Template talk:Delaware

I think that the "Regions" section should be removed as it has little or no relevance to Delaware. Delaware is not divided as "DelVal" and "Chesapeake" in any way, so this information is worthless for a state like Delaware. If no one disagrees after a few days, I'll go through with the changes. --ʀ6ʍɑʏ89

Agreed. I dislike this template anyway, too much space too little info, but see the Template:History of Delaware I use instead, then add relevant other info- see Thomas R. Carper. It really does much the same thing as Template:Delaware, but is a major move form the standard, so I left it alone. This is still a WIP stilltim 02:51, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I went through with the changes. --ʀ6ʍɑʏ89 17:10, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:14, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger ^{BLAH | SZ} 22:40, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the U.S. State templates do not specify a background color, and hence, use the default provided by MediaWiki:Common.css. Per the guidelines in WP:Deviations, I suggest we do the same for this template. Any comments, concerns, or objections? Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 23:12, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Before you changed almost all the colors, there was a wide and delightful variety of colors. Please don't cite your own actions as a good reason to take this template away from the way it's always been. Nyttend (talk) 12:33, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus appears to be at WP:Deviations. Perhaps we can discuss it on the talk page for that page, since no one here seems to comment? Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:00, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]