Template talk:The Damned

	Punk music NA‑class (inactive)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punk music, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Punk musicWikipedia:WikiProject Punk musicTemplate:WikiProject Punk musicPunk music articles NA This article has been rated as NA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

England Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

How do you make "MCA Singles A+B's" not show up in black?

You can't do it directly. The '+' character can't be in an article title due to technical limitations. 23:07, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

What you do is have the page it links to as "MCA Singles A&Bs" and then just note the technical limitations when the article is done.

Tom Prankerd 14:44, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Would it make more sense to do a List of The Damned Compilations page, and just link that to the template? As it is, it takes up a quarter of the template (largely with links to articles nobody's done yet)... It doesn't even seem to be complete - In the Beginning is missing just at first glance. Plus with Dojo/Cleopatra/Castle's treatment of sections of the Damned' back catalogue, I can only see that part getting bigger and more unwieldly.

Tom Prankerd 14:49, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Guinnog 20:41, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Guinnog 20:50, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is all on The Damned discography so we dont actually need a new article. Guinnog 21:45, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing this since that article was a going nowhere stub, and the same material is already in the main The Damned article Cje 09:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]