". Botanical Miscellany. 2: 146–148.
- ^ Koch, C. (1862). "Steudnera colocasiaefolia, Eine neue Aroidee". Wochenscrift des Vereines zur Befördung des Gärtenbaues in den Königl. Preussischen Staaten für Gärtnerei und Pflanzenkunde (in German). 5: 114–116.
- ^ Leprieur, F.R. (1834). "Note sur le Stylochaton hypogeum, plante de la Sénégambie, constituant un genre nouveau dans la famille des Aroïdées". Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Botanique. Série 2 (in French). 2: 184–186.
- ^ Engler, A. (1883). "Beiträge zur Kentniss der Aracee" [Contributions to the knowledge of the Aracee]. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie (in German). 4: 59–66.
- ^ Schott, H. (1857). "Eine Aroidee". Österreichisches Botanisches Wochenblatt. 7 (28): 221–222. doi:10.1007/BF02059011. S2CID 32867514.
- ^ Blume, C.L. (1835). "Collectanea ad monographiam aroidearum, praecipue admeliorem generum indicum cognitionem". Rumphia, sive, Commentationes botanicæ. Vol. 1. pp. 73–154, 127.
- ^ Engler, A. (1906). "Ulearum Engl. nov. gen". Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie. 37 (1): 95–96.
- ^ Sprengel, Kurt (1826). Systema Vegetabilium. Vol. 3 (16th ed.). p. 754.
- ^ "New Garden Plants". The Gardeners' Chronicle. New Series. 16 (400): 266. 1881.
- ^ Bogner, Josef; Nicolson, Dan H. (1991). "A Revised Classification of Araceae with Dichotomous Keys". Willdenowia. 21 (1/2). Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum, Berlin-Dahlem: 35–50. ISSN 0511-9618. JSTOR 3996587. Retrieved 2022-12-16.
- ^ Mayo, S. J.; Bogner, J.; Boyce, P. C. (1997). The genera of Araceae. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. ISBN 1-900347-22-9. OCLC 60140655.
Further reading[edit]
- Mayo, S. J.; Bogner, J.; Boyce, P. C. (1997). The genera of Araceae. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. ISBN 1-900347-22-9. OCLC 60140655.
External links[edit]
- The Genera of Araceae as listed by the International Aroid Society
- Boyce, P. C. & Croat, T. B. (2011 onwards). The Überlist of Araceae, Totals for Published and Estimated Number of Species in Aroid Genera. International Aroid Society.