Template talk:F (New York City Subway service)

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

New York City: Public Transportation This template is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles This template is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation.

@Useddenim and Epicgenius: Should interchanges such as N/R/W at Jay Street–MetroTech be shown? Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 09:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jc86035: In this instance, no. The service diagrams only show connections/interchanges that a train could take, not passengers. Useddenim (talk) 13:07, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jc86035: No. We are just showing cross-platform interchanges (like Useddenim said), as well as stations where the two levels are part of the same line. I'm thinking of adding transfers later, similar to what one would see on a FIND display or strip map. epicgenius (talk) 14:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Useddenim: Also, why the use of  (lACC) instead of  (lvACC) etc.? It should be clear enough from the colour of the lines whether the part of the station is served by the F. Using the circular lACC doesn't make sense when the ACC shape doesn't have to be circular. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 08:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jc86035: Because that's the way Epicgenius originally created the diagram, and personally, I prefer the narrower circle that doesn't obliterate the bi-colored station symbol the way the wider oval does. Useddenim (talk) 11:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Useddenim and Epicgenius: Doesn't doing this make the accessibility status of Coney Island–Stillwell Avenue ambiguous, since the circle is only over the middle two tracks? Jc86035 (talk) 10:46, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. When we want to show partial accessability, we do something like . Useddenim (talk) 10:54, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Useddenim: Disregarding that the station icon currently looks a bit messy, it could still be interpreted as meaning that. Jc86035 (talk) 15:09, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]