User talk:109.76.128.10

Just because a user didn't provide an edit summary for their edit does not automatically mean that their edit should be reverted. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 00:46, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

user deleted references without explanation. -- 109.76.128.10 (talk) 00:53, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So? They removed a ref and replaced it with an updated one. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 00:54, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They deleted a ref without explanation and added duplicate reference without explanation. Maybe they don't understand how to do WP:NAMEDREFS properly, or maybe it was more. First I reverted. Then I checked and updated what the figures are now. It is not clear that that todays figures make the yesterday's weekend figures from Deadline wrong.

There isn't usually a good reason to delete a reliable source like Deadline -- 109.76.128.10 (talk) 01:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Black Adam (film), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 01:41, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]